Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Bronchoscopic Removal of Staple-Line Reinforcement Material

Ayabe, Takanori PhD; Shimizu, Tetsuya PhD; Tomita, Masaki PhD; Hara, Masaki PhD; Onitsuka, Toshio PhD

Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology: July 2011 - Volume 18 - Issue 3 - p 274–277
doi: 10.1097/LBR.0b013e31822846a7
Case Reports
Free

We report a case of a 60-year-old man who presented with severe productive cough caused by an endobronchial foreign body, which was due to the migration of a staple-line reinforcement material (Seamguard, W.L.Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ). This material was placed over 5 years ago during a right upper lobe lobectomy for a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, (T1N0M0). We were able to remove the entire staple line by performing 2 separate flexible bronchoscopic interventions during a 1-year period without any consequences, thereby preventing an open thoracotomy. Our technique involved trimming the projecting reinforcement material with endoscopic scissors and removing it by pulling or pushing the staple line with a grasping forceps. Three-dimensional computed tomographic scanning was useful to detect the exact anatomic location and relation of the bronchial airway, great vessels, and pulmonary tissue to the foreign body. The use of absorbable staple-line reinforcement could avoid such a complication.

Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, Japan

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Reprints: Takanori Ayabe, PhD, Department of Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Kiyotake, Miyazaki, 889-1692, Japan (e-mail: tayabe@med.miyazaki-u.ac.jp).

Received April 28, 2011

Accepted June 8, 2011

The most frequent complication after a thoracic surgical procedure for a patient with emphysema is a prolonged air leak that increases the length of their hospital stay.1 Standard therapy for treating air leaks after lung resection involves surgical stapling or suturing techniques and electrocautery. To minimize air leaks, several preventive techniques that reinforce the staple line using different materials have been developed, ie, strips of bovine pericardium,2 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) sleeves,3 absorbable reinforcement felt (polyglycolic acid, Neoveil, Gunze, Kyoto, Japan), and biological glue. We report a rare case of the migration of staple line reinforcement materials found as an endobronchial foreign body and its successful removal using a flexible bronchoscope.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CASE REPORT

A 60-year-old man underwent an right upper lobe lobectomy and lymph nodal dissection for a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma T1N0M0 lung cancer in December 2002 at an outside institution. On the basis of the surgical records, there was a complete fissure between the right upper and middle lobes, whereas it was incomplete between the upper and lower lobes. An EndoGIA II 45 mm-3.5 staple cartridge (United State Surgical, Norwalk, CT) covered with artificial reinforcement material, that is, ePTFE (Seamguard W.L.Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) was fired twice to separate the incomplete interlobar fissure between the upper and lower lobes. To resect the right upper lobe bronchus, an EndoGIA II 45 mm-3.5 staple cartridge (United State Surgical, Norwalk, CT) was used. For 3 years, until November 2005, the patient's postoperative course remained uneventful and then he missed follow-up visits.

In February 2008, during the 50th month, the patient developed a severe productive cough. During flexible bronchoscopy, a staple-line reinforcement material was found protruding into the right main stem bronchus (RMB) lumen from its membraneous wall (Fig. 1A). Three-dimensional computed tomographic (3D-CT) scanning of the chest (Fig. 1B) revealed that the main body of the staple-line reinforcement material was located in the right mediastinum with one of its ends migrating into the RMB.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1

Under general anesthesia, the migrated portion of the reinforcement material was severed using endobronchial scissors through the flexible bronchoscope and removed (Figs. 1C–E), leaving its mediastinal portion untouched. The patient experienced a significant improvement in his symptomatology.

After 1 year, in March 2009, the patient developed a recurring productive cough. A repeat chest 3D-CT scanning and a flexible bronchoscopy (Fig. 2A–C) revealed a residual staple line protruding into the RMB. Once again, under general anesthesia, using a flexible bronchoscope, we tried to trim the neck of the staple-line reinforcement material; however, our attempts were unsuccessful due to difficulty in manipulation of the instruments. Eventually, we tightly grasped the staple line with a biopsy-forceps through the flexible bronchoscope and pushed it into a peripheral bronchus; once it was totally extracted out of the mediastinum, it was pulled out from the endobronchial tree (Fig. 2D). A follow-up chest CT scan revealed no residual material either in the thorax or mediastinum, and the patient has remained symptom free ever since.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCUSSION

A postoperative air leak is a common complication after standard lung surgery. When a prolonged air leak occurs, it can result in increased morbidity and longer hospital stay.1 Studies from the mid 1990s to the present have shown the benefit of routinely buttressing pulmonary staple lines in patients at-risk for postoperative air leaks.3,4

The virtues of a reinforcement material are ease of use, biocompatibility, flexibility, strength, air tightness, and cost-effectiveness.4 A variety of reinforcement materials are used in thoracic surgery, such as nonsynthetic bovine pericardium (Peri-Strips, Synovis); other nonabsorbable materials, such as ePTFE (Seamguard, W.L.Gore & Associates, Inc., Flagstaff, AZ) or a bioabsorbable polymer (Duet TRS, Covidien, Tokyo, Japan).

In past clinical practices, the 2 most used reinforcements were the bovine pericardium [Peri-Strips Dry (Biovascular, Inc, Saint Paul, MN)] and expanded ePTFE [Seamguard (W.L.Gore Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ)].5

Complications of lung volume reduction surgery have lately included the asymptomatic expectoration of surgical staples linked by bovine pericardium,6 coughing up of a Peri-strip with titanium staples,7 and the need for bronchoscopic removal of the bovine pericardium with staples.8,9 Postoperative complications of lung cancer surgery have included bronchial obstruction due to Teflon pledget migration10 and a pseudotumor associated with ePTFE sleeves.11 In addition, the other kinds of late postoperative complications such as a migrated foreign body have included the need for bronchoscopic removal of an endobronchial gauze that migrated from the mediastinum after mediastinoscopy,12 rigid bronchoscopical removal of iatrogenic surgical gauze after tracheal surgery,13 open thoracotomic surgery of lung abscess from the transdiaphragmatic migration of a forgotten gauze sponge after a cholecystectomy and choledochotomy,14 need for lobectomy and thoracoplasty for gauzeoma from a 30-year-old patient who underwent pulmonary tuberculosis surgery,15 and sudden suffocation by a surgical sponge retained after a 23-year-old patient underwent lung cancer surgery.16

In the past, nonabsorbable materials such as ePTFE reinforcement materials for lung surgery have been used. More recently, however, absorbable materials, such as the Duet TRS Reload with preloaded tissue reinforcement material composed of a synthetic polymer (Covidien, Tokyo, Japan) or an absorbable polyglycolic acid reinforcement sheet (Neoveil, Gunze, Kyoto, Japan) with biological glue after staple-firing are being used. The use of an absorbable material is indeed attractive as there is a low risk-to-benefit ratio and ease of placement.

The etiology for this migration of the reinforcement material was considered as follows. Five years ago, staple lines were used for a lobectomy located in the right mediastinum, which had settled in the backside of the RMB. This foreign object continued to stimulate and form a granulation reaction of a foreign body, which resulted in this endobronchial migration. Eventually, the patient's severe productive cough let us identify the endobronchial migration.

A bronchoscope may be successfully used for the diagnosis and removal of foreign bodies in patients with suspected endobronchial foreign bodies. The possible presence of endobronchial foreign bodies should be remembered in patients with persistent symptoms in patients with lung cancer or other chronic respiratory diseases.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

We experienced migration of a staple-line reinforcement material into the endobronchial tree several months after a lobectomy. Our case highlights the importance of using a bioabsorbable material over the nonabsorbable one. Nevertheless, if endobronchially migrated, the material can be excised and removed with the help of a flexible scope, thus avoiding a thoracotomy. A 3D-CT scan of the chest is very helpful to detect the exact anatomic location of the foreign body and its relation to the surrounding vital structures.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. DeCamp MM. Patient and surgical factors influencing air leak after lung volume reduction surgery: lessons learned from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:197–206
2. Cooper JD. Technique to reduce air leaks after resection of emphysematous lung. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:1038–1039
3. Vaughn CC, Wolner E, Dahan M. Prevention of air leaks after pulmonary wedge resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:864–866
4. Murray K, Ho C, Hsia J, et al. The influence of pulmonary staple line reinforcement on air leaks. Chest. 2002;122:2146–2149
5. Downey DM, Harre JG, Pratt JW. Functional comparison of staple line reinforcements in lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82:1880–1883
6. Ahmed S, Marzouk KA, Bhuiya TA. Asymptomatic expectoration of surgical staples complicating lung volume reduction surgery. Chest. 2001;119:307–308
7. Oey I, Waller DA. Metalloptysis: a late complication of lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;71:694–695
8. Iwasaki A, Yoshinaga Y, Shirakusa T. Successful removal of bovinepericarium by bronchoscope after lung volume reduction surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:2156–2157
9. Provencher S, Deslauriers J. Late complication of bovine pericardium patches used for lung volume reduction surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;23:1959–1961
10. Precht LM, Vallieres E. Bronchial obstruction due to teflon pledgets migration 13 years after lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:2116–2118
11. Fernandez E, Lopez de Castro P, Tapia G. Pseudotumor associated with polytetrafluoroethylene sleeves. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;33:937–938
12. Öztuna F, Bülbül Y, Özlü T. An unusual endobronchial foreign body: a gauze that migrated from the mediastinum. Respiration. 2005;72:543–545
13. Tabuena RP, Zuccatosta L, Tubaldi A. An unusual latrogenic foreign body (surgical gauze) in the trachea. Respiration. 2005;75:105–108
14. Lone GN, Bhat AH, Tak MY. Transdiaphragmatic migration of forgotten gauze sponge: an unreported entity of lung abscess. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28:355–357
15. Kawashima M, Katoh O, Aoki Y. A case of gauzeoma with recurrent massive hemoptysis mimicking aspergilloma (in Japanse). Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi. 1994;32:152–155
16. Szentmariary IF, Laszik A, Sotonyi P. Sudden suffocation by surgical sponge retained after a 23-year-old thoracic surgery. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2004;25:324–326
Keywords:

staple-line reinforcement material; removal; endobronchial foreign body

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.