Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Evolving paradigm in thrombophilia screening

Ashraf, Nomana; Visweshwar, Nathanc; Jaglal, Michaelb; Sokol, Lubomirb; Laber, Damianb

Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis: July 2019 - Volume 30 - Issue 5 - p 249–252
doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000809
SHORT COMMUNICATION
Open

The role of genetic thrombophilia screening for identifying a hypercoagulable state in the management of venous thromboembolism. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1995 to 2017, the websites of the professional bodies including American Society of Hematology, British Society of Hematology, International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, College of American Pathologists, American College of Medical Genetics, and American Society of obstetrics and gynecology for their clinical practice guidelines. We used search strategy terms – venous thromboembolism, inherited, thrombophilia, and hypercoagulable state. Thrombophilia screening does not alter management in pregnancy, infertility, recurrent miscarriages, in primary occlusive arterial syndromes, and for primary prevention in relatives of venous thromboembolism patients considering hormonal manipulation including oral contraceptives. Routine thrombophilia screening for identifying a hypercoagulable state is not indicated in venous thromboembolism, as it is only useful in a select group of patients. There is no difference in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with or without an inherited hypercoagulable state.

aHematology/Oncology Section, Department of Hematology, James A. Haley Veterans’ Hospital

bDepartments of Hematology/Medical Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute

cDepartment of Hematology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA

Correspondence to Nathan Visweshwar, MD, FRCPC, Department of Hematology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA E-mail: nathan.visweshwar@va.gov

Received 31 December, 2018

Revised 6 March, 2019

Accepted 10 April, 2019

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) most commonly presents as deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, or both. Presentation of VTE can range from clinically asymptomatic incidental discovery by imaging, to highly symptomatic DVT or even fatal pulmonary embolism. Although most patients have an obvious provoking risk factor (e.g. surgery, prolonged immobilization, hospitalization, etc.) some features are suggestive of an inherited thrombophilia including an early age of onset (less than 50 years), a family history of VTE in first degree relatives, recurrent unprovoked VTEs, skin necrosis with warfarin or thrombosis in unusual sites including the portal, splanchnic and cerebral venous systems. Even in patients with an inherited thrombophilia, presentation can vary from an episodic disorder with prolonged asymptomatic phases to frequent recurrent VTEs. The exact prevalence of inherited thrombophilia is not known and varies between different racial groups. To complicate matters, there are yet many unidentified genetic abnormalities accounting for the high number of unexplained VTEs clustering in families with no identifiable genetic defects.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Epidemiology

Pulmonary embolism has an estimated annual incidence of two to three cases per 1000 in the general United States population, with a high fatality rate, if left untreated [1]. This is likely an underestimate, as the prevalence of pulmonary embolism has been reported to be 7–30% in autopsy series [2,3]. The inherited defects of thrombophilia account for less than 10% of patients with VTE [4]. In the community, the Leiden Thrombophilia Study (LETS) demonstrated that an increased risk for VTE is mostly associated with a variety of acquired causes [5]. About 25–50% of patients presenting with a first episode of VTE have no clear provoking risk factors – inherited or acquired [6]. Recurrence rate of 5–10% for the initial 2 years and 1–3% per year thereafter are reported if patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism do not receive anticoagulant therapy on a long-term basis [7].

Studies of VTE epidemiology are available mostly in populations of Caucasian origin, with sparse data available for others [8]. The overall incidence of VTE may be higher in African-Americans than in Asians [8]. Hence, prevalence and type of inherited hypercoagulable state is altered by racial differences [9].

Acquired factors in combination with inherited factors contribute to the development of VTE and have implications for both susceptibility and treatment of VTE [10]. The hypercoagulable workup for VTE, should progress from a detailed history focusing on identifying any provoking risk factors, prior history of VTEs and a detailed family history along with physical examination, followed by testing for inherited and acquired disorders based on the likelihood that it will change medical management for the patient or their family members.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Genetic screening for thrombophilia

Genetic studies suggest that common hereditary factors for thromboembolism vary widely according to the racial diversity in the population. Factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation and hyperhomocystinemia occur mainly in the Caucasian population [11]. Africans have significantly lower protein S (P < 0.001) and protein C (P = 0.049) and a trend toward lower antithrombin (P = 0.056) levels, compared with white controls [12]. Recently developed techniques in genetic screening, particularly, next generation sequencing (NGS) is possibly a better choice to detect genetic risk variants for thrombosis in ethnic groups [13]. The data from NGS confirm that in non-Europeans, the prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation is at least seven times lower than in Europeans [14]. However, PCR performed for wild-type allele and factor V Leiden mutation in a Newark, New Jersey population, including African-Americans, indicates an apparent prevalence of 5% in this population [15]. The prevalence of factor II G20210A heterozygotes among Caucasian populations is 1–6%, whereas in non-Caucasian populations it is very rare or absent [16]. The inheritance and racial differences in coagulation are still poorly understood. Acquiring more insight into genetic and environmental risk factors remains important. This should ultimately lead to better prediction of risk and evidence-based management decisions for such patients [17]. However, most patients with inherited thrombophilia do not develop a VTE in the absence of a confounding acquired defect [18].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Evidence-based tenets of thrombophilia screening

Here, we will discuss the existing paradigm for thrombophilia screening, reviewing the current available evidence.

First, who needs thrombophilia screening?

Rationale: Patients presenting with VTE at a young age (under the age of 50 years), with a history of recurrent thromboembolism, thrombosis occurring in unusual sites including cerebral, portal, mesenteric and hepatic veins, history of thrombosis within first degree relatives, warfarin-induced skin necrosis and thrombosis following use of estrogen-containing contraception or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are likely to benefit from screening for inherited or acquired thrombophilia [19]. Finding a strong hypercoagulable state has clinical implications for recommendations regarding preventive strategies, long-term anticoagulation for secondary VTE prophylaxis, and discussion with the patient and family members against hormonal contraception.

Second, thrombophilia screening is not necessary for patients with VTE following a major provocation.

Rationale: Extended duration of anticoagulation is not indicated for patients with VTE provoked by a major transient risk factor including surgery, immobility and trauma (adopting ‘Choosing Wisely’ guidelines published by the American Society of Hematology (ASH), which recommend against testing) [17]. According to ASH, thrombophilia testing in patients with transient risk factors has the potential to cause harm if the duration of anticoagulation is inappropriately prolonged. One caveat to the above recommendation involves patients who experience VTE in the setting of a major transient risk factor but who have additional risk factors such as a strong family history or concurrent exposure to hormonal therapy. As indicated earlier, even patients with an inherited thrombophilia usually do not develop thrombosis in the absence of an acquired risk factor. Testing for thrombophilia should be individualized and clinical judgement used in such cases.

Third, inherited thrombophilia workup is not needed for patients with unprovoked VTE.

Rationale: Patients in this group need long-term anticoagulation therapy, regardless of screening results, provided there is no significant bleeding risk (in line with clinical practice guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians). A negative thrombophilia screening is not sufficient to stop anticoagulation after a limited time interval following an episode of unprovoked VTE, in a patient with low-bleeding risk and willingness to continue therapy [20]. But one may consider testing for lupus anticoagulant because of the choice of anticoagulant therapy and addition of antiplatelet agents.

Fourth, work up for inherited thrombophilia is not indicated to prevent recurrence of VTE.

Rationale: Thrombophilia testing in patients with first VTE does not reduce the incidence of recurrence in clinical practice [21]. Recurrence risk is the same in patients with and without inherited thrombophilia [22]. Recurrence is mostly prevented by adopting a more vigorous prophylactic regimen in high-risk situations, such as surgery, immobilization, pregnancy, postpartum period and avoiding the use of oral contraceptive pills or hormone replacement therapy. Thrombosis of the same site is often secondary to local causes including chronic fibrosis and scarring of the deep venous system, indwelling central venous catheters, anatomic defects including May–Thurner syndrome (right iliac artery compressing the left iliac vein) and thoracic outlet syndromes.

Fifth, thrombophilia screening is not indicated for primary prevention in relatives of VTE patients considering hormonal manipulation including oral contraceptives.

Rationale: Normal thrombophilia testing does not exclude the risk of future thrombotic events [21]. First degree relatives have a predictable increased risk of thrombosis with estrogen use, even when thrombophilia testing is negative. This is likely a result of complex interactions between an unidentified inherited hypercoagulable state, and acquired factors including vascular endothelium, tissue factor-bearing microparticles, circulating leukocytes, altered coagulation proteins and fibrinolytic system.

Sixth, thrombophilia testing is not recommended for VTE occurring during pregnancy.

Rationale: Pregnancy and the postpartum period are acquired hypercoagulable states, as the balance between intrinsic coagulation and anticoagulant factors is tilted in favor of the former. Coagulation factors including fibrinogen increase, and anticoagulants, such as protein S decrease during pregnancy and the postpartum period [23]. Avoidance of future use of combination oral contraceptives and antenatal/postpartum VTE prophylaxis during subsequent pregnancies are recommended, irrespective of thrombophilia status

Seventh, thrombophilia screening is not indicated for recurrent arterial thromboembolic episodes without VTE.

Rationale: Most arterial thromboses are secondary to underlying systemic disorders including dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and atherosclerosis [24]. Arterial thrombosis results from platelet-rich thrombi with underlying atherosclerosis, whereas hypercoagulable states result in fibrin-rich thrombi producing mainly venous thromboembolism. An exception to this recommendation would be young patients or those lacking traditional risk factors for arterial thrombosis. Such patients should be evaluated for antiphospholipid antibody syndrome – an acquired hypercoagulable state associated with increased risk of arterial thrombosis.

Eighth, clinicians should adhere to the clinical practice guidelines available, while ordering a hypercoagulable work-up.

Rationale: The American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and College of American Pathologists recommend against testing for methyl tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphism as part of workup for thrombophilia, recurrent pregnancy loss or for at-risk family members [25]. The MTHFR deficiency leads to hyperhomocysteinemia, which was thought to lead to an increased risk for venous thromboembolism, coronary artery disease and recurrent pregnancy loss. However, recent data have disproven an association between hyperhomocysteinemia and the risk for coronary artery disease, and between the MTHFR polymorphism status and risk for venous thromboembolism [25,26].

Ninth, testing for lupus anticoagulant should not be performed while the patient is receiving rivaroxaban, dabigatran and enoxaparin.

Rationale: Presence of these agents in the blood results in false positive lupus anticoagulant testing, not only on screening, but also in confirmatory studies with rivaroxaban, dabigatran and enoxaparin [27]. Such erroneous results may lead to unnecessary prolongation of the anticoagulant treatment regimen with its antecedent risks of excessive bleeding.

Tenth, routine thrombophilia testing in patients undergoing infertility evaluation should be avoided.

Rationale: Inherited thrombophilia testing in infertility is controversial. There is no evidence to support a strong association between thrombophilia and infertility. Thrombophilia testing in this setting may increase cost, with minimal potential benefit and lead to inappropriate use of anticoagulants with no proven benefit [28,29].

Eleventh, use of low molecular weight heparin in pregnant women with recurrent miscarriages (>3) does not prevent fetal loss, with or without inherited thrombophilia.

Rationale: The use of antepartum low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis to prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications has become common practice despite limited and conflicting evidence to support its use. Use of LMWH does not prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications in women with and without inherited thrombophilia [30]. In a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing LMWH vs. no LMWH in women with inherited thrombophilia and prior late (≥10 weeks) or recurrent early (<10 weeks) pregnancy loss, there was no significant difference in live birth rates with the use of LMWH compared with no LMWH (relative risk, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.19; P = .28) [31].

Finally, a negative thrombophilia screening for a patient should not be interpreted as absence of a hypercoagulable state, as presently available tests are inadequate to identify inherited risks of VTE.

Rationale: The inherited hypercoagulable state can be identified by personal and family history of patients with VTE. The thrombophilia screening also does not help in decision-making, future VTE prophylaxis, length of anticoagulation therapy, recurrence of VTE, help testing other family members or identify the cause of fatal VTE [22].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conclusion

Hypercoagulable workup lacks clinical relevance unless the test results guide the management of VTE. Random genetic screening may not be relevant to a specific population. Thrombophilia workup must not be done for the sole purpose of identifying a genetic defect for future family screening. Thus far, hypercoagulable workup has not been shown to prevent recurrence of VTE, prevent postphlebitic syndrome, help guide the appropriate antithrombotic regimen or assess the duration of anticoagulant therapy. Therefore, testing for inherited and acquired hypercoagulable disorders should be pursued only in patients with VTE who are at increased risk, and who may benefit from testing for an underlying thrombophilia. Obesity, hormonal manipulation and a sedentary lifestyle are significant but modifiable risk factors, even in patients with inherited hypercoagulable states. Therefore, in inherited thrombophilia, behavioral modification, including weight loss, aerobic exercise and avoiding hormonal manipulation are of paramount importance to prevent future thrombotic events.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Future direction

We need further research to better understand the molecular basis and pathophysiology of thrombosis, interaction of genetic mutation of coagulation factors in hemostasis, advance the knowledge of interaction between genetic and acquired risk factors, and improve diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic strategy of hypercoagulable states to ultimately decrease mortality from VTE.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Beth Schachter, PhD for her valuable suggestions and advice in preparation of this manuscript

Authorship: N.A., M.J., L.S., D.L., and N.V. have contributed equally in writing this manuscript.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Anderson FA Jr, Wheeler HB, Goldberg RJ, et al. A population-based perspective of the hospital incidence and case-fatality rates of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The Worcester DVT Study. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:933–938.
2. Saeger W, Genzkow M. Venous thromboses and pulmonary embolisms in postmortem series: probable causes by correlations of clinical data and basic diseases. Pathol Res Pract 1994; 190:394–399.
3. Diebold J, Lohrs U. Venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A study of 5039 autopsies. Pathol Res Pract 1991; 187:260–266.
4. Meinardi JR, Middeldorp S, de Kam PJ, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in carriers of factor V Leiden with a concomitant inherited thrombophilic defect: a retrospective analysis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2001; 12:713–720.
5. Van der Meer FJ, Koster T, Vandenbroucke J, Briet E, Rosendaal FR. The Leiden thrombophilia study (LETS). THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS-STUTTGART- 1997; 78:631–635.
6. White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (23_suppl_1):I4–I8.
7. Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Santamaria MG, et al. Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. New Engl J Med 2001; 345:165–169.
8. Heit JA, Spencer FA, White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2016; 41:3–14.
9. Miyata T, Maruyama K, Banno F, Neki R. Thrombophilia in East Asian countries: are there any genetic differences in these countries? Thromb J 2016; 14 (Suppl 1):25.
10. Giordano NJ, Jansson PS, Young MN, Hagan KA, Kabrhel C. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, stratification and natural history of pulmonary embolism. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2017; 20:135–140.
11. Chudej J, Plamenova I. Prothrombin gene 20210A mutation in Slovak population. Vnitr Lek 2016; 62:281–286.
12. Jerrard-Dunne P, Evans A, McGovern R, et al. Ethnic differences in markers of thrombophilia: implications for the investigation of ischemic stroke in multiethnic populations: the South London Ethnicity and Stroke Study. Stroke 2003; 34:1821–1826.
13. Abdi AA, Osman A. Prevalence of common hereditary risk factors for thrombophilia in Somalia and identification of a novel Gln544Arg mutation in coagulation factor V. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2017; 44:536–543.
14. Pepe G, Rickards O, Vanegas OC, et al. Prevalence of factor V Leiden mutation in non-European populations. Thromb Haemost 1997; 77:329–331.
15. Mack R, Samaan P, Podolak I, Albanese E. Prevalence of factor V Leiden in African-Americans. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol 1998; 99:339–343.
16. Zivelin A, Rosenberg N, Faier S, et al. A single genetic origin for the common prothrombotic G20210A polymorphism in the prothrombin gene. Blood 1998; 92:1119–1124.
17. Middeldorp S. Inherited thrombophilia: a double-edged sword. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2016; 2016:1–9.
18. Heit JA, Sobell JL, Li H, Sommer SS. The incidence of venous thromboembolism among Factor V Leiden carriers: a community-based cohort study. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:305–311.
19. Kujovich JL. Factor V Leiden thrombophilia. Genet Med 2011; 13:1–16.
20. Stevens SM, Woller SC, Bauer KA, et al. Guidance for the evaluation and treatment of hereditary and acquired thrombophilia. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2016; 41:154–164.
21. Coppens M, Reijnders JH, Middeldorp S, Doggen CJ, Rosendaal FR. Testing for inherited thrombophilia does not reduce the recurrence of venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6:1474–1477.
22. Connors JM. Thrombophilia testing and venous thrombosis. New Engl J Med 2017; 377:1177–1187.
23. Hammerova L, Chabada J, Drobny J, Batorova A. Longitudinal evaluation of markers of hemostasis in pregnancy. Bratisl Lek Listy 2014; 115:140–144.
24. Rao AK, Sheth S, Kaplan R. Inherited hypercoagulable states. Vasc Med 1997; 2:313–320.
25. Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG practice guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med 2013; 15:153–156.
26. Van Cott EM, Laposata M, Prins MH. Laboratory evaluation of hypercoagulability with venous or arterial thrombosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126:1281–1295.
27. Martinuzzo ME, Barrera LH, Da MA, Otaso JC, Gimenez MI, Oyhamburu J. Frequent false-positive results of lupus anticoagulant tests in plasmas of patients receiving the new oral anticoagulants and enoxaparin. Int J Lab Hematol 2014; 36:144–150.
28. Hicks LK, Rajasekhar A, Bering H, et al. Identifying existing choosing wisely recommendations of high relevance and importance to hematology. Am J Hematol 2016; 91:787–792.
29. Casadei L, Puca F, Privitera L, Zamaro V, Emidi E. Inherited thrombophilia in infertile women: implication in unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:755–757.
30. Skeith L, Rodger M. Anticoagulants to prevent recurrent placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: is it time to put the needles away? Thromb Res 2017; 151 (Suppl 1):S38–S42.
31. Skeith L, Carrier M, Kaaja R, et al. A meta-analysis of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent pregnancy loss in women with inherited thrombophilia. Blood 2016; 127:1650–1655.
Keywords:

hypercoagulable state; inherited; thrombophilia; venous thromboembolism

Copyright © 2019 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.