Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Bariatric surgery in obese older people: useful or not?

Reijntjes, Susan J.a; Viljoen, Adieb; Wierzbicki, Anthony S.c; Hardman, Timothy C.a

Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism: June 2015 - Volume 4 - Issue 2 - p 60–66
doi: 10.1097/XCE.0000000000000045
Original articles
Free

Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether older (≥65 years) obese people would benefit from bariatric surgery, considering the prevalence of multiple comorbidities and frailty in this group.

Methods A PubMed search was carried out for studies on the use of bariatric surgery in older obese people published in the database from 1980 to the present (August 2014).

Results A total of 244 citations were obtained on searching; 182 of these publications were selected for manual checking and 10 studies were identified as containing useable data on this patient cohort. Published data were available for efficacy in 641 patients. Substantial improvement was observed in diabetes (76%), hypertension (68%) and sleep apnoea (67%) following bariatric surgery. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n=456) was the most frequently reported procedure. Similar findings but with greater weight loss and fewer complications were found in the small numbers of patients undergoing other procedures. Data from four large registry studies (n=6837) showed mortality and complications associated with bariatric surgery to be increased in older compared with younger people especially in those undergoing gastric bypass surgery. The elderly had longer hospital stays, and patients with cardiac, pulmonary or renal comorbidities generally had a worse prognosis.

Conclusion Bariatric surgery in older people is effective in reducing complications of obesity, but is also associated with increased rates of complications compared with those seen in younger patients. The few reported studies in the elderly are retrospective, generally small, primarily describe findings of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding as the surgical intervention option and lack long-term follow-up. More trials and registry data, especially for sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass, are required to better address the utility of bariatric surgery in the elderly and to define long-term clinical outcomes.

aNiche Science and Technology, Richmond

bDepartment of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Lister Hospital, Hertfordshire

cDepartment of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London, UK

Correspondence to Anthony S. Wierzbicki, DM, DPhil, FRCPath, Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Guy’s & St. Thomas’ Hospitals, St. Thomas’ Hospital Campus, Lambeth Palace Road, London SE1 7EH, UK Tel: +44 207 188 1256; fax: +44 207 188 7325; e-mail: anthony.wierzbicki@kcl.ac.uk

Received October 16, 2014

Accepted January 12, 2015

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Rates of obesity have increased worldwide over the last decade 1,2. In the UK rates have increased from 13 to 24% in men and from 16 to 26% in women in the period 1993–2011 3. Inpatient admissions to hospitals in England that have a primary diagnosis of obesity have tripled in the last 5 years to 11 740 (2011–2012). Most (3 : 1) of these admissions were women. The economic burden of obesity on society was estimated to be £16 billion in 2007 (over 1% of UK gross domestic product). The incidence of obesity increases with age and is associated with increased risks of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and cancer 3. Similarly, incidence of T2DM is associated with age, sex, ethnicity, BMI and family history of diabetes. It is also understood that T2DM results in a 5-year reduction in life expectancy after correcting for BMI 4.

Emerging evidence suggests that bariatric surgery results in a high chance of remission from T2DM and subsequent reduction in the incidence of other comorbidities including hyperlipidaemia and hypertension 5,6. Large-scale registry studies of bariatric surgery such as the Swedish Obese Subjects study have shown treatment to be associated with reductions in total mortality 7 and up to 75% reduction in severity or presence of T2DM 8. Furthermore, the outcomes obtained when bariatric surgery is combined with medical therapy for T2DM are far better than those usually achieved by medical treatments alone 9,10. A meta-analysis of outcomes from bariatric surgery in 22 094 patients showed that T2DM resolved or improved in 86% of the patients 5. These beneficial effects have seen eligibility thresholds for bariatric surgery in patients with T2DM being decreased to a BMI of 35 kg/m2 in 2007 11 and then to a BMI of 30–35 kg/m2 in 2013 10. However, almost all surgical studies thus far have limited their observations to patients below 60 years of age. There remain unresolved issues over the impact of interventions in the elderly on their diabetes such as susceptibility to hypoglycaemia, functional capacity and disability, relevance of other comorbidities, cognitive status and life expectancy. Consequently, guidelines for management of diabetes in the elderly do not yet include bariatric surgery as an option for treatment 12,13. This study attempted to summarize available evidence for the benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in populations older than 65 years of age in whom cardiovascular mortality, either postprocedure or from T2DM, may pose a significant limitation to bariatric surgery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Methods

A systematic review of all studies published in the scientific literature on the use of bariatric surgery in older people with T2DM was carried out. Only reports published in English were included for review. PubMed was searched from 1 January 1980 to the present (August 2014), inclusive. Search terms were: [‘obesity/surgery’ OR ‘gastric bypass’ OR ‘gastroplasty’ OR ‘bariatric’ OR ‘gastric banding’ OR ‘anastomosis, Roux-en-Y’ OR ‘biliopancreatic diversion’ OR ‘jejunoileal bypass’ OR ‘gastric pacing’ OR ‘gastric stimulation’ OR ‘laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding’] AND [‘diabetes’ AND ‘elderly’ OR ‘senior’ OR ‘geriatric’ OR ‘older’ OR ‘aged’]. To supplement the electronic search, manual reference checks were performed in the identified studies. Study authors, country, year of publication, surgical procedure and study design were recorded and the findings were summarized. Characteristics of the study groups, BMI and age were also noted.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Results

Two hundred and forty-four citations were obtained on electronic searching; 182 of these publications were identified and manual reference checks were performed on these identified studies. Fourteen reports were not published in English and were excluded. No primary studies met the full criteria for inclusion in this review. Ten manuscripts reporting on bariatric surgery studies were identified in which data were reported in older patients, although the studies were not specifically designed to report on the outcomes of bariatric interventions in 641 older patients with T2DM or other comorbidities (Table 1) 16–20,24. Four registry studies were identified in which data were reported on older patients, which yielded little efficacy data but did yield postoperative mortality and 30-day complication rates in 6837 patients. None of the studies were conducted in the UK.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Outcomes of bariatric surgery

Data for bariatric surgery in elderly patients is limited with patients with T2DM being reported in subsets within the overall groups (Table 1). The prevalence of surgical operations was 478 patients receiving laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) 14–19,24, 52 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomies (LSGs) 20,21, 36 Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses 15,23 and a mixed series of open and laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) operations in 80 patients 22. No consistent definition of improvement nor resolution of T2DM, hypertension or OSA was used in these studies. Few studies reported more than 1 year of follow-up data, whereas improvement in, or resolution of, the above comorbidities was reported in most of the studies. Overall, glycaemic control improved in 76% (155/204) of patients, hypertension in 68% (260/384) and OSA/snoring in 67% (83/123). The greatest amount of data reported was following LAGB, in which glycaemia improved in 75% (86/115) of patients; hypertension in 66% (156/235) and OSA in 67% (64/95). Mortality rates associated with LAGB (within 30 days) generally appeared to be low (0–2% of patients) considering the target population, whereas complications like surgical site port infections and band removals appeared to be relatively common (8–22% of patients). Data for LSG and LGBP were similar. One study compared outcomes in patients undergoing LAGB (n=14) or LGBP (n=13) surgery. Both surgical approaches were associated with improved quality of life scores. However, postsurgical reductions in weight were less following LAGB, which also led to higher rates of complications and no resolution of comorbidities when compared with LGBP, which resulted in almost twice the weight loss and demonstrated a better safety profile and a 60–80% improvement in comorbidities 15.

One single centre registry in older patients (mean age 63 years) collected data on patients undergoing open and laparoscopic procedures. The period of study (1981–2003) covered a changeover in surgical practice from vertical banded gastroplasty to LGBP 22. Laparoscopic procedures appeared to be associated with fewer complications and/or a better safety profile compared with open procedures. These procedures were associated with a 16 kg/m2 reduction in BMI, which was also associated with improvements in glycaemic control (66% of patients), blood pressure (32% of patients) and OSA (80% of patients). Patients undergoing LSG showed less marked reductions in BMI reduction (9 kg/m2) 20 compared with those who underwent GB (17 kg/m2), but both surgical approaches reported similar rates of improvement in comorbidities. Rates of complications varied greatly with minimal numbers being seen with LAGB (5%), but one series showing a 21% rate with LSG 20.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Safety and tolerability of bariatric surgery in older people

Several large registries have collected safety data on bariatric surgery in older people without recording information on outcomes, weight loss or change in comorbidities. Four studies, comprising 6837 elderly patients were identified in which a small percentage of patients (3–4%) were aged over 65 years 25–28. Most of the patients had undergone minimally invasive procedures (LABGs) and the data suggest a ‘slight to moderate’ increase in complications and mortality rates, but these were lower than those reported in comparator cohorts undergoing other surgical procedures in this age group. Older patients had longer lengths of stay in hospital and their prognosis was poorer in patients with worse preoperative anaesthetic assessment scores, those who were male, those with diabetes and those with concomitant pulmonary or cardiovascular comorbidities or decreased renal function.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005–2009) included 48 738 patients, of whom 4.1% (n=1994) were over 65 years of age 25. The registry reported the frequency of bariatric surgery in the elderly increasing from 1.9 to 4.8% during the period of the study. Fewer elderly patients underwent LGBP and more had LAGB insertions than seen in younger cohorts. Although operative mortality was numerically higher in the younger cohort (0.1%), this difference did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.15). Predictors of mortality for laparoscopic surgery included BMI more than 60 kg/m2 (vs. 45–49 kg/m2), male sex, presence of diabetes and cardiovascular or pulmonary comorbidities, and higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists’ (ASA) scores or renal impairment (creatinine>140 μmol/l). Older patients did not have a higher risk of major complications with either open or laparoscopic procedures, although they were more likely to experience prolonged length of stay (>90th centile) following open procedures 25.

A report that reviews bariatric surgery performed in 99 US centres between 1999 and 2005 compared outcomes in patients over 60 years of age with those aged 19–60 years 26. Despite the procedure being offered to older patients in 80% of the study centres, only 2.7% (n=1339) of the study cohort were elderly. The older patients (vs. younger patients, respectively) reported more comorbidities, longer lengths of stay (4.9 vs. 3.8 days), higher rates of in-hospital mortality (0.7 vs. 0.3%) and more complications (18.9 vs. 10.9%). Although morbidity and mortality were higher in the older cohort, the overall safety of bariatric surgery was better than predicted (risk adjusted) mortality rates.

More recent data reported from the US National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the period 2010–2011 compared patients undergoing LAGB with those undergoing LSG operations 27. The data were used to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality associated with these procedures in the elderly (>65 years) compared with that of younger patients. The audit identified 1005 patients with BMI 44±7 kg/m2; of these, sleeve gastrectomy had been performed in 155 (15.4%) patients. The percentage of patients with preoperative ASA physical classifications of 3 or 4 was similar between the two groups (LAGB 82.6% vs. LSG 86.7%, P=0.17). Diabetes occurred more frequently in the LGBP group (43 vs. 56%, P=0.004). The data showed 30-day mortality [0.6 vs. 0.6%, odds ratio (OR) 1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11–9.49], serious morbidity (5.2 vs. 5.6%, OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42–0.96), and overall morbidity (9 vs. 9.1%, OR 1.0, 95% CI 0.55–1.81) were similar for the procedures. Both were considered to demonstrate acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality. An updated analysis of the registry data for the period 2005–2012 identified 303 of the 67 499 patients as being older than 65 years of age 28. Overall, there was little difference between complications in patients undergoing LSG and LGBP. There was a marked difference in complications following LSG in the 50–65-year-old group compared with the over 65-year age group (4.0 vs. 7.3%, respectively, OR 1.75, P=0.006); however, age did not emerge as a risk factor for complications following this operation on multiple regression analysis. In contrast, in the 2196 patients who underwent LGBP, incidence of complications appeared to be associated with age, culminating with nearly 8% of patients aged over 65 years experiencing complications of one form or another. Death rates were 0.7% for LSG and 0.5% for LGBP, and surgical complications occurred in 1.3% for LSG and 2.6% of LGBP cases.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

An extensive literature now exists on the risk and benefits of bariatric surgery in middle-aged populations, including those with T2DM. Overall, results are very positive with rates of remission for T2DM of 70–85% and with relatively low rates of postoperative complications. Bariatric surgery is now recommended as an option for the treatment of T2DM and its complications 30–32 (Table 2). The summary of data generated by the literature search we performed 29 has shown that the current evidence base for bariatric surgery in the elderly is limited. Efficacy data comprise a heterogeneous group of operative interventions from 10 studies comprising 624 patients that report a broad collection of outcome measures. In contrast, 30-day safety outcomes are reported for 6837 patients. Most of the efficacy data are based on studies using LAGB surgery that has limited efficacy in terms of weight reduction and is associated with a high rate of complications (Table 1). Despite these limitations, many studies showed significant benefits on comorbidities including T2DM (76% improved/resolved), hypertension (68%) and OSA (67%). The published datasets on LSG or LGBP procedures in the elderly are very limited. Overall, they suggest that despite greater weight reductions, rates of resolution of comorbidities are similar to LAGB but with lower rates of complications. The use of LAGB surgery appears to be declining in popularity in younger obese populations, given its moderate efficacy, high associated work-load and higher rate of complications 33.

Table 2

Table 2

Data on postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing bariatric surgery are a little more robust than that for efficacy, with four registry reviews comprising data on 6837 patients aged above 65 years. Historically, operative mortality associated with bariatric surgery has been between 0.1 and 2.0%, and recent data show a mortality rate of no more than 1% 30–32. An analysis of the UK General Practice Research Database has been carried out for mortality of 15 394 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients included in the analysis were aged below 65 years with a mean±SD age of 47±12 years and BMI of 36±6 kg/m2 (63% were women) 34. Postoperative all-cause mortality in the study population was 2.1% after a mean follow-up of 9.9 years. These data were used to derive a predictive model for 10-year mortality that included age (OR 1.09 per year, 95% CI 1.07–1.10), presence of T2DM (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.76–2.87), current smoking (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.28–2.06) and sex (male sex: OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.20–1.87), but not BMI (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.05 per unit, not significant). This score had a total C statistic of 0.768, and could be divided into four risk bands ranging from 0.2 to 5.2%. The highest risk category in practice is defined mostly by the presence of smoking and T2DM. Registries show no significant increase in postoperative mortality nor major adverse events in the elderly 29, though lengths of stay appeared to be longer in the elderly patients, especially if they had cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities or impaired renal function 25. These data do not per se define risks for a more elderly population, but does suggest that age and comorbidities should be considered rather than age alone for making decisions on whether to offer bariatric surgery to an elderly patient. The recent registry data 28 suggest that age is a risk factor for increased complications and extended hospital stays and that the effect seems most pronounced for LGBP.

Evidence from health economic studies of bariatric surgery appears to be consistent in their demonstration that bariatric surgery improves quality-adjusted life years (QALYS) by 0.9–1.2 and that surgery is a cost-effective treatment option [e.g. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE)<£20 000 per life year saved] 3,35,36. These analyses do not stratify their analyses by age and few by duration of diabetes. Admissions increase over the first 6 years postbariatric surgery and so a reduction in life-long available QALYS would be expected in the elderly as opposed to younger patients 37. The role of social care costs also remains unclear as the Swedish Obesity Study of 2901 patients over 10 years suggests a decrease in disability pensions and in disability days (609 vs. 734 days, 21%, P=0.01) in men but not women aged less than 65 years 38. There currently appear to be no data on the elderly, in whom these costs are potentially highly significant.

A study of direct costs conducted in the USA found that bariatric surgery in (young) patients with T2DM was cost-effective 39. The retrospective time–series study of 2235 patients with T2DM aged 18–64 years showed baseline annual costs of $6376 per person. Total annual healthcare costs in the first year after surgery increased 10% ($616), but then decreased by 34% ($2179) in year 2 and 71% ($4498) in year 3. Bariatric surgery was associated with elimination of diabetes medication use in 1669 of 2235 (75%) patients at 6 months, 1489 of 1847 (81%) patients at 1 year, and 906 of 1072 (85%) patients at 2 years. Given the current cost of bariatric surgery, data suggest that the surgery should have paid for itself within 3.5 years.

The UK government published the National Service Framework (NSF) for Older People in 2001 with the aim of improving the treatment of older people within the NHS 40. A report on the treatment of older people within health and social care concluded that ‘some age groups, especially older people, are much more likely to receive poor services’ 41. The Centre for Policy on Ageing (http://www.cpa.org.uk/reviews) noted in five literature reviews from 2007 to 2009 that older patients were less likely to be referred for surgical interventions for cancer, heart disease and stroke. Since the UK Equality Act 2010 came into force in 2012 it is now unlawful to discriminate on the basis of age and therefore it seems that current practice in terms of bariatric surgery requires further justification.

The NIH Consensus Conference on bariatric surgery in 1991 proposed age limitations of 18–50 years 42 but later extended this to age 60 years 31,43. In 2014, the UK NICE reviewed the utility of bariatric surgery for patients and found it cost-effective especially for those with onset of T2DM under 10 years previously. UK NICE allows bariatric intervention in patients with BMI more than 40 or 35–40 kg/m2 with other significant disease (e.g. T2DM or high blood pressure) 3. However, despite its stated brief of encompassing inequalities, NICE failed to make any specific clinical practice or research recommendations on the utility of bariatric surgery in the elderly 3. The majority of patients who undergo bariatric surgery in the UK appear to be younger than 60 years 36, as in other countries 8,25,26,28. Similarly, other guidelines on the management of diabetes in the elderly do not consider bariatric surgery as an option for this group 12,13, but note an increased risk of cardiovascular disease 44.

The limited evidence presented here suggests that bariatric surgery is safe and clinically effective in producing weight loss and remission of comorbidities in older people. However, it appears that few elderly patients are currently considered for bariatric surgery 29. In fact, little evidence exists to guide selection of procedures in the elderly as much of the data relate to a declining procedure of limited efficacy (LAGB), whereas LGBP is frequently used and LSG is rapidly increasing in popularity 33. There is minimal published data on these more effective procedures in older people.

The available data suggest that following bariatric surgery, older people lose significant amounts of weight and their obesity-related comorbidities improve, medication requirements decrease and quality of life improves. However, the amount of data to support this conclusion is limited; the studies described are small, retrospective, use dated procedures of limited efficacy and lack long-term follow-up. Specific studies are needed in elderly patients to determine whether patients and healthcare services could benefit from the improvements that bariatric surgery is currently delivering through its use in younger patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Dixon JB, Zimmet P, Alberti KG, Rubino F. Bariatric surgery: an IDF statement for obese type 2 diabetes. Diab Med 2011; 28:628–642.
2. Shaw JE, Sicree RA, Zimmet PZ. Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 87:4–14.
3. National Clinical Guideline Centre. Obesity: identification, assessment and management of overweight and obesity in children, young people and adults; Clinical Guideline 43 (update) [Report No: CG43 (update)]. London: National Institutie for Health and Clinicla Excellence; 2014.
4. Campbell PT, Newton CC, Patel AV, Jacobs EJ, Gapstur SM. Diabetes and cause-specific mortality in a prospective cohort of one million U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 2012; 35:1835–1844.
5. Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Jensen MD, Pories WJ, et al.. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med 2009; 122:248–256e.
6. Pontiroli AE, Morabito A. Long-term prevention of mortality in morbid obesity through bariatric surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials performed with gastric banding and gastric bypass. Ann Surg 2011; 253:484–487.
7. Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al.. Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:741–752.
8. Carlsson LM, Peltonen M, Ahlin S, Anveden A, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al.. Bariatric surgery and prevention of type 2 diabetes in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med 2012; 367:695–704.
9. Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Pothier CE, et al.. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:1567–1576.
10. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, Wolski K, Brethauer SA, Navaneethan SD, et al.. STAMPEDE Investigators. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes – 3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:2002–2013.
11. Rubino F, Kaplan LM, Schauer PR, Cummings DE. Diabetes Surgery Summit Delegates. The Diabetes Surgery Summit consensus conference: recommendations for the evaluation and use of gastrointestinal surgery to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg 2010; 251:399–405.
12. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2012. Diabetes care 2012; 35 (Suppl 1):S11–S63.
13. Dunning T, Sinclair A, Colagiuri S. New IDF guideline for managing type 2 diabetes in older people. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 103:538–540.
14. Abu-Abeid S, Keidar A, Szold A. Resolution of chronic medical conditions after laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding for the treatment of morbid obesity in the elderly. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:132–134.
15. Quebbemann B, Engstrom D, Siegfried T, Garner K, Dallal R. Bariatric surgery in patients older than 65 years is safe and effective. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005; 1:389–392. discussion 392–3993.
16. Taylor CJ, Layani L. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients > or =60 years old: is it worthwhile? Obes Surg 2006; 16:1579–1583.
17. Busetto L, Angrisani L, Basso N, Favretti F, Furbetta F, Lorenzo M. Italian Group for Lap-Band. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the elderly. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16:334–338.
18. Clough A, Layani L, Shah A, Wheatley L, Taylor C. Laparoscopic gastric banding in over 60s. Obes Surg 2011; 21:10–17.
19. Loy JJ, Youn HA, Schwack B, Kurian MS, Fielding GA, Ren-Fielding CJ. Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients aged seventy and older. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2014; 10:284–289.
20. Mizrahi I, Alkurd A, Ghanem M, Zugayar D, Mazeh H, Eid A, et al.. Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in patients older than 60 years. Obes Surg 2014; 24:855–860.
21. Burchett MA, McKenna DT, Selzer DJ, Choi JH, Mattar SG. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe and effective in elderly patients: a comparative analysis. Obes Surg 2015; 25:222–228.
22. Sugerman HJ, DeMaria EJ, Kellum JM, Sugerman EL, Meador JG, Wolfe LG. Effects of bariatric surgery in older patients. Ann Surg 2004; 240:243–247.
23. Sosa JL, Pombo H, Pallavicini H, Ruiz-Rodriguez M. Laparoscopic gastric bypass beyond age 60. Obes Surg 2004; 14:1398–1401.
24. Pournaras DJ, Osborne A, Hawkins SC, Vincent RP, Mahon D, Ewings P, et al.. Remission of type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass and banding: mechanisms and 2 year outcomes. Ann Surg 2010; 252:966–971.
25. Dorman RB, Abraham AA, Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Ikramuddin S, Habermann EB. Bariatric surgery outcomes in the elderly: an ACS NSQIP study. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:35–44. discussion 44.
26. Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT. Outcomes of bariatric surgery in the elderly. Am Surg 2006; 72:865–869.
27. Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL, Quigley MT, Pories WJ, Laycock WS. Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2014; 10:584–588.
28. Qin C, Luo B, Aggarwal A, De Oliveira G, Kim JY. Advanced age as an independent predictor of perioperative risk after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Obes Surg 2014. [PMID: 25373923; in press].
29. Marihart CL, Brunt AR, Geraci AA. Older adults fighting obesity with bariatric surgery: benefits, side effects, and outcomes. SAGE Open Med 2014; 2.
30. Poirier P, Cornier MA, Mazzone T, Stiles S, Cummings S, Klein S, et al.. American Heart Association Obesity Committee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Bariatric surgery and cardiovascular risk factors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123:1683–1701.
31. Fried M, Yumuk V, Oppert JM, Scopinaro N, Torres AJ, Weiner R, et al.. European Association for the Study of Obesity; International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity – European Chapter. Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on metabolic and bariatric surgery. Obes Facts 2013; 6:449–468.
32. Via MA, Mechanick JI. The role of bariatric surgery in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: current evidence and clinical guidelines. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2013; 15:366.
33. Nguyen NT, Nguyen B, Gebhart A, Hohmann S. Changes in the makeup of bariatric surgery: a national increase in use of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg 2013; 216:252–257.
34. Padwal RS, Klarenbach SW, Wang X, Sharma AM, Karmali S, Birch DW, Majumdar SR. A simple prediction rule for all-cause mortality in a cohort eligible for bariatric surgery. JAMA Surg 2013; 148:1109–1115.
35. Keating CL, Dixon JB, Moodie ML, Peeters A, Playfair J, O’Brien PE. Cost-efficacy of surgically induced weight loss for the management of type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2009; 32:580–584.
36. Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya E, Loveman E, Baxter L, Clegg AJ. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2009; 13:1–190. 215–357, iii–iv.
37. Neovius M, Narbro K, Keating C, Peltonen M, Sjöholm K, Agren G, et al.. Health care use during 20 years following bariatric surgery. JAMA 2012; 308:1132–1141.
38. Gripeteg L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Sjöström L, Narbro K. Effects of bariatric surgery on disability pension in Swedish obese subjects. Int J Obes (Lond) 2012; 36:356–362.
39. Makary MA, Clark JM, Shore AD, Magnuson TH, Richards T, Bass EB, et al.. Medication utilization and annual health care costs in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus before and after bariatric surgery. Arch Surg 2010; 145:726–731.
40. Department of Health. National service framework for older people. London: Department of Health; 2001.
41. Carruthers IOJ. Achieving age equality in health and social care A report to the Secretary of State for Health. London: Department of Health; 2009.
42. NIH Consensus Statement. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Washington, DC, USA: National Institutes of Health; 1991.
43. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, Garvey WT, Hurley DL, McMahon MM, et al.. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient – 2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Obesity 2013; 21 (Suppl 1):S1–27.
44. Halter JB, Musi N, McFarland Horne F, Crandall JP, Goldberg A, Harkless L, et al.. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease in older adults: current status and future directions. Diabetes 2014; 63:2578–2589.
Keywords:

bariatric surgery; elderly; morbid obesity; type 2 diabetes

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.