Journal Logo


An intronic mutation c.6430-3C>G in the F8 gene causes splicing efficiency and premature termination in hemophilia A

Xia, Zunjinga; Lin, Jiea; Lu, Lingpingb; Kim, Cholc; Yu, Pinga; Qi, Minga,d,e,f

Author Information
Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis: June 2018 - Volume 29 - Issue 4 - p 381-386
doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000730
  • Open



Hemophilia A (OMIM #306700) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder. It is caused by deficiency or dysfunctional of the coagulation factor VIII protein, which is encoded by the F8 gene and affects one to two per 10 000 males [1]. Hemophilia A typically occurs in males, but mutations of the F8 gene with X-chromosome inactivation of females with hemophilia A have also been reported [2,3]. Patients with severe hemophilia A (factor VIII clotting activity less than 1%) are usually diagnosed before the age of 2 years [4] and often suffer from frequent spontaneous bleeding or excessive pain and swelling from minor injuries, surgery, or even tooth extractions. Patients with moderate hemophilia A (factor VIII clotting activity 1–5%) rarely bleed spontaneously and are diagnosed before 5–6-year old, whereas patients with mild hemophilia A (factor VIII clotting activity 5–40%) are diagnosed later in life [5]. Moderate and mild hemophilia A constitute about 10% and 30–40% of the total, respectively [6]. F8 mutation carriers do not usually exhibit bleeding symptoms, whereas heterozygous females with a factor VIII clotting activity level lower than 40% may be at risk of mild hemophilia A and slight bleeding may occur in those with a factor VIII clotting activity level between 35 and 60% or higher [7,8].

The F8 gene (NM_000132.3), located in the Xq28 region, spans 26 exons and encodes 2351 amino acids, forming an F8 precursor protein with the following domain structure: A1-A2-B-A3-C1-C2 [9]. The first 19 amino acids (–19) comprise a signal sequence, followed by the A1 domain (residues 1–336), A2 domain (residues 373–710), B domain (residues 741–1648), A3 domain (residues 1690–2019), C1 domain (residues 2020–2172), and C2 domain (residues 2173–2332). In plasma, the mature F8 protein of 2332 amino acids circulates as a heterodimer consisting of a heavy chain (A1-A2-B domains) and a light chain (A3-C1-C2 domains), which associate with each other via noncovalent bonds. It also interacts with von Willebrand factor (vWF) to stabilize this heterodimeric complex [10]. To date, more than 1000 variants of the F8 gene have been found and collected in the Human Genome Mutation Database ( [11], including point mutations (missense, nonsense mutations), splice mutations, insertions, deletions as well as rearrangements [12]. To illustrate the pathogenic effects of these mutations, studies have suggested the value of investigating their influence on F8 pre-mRNA. Therefore, cDNA sequencing and minigene assay were conducted to clarify this, whereas the bioinformatic tool Human Splicing Finder (HSF) and a three-dimensional model were also used to clearly elucidate the effects of these mutations.



The patient was a young boy diagnosed with moderate hemophilia A (factor VIII clotting activity 2.6%) at The Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. He has a clinical symptom with prolonged or delayed bleeding or poor wound healing following trauma such as the time when blood drawing and his grandfather suffered from hemophilia A, whereas his mother was an obligate carrier. Sample materials from the patient and his mother were collected with written informed consent using protocols approved by an institutional review board in compliance with all of the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Mutation screening

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood leukocytes in accordance with the guidelines of Blood DNA Mini Kit (SIGMEN, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China). All 26 exons and exon–intron boundaries were determined. Primers for PCR amplification were designed in accordance with sequences collected in the NCBI database (,NC_000023.11). PCR products were sequenced and the results were analyzed using the software DNAMAN.

In-vivo analysis

RNA extraction was conducted using RNAiso Plus Reagent (Takara, Otsu, Shiga, Japan). Then, the total RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA and amplified using the primers F8-cDNA-Exon22-24-F: GGATCAATCAATGCCTGGAGCA and F8-cDNA-Exon22-24-R: TCCTTCACATACATGCTGGTAAGC. The amplification consisted of 5 min at 95 °C; 35 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 54 °C, and 40 s at 72 °C; and then finally 10 min at 72 °C. PCR products were validated by Sanger sequencing.

In-silico analysis

The bioinformatic splicing tool HSF version 3.0 ( was applied to predict the possible influence of mutation on pre-mRNA splicing using the donor or acceptor splice site signal with the default threshold [13]. Primary structures were compared between the wild-type and mutant sequences using ORF Finder ( In addition, a three-dimensional model was established to predict the probable conformational change or discrepancy of molecular interaction associated with the mutation using the PyMol software (South San Francisco, California, USA).

Minigene construct, transfection, and RT-PCR

An in-vitro strategy was developed to clarify the effects of the splicing mutation. Appropriate primers covering the target region were designed for each intron/exon segment for the mutation, as follows: F8-Trap-Ex23-24-F: GTCActcgagGATGTTGGATGCTGTTGAGAAAC; F8-Trap-Ex23-24-R: GTCAggatccATACCTCAGAAGAAACAGTCAAGG. We then constructed wild-type and mutant mini genes using pSPL3 plasmid (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, California, USA). The plasmid and intron 22 mutation PCR products were double-digested using XhoI and BamHI endonucleases at 37 °C for 2 h. The inserts were then ligated into pSPL3 at 16 °C for 2 h using T4 DNA ligase (Invitrogen Corporation). Escherichia coli DH5α competent cells were transformed with both wild-type and mutant minigene constructs. The transformed constructs were then isolated using a Nucleoband Xtra Midi Kit (MN, Düren, Germany). The wild-type, mutant, or empty control vector was transfected into COS7 cells using Polyjet reagent (SignaGen Laboratories, Ijamsville, Maryland, USA). After 48 h, RNA was extracted and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (Primer Script Reverse Transcription Reagent; Takara, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan) was performed using the vector primers SD6 (5′-TCTGAGTCACCTGGACAACC-3′) and SA2 (5′-ATCTCAGTGGTATTTGTGAGC-3′). The PCR products for the wild-type, mutant, and empty vectors were analyzed on 2% TBE agarose gel and sequenced.


Mutation analysis

We performed sequencing of the F8 gene in the patient and identified an intronic variant (c.6430-3C>G or IVS22-3C>G) located in the less conserved 3′ splice region of intron 22 (Fig. 1a). This mutation was first reported in 2002 [14], but no experimental data have yet been presented on if and how it affects F8 pre-mRNA splicing. The patient's mother was also shown to be a heterozygous carrier of this mutation (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Identification of F8 gene mutation and analysis of its effect on mRNA splicing. (a) Sanger sequencing of the hemophilia A patient. (b) Sanger sequencing of the patient's mother. (c) Sanger sequencing of a normal control. (d) cDNA sequencing of the patient's mother. (e) Agarose gel electrophoresis and sequencing diagram of minigene assay. The circle with a slash indicates a premature termination codon in exon 23. Arrows indicate mutations. M, markers; lanes one and 2, recombinant contains mutated genomic DNA fragment, mutant-pSPLS; lanes three and 4, recombinant contains normal genomic DNA sequence, wild-type-pSPL3; lanes five and 6, empty pSPL3 plasmid.

In-silico splicing analysis

HSF can be used by clinicians, geneticists, and other researchers to identify splicing mutations, providing a better understanding of clinical and biological data. Here, this bioinformatic tool was applied and showed that the score of the mutation c.6430-3C>G decreases significantly, with the wild-type score being 94.07 in comparison with the mutant score of 83.77. Therefore, it is suspected that the mutant sequence may break the original splice site. Meanwhile, the mutation is related to a 53.87% increase in a new acceptor site associated with the atctctccatagAG of a new motif (Table 1). This produces a cryptic acceptor site and leads to a dinucleotide AG inclusion at the last site of intron 22, which may cause a frameshift mutation in the normal coding sequence and produce a truncated F8 protein with a premature termination codon in exon 23. Exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) and exonic splicing silencer (ESS) were also used for illustrating these results. As Table 1 shows, the motif atac(a>g)gG linked SR protein SRp 40 predicted to break the original ESE element by decreasing −11.21% of wild-type score; meanwhile, this mutation sequence also predicted to create an ESS element linked by heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1 protein and thus may greatly reduce the efficiency of transcription of the specific mutant allele. Alternatively, it may explain why the level of mutant transcript is markedly lower than that of the normal transcript. In brief, the score decrease of −10.95% indicated that this mutation may break the original splicing site of F8 gene and predicted to be a splicing mutation. In addition, the score increase of +53.87% manifested the production of a new possible acceptor site, which also forecasted a change of F8 pre-mRNA splicing in another aspect.

Table 1
Table 1:
In-silico predictions for 3′ acceptor splice sites using Human Splicing Finder, exonic splicing enhancer, and exonic splicing silencer

In-vivo and in-vitro splicing assays

The variant c.6430-3C>G of the F8 gene may be associated with a two-nucleotide inclusion at the 3′ splice site by creating a cryptic acceptor site, as determined using the splicing prediction software HSF. This mutation may affect pre-mRNA splicing; so, a test was performed to evaluate its pathogenicity. An in-vivo assay showed a minor peak representing a mutant sequence in the boundary of exon 22 and 23, in addition to a major normal sequence peak, which reflected a two-nucleotide inclusion at intron 22 in the 3′ splice site (Fig. 1d). In the minigene assay, the pSPL3 vector worked well by forming a 263-bp fragment in empty plasmid using SD6 and SA2 primers (Fig. 1e). Mutant-pSPL3 and wild-type-pSPL3 recombinants were associated with similar bands of 559 and 557 bp, respectively, indicating the inclusion of the two nucleotides AG at the end of the 3′ splice site of intron 22, as confirmed by Sanger sequencing. This intronic mutation led to a premature termination codon in exon 23 of the F8 protein, p.Val2144Glufs*12, which is consistent with the results of the in-vivo assay and bioinformatic prediction. Both in-vivo and in-vitro assays demonstrated the same effect on F8 pre-mRNA splicing.

Three-dimensional modeling analysis

The mutation identified in this study leads to a truncated F8 protein of 2129 amino acids, in comparison with the wild-type sequence of 2332 amino acids, due to an extra two-nucleotide inserted AG into the normal sequence, which results in a premature termination codon in exon 23 (Fig. 2). This leads to the mutant F8 protein having partial deletion of the C1 domain and total loss of the C2 domain. This partial deletion changes not only the primary structure but also the protein conformation, as well as the protein's interactions with other proteins and small molecules such as von Willebrand factor. This mutation may also change the formation of the F8 heterodimer or the stability of the whole F8 complex by abolishing or altering hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions, not only the brief conformational change of the F8 protein compared with that of the wild-type on the surface, as determined by three-dimensional modeling.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
Primary and three-dimensional structures of wild-type and mutant F8 proteins. (a) Amino acid sequences of the wild-type and mutant were subjected to a Blast search using ORF Finder, revealing that the mutation produced a truncated F8 protein. (b) Three-dimensional modeling of the F8 protein using PyMol software. (c) Three-dimensional modeling of the truncated F8 protein, which loses part of the C1 domain and all of the C2 domain, in comparison with the wild-type protein, as indicated by an arrow.


Mutations occurring in less conserved regions are usually overlooked by geneticists or physicians, which should be confirmed by experiments such as in vivo or minigene assays. The findings suggest that in-silico splicing tools are a powerful option for researchers to identify splicing variants in a time and cost-effective manner. A series of reports on the use of HSF software or the evaluation of its ability in predicting splice mutations has been published [15–17]. In addition, in-vivo splicing assay is a direct method to prove pathogenicity, whereas minigene assay can also be an effective validation technique when there is difficulty obtaining materials such as fresh blood or specific organs from patients.

The mutation c.6430-3C>G has been previously reported but it did not provide any experimental evidence except clinical phenotype [14]. In our in-vitro splicing assay, the mutant constructs produced a new acceptor site in intron 22. This was confirmed by the in-vivo splicing assay (Fig. 1d). However, one problem with this approach is that the quantity of mutant sequence is very low compared with wild-type cDNA sequence according to the ratio of peak heights from sequencing diagram (Fig. 1d). There are some possible reasons for this as follows. First, a general decrease of mutant transcript probably occurs via nonsense-mediated mRNA decay as reported in F13a [18], F5 [19], F11 [20], and vWF genes [21]. The second reason for the low level of mutant sequence is that the alteration of regulatory elements such as ESE and ESS, which act as cis-acting elements, regulates premature mRNA splicing via the SR protein family and hnRNP family protein, respectively. Alternatively, the motif change from tacagG to taGagG may also act as a new ESS by increasing 29.03% of the wild-type score. These regulatory elements may change the splicing site, as well as the transcriptional efficiency. The findings from this study suggest that the ESE and ESS elements may play important roles in the pre-mRNA splicing process and transcriptional efficiency. Third, the marked decrease in the level of mutant sequence may result from another unknown mechanism due to different experimental conditions.

It should be noted that deficient interaction between the F8 protein and the carrier protein vWF due to the lack of the sequence encoding the carboxyterminal end binding region (residues 2303–2332) [22,23] in the mutant F8 allele may play an important role in stabilizing the mutant protein by protecting the F8 protein from proteolytic attack [24]. There is another interacting region at the amino terminal end of the factor VIII light chain [25], but the affinity of binding of these two separate fragments to vWF is markedly lower than that for the intact F8 heterodimer [26]. The truncated protein destroyed the formation of a complex between F8 and vWF and prevented the next step of activation of the F8 protein in the blood coagulation process, which may result in a moderate symptom of the patient with prolonged or delayed bleeding or poor wound healing following trauma such as the time when blood drawing.

Most reported splice mutations causing hemophilia A were identified at mRNA level isolated from patients and predicted splicing efficiencies [27] or splicing effect using in-silico prediction tools of F8 gene. Mutations c.5587-93C>T and c.5999-277G>A were identified by in-vitro assays using pcDNA 3.1/V5-His-TOPO vector [28]. To our knowledge, this was the first report using pSPL3 plasmids as the vectors in identifying splice mutations of F8 gene, and it provided another further verification method in genetic, prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis of hemophilia A [29]. The pSPL3 exon trapping vector contains two exons SD and SA, and a functional intron, with transcription beginning following the SV40 promoter and ending at the late poly (A) signal [30]. In addition, the exon SD can recognize the nearest and the most probable acceptor site to complete the splicing process, which may imitate a in-vivo splicing environment. However, the entire F8 gene contains more than 180 000 nucleotides, whereas to our knowledge, the maximum capacity of 5000 nucleotides can be amplified and successfully cloned into the pSPL3 exon trapping vector due to the experimental limitations. Therefore, only a fragment of F8 gene sequence containing the mutation c.6430-3C>G was cloned into the pSPL3 vector. Actually, the in-vivo assay also illustrated the accuracy of the in-vitro splicing assay. In brief, to some extent, in-vitro splicing assay can be another valid method to auxiliarily diagnosis splicing mutations especially when experiments in vivo are difficult to carry out.


We thank the patient and his family for their cooperation and participation in the study. This study was partially supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 31371271) and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (grant number LZ14C060001). We are also grateful to Prof Jörg Gromoll for providing the pSPL3 vector.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Gitschier J, Wood WI, Goralka TM, Wion KL, Chen EY, Eaton DH, et al. Characterization of the human factor VIII gene. Nature 1984; 312:326–330.
2. Zheng J, Ma W, Xie B, Zhu M, Zhang C, Li J, et al. Severe female hemophilia A patient caused by a nonsense mutation (p.Gln1686X) of F8 gene combined with skewed X-chromosome inactivation. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2015; 26:977–978.
3. Song MJ, Kim HJ, Yoo KY, Park IA, Lee KO, Ki CS, et al. Molecular characterization of female hemophilia A by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis and X-chromosome inactivation study. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2011; 22:211–214.
4. Kulkarni R, Soucie JM, Lusher J, Presley R, Shapiro A, Gill J, et al. Sites of initial bleeding episodes, mode of delivery and age of diagnosis in babies with haemophilia diagnosed before the age of 2 years: a report from The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Universal Data Collection (UDC) project. Haemophilia 2009; 15:1281–1290.
5. Konkle BA, Huston H, Nakaya FS. Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A. Hemophilia A. University of Washington, GeneReviews. Seattle, Washington: 2000.
6. Bogdanova N, Markoff A, Eisert R, Wermes C, Pollmann H, Todorova A, et al. Spectrum of molecular defects and mutation detection rate in patients with mild and moderate hemophilia A. Hum Mutat 2007; 28:54–60.
7. Paroskie A, Gailani D, DeBaun MR, Sidonio RF Jr. A cross-sectional study of bleeding phenotype in haemophilia A carriers. Br J Haematol 2015; 170:223–228.
8. Plug I, Mauser-Bunschoten EP, Brocker-Vriends AH, van Amstel HK, van der Bom JG, van Diemen-Homan JE, et al. Bleeding in carriers of hemophilia. Blood 2006; 108:52–56.
9. Vehar GA, Keyt B, Eaton D, Rodriguez H, O’Brien DP, Rotblat F, et al. Structure of human factor VIII. Nature 1984; 312:337–342.
10. Lenting PJ, van Mourik JA, Mertens K. The life cycle of coagulation factor VIII in view of its structure and function. Blood 1998; 92:3983–3996.
11. Djambas Khayat C, Salem N, Chouery E, Corbani S, Moix I, Nicolas E, et al. Molecular analysis of F8 in Lebanese haemophilia A patients: novel mutations and phenotype–genotype correlation. Haemophilia 2008; 14:709–716.
12. Castaldo G, D’Argenio V, Nardiello P, Zarrilli F, Sanna V, Rocino A, et al. Haemophilia A: molecular insights. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007; 45:450–461.
13. Desmet FO, Hamroun D, Lalande M, Collod-Beroud G, Claustres M, Beroud C. Human Splicing Finder: an online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:e67.
14. Citron M, Godmilow L, Ganguly T, Ganguly A. High throughput mutation screening of the factor VIII gene (F8C) in hemophilia A: 37 novel mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation. Hum Mutat 2002; 20:267–274.
15. Colombo M, De Vecchi G, Caleca L, Foglia C, Ripamonti CB, Ficarazzi F, et al. Comparative in vitro and in silico analyses of variants in splicing regions of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes and characterization of novel pathogenic mutations. PLoS One 2013; 8:e57173.
16. Thery JC, Krieger S, Gaildrat P, Revillion F, Buisine MP, Killian A, et al. Contribution of bioinformatics predictions and functional splicing assays to the interpretation of unclassified variants of the BRCA genes. Eur J Hum Genet 2011; 19:1052–1058.
17. Houdayer C, Caux-Moncoutier V, Krieger S, Barrois M, Bonnet F, Bourdon V, et al. Guidelines for splicing analysis in molecular diagnosis derived from a set of 327 combined in silico/in vitro studies on BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat 2012; 33:1228–1238.
18. Mikkola H, Syrjälä M, Rasi V, Vahtera E, Hämäläinen E, Peltonen L, Palotie A. Deficiency in the A-subunit of coagulation factor XIII: two novel point mutations demonstrate different effects on transcript levels. Blood 1994; 84:517–525.
19. Montefusco MC, Duga S, Asselta R, Santagostino E, Mancuso G, Malcovati M, et al. A novel two base pair deletion in the factor V gene associated with severe factor V deficiency. Br J Haematol 2000; 111:1240–1246.
20. Solda G, Asselta R, Ghiotto R, Tenchini ML, Castaman G, Duga S. A type II mutation (Glu117stop), induction of allele-specific mRNA degradation and factor XI deficiency. Haematologica 2005; 90:1716–1718.
21. Plate M, Duga S, Baronciani L, La Marca S, Rubini V, Mannucci PM, et al. Premature termination codon mutations in the von Willebrand factor gene are associated with allele-specific and position-dependent mRNA decay. Haematologica 2010; 95:172–174.
22. Shima M, Nakai H, Scandella D, Tanaka I, Sawamoto Y, Kamisue S, et al. Common inhibitory effects of human anti-C2 domain inhibitor alloantibodies on factor VIII binding to von Willebrand factor. Br J Haematol 1995; 91:714–721.
23. Saenko EL, Shima M, Rajalakshmi KJ, Scandella D. A role for the C2 domain of factor VIII in binding to von Willebrand factor. J Biol Chem 1994; 269:11601–11605.
24. Koedam JA, Meijers JC, Sixma JJ, Bouma BN. Inactivation of human factor VIII by activated protein C. cofactor activity of protein S and protective effect of von Willebrand factor. J Clin Invest 1988; 82:1236–1243.
25. Precup JW, Kline BC, Fass DN. A monoclonal antibody to factor VIII inhibits von Willebrand factor binding and thrombin cleavage. Blood 1991; 77:1929–1936.
26. Saenko EL, Scandella D. The acidic region of the factor VIII light chain and the C2 domain together form the high affinity binding site for von Willebrand factor. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:18007–18014.
27. Pezeshkpoor B, Berkemeier AC, Czogalla KJ, Oldenburg J, El-Maarri O. Evidence of pathogenicity of a mutation in 3′ untranslated region causing mild haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2016; 22:598–603.
28. Castaman G, Giacomelli SH, Mancuso ME, D’Andrea G, Santacroce R, Sanna S, et al. Deep intronic variations may cause mild hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9:1541–1548.
29. Chen M, Chang SP, Ma GC, Lin WH, Chen HF, Chen SU, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of hemophilia A. Thromb J 2016; 14 (suppl 1):33.
30. Zhao X, Cui L, Lang Y, Liu T, Lu J, Wang C, et al. A recurrent deletion in the SLC5A2 gene including the intron 7 branch site responsible for familial renal glucosuria. Sci Rep 2016; 6:33920.

cDNA sequencing; F8 gene; Human Splicing Finder; intronic mutation; pSPL3 assay; PyMol

Copyright © 2018 YEAR Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.