Review ArticleValidation protocols for blood pressure-measuring devices status quo and development needsBeime, Beatea; Deutsch, Corneliaa; Gomez, Timothyd; Zwingers, Thomasb; Mengden, Thomasc; Bramlage, Petera,dAuthor Information aInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg bEstimate GmbH, Augsburg cKerckhoff Klinik Bad Nauheim, Rehabilitation Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany dInstitute for Research and Medicine Advancement (IRMEDICA), Barcelona, Spain Correspondence to Peter Bramlage, MD, PhD, Institut für Pharmakologie und präventive Medizin, Bahnhofstrasse 20, 49661 Cloppenburg, Germany Tel: +49 4471 8503331; fax: +49 4471 8503332; e-mail: email@example.com Received October 31, 2014 Received in revised form August 5, 2015 Accepted August 7, 2015 Blood Pressure Monitoring: February 2016 - Volume 21 - Issue 1 - p 1-8 doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000150 Buy Metrics Abstract Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, blood pressure self-measuring devices have emerged as valuable tools in patient care and the accuracy of these instruments is of fundamental importance. For this reason, several validation procedures for assessing the efficacy of blood pressure monitoring devices have been developed, including protocols by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the British Hypertension Society, the German Hypertension League (Prüfsiegelprotokoll), and the International Protocol of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. In the past, most of the protocols have been reviewed and modified because of experiences gained during the validation studies carried out. However, each shows distinct differences, that is number and characteristics of patients required, blood pressure ranges, and the length of the validation procedure, which may result in unique advantages and/or limitations associated with their use. The continued standardization and evolution of these guidelines is essential to ensure the efficacy of blood pressure-measuring devices marketed for clinical and home use. Here, we aimed to compare four currently used validation protocols and to initiate a discussion on potential future improvements. Copyright © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.