Journal Logo

REVIEW ARTICLES

The role of cholesterol metabolism in leukemia

Zhao, Lianga; Zhan, Huienb; Jiang, Xinyaa; Li, Yangqiuc,∗; Zeng, Huib,∗

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000016
  • Open

Abstract

1 INTRODUCTION

Leukemia is a malignant clonal hematopoietic disease characterized by abnormal aggregation of immature blasts in the bone marrow and hindrance to the formation of normal blood cells. On the basis of the involved cell type and expansion speed, leukemia is classified into four major types, namely acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Even rapid progress in the discovery of novel drugs and the development of new approaches, however, highly effective treatments with minimal side effects are still in shortage. Consequently, there is an urgent need to elucidate the mechanism of leukemia-initiating, developing, relapsing and drug resistance, and further screen novel targets.

The metabolic profiles in leukemia cells were found to be distinct from the normal process. Chen et al reported that a total of 47 metabolites and 45 metabolic pathways were altered in AML patients,1 among which glucose and lipid metabolic alterations were notable. In another study, it was reported that cholesterol metabolism was aberrant in both ALL and AML patients.2

Cholesterol is indispensable for cancer cells to achieve fast proliferation as it functions in several biological aspects. Apart from acting as an essential structural component for cell membrane,3 cholesterol also provides a platform for cell signal transductions by way of lipid raft element, which are master regulators of cell fate.4 Moreover, the intermediate metabolites in cholesterol synthesis regulate the post-translational prenylation of many proteins, including small GTPases, which is a vital process to make those proteins function normally.5

It has been demonstrated that leukemia cells display increased synthesis and uptake of cholesterol to satisfy their rapid growth, as indicated by elevating 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase (HMGCR) activity and expression, and enhancing low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDL-R) mediated degradation of LDL.6–8 With it comes extensive attention drawn by cholesterol modulators nowadays, many efforts have been made to test the therapeutic efficacy and promote clinical translation. For example, SWOG S0919, a Phase 2 trial, revealed an encouraging complete remission rate in relapsed AML patients treated with high dose pravastatin combined with idarubicin and cytarabine.9

In this review, we provide an outline of the cholesterol homeostasis, as well as discuss the function of cholesterol and its derived metabolites in leukemia expansion, progression, and drug resistance. We further briefly highlight the research progresses of diverse inhibitors targeting cholesterol metabolism in leukemia, which may open a new therapeutic window for treating leukemia.

2 CHOLESTEROL METABOLISM NETWORK

Cholesterol is both synthesized and taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis (Fig. 1). Cells delicately balance the importation and biosynthesis of cholesterol by a tightly regulated feedback of LDL receptors and HMGCR. The brief procedures are as follows.

Figure 1
Figure 1:
Overview of the cholesterol metabolism and the promising inhibitors. Cholesterol metabolism, which uses acetyl-CoA to produce sterols and isoprenoid metabolites, is indispensable for cancer cells. Cholesterol is both de novo synthesized (the left part) and taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis(the right part). Key metabolic enzymes discussed in this review are marked in black besides the corresponding arrows, derived intermediate metabolites are shown in light blue boxes, and agents targeting cholesterol metabolism are shown in orange boxes. Many reactions have been omitted for simplicity. HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA; HMGCS1, HMG-CoA synthase 1; HMGCR, HMG-CoA reductase ; IPP, isopentenyl-diphosphate; FDPs, farnesyl diphosphate synthase; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; GGPS, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase; GGPP, geranylgeranyl-diphosphate; FTIs , farnesyl-transferase inhibitors; GGTIs, geranyl transferase inhibitors; LDL, low-density lipoprotein.; LDs lipid droplets.

2.1 De novo cholesterol synthesis

Cholesterol can be synthesized in the plasm by the mevalonate (MVA) pathway.10,11 The MVA pathway leads to the synthesis of sterols and isoprenoids that are shown to be crucial for tumor-growth.12 The MVA pathway begins with the synthesis of acetoacetyl-CoA from acetyl-CoA. Next, HMG-CoA is produced by the condensation of acetoacetyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA, catalyzed by HMG-CoA synthase 1 (HMGCS1). The next step is the conversion of HMG-CoA to MVA by HMGCR, which is the first committed step of the MVA pathway. MVA is then converted into isopentenyl-diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP) through a series of enzymatic steps. Farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FDPS) catalyzes sequential condensation reactions of DMAPP with two units of IPP to form farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP). Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GGPS) catalyzes yet another condensation reaction to form geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). GGPP can be converted into dolichol and ubiquinone (coenzyme Q, CoQ) through multiple enzymatic steps. On the other hand, farnesyl-diphosphate farnesyltransferase 1 (FDFT1) converts FPP into squalene, which is then converted into cholesterol through a series of enzymatic steps.

2.2 Receptor-mediated endocytosis

Other than de novo synthesis, the increase of intracellular cholesterol is also triggered by the uptake of LDL.13,14 First, circulating LDL particle binds to LDL receptor localized in the cell surface and is engulfed by endocytosis, forming a vesicle (endosome). LDL dissociates from the receptor inside the endosome, and the latter is recycled to the cell surface. Next LDL traffics to the lysosomal system where it is hydrolyzed to free cholesterol and fatty, functioning as the component of the cell membrane and other cell membrane-bound organelles acids.

3 THE EFFECTS OF ABERRANT CHOLESTEROL METABOLISM ON LEUKEMIA

Existing data on intracellular cholesterol levels in leukemia cells are discrepant: the intracellular cholesterol level may be higher15,16 or lower17,18 in comparison to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy donors, which may be due to cell differentiation status and different experimental approaches. But it is widely accepted and accordant that the utilization rate of cholesterol is more rapid6,19 and cholesterol synthesis is enhanced in leukemia cells.20 Moreover, negative feedback repression of leukemia cells is defective and limited in high-sterol media.7 Based on available research findings, aberrant cholesterol metabolism primarily has the following effects.

3.1 Promotion of cell growth and inhibition of apoptosis

As a critical component of lipid raft, cholesterol is tightly related to the abundance and function of numerous growth signaling proteins, remarkably affecting the proliferation rate of ALL and CLL cells.16 Besides, cholesterol promotes cell viability in subsets of acute leukemias by modulating VEGF:VEGFR-1 signaling, leading to leukemia expansion and extramedullary colonization ultimately.16 Drugs that aim at reducing cholesterol would counteract this function. For example, when depressed expression of FDPS and farnesyl diphosphate farnesyltransferase (FDFT1) as a result of 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine treatment, leukemia cells present with substantially reduced cellular cholesterol and growth inhibition.21 The treatment of 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, a cholesterol modifier,22 reduces intracellular cholesterol leading to significant leukemic cell growth inhibition by means of G2/M cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis.23 In human myeloid leukemia HL-60 cells, the effect of growth inhibition and apoptosis is triggered by α-tomatine, a glycoalkaloid, and is partially abrogated by the addition of cholesterol.24 Moreover, the specific inhibitors of cholesterol, presenting opposite effects, will be discussed in detail subsequently.

3.2 Disturbance with cell differentiation

All trans-retinoic acid (ATRA), as a potent inducer of differentiation, is classically used to treat AML-M3 in the clinic. Cells pretreated by compactin, a competitive inhibitor of HMGCR, obviously enhance the differentiation rate in HL-60 cells.25 Cholesterol starvation or treatment with zaragozic acid, which inhibits squalene synthase, induces differentiation of HL-60 cells following a granulocyte lineage.26

3.3 Contribution to drug resistance

Abnormal cholesterol homeostasis is observed in both refractory leukemia and leukemia cells exposed to chemotherapy.27 Recent research reported that the HMGCR expression is up-regulated in drug-resistant myeloid leukemia cell lines compared with the parental cell lines.28 Likewise, drug-resistant ALL cell lines have increased cholesterol levels.29 AML cells prevent themselves against drug cytotoxicity by swiftly boosting protective cholesterol levels via elevating HMGCR and LDL-R mRNA level.20 Most leukemia cells depend on de novo cholesterol synthesis to increase cholesterol levels. Nevertheless, a subset of AML cells relies on increased LDL-C enrichment to accumulate cholesterol.20

4 THE ROLES OF DERIVED INTERMEDIATE METABOLITES IN LEUKEMIA

4.1 FPP and GGPP

FPP and GGPP function as the substrates for farnesylation and geranylgeranylation respectively. This process is catalyzed by either farnesyl transferase (FTase) that covalently attaches a farnesyl moiety or geranylgeranyl transferases I and II (GGTase I and II) that covalently attach a geranylgeranyl moiety to carboxyl-terminal cysteines.30

Disordered RAS signal transduction is a major pathogenesis of myeloid leukemias.31 As a small GTPases, the RAS family requires mevalonate-derived farnesyl or geranylgeranyl isoprenoid modifications for membrane localization32 and further transduces mitogenic signals by activating downstream effectors such as Rafs and PI3K, which regulate proliferation, differentiation, and malignant transformation.33 In other words, reducing the production of FPP and GGPP could contribute to the anti-leukemic activity. For example, depletion of cellular GGPP blocks protein geranylgeranylation of ERK Rac, RhoA, and Rap1, resulting in activation of caspases and pro-apoptotic signaling, and suppressing leukemia growth ultimately.34

4.2 CoQ

CoQ localizes to the inner membrane of the mitochondria, acting as an electron carrier within the mitochondrial respiratory chain, thus enabling ATP production.35 CoQ(10) is necessary to control superoxide levels in HL-60 cells.36 CoQ analogs, CoQ0, significantly reduced HL-60 cell viability and triggered apoptosis via ROS-mediated up-regulation of the Voltage-dependent anion channel 1 (VDAC1) signaling pathway.37 Ubiquinone-based compounds could inhibit human leukemic cell growth by disrupting trans-plasma membrane electron transport (tPMET) and then disturbing intracellular redox homeostasis.38 Besides, CoQ(10) has protective effects on anthracyclines induced cardiotoxicity.39

4.3 Dolichol

Dolichol and dolichyl monophosphate (Dol-P) are involved in the attachment of carbohydrate chains to proteins in the formation of N-linked glycoprotein.40 Dol-P induces apoptosis in human leukemia U937 cells, while dolichol fails to do so.41 During this apoptotic execution, reduction in mitochondrial transmembrane potential (immediately),42 increase in membrane fluidity (5–20 min),43 mitochondrial morphological changes (5–60 min),42 translocation of apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) (1–3 h),44 increase in caspase-3-like protease activity (2–4 h)45 and DNA ladder formation (3–4 h)46 were observed successively. Direct disruption of mitochondrial respiratory complexes and the consequent reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation also play a critical role in the initiation of Dol-P-induced apoptosis.47

5 AGENTS TARGETING CHOLESTEROL METABOLISM

Both cholesterol synthesis and transport are promising targets for leukemia therapy, as researches concentrating on intestinal cholesterol absorption have got certain attention. For example, CML is featured with accumulated cholesteryl ester (CE). Blocking CE with avasimibe could profoundly suppress CML cell proliferation and sensitize resistant cells to imatinib treatment.48 However, present researches mainly shed light on cellular cholesterol synthesis. Herein, we will discuss several types of widely studied inhibitors in leukemia (Fig. 1).

5.1 Statins

Used extensively as a cholesterol-lowering agent in the clinic, statins inhibit HMGCR by blocking the binding site of HMG-CoA.49 They are generally classified into two groups, hydrophobic and hydrophilic. Hydrophobic statins (e.g., atorvastatin, simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin) are more effective than hydrophilic statins (e.g., pravastatin and rosuvastatin) in cancer treatment since the former are easier to cross the biological membranes.50

Statins exert cytotoxicity on cancer cells,51 ascribing to the inhibition of both cholesterol synthesis and various MVA-derived metabolites.5,52 Preliminary clinical investigations have suggested that statins have anti-leukemia activities.27,53,54 Even multidrug-resistant (MDR) sublines of myeloid leukemia cell lines also show sensitivity to lovastatin.28 Two clinical trials further reveal that statins can improve the efficacy of standard therapy in AML.9,55

Statins possess several mechanisms, such as apoptosis, anti-proliferation, autophagy, to realize the anti-leukemia effect. Xia et al reported that lovastatin could induce apoptosis in AML. After conducting a series of add-back experiments, depressed geranylgeranylation of target proteins is identified as the predominant mechanism.56 Through abrogating ERK MAP kinase pathway activation and affecting normal cell cycle, fluvastatin and atorvastatin could inhibit cell growth and enhance cytotoxicity in aggressive natural killer cell leukemia.57 Lovastatin exposure increased the expression of leukocyte integrins CD11b and CD18 and decreased the level of BCL-2, inducing a pronounced differentiation response followed by extensive apoptosis in AML.58 In rat basophilic leukemia (RBL-2H3) cells, simvastatin inhibited histamine release by suppressing the geranylgeranylation of Ras-like protein in the brain 27a (Rab27a) and interfering with the Rab27a-Doc2a (double C2 alpha) interaction, which influenced exocytosis in RBL-2H3 cells finally.59 By reducing cholesterol levels, statins evoked autophagy in leukemic cells, as a consequence inactivated the main autophagy suppressor mTOR and its substrate ribosomal p70S6 kinase (p70S6K).60

However, leukemia cells are observed to display heterogenous responses to statins. For example, Wong et al demonstrated that AML cells had variant sensitivity to lovastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, and cerivastatin. They found cerivastatin is at least 10 times more powerful than the other statins at inducing apoptosis.61 Weide et al reported that simvastatin only exerted ab inhibitory effect on partial primary sorted CD34+ AML cells53 and this heterogeneity attributes to the differences in Ras isoprenylation.52 These findings indicate a subgroup of patients may need co-treatment.

5.2 FDPS and GGPS inhibitors

Deriving from the same biosynthetic pathway and reacting both primarily due to depletion of downstream products, GGPS inhibitor shares similar function with FDPS inhibitor.

Bisphosphonates function by targeting FDPS and are extensively used to treat osteoporosis and other complications of bone and calcium metabolism,62,63 such as metastatic bone disease associated with multiple myeloma.64,65 Their benefit on leukemia therapy also has come to the surface.

A third-generation bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZOL), was reported to synergistically augment the antileukemic efficacy of imatinib, hydroxyurea (HU), cytarabine (Ara-C), and daunorubicin (DNR).66 By inhibiting the prenylation of Ras and Ras-related proteins, ZOL accelerated the extent of imatinib to eradicate Ph+ clone67 and induce S-phase cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in both imatinib-sensitive and -resistant CML cells.68 Besides, leukemias derived from T cells are characterized by osteolytic bone lesions and hypercalcemia. Bisphosphonates cannot only inhibit cell proliferation directly by virtue of inhibition of isoprenoid biosynthesis, but also relief from hypercalcemia due to their binding to calcium ions.69,70 For example, Ishikawa et al proved bisphosphonate incadronate could prevent cell growth of adult T-cell leukaemia cells.70

Interestingly, Agabiti et al recently explored a new class of bisphosphonates including digeranyl bisphosphonate (DGBP), which targeted the subsequent enzyme of GGPS instead of FDPS.71 DGBP likewise could inhibit lymphocytic leukemia cell proliferation and apoptosis mediated through caspases and MEK/ERK pathways,69 and its anti-tumor effect was more potent than zoledronate. Apart from DGBP, Reilly et al tested five more isoprenoid bisphosphonates targeting GGPS while having little or no activity to FDPS, which could disturb the cell viability in the K562 CML cells.72 Combinations of FDPS and GGPS inhibitors could synergistically inhibit growth and induce apoptosis in leukemia.73

5.3 Farnesyl-transferase inhibitors (FTIs) and Geranyl transferase inhibitors (GGTIs)

As mentioned before, prenylated proteins, such as the Ras family, are frequently activated in leukemia, as a consequence great interests are obtained with respect to the prenylation inhibitor.

Among FTIs, tipifarnib, lonafarnib, and BMS-214662 have been investigated in hematologic malignancies74 and numerous clinical trials have been undertaken in this arena.31 Tipifarnib, the most extensively investigated FTI, displays a cytotoxic effect on primary sorted CD34+ AML cells, accomplished by an amplification effect in conjunction with simvastatin.53 Phase I–II studies demonstrate that tipifarnib contributes to 8 to 9.5% hematological improvement in refractory/poor-risk AML.75 In the Phase II study SWOG S0432, patients ≥70 years with AML respond to all tipifarnib regimens with 20% overall response rate and toxicities were acceptable.76 In a phase II–III trial of juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), administration of tipifarnib followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is safe and yield a 51% initial response rate.77 However, a phase III study comparing tipifarnib with best supportive care suggested that tipifarnib showed no survival advantage for untreated AML ≥70 years old. A two-gene expression assay (RASGRP1: APTX gene expression ratio) may assist in predicting AML patients who would benefit from tipifarnib.75

Comparatively, the quantity of reports on GGTIs in leukemia has a limitation. Xia et al found that the GGTI-298 could induce a similar apoptotic effect as lovastatin in AML.56 In ATL, GGTI-298 could reduce cell viability and induce G(2)/M phase accumulation.78

Reserved geranylgeranylation of RAS represents an important mechanism of FTI resistance. To overcome this, co-treatment of FTIs and GGTIs causes an accumulation of unprocessed N-RAS and inactive N-RAS–RAF complexes, inducing significant growth inhibition (>70%) in myeloid cell lines.79 Moreover, FTIs and GGTIs demonstrate the function to reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly via effects on CD4 effector T cells, alleviating the complication of HSCT.80 However, GGTIs have been disappointingly toxic. It is inevitable to develop next-generation FTIs and GGTIs.

6 FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Understanding the connections between metabolic pathways and leukemia is extremely crucial for developing new therapeutic approaches. As we discussed in this review, cholesterol metabolism has a very important impact on leukemia in multiple aspects, providing a strong rationale for exploring inhibitors of this key metabolic activity. There has been inspiring progress in applying cholesterol synthesis inhibitors in leukemia treatment. Several drugs, such as statins and tipifarnib, have been approved for clinical trials. More efforts are still required to realize the clinical translation of those drugs.

Advances in precision medicine have shifted the focus toward individual differences in leukemia cases. Leukemia is characterized by heterogeneity, consisting of a group of subtypes according to morphology, immunology, cytogenetics, and molecular features (MICM). Previous researches verified that leukemia subtypes respond diversely to a certain inhibitor, and a certain subtype of leukemia responds differently to inhibitors who have similar pharmacological activity. It is intriguing to explore whether leukemia could be subclassed based on characteristic profiles of cholesterol metabolism. Moreover, there is space for optimization in the administration regimens. The ultimate goal is to select the most appropriate inhibitor or drug combination to achieve the best efficacy with the lowest side effects.

Another question that needs to be addressed is developing new targets. Cholesterol metabolism is intricate, with numerous catalytic genes and metabolites involved, our knowledge of which is insufficient in the contrast. For example, current researches shine the light on the inhibitors targeting the de novo synthesis pathway, while those targeting cholesterol transportation in subcellular organelle and esterification are poorly studied in leukemia. Further metabolomic study may be valuable to comprehensively interpret cholesterol metabolism.

In summary, we can draw a conclusion that the deregulation of cholesterol homeostasis contributes to clonal leukemia expansion and chemo-insensitivity. It has a great significance to dissect the pathogenic mechanisms thoroughly and further explore affordable and safe drugs in leukemia.

REFERENCES

[1]. Chen WL, Wang JH, Zhao AH, et al. A distinct glucose metabolism signature of acute myeloid leukemia with prognostic value. Blood 2014;124(10):1645–1654.
[2]. Musharraf SG, Siddiqui AJ, Shamsi T, Choudhary MI, Rahman AU. Serum metabonomics of acute leukemia using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci Rep 2016;6:30693.
[3]. Baenke F, Peck B, Miess H, Schulze A. Hooked on fat: the role of lipid synthesis in cancer metabolism and tumour development. Dis Model Mech 2013;6(6):1353–1363.
[4]. Mollinedo F, Gajate C. Lipid rafts as major platforms for signaling regulation in cancer. Adv Biol Regul 2015;57:130–146.
[5]. Resh MD. Covalent lipid modifications of proteins. Curr Biol 2013;23(10):R431–R435.
[6]. Ho YK, Smith RG, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity in human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Blood 1978;52(6):1099–1114.
[7]. Vitols S, Norgren S, Juliusson G, Tatidis L, Luthman H. Multilevel regulation of low-density lipoprotein receptor and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase gene expression in normal and leukemic cells. Blood 1994;84(8):2689–2698.
[8]. Bhuiyan H, Masquelier M, Tatidis L, Gruber A, Paul C, Vitols S. Acute myelogenous leukemia cells secrete factors that stimulate cellular LDL uptake via autocrine and paracrine mechanisms. Lipids 2017;52(6):523–534.
[9]. Advani AS, McDonough S, Copelan E, et al. SWOG0919: a Phase 2 study of idarubicin and cytarabine in combination with pravastatin for relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2014;167(2):233–237.
[10]. Bathaie SZ, Ashrafi M, Azizian M, Tamanoi F. Mevalonate pathway and human cancers. Curr Mol Pharmacol 2017;10(2):77–85.
[11]. Mullen PJ, Yu R, Longo J, Archer MC, Penn LZ. The interplay between cell signalling and the mevalonate pathway in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2016;16(11):718–731.
[12]. Boroughs LK, DeBerardinis RJ. Metabolic pathways promoting cancer cell survival and growth. Nat Cell Biol 2015;17(4):351–359.
[13]. Barbosa AD, Savage DB, Siniossoglou S. Lipid droplet-organelle interactions: emerging roles in lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2015;35:91–97.
[14]. Martin S, Parton RG. Lipid droplets: a unified view of a dynamic organelle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006;7(5):373–378.
[15]. Mulas MF, Abete C, Pulisci D, et al. Cholesterol esters as growth regulators of lymphocytic leukaemia cells. Cell Prolif 2011;44(4):360–371.
[16]. Casalou C, Costa A, Carvalho T, et al. Cholesterol regulates VEGFR-1 (FLT-1) expression and signaling in acute leukemia cells. Mol Cancer Res 2011;9(2):215–224.
[17]. Klock JC, Pieprzyk JK. Cholesterol, phospholipids, and fatty acids of normal immature neutrophils: comparison with acute myeloblastic leukemia cells and normal neutrophils. J Lipid Res 1979;20(7):908–911.
[18]. Usman H, Ameer F, Munir R, et al. Leukemia cells display lower levels of intracellular cholesterol irrespective of the exogenous cholesterol availability. Clin Chim Acta 2016;457:12–17.
[19]. Vitols S, Angelin B, Ericsson S, et al. Uptake of low density lipoproteins by human leukemic cells in vivo: relation to plasma lipoprotein levels and possible relevance for selective chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990;87(7):2598–2602.
[20]. Banker DE, Mayer SJ, Li HY, Willman CL, Appelbaum FR, Zager RA. Cholesterol synthesis and import contribute to protective cholesterol increments in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Blood 2004;104(6):1816–1824.
[21]. Zhang F, Dai X, Wang Y. 5-Aza-2’-deoxycytidine induced growth inhibition of leukemia cells through modulating endogenous cholesterol biosynthesis. Mol Cell Proteomics 2012;11(7): M111.016915.
[22]. Davis ME, Brewster ME. Cyclodextrin-based pharmaceutics: past, present and future. Nature reviews. Drug Discov 2004;3(12):1023–1035.
[23]. Yokoo M, Kubota Y, Motoyama K, et al. 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin acts as a novel anticancer agent. PLoS One 2015;10(11):e0141946.
[24]. Huang H, Chen S, Van Doren J, et al. alpha-Tomatine inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in HL-60 human myeloid leukemia cells. Mol Med Rep 2015;11(6):4573–4578.
[25]. Gueddari-Pouzols N, Duriez P, Chomienne C, Trussardi A, Jardillier JC. Interaction between mevalonate pathway and retinoic acid-induced differentiation. J Biomed Biotechnol 2001;1(3):108–113.
[26]. Sanchez-Martin CC, Davalos A, Martin-Sanchez C, de la Pena G, Fernandez-Hernando C, Lasuncion MA. Cholesterol starvation induces differentiation of human leukemia HL-60 cells. Cancer Res 2007;67(7):3379–3386.
[27]. Li HY, Appelbaum FR, Willman CL, Zager RA, Banker DE. Cholesterol-modulating agents kill acute myeloid leukemia cells and sensitize them to therapeutics by blocking adaptive cholesterol responses. Blood 2003;101(9):3628–3634.
[28]. Maksumova L, Ohnishi K, Muratkhodjaev F, et al. Increased sensitivity of multidrug-resistant myeloid leukemia cell lines to lovastatin. Leukemia 2000;14(8):1444–1450.
[29]. May GL, Wright LC, Dyne M, Mackinnon WB, Fox RM, Mountford CE. Plasma membrane lipid composition of vinblastine sensitive and resistant human leukaemic lymphoblasts. Int J Cancer 1988;42(5):728–733.
[30]. Sinensky M. Recent advances in the study of prenylated proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1484(2–3):93–106.
[31]. Lancet JE, Karp JE. Farnesyl transferase inhibitors in myeloid malignancies. Blood Rev 2003;17(3):123–129.
[32]. Wiemer AJ, Wiemer DF, Hohl RJ. Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase: an emerging therapeutic target. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;90(6):804–812.
[33]. Wang M, Casey PJ. Protein prenylation: unique fats make their mark on biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016;17(2):110–122.
[34]. Agabiti SS, Li J, Wiemer AJ. Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase inhibition induces apoptosis that is dependent upon GGPP depletion, ERK phosphorylation and caspase activation. Cell Death Dis 2017;8(3):e2678.
[35]. Ernster L, Dallner G. Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochim Biophys Acta 1995;1271(1):195–204.
[36]. Gonzalez-Aragon D, Buron MI, Lopez-Lluch G, et al. Coenzyme Q and the regulation of intracellular steady-state levels of superoxide in HL-60 cells. BioFactors 2005;25(1–4):31–41.
[37]. Hseu YC, Thiyagarajan V, Ou TT, Yang HL. CoQ0-induced mitochondrial PTP opening triggers apoptosis via ROS-mediated VDAC1 upregulation in HL-60 leukemia cells and suppresses tumor growth in athymic nude mice/xenografted nude mice. Arch Toxicol 2018;92(1):301–322.
[38]. Grasso C, Larsen L, McConnell M, Smith RA, Berridge MV. Anti-leukemic activity of ubiquinone-based compounds targeting trans-plasma membrane electron transport. J Med Chem 2013;56(8):3168–3176.
[39]. Iarussi D, Auricchio U, Agretto A, et al. Protective effect of coenzyme Q10 on anthracyclines cardiotoxicity: control study in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mol Aspects Med 1994;15(Suppl):s207–s212.
[40]. Leloir LF. The role of dolichol in protein glycosylation. Adv Exp Med Biol 1977;83:9–19.
[41]. Dohi T, Yasugi E, Oshima M. Activation of mitogen activated protein kinase in dolichyl phosphate-induced apoptosis in U937 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;224(1):87–91.
[42]. Yasugi E, Uemura I, Kumagai T, Nishikawa Y, Yasugi S, Yuo A. Disruption of mitochondria is an early event during dolichyl monophosphate-induced apoptosis in U937 cells. Zool Sci 2002;19(1):7–13.
[43]. Fujimoto K, Iwasaki C, Kawaguchi H, Yasugi E, Oshima M. Cell membrane dynamics and the induction of apoptosis by lipid compounds. FEBS Lett 1999;446(1):113–116.
[44]. Yasugi E, Kumagai T, Nishikawa Y, et al. Involvement of apoptosis-inducing factor during dolichyl monophosphate-induced apoptosis in U937 cells. FEBS Lett 2000;480(2–3):197–200.
[45]. Yasugi E, Nakata K, Yokoyama Y, Kano K, Dohi T, Oshima M. Dihydroheptaprenyl and dihydrodecaprenyl monophosphates induce apoptosis mediated by activation of caspase-3-like protease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998;1389(2):132–140.
[46]. Yasugi E, Yokoyama Y, Seyama Y, Kano K, Hayashi Y, Oshima M. Dolichyl phosphate, a potent inducer of apoptosis in rat glioma C6 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1995;216(3):848–853.
[47]. Yokoyama Y, Nohara K, Okubo T, Kano I, Akagawa K, Kano K. Generation of reactive oxygen species is an early event in dolichyl phosphate-induced apoptosis. J Cell Biochem 2007;100(2):349–361.
[48]. Bandyopadhyay S, Li J, Traer E, et al. Cholesterol esterification inhibition and imatinib treatment synergistically inhibit growth of BCR-ABL mutation-independent resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia. PLoS One 2017;12(7):e0179558.
[49]. Eva S, Istvan JD. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science 2001;292:1160–1164.
[50]. Roy M, Kung HJ, Ghosh PM. Statins and prostate cancer: role of cholesterol inhibition vs. prevention of small GTP-binding proteins. Am J Cancer Res 2011;1(4):542–561.
[51]. Yeganeh B, Wiechec E, Ande SR, et al. Targeting the mevalonate cascade as a new therapeutic approach in heart disease, cancer and pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Ther 2014;143(1):87–110.
[52]. van der Weide K, Korthuis PM, Kuipers F, de Vries EG, Vellenga E. Heterogeneity in simvastatin-induced cytotoxicity in AML is caused by differences in Ras-isoprenylation. Leukemia 2012;26(4):845–848.
[53]. van der Weide K, de Jonge-Peeters SD, Kuipers F, de Vries EG, Vellenga E. Combining simvastatin with the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib results in an enhanced cytotoxic effect in a subset of primary CD34+ acute myeloid leukemia samples. Clin Cancer Res 2009;15(9):3076–3083.
[54]. Minden MD, Dimitroulakos J, Nohynek D, Penn LZ. Lovastatin induced control of blast cell growth in an elderly patient with acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2001;40(5–6):659–662.
[55]. Kornblau SM, Banker DE, Stirewalt D, et al. Blockade of adaptive defensive changes in cholesterol uptake and synthesis in AML by the addition of pravastatin to idarubicin + high-dose Ara-C: a phase 1 study. Blood 2007;109(7):2999–3006.
[56]. Xia Z, Tan MM, Wong WW, Dimitroulakos J, Minden MD, Penn LZ. Blocking protein geranylgeranylation is essential for lovastatin-induced apoptosis of human acute myeloid leukemia cells. Leukemia 2001;15(9):1398–1407.
[57]. Henslee AB, Steele TA. Combination statin and chemotherapy inhibits proliferation and cytotoxicity of an aggressive natural killer cell leukemia. Biomark Res 2018;6:26.
[58]. Dimitroulakos J, Thai S, Wasfy GH, Hedley DW, Minden MD, Penn LZ. Lovastatin induces a pronounced differentiation response in acute myeloid leukemias. Leuk Lymphoma 2000;40(1–2):167–178.
[59]. Sahid MNA, Liu S, Kiyoi T, Maeyama K. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway by simvastatin interferes with mast cell degranulation by disrupting the interaction between Rab27a and double C2 alpha proteins. Eur J Pharmacol 2017;814:255–263.
[60]. Vilimanovich U, Bosnjak M, Bogdanovic A, et al. Statin-mediated inhibition of cholesterol synthesis induces cytoprotective autophagy in human leukemic cells. Eur J Pharmacol 2015;765:415–428.
[61]. Wei-Lynn Wong W, Zhenlei X, Melissa M, et al. Cerivastatin triggers tumor-specific apoptosis with higher efficacy than lovastatin. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2067–2075.
[62]. Licata AA. Discovery, clinical development, and therapeutic uses of bisphosphonates. Ann Pharmacother 2005;39(4):668–677.
[63]. Russell RG, Watts NB, Ebetino FH, Rogers MJ. Mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates: similarities and differences and their potential influence on clinical efficacy. Osteoporos Int 2008;19(6):733–759.
[64]. Baulch-Brown C, Molloy TJ, Yeh SL, Ma D, Spencer A. Inhibitors of the mevalonate pathway as potential therapeutic agents in multiple myeloma. Leuk Res 2007;31(3):341–352.
[65]. Guenther A, Gordon S, Tiemann M, et al. The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid has antimyeloma activity in vivo by inhibition of protein prenylation. Int J Cancer 2010;126(1):239–246.
[66]. Kimura S, Kuroda J, Segawa H, et al. Antiproliferative efficacy of the third-generation bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, combined with other anticancer drugs in leukemic cell lines. Int J Hematol 2004;79(1):37–43.
[67]. Segawa H, Kimura S, Kuroda J, et al. Zoledronate synergises with imatinib mesylate to inhibit Ph primary leukaemic cell growth. Br J Haematol 2005;130(4):558–560.
[68]. Chuah C, Barnes DJ, Kwok M, et al. Zoledronate inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of imatinib-resistant chronic myeloid leukaemia cells. Leukemia 2005;19(11):1896–1904.
[69]. Agabiti SS, Li J, Wiemer AJ. Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase inhibition induces apoptosis that is dependent upon GGPP depletion, ERK phosphorylation and caspase activation. Cell Death Dis 2017;8(3):e2678–e12678.
[70]. Ishikawa C, Matsuda T, Okudaira T, et al. Bisphosphonate incadronate inhibits growth of human T-cell leukaemia virus type I-infected T-cell lines and primary adult T-cell leukaemia cells by interfering with the mevalonate pathway. Br J Haematol 2007;136(3):424–432.
[71]. Wiemer AJ, Tong H, Swanson KM, Hohl RJ. Digeranyl bisphosphonate inhibits geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;353(4):921–925.
[72]. Reilly JE, Zhou X, Tong H, Kuder CH, Wiemer DF, Hohl RJ. In vitro studies in a myelogenous leukemia cell line suggest an organized binding of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 2015;96(2):83–92.
[73]. Dudakovic A, Wiemer AJ, Lamb KM, Vonnahme LA, Dietz SE, Hohl RJ. Inhibition of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase induces apoptosis through multiple mechanisms and displays synergy with inhibition of other isoprenoid biosynthetic enzymes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008;324(3):1028–1036.
[74]. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H, Cortes J. Clinical activity of farnesyl transferase inhibitors in hematologic malignancies: possible mechanisms of action. Leuk Lymphoma 2004;45(11):2187–2195.
[75]. Tsimberidou AM, Chandhasin C, Kurzrock R. Farnesyltransferase inhibitors: where are we now? Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2010;19(12):1569–1580.
[76]. Erba HP, Othus M, Walter RB, et al. Four different regimens of farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib in older, untreated acute myeloid leukemia patients: North American Intergroup Phase II study SWOG S0432. Leuk Res 2014;38(3):329–333.
[77]. Stieglitz E, Ward AF, Gerbing RB, et al. Phase II/III trial of a pre-transplant farnesyl transferase inhibitor in juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. Pediatric Blood Cancer 2015;62(4):629–636.
[78]. Edwards DC, McKinnon KM, Fenizia C, Jung KJ, Brady JN, Pise-Masison CA. Inhibition of geranylgeranyl transferase-I decreases cell viability of HTLV-1-transformed cells. Viruses 2011;3(10):1815–1835.
[79]. Morgan MA, Wegner J, Aydilek E, Ganser A, Reuter CWM. Synergistic cytotoxic effects in myeloid leukemia cells upon cotreatment with farnesyltransferase and geranylgeranyl transferase-I inhibitors. Leukemia 2003;17(8):1508–1520.
[80]. Hechinger AK, Maas K, Durr C, et al. Inhibition of protein geranylgeranylation and farnesylation protects against graft-versus-host disease via effects on CD4 effector T cells. Haematologica 2013;98(1):31–40.
Keywords:

Cholesterol metabolism; Drug resistance; Leukemia; Mevalonate pathway; Statins

Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health Inc., on behalf of the Chinese Association for Blood Sciences.