Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Exercise as an Intervention to Mitigate Decreased Cognitive Function From Cancer and Cancer Treatment: An Integrative Review

Myers, Jamie S., PhD; Erickson, Kirk I., PhD; Sereika, Susan M., PhD; Bender, Catherine M., PhD

doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000549

Background: Decreased cognitive function associated with non–central nervous system cancers and cancer treatment significantly affects cancer survivors’ quality of life. Exercise may be an effective intervention to mitigate decreased cognitive function.

Objective: The aim of this article is to conduct an integrative review to summarize and critique the available evidence related to the use of exercise as a potential intervention for decreased cognitive function from cancer and cancer treatment.

Methods: We conducted an integrative review through January 2016 utilizing PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Broad inclusion criteria included any quantitative study in which cognitive outcomes were reported in relationship to any type of exercise for adult cancer survivors. Effect sizes were calculated when possible based on available data.

Results: Twenty-six studies were included for review. The majority of studies (including aerobic or resistance exercise as well as mindfulness-based exercise) were associated with some improved cognitive outcomes. However, studies varied significantly in levels of evidence, cognitive domains assessed, and types of cognitive measures. Less than half of the studies included objective measures of cognitive function.

Conclusions: The evidence shows promising trends for the use of exercise as a potential intervention for improving cognitive function following cancer and cancer treatment, but questions remain concerning exercise type, timing of initiation, intensity, frequency, and duration.

Implications for Practice: Additional research is warranted to understand how various types of exercise influence cognitive function in the cancer survivor population and to better understand the mechanisms driving these effects. Trial designs that include both objective and subjective measures of cognitive function are needed.

Author Affiliations: School of Nursing, University of Kansas (Dr Myers); and Department of Psychology (Dr Erickson) and School of Nursing (Drs Sereika and Bender), University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

J.S.M.’s time was supported by the National Institution of Nursing Research T32 and Interdisciplinary Training of Nurse Scientists in Cancer Survivorship while a postdoctoral scholar at the University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Correspondence: Jamie S. Myers, PhD, School of Nursing, University of Kansas, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mail Stop 4043, Kansas City, KS 66160 (

Accepted for publication August 14, 2017.

Decreased cognitive function associated with non–central nervous system cancers and cancer treatments is a challenging problem that is important to address for providing quality care and rehabilitation to cancer survivors. The most common cognitive sequelae can occur prior to, during, and after therapy and include difficulty within the cognitive domains of executive function, learning and memory, attention and concentration, information-processing speed, motor function, and spatial skills.1–3 Estimates of cognitive impairment prior to the initiation of therapy are approximately 30% for breast cancers and other malignancies.1 Incidence estimates during and shortly after chemotherapy range as high as 75%.2,4 Approximately 30% of cancer survivors experience more long-lasting issues with cognitive function, which, in some cases, have been reported as late as 20 years following cessation of cancer treatment.2,4,5 The impact of these cognitive problems on cancer survivors’ quality of life is significant. Difficulty with executive function, word finding, and concentration impacts some survivors’ work performance.6 Likewise, survivors’ comfort level in social situations and interactions with friends and family can be affected.6 Survivors who experience decreased cognitive function express significant frustration with short-term memory issues, word finding, reading retention, and difficulty with sense of direction and response time when driving.6 Thus, the development of appropriate interventions to prevent or mitigate these problems is of high importance.

Multiple mechanisms likely underlie the decreases in cognitive function experienced by cancer survivors.7 The release of proinflammatory cytokines in response to both tissue invasion by the cancer and the administration of chemotherapy and direct injury to neural progenitor cells are postulated as 2 potential causal mechanisms.8 Thus, interventions targeting a reduction in inflammation are of interest, as are interventions that enhance neuroplasticity, thereby facilitating recovery from neural progenitor cell injury.

Exercise may be an effective intervention to mitigate decreased cognitive function from cancer and cancer therapy. Exercise has been shown to decrease levels of markers of inflammation9 and increase levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor,10 as well as increase hippocampal volume.11 Exercise also has been shown to reduce the incidence of cognitive decline and improve cognition across several preclinical and clinical populations including the healthy elderly and those suffering from Alzheimer or Parkinson disease.12–14

Research is ongoing to investigate the potential for exercise to mitigate cancer-related decreases in cognitive function. Many types and combinations of exercise are under investigation, including aerobic, resistance, and mindfulness-based forms of exercise such as yoga, tai chi, and qigong. One common mechanistic thread postulated for components of all forms of exercise is the reduction of inflammation and proinflammatory markers.9 Qualitative studies conducted primarily with survivors of breast cancer indicate that patients use a variety of forms of exercise as a strategy to attempt to regain mental clarity and enhance the ability to multitask and concentrate in the work environment.6,15

Despite the rather limited number of quantitative clinical research studies, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network has recommended exercise as a general strategy for managing cancer-related cognitive dysfunction.16 However, other experts argue that the level of evidence does not yet support recommending exercise as a method for mitigating the cognitive effects of cancer and cancer treatment.17 In an effort to determine whether existing evidence supports the use of exercise in the context of cancer-related cognitive dysfunction, we conducted an integrative review of the literature. The purpose of this integrative review is to summarize and critique the available quantitative clinical research evidence related to the use of exercise as a potential intervention for decreased cognitive function from cancer and cancer treatment. In addition, we briefly describe study results from interventional research to gain insight into reduction in inflammation as a potential mechanism underlying the effects of exercise on cognitive function.

Back to Top | Article Outline


An integrative review was conducted for this project because it is the only approach that allows diverse study methodologies to be synthesized, specifically a combination of experimental and nonexperimental studies.18–20 The integrative review approach was selected because of the preliminary nature of the research in this area, consisting of experimental, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental study designs, and the need to comprehensively capture and synthesize the work to date related to all types of exercise as potential intervention for cancer-related cognitive impairment. The wide variety of study designs and limited number of studies available for each form of exercise under investigation necessitated the establishment of very broad inclusion criteria, so as to facilitate determining the state of the knowledge in as much depth as possible. We conducted this integrative review using the scientific guidelines developed by Cooper18,19 and refined by Whittemore and Knafl.20 The process for conducting an integrative review includes problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis, and presentation.20 Exercise was defined as any form of repetitive, structured, and intentional physical activity, including physical activity that was mindfulness based.21,22 Physical activity was defined as any bodily movement produced by the contraction of skeletal muscle that increases energy above a basal level.23,24

Back to Top | Article Outline

Eligibility Criteria

Research considered eligible for inclusion met the following criteria: (1) full articles published prior to February 2016; (2) quantitative studies including experimental, quasi-experimental, and nonexperimental study designs, (3) primary or secondary cognitive outcomes reported; (4) cognitive outcomes assessed with objective or subjective measures; (5) adult cancer survivor population (>18 years of age); (6) exercise or physical activity self-reported, observed, prescribed (in terms of number/duration of sessions and/or home practice), device monitored, or supervised; and (7) exercise or physical activity consisted of aerobic, resistance, or mindfulness-based exercise, as well as combined modality interventions. Studies were excluded if not published in the English language.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Search Strategies

Two independent reviewers conducted literature searches in electronic medical databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for research published through January 2016. The following search terms were systematically combined (see Table 1 for all permutations): cancer, physical activity, exercise, aerobic exercise, resistance exercise, cognition, cognitive function, mindfulness, meditation, mindfulness-based exercise, qigong, yoga, and tai chi. In addition, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and reference lists from pertinent articles retrieved during the electronic database search were hand searched. The results of the independent literature reviews were examined for duplication, and the reviewers reached consensus on the documents meeting inclusion criteria for the integrative review.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Data Extraction and Analyses

Each article was reviewed and critiqued by both reviewers. Data related to study purpose, design, sample, intervention, measures, and results were extracted and summarized in Table 2. Data extraction for measures and results was restricted to cognitive outcomes and some potential mechanisms including biomarkers of inflammation. We did not extract data related to fitness measures unless these data specifically were investigated as predictors of cognitive function. We organized the evidence by type of exercise, that is, aerobic, resistance training, aerobic/resistance combination, and aerobic/other combination in which exercise was investigated as a component of a rehabilitation program or in conjunction with a neurostimulant. Mindfulness-based exercise was subdivided further into yoga, tai chi, and qigong. Two publications for different outcomes/time points of the same study are grouped into the same row in Table 2. Effect sizes (ESs) for cognitive outcomes were calculated where possible using the online calculator available from The Campbell Collaboration (David B. Wilson, PhD, George Washington University, The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) ranking system was used to evaluate the quality of evidence for study outcomes.52 The GRADE levels of quality (high, moderate, low, very low) were adjusted (eg, upgraded or downgraded by 1 level) based on risk of bias related to sample size, cognitive function as a primary end point, specificity of instrumentation related to cognitive outcomes, and the inclusion of both objective and subjective measurements of cognitive function. The results of the data extraction were synthesized by both reviewers.

Table 2

Table 2

Back to Top | Article Outline


The literature search yielded 363 citations. After removing duplicates (131 duplicates) and excluding citations not meeting eligibility criteria (205 citations), 26 full-text citations were included for the integrative review. The results of the literature search are depicted in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses diagram (Figure).51



Back to Top | Article Outline

Study Characteristics

Results from the data extraction are summarized in Table 2. Study designs included 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs),30,31,35,36,41–44,46,48,50,53 11 quasi-experimental trials,26,27,29,32–34,37,38,40,47,49 3 observational studies,25,28,39 and 1 case series.45 Twelve of the studies were designed to measure cognitive function as a primary end point.27–29,37–39,42,45–48,50,54 Nine studies included objective measures of cognitive function,27,29–31,37,39,42,45,49 21 studies included subjective measures of cognitive function,25,26,28,30–36,38,40–49,54,55 and 4 studies included both objective and subjective cognitive function measures.30,31,45,49 Sample sizes ranged from as few as 4 (for the case series) to 658. Ten studies involved patient populations other than breast cancer survivors.25,34–36,39,40,42,48,49,56

The majority of the exercise intervention research published to date (n = 19) has involved aerobic exercise (n = 4),25–28 resistance training (n = 3),29–31 and a combination of both aerobic exercise and resistance training (n = 11)32–36,38 with or without other intervention components such as cognitive rehabilitation training (n = 2),40,41 sustained attention task (n = 1),42 or neurostimulants (n = 1).39 Less research has been conducted in the arena of mindfulness-based exercise (n = 8). Most of the mindfulness-based exercise studies have involved the investigation of yoga (n = 6)43–48 as compared with tai chi (n = 1)49 and qigong (n = 1).56 Significant variation was noted for the specific instruments used and the cognitive domains assessed across studies.

The majority of the studies involving either aerobic or resistance training exercise or both (15 of 19) were associated with improved cognitive function25,27–29,31,35,37,38,40,42,54 or demonstrated mixed results32–34,36 in which cognitive function outcomes for some domains were improved and cognitive function for other domains were not. All of the 8 mindfulness-based exercise studies were associated with some improved cognitive function outcomes, although 2 demonstrated mixed results.43,47

Twelve of the studies were designed to investigate cognitive function as a primary outcome. Of these, 11 demonstrated some significant positive results for cognitive function with exercise.27–29,37–39,42,46–48,50 One insufficiently powered study, involving a series of only 4 case studies, showed trends for positive outcomes in objective measures of cognitive function without appreciable change in subjective measures.45 Six of the studies were designed to measure objective cognitive function across multiple cognitive domains.27,29,37,42,45,49 Of the 12 studies with significant findings, 6 included objective cognitive measures,27,29,31,37,39,42,49 and 6 included subjective cognitive measures.28,48–50,54

Back to Top | Article Outline

Levels of Evidence

Significant variability in the levels of evidence was noted across studies. Three of the 11 RCTs were reports of secondary analyses of existing data,36,46,48 and 2 were small pilot studies.36,41 Only 5 of the RCTs were designed to investigate cognitive function as a primary outcome.42,46,50,53 Of these, only 3 included objective measures of cognitive function,46,50,53 Only 8 of the 15 non-RCT studies were designed with cognitive function measures as primary outcomes,27–29,37–39,45,47 6 of which included objective measures.27,29,37,39,45,49 Based on the GRADE system, none of the studies met criteria for a high ranking of quality of evidence. Fourteen studies were ranked as moderate, including 2 resistance exercise studies,30,31 6 of the aerobic/resistance/other combination studies,35,37,38,40,42,57 and 6 of the mindfulness-based exercise studies.43,44,46,48,49,55 The rest of the studies were ranked low25–29,32–34,36,39,47 or very low for the case series.45

Back to Top | Article Outline

Randomized Controlled Trials

Restricting the examination of the evidence to the 11 RCTs, we found that results from 7 studies indicated improved cognitive function with some form of exercise. The significant positive outcomes on cognitive function were noted for resistance exercise (n = 1),31 aerobic/resistance exercise combination (n = 1),35 aerobic exercise/other combination (n = 1),42 and mindfulness-based exercise (n = 4).44,46,48,50 Two of these studies were designed to investigate objectively measured cognitive function. Resistance exercise was associated with improvement in the domains of concentration and cognitive flexibility.31 Speed feedback therapy (aerobic exercise/other combination involving sustained attention) was associated with improvements in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, 2 domains important to executive function.42 One study trended toward positive subjective cognitive outcomes (mindfulness-based exercise),43 and another study demonstrated mixed results (aerobic/resistance exercise combination) for 2 measures of subjective cognitive function.36 Two of the studies’ results were not significant for changes in cognitive outcomes. These included resistance exercise (n = 1)30 and aerobic exercise/other combination (12-week physical activity behavior change intervention) (n = 1).41

Effect sizes (as Cohen d) were published for 4 of the 11 RCTs included in this review.30,41,44,48 We calculated the ES (Cohen d) for 2 additional RCTs based on available data.42,50 Effect sizes ranged from 0.0700 to 0.6968 and are reported in Table 2. A medium ES (d = 0.6203-0.6969) was demonstrated for 89 women with breast cancer participating in an RCT to evaluate the effect of a 10-week medical qigong intervention. In this study, subjective measures of cognitive function were primary study outcomes.50 A medium ES also was demonstrated for the use of speed feedback therapy (described above) (d = 0.69).42 The remaining ESs were small, d < 0.05.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Non–Randomized Controlled Trials

Three of the non-RCT studies involved self-reported exercise,25,27,28 and 1 study used accelerometer measurement of 7 days of usual activity.37 The remaining 4 studies involved observation of nonrandomized prescribed study-specific exercise interventions. All but 1 of the 15 non-RCT studies26 reported a positive association between exercise and subjective measures of cognitive function. Results of 2 cross-sectional observational studies suggested a relationship between higher body mass index (BMI) and reports of decreased cognitive function.28,37 Myers et al28 found that higher frequency of aerobic exercise was associated with decreased negative impact of higher BMI on self-reported cognitive function for women with breast cancer exposed to chemotherapy. Marinac et al37 found a significant positive interaction between BMI and moderate to vigorous physical activity on measures of processing speed for women with breast cancer within 5 years of diagnosis (not currently receiving chemotherapy). Leach et al38 conducted a quasi-experimental study to evaluate an aerobics/resistance combination exercise program delivered during and within 3 months of completing chemotherapy or radiation therapy and found no significant decline in subjective cognitive function between baseline and the postintervention assessment (at 12 weeks). The perceived cognitive impairment subscale of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognition did drop by 2.4 points. The authors reported this as an improvement; however, lower perceived cognitive impairment scores actually indicate worse perceived cognitive function per the instrument scoring guidelines.58 Improvement in visual memory was demonstrated with aerobic exercise.27 Resistance exercise was associated with improvements in working memory, attention, and concentration.29 Mindfulness-based exercise (specifically tai chi) was associated with improvements in memory, attention, verbal fluency, and executive function.49

Back to Top | Article Outline

Prescribed Exercise

The studies with prescribed study-specific exercise interventions (22 of 26) also varied by the types of cancer treatment, timing of initiation of the intervention, frequency, and duration of the intervention. Nine of the studies26,32,40,42,43,45,46,48,49 were designed to investigate cognitive outcomes for patients who had completed surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation therapy. Results from all but 1 of these studies demonstrated positive cognitive outcomes.26 Four studies were designed to evaluate exercise interventions during and after cancer therapy.33,34,38,50 Results from 2 of these studies conducted for breast or prostate cancer survivors indicated positive cognitive outcomes after, but not during, cancer treatment.33,34 Mixed results were demonstrated for cognitive outcomes for studies designed to evaluate cognitive function during radiation (n = 2),30,44 chemotherapy (n = 4),29,31,36,47 or antihormonal therapy (n = 2).35,41 Only 1 small study was conducted to evaluate cognitive outcomes for patients with melanoma receiving immunotherapy with interferon, and this study showed no significant associations between exercise and cognitive function.39 Adherence rates were reported for 10 of the studies and ranged from 24.4% to 100%.

The frequency of exercise was associated with cognitive outcomes in 1 mindfulness-based exercise study.46 Women with higher yoga practice frequency (75th percentile, 29 min/d) reported less problems with cognitive function from immediately following the intervention to the 3-month follow-up (M = 0.97; t175 = −2.58; P = .011).

The duration of prescribed study-specific exercise interventions ranged from 4 weeks to 6 months, with weekly frequencies ranging from twice to 5 times per week. Only 1 study addressed the intensity of exercise.37 Marinac et al37 reported that moderate to vigorous physical activity was positively associated with processing speed performance compared with light physical activity or sedentary lifestyle (as measured by metabolic equivalents per day for aerobic/resistance combination exercise intervention).

Back to Top | Article Outline


Randomized controlled trials designed to investigate biomarkers of inflammation in conjunction with cognitive function yielded mixed results. C-reactive protein levels were measured in 2 studies.35,50 C-reactive protein levels decreased for men with prostate cancer participating in a combined resistance and aerobic exercise program35 but were not associated with preintervention or postintervention self-reported cognitive function for those survivors of breast, colorectal, and other cancers participating in a 10-week program of medical qigong.50 Markers of inflammation (interleukin 6, interleukin 1B, tumor necrosis factor α) did not predict self-reported cognitive function for breast cancer survivors participating in a 12-week yoga program.46 None of the studies investigating biomarkers included objective measures of cognitive function.

Back to Top | Article Outline


We examined the existing evidence for the use of exercise as an intervention for cancer- and cancer treatment–related cognitive dysfunction. As noted previously, 11 RCTs have been published to date, and these did not consistently measure cognitive function as a primary outcome, nor did they consistently measure cognitive function in both a subjective and objective manner. Of all the studies reviewed, only 9 studies used objective measures of cognitive function. Experts in the field have argued that subjective cognitive function is the most clinically relevant measure and that self-report should be considered the primary outcome for research in this field.59 However, objective measures of cognitive function are crucial to answering questions related to the efficacy of interventions for performance in specific cognitive domains. Ideally, study designs should include both measures as research is conducted to understand more about the mechanism of cancer- and cancer treatment–related cognitive impairment.

The studies varied widely with the selection of instruments and the cognitive domains measured. In many cases, cognitive outcomes were measured solely by subscales of instruments that were not designed with a cognitive focus and were composed of very few items (such as the 2 items addressing forgetfulness and concentration on the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial Symptom Index, the 2 items addressing concentration and memory of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, or the single memory item on the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory). Instruments such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognition and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scales for applied cognition (cognitive concerns, cognitive abilities) have been validated in the cancer survivor population and specifically designed to assess cancer survivors’ perceived cognitive impairment.58,60

The International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) has recommended a core set of instruments to be used prospectively to measure the specific cognitive domains typically affected by cancer and cancer therapy.1 Only 6 of the studies reviewed were designed to measure multiple cognitive domains.27,29,37,42,45,49 None of these studies addressed all of the domains specified by the ICCTF. Improvements were seen in the cognitive domains of working and visual memory, attention and concentration, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, and verbal fluency. The small numbers of studies conducted for each of the various types of exercise makes drawing conclusions about the type(s) of exercise that may have the most positive impact on a particular cognitive domain difficult.

Of the 26 studies reviewed, sample sizes ranged from as few as 4 (for the case series) to 658. Of the 11 RCTs, only 5 had sample sizes of 100 or more, and these varied for the types of exercise interventions studied. Effect sizes were published for only 4 of the RCTs, and appropriate data were available to calculate ES for only 2 additional studies. Medium ESs were noted for 2 of these studies, one involving mindfulness-based exercise (qigong) and the other a form of aerobic/combination exercise (speed feedback therapy). All other ESs were small. Additional comprehensive, longitudinal, randomized controlled studies are needed to ascertain the ESs of the various types of exercise on both subjective and objective cognitive function across multiple and standardized domains.

Very few studies addressed issues related to timing of initiating exercise interventions, duration of the intervention, intensity and frequency of exercise, or adherence and compliance. Given the fact that approximately 30% of cancer survivors demonstrate some cognitive impairment prior to the initiation of cancer therapy, early initiation of exercise intervention may be warranted.1 Aerobic/resistance exercise may vary in intensity compared with the gentle exercise used in mindfulness-based exercise such as yoga and qigong. However, some preliminary evidence indicates that yoga meets the criteria for moderate-intensity physical activity.61

Both aerobic/resistance and mindfulness-based exercises have been shown to reduce markers of inflammation.9 However, some evidence suggests that mindfulness-based exercise may affect cognitive function by different mechanisms than non–mindfulness-based exercises.46 The mindfulness component may provide additional benefit via stress-reduction pathways in addition to the reduction of inflammatory markers and other neurotrophic pathway mechanisms associated with non–mindfulness-based exercise. Additional research is needed because of the limited evidence available from the studies conducted to date.

The majority of the studies addressed the issues of decreased cognitive function in the breast cancer population. Expanding the work to other types of malignancies and designing studies to answer the questions surrounding timing, duration, and frequency are needed to advance the state of the knowledge and provide the evidence necessary for practice change.

Back to Top | Article Outline


Exploration of the use of exercise as an intervention for cancer- and cancer treatment–related decreases in cognitive function remains a nascent field of research. As such, we conducted this integrative review using very broad inclusion criteria in order to capture as much of the available evidence as possible relating to this area of inquiry. As a result, the literature selected for inclusion in the review varied widely in terms of levels of evidence, design limitations, and homogeneity of patient populations, cancer treatment regimens, types of exercise, primary end points, and instrumentation.

Although several studies examining the influence of exercise on cognitive function have been reported, the science in this area is limited primarily because of issues with study design and the limited number of studies conducted for each type of exercise. Thus, a great deal of work remains to be done to advance the state of the knowledge about the use of exercise as a potential intervention for cancer- and cancer treatment–related decreased cognitive function. However, despite variations in study design and low to moderate quality of evidence per the GRADE ranking system, most of the studies reviewed indicated that aerobic, resistance, and mindfulness-based exercises may be beneficial in mitigating the cognitive dysfunction experienced by cancer survivors.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Implications for Future Research

Additional RCTs are warranted to understand how various types of exercise influence cognitive function in the cancer survivor population and to better understand the mechanisms driving these effects. A multitude of questions remain unanswered. Does the type of exercise matter? Do the intensity, frequency, and duration of exercise make a difference in cognitive outcomes? What is the best timing for initiating an exercise intervention? Does the type of cancer treatment influence the efficacy of various types of exercise interventions? Which cognitive domains are most sensitive to exercise interventions? What role do patient preferences play in adherence to exercise interventions? Do certain patient characteristics drive exercise intervention preferences (such as gender, age, performance status)?

A direct comparison of aerobic and/or resistance training exercise to mindfulness-based exercise would be of benefit for determining differences in the mechanisms for these different types of activities. Trial designs that include both objective and subjective measures of cognitive function still are preferred, although some experts in the field have argued the case for self-report being the most clinically meaningful for this patient population.62 The ICCTF recommends greater consistency in the selection of core objective cognitive measures in order to facilitate comparisons across studies.1 In future studies, controlling for comorbidities such as hypermetabolic syndrome, obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease will be important, as well as the assessment of markers of inflammation, neurotrophic factors, and cardiovascular fitness. Potential relationships with markers of inflammation should be explored for both subjective and objective cognitive function. Much of the work to date has involved breast cancer survivors. Expansion to survivors of malignancies beyond breast cancer also is needed. Given the significant impact that decreased cognitive function has on survivors’ quality of life, continuing research is of key importance to determine the effectiveness of interventions, such as exercise, for improving cognitive function.

Back to Top | Article Outline


The methodological variability and the limited number of studies conducted for each type of exercise make it difficult to make confident conclusions about the efficacy of exercise for improving cognitive function in cancer survivors. However, given that 21 of the 26 studies reviewed demonstrated positive results and the improvements noted in the cognitive domains of working and visual memory, attention and concentration, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control, and verbal fluency, we conclude that the evidence shows promising trends for the use of exercise as a potential intervention for improving cognitive function following cancer and cancer treatment and provides support for the conduct of additional research.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Implications for Oncology Nursing Practice

Oncology nurses are key to providing quality cancer care including, but not limited to, the identification and management of disease and treatment-related sequelae. Educating cancer survivors and their families about the current evidence for the use of exercise as a potential intervention for cancer- and cancer treatment–related decreased cognitive function is an important component of survivorship care. Oncology nurses also are well positioned to question patients about cognitive concerns, as well as to assess eligibility and inform cancer survivors about available studies investigating exercise as an intervention for this very troubling adverse effect. The evidence for exercise interventions continues to grow, but much work remains to be done to form clear recommendations. Oncology nurse researchers are encouraged to design and conduct studies to answer these important questions necessary to inform clinical practice.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, Schagen SB. International Cognition and Cancer Task Force reommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:703–708.
2. Ahles TA, Root JC, Ryan EL. Cancer- and cancer treatment-associated cognitive change: an update on the state of the science. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3675–3686.
3. McGinty HL, Phillips KM, Jim HS, et al. Cognitive functioning in men receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:2271–2280.
4. Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol. 2011;38:431–438.
5. Koppelmans V, Breteler MM, Boogerd W, Seynaeve C, Schagen SB. Late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy for adult onset non-CNS cancer; cognitive impairment, brain structure and risk of dementia. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88:87–101.
6. Myers JS. Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment: the breast cancer experience. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012;39:E31–E40.
7. Janelsins MC, Kesler SR, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancer-related cognitive impairment. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2014;26:102–113.
8. Dietrich J, Han R, Yang Y, Mayer-Pröschel M, Noble M. CNS progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes are targets of chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo. J Biol. 2006;5:1–23.
9. Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Stensel DJ, Lindley MR, Mastana SS, Nimmo MA. The anti-inflammatory effects of exercise: mechanisms and implications for the prevention and treatment of disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:607–615.
10. Szuhany KL, Bugatti M, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of the effects of exercise on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;60:56–64.
11. Erickson KI, Voss MW, Prakash R, et al. Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3017–3022.
12. de Andrade LP, Gobbi LT, Coelho FG, Christofoletti G, Costa JL, Stella F. Benefits of multimodal exercise intervention for postural control and frontal cognitive functions in individuals with Alzheimer’s disease: a controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61:1919–1926.
13. Erickson KI, Kramer AF. Aerobic exercise effects on cognitive and neural plasticity in older adults. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43(1):22–24.
14. Murray DK, Sacheli MA, Eng JJ, Stoessl AJ. The effects of exercise on cognition in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Transl Neurodegener. 2014;3(1):5.
15. Groeneveld IF, de Boer AG, Frings-Dresen MH. Physical exercise and return to work: cancer survivors’ experiences. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7:237–246.
16. NCCN. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Survivorship. Fort Washington, PA: NCCN; 2015.
17. Von Ah D, Jansen CE, Allen DH. Evidence-based interventions for cancer- and treatment-related cognitive impairment. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014;18:17–25.
18. Cooper H. Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1982;52:291–302.
19. Cooper H. Integrating Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1989.
20. Whittemore R, Knafl K. The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs. 2005;52(5):546–553.
21. Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;1:CD011279.
22. Pradhan KR, Stump TE, Monahan P, Champion V. Relationships among attention function, exercise, and body mass index: a comparison between young breast cancer survivorsa and acquaintance controls. Psychooncology. 2015;24:325–332.
23. Physical Activity Fact Sheet. World Health Organization; 2017. Accessed October 24, 2017.
24. 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Accessed August 31, 2016.
25. Sprod LK, Mohile SG, Demark-Wahnefried W, et al. Exercise and cancer treatment symptoms in 408 newly diagnosed older cancer patients. J Geriatr Oncol. 2012;3:90–97.
26. Knobf MT, Thompson A, Fennie K, Erdos D. The effect of a community-based exercise intervention on symptoms and quality of life. Cancer Nurs. 2013;37:E43–E50.
27. Crowgey T, Peters KB, Hornsby WE, et al. Relationship between exercise behavior, cardiorespiratory fitness, and cognitive function in early breast cancer patients treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy: a pilot study. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2014;39:724–729.
28. Myers JS, Wick J, Klemp JR. Potential factors associated with perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23:3219–3228.
29. Baumann FT, Drosselmeyer N, Leskaroski A, et al. 12-Week resistance training with breast cancer patients during chemotherapy: effects on cognitive abilities. Breast Care. 2011;6:142–143.
30. Steindorf K, Schmidt ME, Klassen O, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of resistance training in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy: results on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life. Ann Oncol. 2014;25:2237–2243.
31. Schmidt ME, Wiskemann J, Armbrust P, Schneeweiss A, Ulrich CM, Steindorf K. Effects of resistance exercise on fatigue and quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Cancer. 2015;137:471–480.
32. Hsieh CC, Sprod LK, Hydock DS, Carter SD, Hayward R, Schneider CM. Effects of a supervised exercise intervention on recovery from treatment regimens in breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008;35:909–915.
33. Schneider CM, Hsieh CC, Sprod L, Carter SD, Hayward R. Effects of supervised exercise training on cardiopulmonary function and fatigue in breast cancer survivors during and after treatment. Cancer. 2007;110:918–825.
34. Schneider CM, Hsieh CC, Sprod L, Carter SD, Hayward R. Exercise training manages cardiopulmonary function and fatigue during and following cancer treatment in male cancer survivors. Integr Cancer Ther. 2007;6:235–241.
35. Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N, Joseph D, Newton RU. Combined resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:340–347.
36. Oechsle K, Aslan Z, Suesse Y, Jensen W, Bokemeyer C, de Wit M. Multimodal exercise training during myeloablative chemotherapy: a prospective randomized pilot trial. Support Care Cancer. 2014;22:63–69.
37. Marinac CR, Godbole S, Kerr J, Natarajan L, Patterson RF, Hartman SJ. Objectively measured physical activity and cognitive functioning in breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9:230–238.
38. Leach HJ, Danyluk JM, Nishimura KC, Culos-Reed SN. Evaluation of a community-based exercise program for breast cancer patients undergoing treatment. Cancer Nurs. 2015;38:417–425.
39. Schwartz AL, Thompson A, Masood N. Interferon-induced fatigue in patients with melanoma: a pilot study of exercise and methylphenidate. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:E85–E90.
40. Korstjens I, Mesters I, van der Peet E, Gijsen B, van den Borne B. Quality of life of cancer survivors after physical and psychosocial rehabilitation. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2006;15:541–547.
41. Rogers LQ, Hopkins-Price P, Vicari S, et al. A randomized trial to increase physical activity in breast cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:935–946.
42. Miki E, Kataoka T, Okamura H. Feasibility and efficacy of speed-feedback therapy with a bicycle ergometer on cognitive function in elderly cancer patients in Japan. Psychooncology. 2014;23:906–913.
43. Culos-Reed SN, Carlson L, Daroux LM, Hately-Aldous S. A pilot study of yoga for breast cancer survivors: physical and psychological benefits. Psychooncology. 2006;15:891–897.
44. Vadiraja HS, Rao R, Nagarathna R, et al. Effects of yoga program on quality of life and affect in early breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2009;17:274–280.
45. Galantino ML, Greene L, Daniels L, Dooley B, Muscatello L, O’Donnell L. Longitudinal impact of yoga on chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and quality of life in women with early stage breast cancer: a case series. Explore (NY). 2012;8:127–135.
46. Derry HM, Jaremka LM, Bennett JM, et al. Yoga and self-reported cognitive problems in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2015;24:958–966.
47. Komatsu H, Yagasaki K, Yamauchi H, Yamauchi T, Takebayashi T. A self-directed home yoga programme for women with breast cancer during chemotherapy: a feasibility study. Int J Nurs Pract. 2016;22(3):258–266.
48. Janelsins MC, Peppone LJ, Heckler C, et al. YOCAS yoga reduces self-reported memory difficulty in cancer survivors in a nationwide randomized clinical trial: investigating relationships between memory and sleep. Integr Cancer Ther. 2016;15:263–271.
49. Reid-Arndt AA, Matsuda S, Cox CR. Tai chi effects on neuropsychological, emotional, and physical functioning following cancer treatment: a pilot study. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2012;18:26–30.
50. Oh B, Butow PN, Mullan BA, et al. Effect of medical qigong on cognitive function, quality of life, and a biomarker of inflammation in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:1235–1242.
51. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. PLoS One. 2009;6.
52. Higgins J, Green SE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0. Updated March 2011.
53. Mustian KM. Yoga as treatment for insomnia among cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review. Eur Med J Oncol. 2013;1:106–115.
54. Mustian KM, Palesh O, Sprod L, et al. Effect of YOCAS yoga on sleep, fatigue, and quality of life: a URCC CCOP randomized, controlled clinical trial among 410 cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(suppl 15S; abstr 9013):639s.
55. Oh B, Butow P, Mullan B, et al. Impact of medical qigong on quality of life, fatigue, mood and inflammation in cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Oncol. 2010;21(3):608–614.
56. Oh B, Butow P, Mullan B, Clarke S. Medical qigong for cancer patients: pilot study of impact on quality of life, side effects of treatment and inflammation. Am J Chin Med. 2008;36:459–472.
57. Rodgers SP, Trevino M, Zwaski JA, Gaber MW, Leasure JL. Neurogenesis, exercise, and cognitive late effects of pediatric radiotherapy. Neural Plas. 2013;2013.
58. Wagner L, Sweet J, Butt Z, Lai J, Cella D. Measuring patient self-reported cognitive function: development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Cognitive Function instrument. J Support Oncol. 2009;7:W32–W39.
59. Savard J, Ganz PA. Subjective or objective measures of cognitive functioning—what’s more important? JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(10):1263–1264.
60. Lai JS, Wagner LI, Jacobsen PB, Cella D. Self-reported cognitive concerns and abilities: two sides of one coin? Psychooncology. 2014;23(10):1133–1141.
61. Sherman SA, Rogers RJ, Davis KK, et al. Energy expenditure in vinyasa yoga versus walking. J Phys Act Health. 19 2017:1–29.
62. Ganz PA, Kwan L, Castellon SA, et al. Cognitive complaints after breast cancer treatments: examining the relationship with neuropsychological test performance. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(11):791–801.

Cancer; Cognitive function; Exercise; Intervention

Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved