Pulmonary embolism location is associated with the co-existence of the deep venous thrombosis

Abstract

 

Multiple studies have shown that in approximately half of individuals with pulmonary embolism (PE), the deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is not evident at the moment of PE diagnosis. The underlying factors and the origin of PE in these patients are not completely understood: missed DVT, embolization of DVT in its entirety, or de-novo PE being possible explanations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in PE patient with or without co-existing DVT. Sixty-three consecutive PE patients were included. Whole leg bilateral Doppler compression ultrasound was performed to all patients. The PE location and extension, C-reactive protein, platelet count, hemostatic markers FV, FVIII, FXIIIa, Fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor antigen, thrombomodulin were assessed. Thorough clinical assessment including echocardiography and pulmonary function tests were performed upon arrival and seven months later. The mean age of the patients was 57 years (SD 17.3) and 33 (52%) were women. Thirty-one patients (49.2%) had co-existing DVT. The presence of DVT was associated with the proximal location of the PE (100%), whereas none of the patients (n = 10) with exclusively peripheral PE had co-existing DVT. The PE extension, the measured hemostatic and inflammatory markers or the patient characteristics did not statistically differ between patients with isolated PE and PE with co-existing DVT. In roughly half of the PE patients no DVT could be detected. The location of the PE was associated with the presence of co-existing DVT. There were no differences in the PE extension, hemostatic markers or in the patient characteristic between patients with isolated PE or PE with co-existing DVT.