Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Low-dose, short course alteplase treatment of submassive pulmonary embolism

a case series from the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Lozier, Jay N.a; Elinoff, Jason M.b; Suffredini, Anthony F.b; Rosing, Douglas R.c; Sidenko, Stanislavc; Sherry, Richard M.d; Metwalli, Adam R.e,f; Sachdev, Vandanac; Danner, Robert L.b; Chang, Richardg

Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis: December 2018 - Volume 29 - Issue 8 - p 701–707
doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000774
CASE REPORTS

Guidelines-recommend thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism in patients with severe hemodynamic compromise and low risk of bleeding. Thrombolytics in submassive pulmonary embolism have an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio and remain controversial. Based on our experience with extensive, lower extremity thrombi, nine patients with symptomatic, submassive pulmonary embolisms (five medical, four surgical) were treated with low-dose alteplase (<10 mg/day, infused over 6 h per treatment). Alteplase was delivered by pulse spray and/or directed or undirected central venous catheters depending on clot size and location. All patients improved symptomatically and as determined objectively by pulmonary artery pressures and/or imaging, though acute benefits ranged from substantial to modest. One surgical patient required re-exploration for bleeding at the site of a recent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. This experience may help guide the design of a randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose alteplase for submassive pulmonary embolism.

aOffice of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Silver Spring

bCritical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

cCardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

dSurgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

eUrologic Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

fDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Howard University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia

gDepartment of Radiologic Diagnostics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to Jay N. Lozier, MD, PhD, FACP, Office of Tissues and Advanced Therapies, FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Building 71, Room 5270, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20993, USA Tel: +1 240 402 5605; fax: +1 301 402 1213; e-mail: Jay.Lozier@fda.hhs.gov

Received 12 April, 2018

Accepted 31 August, 2018

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's website (www.bloodcoagulation.com).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Introduction

Current guidelines recommend fibrinolytic therapy with tissue plasminogen activator (alteplase) for massive pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic collapse (e.g., alteplase 100 mg over 2 h) [1,2]. In submassive pulmonary embolism, the potential benefits of clot lysis are offset by bleeding complications [3–7] and accordingly fibrinolytic therapy has been advocated only if these patients develop hemodynamic compromise [8,9]. However, the evidence supporting this ‘watch and wait’ approach only applies to upfront, full-dose systemic fibrinolytic therapy for which the risk of hemorrhagic stroke is 10 times higher than anticoagulation alone [7]. Somewhat lower dose alteplase regimens (0.6 mg/kg and 50 mg) and shorter duration infusions have also been investigated and appear to be effective, but still engender serious bleeding complications [10–15]. In our experience, alteplase doses of 10 mg/day or less, for 1–3 days can lyse large volume, deep vein thrombi involving an entire leg [16], so we empirically tried this low-dose approach in submassive pulmonary embolism cases not requiring rapid clot lysis with ‘standard’ doses of alteplase.

The Office of Human Subjects Research Protections of the NIH Clinical Center declined to consider our case series to be research and waived the need for Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval as they considered our activity to be the practice of medicine.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Case reports

Between 2011 and 2016, nine patients enrolled in various clinical research protocols at the NIH Clinical Center received low-dose alteplase treatment in addition to anticoagulation for submassive pulmonary embolism (Table 1 ). All of these patients, ranging from 29 to 86 years of age, presented with severe dyspnea, large embolic burden, evidence of cardiac strain, and/or limitations in cardiopulmonary reserve. Four of the patients had undergone surgery within the prior 30 days. N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide and/or troponin levels performed in eight patients showed evidence of cardiac strain and/or injury. Echocardiography demonstrated various degrees of right ventricular (RV) dilatation and/or dysfunction in all nine patients (refer to Supplemental Table 1, http://links.lww.com/BCF/A54 for detailed echocardiographic results).

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Table 1

Each patient received 10 mg/day or less of alteplase (reconstituted and diluted to 0.1 mg/ml in normal saline) administered through central venous (five patients) or pulmonary artery catheters (four patients). The latter patients underwent pulmonary artery catheterization and direct intraclot injection of small starting doses (i.e., 2 mg) through four French pulse spray catheters, followed by infusion of the remaining alteplase dose (up to 6 mg) through a pigtail catheter positioned in the affected pulmonary artery. All patients received concomitant anticoagulation with heparin or argatroban.

All patients demonstrated modest to substantial improvement in symptoms, pulmonary perfusion, pulmonary artery pressures, and/or RV function within 72 h of initiation of treatment (4/9, ≤24 h after one infusion; 8/9, ≤48 h after one or two infusions). For case 4 with only slight echocardiographic improvement at 48 h, estimated RV systolic pressure decreased from 101 to 48 mmHg at 1 week, and computerized tomography (CT) angiogram showed complete radiographic resolution of pulmonary embolism after 1 month. Case 5 with a large ‘saddle’ embolus needed only one treatment of alteplase (total dose 10 mg) with marked improvement overnight and no need for supplemental oxygen by 36 h. In two cases with both pulmonary embolism and acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulse spray catheters were used to treat large pulmonary emboli and then redirected to inject alteplase into large DVTs of the left leg (case 6, Day 2; case 8, Day 2).

Although the majority of patients obtained some symptomatic relief within 24 h, ventilation/perfusion scans, and/or echocardiography examinations were not repeated frequently enough to closely associate these clinical benefits with decreased clot burden and/or improved RV function. Repeat computed tomography angiography was not routinely employed and was clinically indicated for only three of our patients (1, 3, and 6), usually to assess concomitant problems such as pleural effusions or cancer progression. However, pulmonary artery catheter systolic pressure measurements obtained in three cases (#6, #8, and #9) treated with directed alteplase infusions demonstrated reductions of 13 mmHg at 6 h, 20 mmHg at 6 h, and 19 mmHg at 10 h, respectively. All seven patients not requiring supplemental oxygen before their pulmonary embolism were discharged home on room air.

Alteplase was well tolerated without bleeding complications, except case 9. This patient, only 2 days after left nephrectomy, improved symptomatically with 2 mg of alteplase administered by pulse spray catheter injection of clot in the right pulmonary artery, followed by 4 mg via a right pulmonary artery pigtail catheter (1 mg/h for 4 h). However, a repeat echocardiogram still demonstrated persistent RV dysfunction and only a minimal decrease in estimated RV systolic pressure. Therefore, it was decided to administer a second infusion of low-dose alteplase, but the pulmonary artery pigtail developed a leak and was replaced by a central venous line. Four hours after completion of this undirected alteplase infusion, the patient developed hypotension and abdominal distension. A large hematoma was evacuated at a lymph node dissection site without evidence of active bleeding.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Discussion

An ideal treatment for pulmonary embolism would be safe, lyse emboli quickly, and be simple to administer. High-dose alteplase (100 mg/2 h) is effective, and indicated for massive pulmonary embolism, but not submassive pulmonary embolism, for which the risk of bleeding exceeds the more modest benefits. Although lower doses of alteplase might provide a more favorable risk/benefit ratio, alternative very low dose regimens for submassive pulmonary embolism have not been investigated adequately. Effective fibrinolysis (especially with low alteplase doses) should be guided by the biochemical properties of alteplase and the effect emboli have had on pulmonary artery blood flow. Alteplase binds clot surfaces due to its strong affinity for fibrin. When thrombi are small, a simple brief infusion may be highly effective because the surface area to volume ratio is high. As the thrombus becomes larger, this ratio becomes less favorable and pulse spray catheter injection may be needed to drive alteplase into the thrombus and thereby potentiate lysis.

Ideally, alteplase would be delivered to each pulmonary artery in proportion to the clot burden. Ventilation/perfusion scans show blood flow is diminished by pulmonary embolism, with greater blood flow diverted to arteries with less emboli. Therefore, central catheter infusions are likely to be most effective in cases with diffuse, equally distributed clot burden. In such patients, tedious pulse spray catheterization of multiple vessels is probably unnecessary and central venous administration of alteplase may suffice. In case 1 with a solitary lung and a central, large embolus, either option would likely be effective and the risk of inducing an arrhythmia in the presence of cardiomyopathy weighed against pulmonary catheterization. In absence of other considerations, when emboli are large and centrally located (cases 5, 7, and 8) or predominantly located in only one lung (case 9), pulmonary catheterization and pulse spray intraclot injection ensures adequate delivery of alteplase to the clot. Direct pulmonary artery administration might also be indicated in patients with large right to left intracardiac shunts, as alteplase given by central venous infusion is likely to bypass the pulmonary circulation. Notably, case 5 was found to have right to left shunting through a patent foramen ovale, which is present in ∼25% of the population [17,18], and may open due to pulmonary embolism-induced increases in right atrial pressure.

Safety is a critical factor to consider for fibrinolytic therapy. Improving the safety of thrombolytic therapy requires more than simply reducing the dose. Despite a 50-fold reduction in alteplase infusion rate from 100 mg/2 h for treating massive pulmonary embolism to the 1 mg/h infusions used here and in other low-dose treatment studies, circulating alteplase levels increase substantially and its physiologic inhibitor, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) becomes undetectable [19,20]. One advantage of short duration infusions of alteplase may be the ability to reform beneficial clots between treatments, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding. Between infusions, when alteplase disappears and PAI-1 rebounds to levels above baseline, fibrin clots can be restored to some extent, inversely proportional to the level of anticoagulation. Although our alteplase infusion rate (1 mg/h) was similar to the rate used in the Seattle II study, 2 mg/h for 12 h or 1 mg/h for 24 h [21], the duration of infusion used here was significantly shorter. Therefore, even though Seattle II excluded patients who underwent surgery within the prior 7 days, nonintracranial hemorrhages requiring 2 or more units of packed red cells still occurred in 10% of their patients.

Intraclot injection of alteplase accelerates clot lysis at the target site and decreases (but does not eliminate) undesired off-target clot lysis, particularly at low doses (e.g., 2–4 mg) that we employed in select cases. Therefore, in patients who need to maintain beneficial clots at surgical sites, intraclot injections may improve the margin of safety. In patients not needing to maintain clot integrity at noncompressible sites, short course central venous infusions of low-dose alteplase may be safe, effective, and relatively easy to administer. For case 9, with the only major bleeding adverse event in our series, there was no bleeding at incisions or central line or pleural catheter insertion sites. Bleeding was restricted to the lymph node dissection bed, which lacked sutures, staples or devices to provide physical hemostasis by tamponade. Although symptomatically improved after one dose of alteplase, this patient received a second infusion and 4 h thereafter developed bleeding. In retrospect, central venous administration, rather than therapy directed to the side of clot as was done initially, may have contributed to this complication. More importantly, the second infusion may have been unnecessary in this high-risk surgical patient. Starting 24 h after laparotomy for hemorrhage, the patient was treated with prophylactic dose enoxaparin and was eventually transitioned to full-dose enoxaparin before discharge with no further thrombosis or bleeding.

Our report is limited by the lack of an anticoagulation alone control group (standard therapy), like the Seattle II study, so we cannot attribute any benefits to fibrinolysis alone. Also similar to Seattle II and in contrast to the ‘watch and wait’ approach [8], low-dose alteplase was initiated in our patients without evidence of hemodynamic compromise. Our report is also limited by the fact that there was no control group (e.g., anticoagulation alone) and the possibility of selection bias, since most of our cases had cancer. Further, there was variability in how alteplase was administered (systemic vs. catheter directed in lower extremities vs. catheter directed in pulmonary circulation). Other institutions may have different outcomes that are not reported in the literature. Nonetheless, our series suggests that low dose, brief duration infusions of alteplase may improve the efficacy of anticoagulation alone for submassive pulmonary embolism, without conferring a high risk of bleeding, particularly in patients who have not had recent major surgery. We encourage larger, controlled studies that are necessary to determine whether low-dose alteplase for submassive pulmonary embolism has an acceptable risk/benefit ratio and provides net long-term benefits for patients [22,23].

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acknowledgements

The presentation reflects the views of the authors and should not be construed to represent FDA's views or policies.

The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, the US Department of Health and Human Services, or the US Government.

The research was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of the NIH Clinical Center, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the National Cancer Institute.

Presented in part at the 26th International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress, Berlin, Germany 11 July 2017.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149:315–352.
2. Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL, Cushman M, Goldenberg N, Goldhaber SZ, et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123:1788–1830.
3. Hamel E, Pacouret G, Vincentelli D, Forissier JF, Peycher P, Pottier JM, et al. Thrombolysis or heparin therapy in massive pulmonary embolism with right ventricular dilation: results from a 128-patient monocenter registry. Chest 2001; 120:120–125.
4. Dalla-Volta S, Palla A, Santolicandro A, Giuntini C, Pengo V, Visioli O, et al. PAIMS 2: alteplase combined with heparin versus heparin in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Plasminogen activator Italian multicenter study 2. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 20:520–526.
5. Meyer G, Sors H, Charbonnier B, Kasper W, Bassand JP, Kerr IH, et al. Effects of intravenous urokinase versus alteplase on total pulmonary resistance in acute massive pulmonary embolism: a European multicenter double-blind trial. The European Cooperative Study Group for Pulmonary Embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992; 19:239–245.
6. Konstantinides S, Tiede N, Geibel A, Olschewski M, Just H, Kasper W. Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for resolution of major pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82:966–970.
7. Meyer G, Vicaut E, Danays T, Agnelli G, Becattini C, Beyer-Westendorf J, et al. Fibrinolysis for patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1402–1411.
8. Elliott CG. Fibrinolysis of pulmonary emboli – steer closer to Scylla. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1457–1458.
9. Goldhaber SZ. PEITHO long-term outcomes study: data disrupt dogma. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:1545–1548.
10. Levine M, Hirsh J, Weitz J, Cruickshank M, Neemeh J, Turpie AG, et al. A randomized trial of a single bolus dosage regimen of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 1990; 98:1473–1479.
11. Goldhaber SZ, Agnelli G, Levine MN. Reduced dose bolus alteplase vs conventional alteplase infusion for pulmonary embolism thrombolysis. An international multicenter randomized trial. The Bolus Alteplase Pulmonary Embolism Group. Chest 1994; 106:718–724.
12. Sors H, Pacouret G, Azarian R, Meyer G, Charbonnier B, Simonneau G. Hemodynamic effects of bolus vs 2-h infusion of alteplase in acute massive pulmonary embolism. A randomized controlled multicenter trial. Chest 1994; 106:712–717.
13. Wang C, Zhai Z, Yang Y, Wu Q, Cheng Z, Liang L, et al. Efficacy and safety of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: a randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Chest 2010; 137:254–262.
14. Sharifi M, Bay C, Skrocki L, Rahimi F, Mehdipour M. Moderate pulmonary embolism treated with thrombolysis (from the ‘MOPETT’ trial). Am J Cardiol 2013; 111:273–277.
15. Zhang Z, Zhai ZG, Liang LR, Liu FF, Yang YH, Wang C. Lower dosage of recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in the treatment of acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2014; 133:357–363.
16. Chang R, Horne MK 3rd, Shawker TH, Kam AW, Chen EA, Joe GO, et al. Low-dose, once-daily, intraclot injections of alteplase for treatment of acute deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:1107–1116.
17. Cho SY, Youn HJ, Park MY, Shim BJ, Lee SJ, Kim JH, et al. Post-operative multiple thrombosis associated with patent foramen ovale: embolic stroke, right atrial thrombi, pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. J Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2015; 23:177–180.
18. Schnieder M, Siddiqui T, Karch A, Bahr M, Hasenfuss G, Liman J, et al. Clinical relevance of patent foramen ovale and atrial septum aneurysm in stroke: findings of a single-center cross-sectional study. Eur Neurol 2017; 78:264–269.
19. Lozier JN, Cullinane AM, Nghiem K, Chang R, Horne MK 3rd. Biochemical dynamics relevant to the safety of low-dose, intraclot alteplase for deep vein thrombosis. Transl Res 2012; 160:217–222.
20. Horne MK 3rd, Chang R. Pharmacokinetics of pulse-sprayed recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for deep venous thrombosis. Thromb Res 2003; 111:111–114.
21. Piazza G, Hohlfelder B, Jaff MR, Ouriel K, Engelhardt TC, Sterling KM, et al. A prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial of ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed, low-dose fibrinolysis for acute massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: the SEATTLE II study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2015; 8:1382–1392.
22. Kahn SR, Hirsch AM, Akaberi A, Hernandez P, Anderson DR, Wells PS, et al. Functional and exercise limitations after a first episode of pulmonary embolism: results of the ELOPE prospective cohort study. Chest 2017; 151:1058–1068.
23. Konstantinides SV, Vicaut E, Danays T, Becattini C, Bertoletti L, Beyer-Westendorf J, et al. Impact of thrombolytic therapy on the long-term outcome of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 69:1536–1544.
Keywords:

alteplase; submassive pulmonary embolism; thrombolysis

Supplemental Digital Content

Back to Top | Article Outline
Copyright © 2018 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.