In all four RECORD studies the incidence of major bleeding events was low and similar between the study arms. Rates of nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding events in each of the RECORD studies were not statistically different between the two treatment arms.6–9
A pooled analysis of all four RECORD studies showed that rivaroxaban was associated with a small increase in major plus nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding events (3.2% compared with 2.5% in the enoxaparin group; odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.01–1.54) up to Day 12±2.15 This analysis also compared major bleeding outcomes according to three contemporary definitions of major bleeding (Table 3) by RECORD,6–9 the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH),16 and the European Medicines Agency (EMA).15 Rates of major bleeding were not statistically different for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin in any of the pools when analyzed according to each definition (Table 3, Figure 1B). The pooled analysis also showed that the rates of patients who had postoperative wound drainage or postoperative wound infection, or who had clinically overt hemorrhagic wound complications were similar in both treatment arms (Table 2).15 Rates of major bleeding leading to reoperation were also similar between rivarobaxin and enoxaparin (Table 2).15
XAMOS: A NONINTERVENTIONAL STUDY
XAMOS was an international, noninterventional, observational, open-label, real-world study designed to assess the safety and effectiveness of oral rivaroxaban compared with any other pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis (referred to as SOC) in everyday clinical practice in patients after major orthopaedic surgery (including fracture surgery in those countries in which rivaroxaban is approved for this indication).14
Patients were included if they were older than 18 yr of age, if the treating physician prescribed pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis, and if the patient provided written informed consent. There were no additional exclusion criteria other than those specified by the approved local product information.14 These criteria ensured that XAMOS included a broad range of patients treated in everyday clinical practice.
This study was conducted between February 2009 and August 2011 and included 252 centers in 37 countries. Decisions regarding type, duration, and dose of pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for each patient were made by the attending physician before enrollment. Of the 17,701 patients enrolled, 17,413 took at least one dose of prophylactic drug (safety population). Of these patients, 8778 received rivaroxaban (50.4%) and 8635 received SOC (49.6%): SOC included LMWHs (81.7% of patients), unfractionated heparin, fondaparinux, VKAs, and dabigatran, among other types of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.14
The demographic characteristics of patients in XAMOS were similar to those of the RECORD program (Table 1). Approximately 80% of patients were 75 yr of age or older, and there were approximately twice as many women (63%) as men (37%). Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus were the three most frequent comorbidities observed. In total, 3.3% of patients in the rivaroxaban group and 4.1% of patients in the SOC group (safety population) had a thrombotic event within the 12 mo before enrollment (Table 1).14
Data on all adverse events were reported, including symptomatic venous and arterial thromboembolic events, bleeding events, uncommon adverse events, and all-cause mortality. Major bleeding events were analyzed according to the RECORD and EMA definitions of major bleeding (Table 3). Follow-up assessments were conducted 1 wk after completion of prophylaxis and 3 mo after surgery. Treatment-emergent adverse events were defined as events that started on or after the day of the first dose and within 48 h after the last dose of VTE prophylaxis.14
The incidence of symptomatic thromboembolic events was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group (0.9%) compared with the SOC group (1.4%; odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.49–0.87) (data for symptomatic VTE only are included in Table 2; Figure 1C).14
Treatment-emergent major bleeding events according to both the RECORD and EMA definitions occurred at low and similar rates in the rivaroxaban and SOC groups in the safety population (Table 2; Figure 1D). There were no fatal bleeding events in the rivaroxaban group and one fatal bleeding event in the SOC group. There was a higher incidence of any treatment-emergent bleeding event in the rivaroxaban group compared with the SOC group (4.7% vs. 3.2%). The incidences of all serious treatment-emergent adverse events and the rates of mortality were similar in both treatment groups (Table 2). Furthermore, the incidence of thrombocytopenia (a limitation that is associated with LMWHs) was significantly lower with rivaroxaban compared with SOC.14
Data after propensity score adjustment (safety population adjusted to balance covariates of patients between treatment groups including patient demographics, risk factors, and other relevant factors that may influence the outcomes) were similar to the incidences in the safety population. The rates of major bleeding according to the EMA definition were greater in the rivaroxaban group.14
The results of the XAMOS study showed that results from the RECORD trials were reflected in routine clinical practice and confirmed the favorable benefit–risk profile of rivaroxaban compared with SOC in patients after major orthopaedic surgery of the hip or knee (Figure 1).
THE ORTHO-TEP REGISTRY
ORTHO-TEP was a single-center, retrospective registry of consecutive patients that compared the efficacy and safety of different types of VTE prophylaxis (including LMWH, fondaparinux, and rivaroxaban) in unselected patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery in daily practice.12,13 A total of 5061 patients were evaluated: 1495 had received LMWH according to hospital standard (January 2006–December 2007), 1994 had received fondaparinux (January 2008–December 2009), and 1043 had received rivaroxaban (January 2010–June 2011).
The patient demographics of the three cohorts (rivaroxaban, LMWH, and fondaparinux) were similar compared with those of RECORD and XAMOS (Table 1). The rivaroxaban cohort of ORTHO-TEP had a higher percentage of patients with a history of VTE (4.0% with rivaroxaban compared with 0.9% and 1.0% with LMWH and fondaparinux, respectively; both comparisons P<0.001; Table 1)
Endpoints were evaluated retrospectively based on patient charts, complication and transfusion databases, and autopsy reports. Therefore, only symptomatic VTE that occurred in hospital were used as efficacy endpoints.12,13 The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding complications defined according to the modified ISTH definition for major bleeding.16
The rate of symptomatic VTE was lowest in the rivaroxaban group (2.1%) compared with LMWH (4.2%; P=0.005) or fondaparinux (5.6%; P<0.001) (Table 2; Figure 1E), mainly driven by lower rates of distal VTE in the rivaroxaban group (1.1% compared with 2.5% and 3.9% in the LMWH [P=0.011] and fondaparinux [P<0.001] groups, respectively). These retrospective registry data suggest that rivaroxaban was significantly more effective for VTE prevention compared with LMWH or fondaparinux.12,13
The rate of major bleeding events was lowest in the rivaroxaban group (2.9%) compared with LMWH (7.0%; P<0.001) or fondaparinux (4.9%; P=0.010) (Figure 1F).12,13 The mean length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the rivaroxaban group compared with the fondaparinux group (8.3 and 9.3 days, respectively; P<0.001) and also compared with the LMWH group (8.3 days and 11.1 days, respectively; P<0.001).
The design of randomized controlled trials may limit the generalizability of study results to real-world clinical practice. Here we compare two large, real-world datasets with that of the phase III RECORD clinical trial program investigating the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban. Patient demographics regarding average age, male to female ratio, weight, and body mass index were similar in the RECORD program, the XAMOS study, and the ORTHO-TEP registry. Overall, the real-world data from XAMOS and ORTHO-TEP confirmed the effectiveness and acceptable safety profile of rivaroxaban for the prevention of VTE in patients after major orthopaedic surgery that was demonstrated by the results of the RECORD program in patients after THA or TKA.
The rates of symptomatic VTE in patients included in the ORTHO-TEP registry were approximately fourfold higher in all treatment groups compared with the rates reported in XAMOS and RECORD. Potential reasons that may have contributed to this higher than expected incidence of symptomatic VTE in ORTHO-TEP include this being a single-center, retrospective registry with specific hospital practices, such as more rigorous methods used to investigate clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis. Differences in other clinical characteristics, for example with respect to patient co-morbidities and revision surgery, may also have contributed to the higher rate of VTE in ORTHO-TEP compared with XAMOS and RECORD.
The rates of treatment-emergent adverse events, including bleeding, were anticipated to be generally higher in XAMOS owing to the longer median treatment duration for patients who underwent elective knee arthroplasty (median 27 days or 28 days dependent on treatment) compared with RECORD3 and RECORD4 (∼12 days). However, similar rates of major bleeding (according to both the RECORD and EMA definitions) were observed for rivaroxaban and SOC in the XAMOS and RECORD studies. Any bleeding events occurred at similar rates in both treatment arms in RECORD. In XAMOS, any bleeding events occurred at a higher rate in the rivaroxaban group compared with the SOC group, but overall rates were approximately half of those observed in RECORD. The higher rates of any bleeding events in the rivaroxaban arm compared with the SOC arm were due at least in part to the higher rates of reporting because of the Weber effect (an increase in adverse event reporting within the first 1–2 yr of a drug being approved).17 The principal safety endpoint in ORTHO-TEP was major bleeding (according to a modified ISTH definition).16 Rates of major bleeding in the different treatment groups of ORTHO-TEP were much higher (2.9–7.0%) than in RECORD and XAMOS (0.2–2.2%). This may be at least partially because of the different definitions of major bleeding used in RECORD and XAMOS, compared with ORTHO-TEP. Therefore, a direct comparison of rates of bleeding between studies is not feasible. However, whereas RECORD and XAMOS showed that the rates of major bleeding were similar in patient groups treated with rivaroxaban or SOC, ORTHO-TEP showed that the incidence of major bleeding was significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group compared with the SOC or fondaparinux groups.
The XAMOS study involved over 17,000 patients from 37 countries and, therefore, is expected to provide a more robust dataset than a single-center retrospective study, such as ORTHO-TEP. As with all noninterventional studies and registries, one of the limitations of XAMOS and ORTHO-TEP is their open-label design, in which both the patients and physicians knew which drug they were receiving or prescribing, respectively. This is in contrast to the double-blind design of the RECORD phase III studies.
Although one previously published study showed that in clinical practice rivaroxaban was associated with an increased rate of return to theater because of wound complications,11 the large datasets available from XAMOS and ORTHO-TEP did not support these findings.
Real-world data for the other direct oral anticoagulants, which are approved in many countries for the prevention of VTE after elective hip or knee arthroplasty, are more limited. To date, there have been no publications of large-scale, real-world studies with other direct oral anticoagulants. Studies that evaluated dabigatran utility in the real-world setting showed that dabigatran was an effective anticoagulant with an acceptable safety profile, but did not report comparative outcomes with SOC.18–20 Apixaban has been associated with a trend towards a lower risk of bleeding versus enoxaparin in clinical studies,21–24 but this has not yet been confirmed in routine practice.
It is important to note that all anticoagulants carry a risk of bleeding, owing to their mode of action. Although there are currently no clinically approved specific antidotes for any direct oral anticoagulants, most bleeding events can generally be managed by discontinuing antithrombotic administration and using appropriate supportive measures. In XAMOS and ORTHO-TEP, fatal bleeding events were rare, and major bleeding events were managed according to routine practice.
In summary, the results of the large, real-world datasets of XAMOS and ORTHO-TEP in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery support the findings of the RECORD clinical trial program and confirm that rivaroxaban reduces the incidence of VTE, including symptomatic events, with a similar safety profile compared with SOC.
The authors would like to acknowledge Claudia Wiedemann, who provided editorial support with funding from Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals and Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC.
1. Falck-Ytter Y, Francis CW, Johanson NA, et al.. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e278S–e325S.
2. Garcia DA, Baglin TP, Weitz JI, et al.. Parenteral anticoagulants: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e24S–e43S.
3. Warkentin TE, Maurer BT, Aster RH. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia associated with fondaparinux. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2653–2655.
4. Moualla H, Garcia D. Vitamin K antagonists - current concepts and challenges. Thromb Res. 2011;128:210–215.
5. Ageno W, Gallus AS, Wittkowsky A, et al.. Oral anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141:e44S–e88S.
6. Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ, et al.. Rivaroxaban
versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after hip arthroplasty
. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2765–2775.
7. Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE, et al.. Extended duration rivaroxaban
versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism
after total hip arthroplasty
: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008;372:31–39.
8. Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC, et al.. Rivaroxaban
versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after total knee arthroplasty
. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2776–2786.
9. Turpie AGG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL, et al.. Rivaroxaban
versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after total knee arthroplasty
(RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1673–1680.
10. Bauer KA. Reversal of antithrombotic agents. Am J Hematol. 2012;87Suppl 1S119–S126.
11. Jensen CD, Steval A, Partington PF, et al.. Return to theatre following total hip and knee replacement, before and after the introduction of rivaroxaban
: a retrospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:91–95.
12. Beyer-Westendorf J, Lützner J, Donath L, et al.. Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban
or fondaparinux thromboprophylaxis
in major orthopedic surgery: findings from the ORTHO-TEP registry. J Thromb Haemost. 2012;10:2045–2052.
13. Beyer-Westendorf J, Lützner J, Donath L, et al.. Efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis
with low-molecular-weight heparin or rivaroxaban
in hip and knee replacement surgery. Findings from the ORTHO-TEP registry. Thromb Haemost. 2013;109:154–163.
14. Turpie AGG, Haas S, Kreutz R, et al.. A non-interventional comparison of rivaroxaban
with standard of care for thromboprophylaxis
after major orthopaedic surgery in 17,701 patients with propensity score adjustment. Thromb Haemost. 2014;111:94–102.
15. Turpie AGG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI, et al.. Rivaroxaban
for the prevention of venous thromboembolism
after hip or knee arthroplasty
. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost. 2011;105:444–453.
16. Schulman S, Kearon C. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost. 2005;3:692–694.
17. Weber JCPRainsford KD, Velo GP. Epidemiology of adverse reactions to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugsAdvances in Inflammatory Research. 1984.New York: Raven Press;1–7.
18. Rosencher N, Frostick S, Fuering M, et al.. Real-world study of dabigatran etexilate for thromboprophylaxis
in over 5000 hip or knee replacement patients: favourable safety profile in subgroups with different BMI, renal function and age. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts). 2012;120Abstract 1160.
19. Kendoff D, Perka C, Fritsche HM, et al.. Oral thromboprophylaxis
following total hip or knee replacement: review and multicentre experience with dabigatran etexilate. Open Orthop J. 2011;5:395–399.
20. Subramanian P, Kantharuban S, Shilston S, et al.. A 12 month review of a modified protocol using low dose dabigatran etexilate in postoperative thromboembolic prophylaxis in joint replacement surgery. Thromb J. 2012;10:14.
21. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, et al.. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after knee replacement. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:594–604.
22. Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A, et al.. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2010;375:807–815.
23. Lassen MR, Gallus A, Raskob GE, et al.. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis
after hip replacement. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2487–2498.
24. Eriksson BI, Quinlan DJ, Eikelboom JW. Novel oral Factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors in the management of thromboembolism. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:41–57.
Keywords:Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved
Arthroplasty; real-life data; rivaroxaban; thromboprophylaxis; venous thromboembolism