Capturing Essentials in Wound Photography Past, Present, and Future: A Proposed Algorithm for Standardization : Advances in Skin & Wound Care

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Capturing Essentials in Wound Photography Past, Present, and Future: A Proposed Algorithm for Standardization

Onuh, Ogechukwu C. BA; Brydges, Hilliard T. BS; Nasr, Hani MD; Savage, Elizabeth MSN, APRN, ACNS-BC, CWON, IIWCC-NYU; Gorenstein, Scott MD; Chiu, Ernest MD

Author Information
Advances in Skin & Wound Care 35(9):p 483-492, September 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000852564.21370.a4



To discuss a standardized methodology for wound photography with a focus on aiding clinicians in capturing high-fidelity images.


This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care.


After participating in this educational activity, the participant will be able to:

1. Discriminate the components of high-quality wound photography.

2. Identify the technological innovations that can augment clinical decision-making capacity.

3. Choose strategies that can help clinicians avoid adverse medicolegal outcomes.


According to a 2018 study, chronic wounds affect more than 8 million Americans and impose a substantial economic burden, with costs of care reaching upward of US $30 billion. As demographics in the US shift toward an aging population, these numbers are likely to progressively increase annually. Care of these patients relies heavily on photographic documentation, which catalogs disease progression and informs management decisions. This article elaborates a standardized methodology for wound photography and aims to aid clinicians in capturing high-fidelity images.

Recent Advances 

Technological advancements, notably digital cameras and smart phones, have exponentially improved both the rate and quality of wound photography, but their potential has yet to be fully realized.

Critical Issues 

Despite the indispensable nature of wound photography, literature detailing the photography process remains sparse. The absence of a standardized methodology for wound photography leads to subpar documentation, which ultimately hinders patient care. Further, information regarding medicolegal implications of wound photography remains fragmented and opaque to many clinicians. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of best practices in wound photography, medicolegal considerations, and an overview of emerging technologies.

Future Directions 

Photographic documentation is indispensable in the management of chronic wounds. Capturing consistent, high-fidelity images requires the adoption of standardized protocols. Emerging technologies, such as three-dimensional imagery, biosensors, and artificial intelligence, are poised to profoundly alter wound photography in the future. However, standardized protocols informed by sound clinical judgment will remain of paramount importance.


With millions impacted by the impediments of chronic wound care, it is imperative that clinicians and researchers continue to channel efforts toward creating the ultimate platform to facilitate clinical decision-making. With the advancement of technology dedicated to wound photography, patients and clinicians are equipped not only to enhance patient-centered care but also to provide care teams with an all-encompassing overview of their patients’ progress and assist with ideal forms of management.

Translational Relevance

Chronic, nonhealing wounds result from an aberration of the normal wound healing process. These wounds remain in a chronic inflammatory state, failing to progress to the proliferation and remodeling stages of wound healing.1 Factors that contribute to chronic wound formation include poor glycemic control, nutrition deficiencies, elevated body mass index, pain, renal insufficiency, atherosclerotic disease, anemia, smoking, morbidity status, inflammatory states, and psychological well-being.2 These wounds present a considerable economic and medical burden and warrant continued research.

Clinical Relevance

In lieu of digital advancements in photography, capabilities such as digitization-enabled autofocus and immediate review of photographs radically increased the rate and quality of wound photography. These user-friendly and intuitive devices enable easy and rapid shared communication between clinicians and patients, although the security of patient privacy remains a concern. Documentation of treatment progress in a hospital setting is indispensable to patient care.


The overall lifetime prevalence of chronic wounds is estimated to be 2.21 per 1,000 population.3 In 2018, Medicare amassed approximately US $31.7 billion in costs related to caring for the 8.2 million Americans affected by chronic wounds.4,5 Further, there is an increasing burden of chronic wounds. In 2006, total spending on skin ulcers and wound care accounted for US $11 billion,6 increasing to US $15 billion in 2012 and US $37 billion by 2016.7 However, these numbers may be underestimates; some studies have found annual spending in the US healthcare system to range anywhere from $25 billion to $100 billion.4 Specifically, the US population older than 65 years was more than 50 million in 2020, and companies marketing wound dressings as well as wound care products targeting chronic wounds are expected to exceed $22 billion in expenditures by 2024.8

Addressing this complex clinical challenge requires the integration of data from multiple sources. Implementation of wound summary sheets, electronically or physically, has enabled standardized, robust, and protocolled data capture.2 In addition, multidisciplinary wound conferences (similar in function to tumor boards utilized in oncology) have been developed to integrate often siloed inputs across medical, surgical, and other clinical providers. The results of these conferences include changes in management, increased adherence, and improved outcomes.9 Evaluating the status and progression of a chronic wound requires integration of multiple data points including laboratory values, inflammatory markers, pathology, and physical examination findings.2 Although a holistic evaluation integrating multiple data points is integral, direct visualization (and photographic documentation) remains the crux of evaluating healing and informing management decisions.

In this article, the authors detail the photography process and provide proposed algorithms for capturing clinically sound photographs. They discuss the purpose of these photographs in the clinical setting, as well as their medicolegal implications. In addition, they describe future innovations in wound photography and how providers can prepare to implement such innovations in an equitable and patient-centered manner.


Photographic technology has improved remarkably in recent years. Notably, cumbersome digital SLR and point-and-shoot cameras have largely been replaced by smartphone cameras that provide higher resolution images.10 However, cautionary limitations remain with using phone cameras, notably low-quality photographs in the healthcare setting resulting from increased storage and increased phone functionality.2,8 Currently, mobile cameras are frequently used because they provide ideal storage and quality; however, differences among mobile carriers and phone quality, as well as lack of standardization regarding where and how photographs are stored among mobile devices, present challenges.

At present, the lack of a formal standardized wound photography protocol permits room for less than adequate documentation, risking optimal patient care through increased costs and length of stay for delayed resolution, more frequent dressing changes, and persistent wound-associated pain. Although handheld smart devices boost feasibility and quantity of images, the standardization and quality of wound photography are often jeopardized, necessitating an in-depth overview of favorable components within wound photograph documentation.

Wound Analytic Tools

Analytic tools provide a framework to characterize patients’ wounds both quantitatively and qualitatively. Although manual analysis appears to be the most practical approach, human error hinders accuracy. Contrary to the limitations of manual analysis, digital planimetry and digital imaging show promise, offering accuracy in measuring larger, irregularly shaped wounds.11 Digital planimetry has become increasingly popular in the wound care setting because of its relative ease of use, low cost, and reduced user variability.12 The technology has rapidly advanced over the years with improved user interfaces that can track wound contraction over time and produce reader-friendly graphs to illustrate the healing progress. This visual aid can be shared with patients, family, and other members of the treatment team. Using analytic features, such as the ability to detect areas of granulation tissue, increases the sensitivity of the software to detect changes in the wound healing process over time.8


During the COVID-19 pandemic, the healthcare field was forced to adopt a remote approach to patient care. Video conferencing replaced office visits, and physicians adopted methods to circumnavigate the limitations of remote care. Although the criterion standard of wound evaluation remains thorough physical examination, telemedicine wound care visits can assist providers and patients reduce costs and increase availability by eliminating the need for transportation for frequent office visits, which is particularly useful in rural settings and for patients with limited mobility.13 Many wound care systems adopted photography, secure cloud storage, digital planimetry, and even three-dimensional (3D) technologies into their software, further increasing the accuracy of these assessments.14,15


Pressure Injuries

Pressure injuries are some of the most frequently encountered chronic wounds in inpatient and long-term care settings. These patients are commonly bedridden because of critical illness, chronic long-term disease processes, or severe disability. Photography can be extremely difficult in critically ill patients who may be mechanically ventilated and receiving multiple infusions; therefore, ensuring an adequate support staff for patient positioning is essential for patient safety. Important factors to consider when evaluating these wounds are adequate exposure and, if debridement is planned, obtaining a clinical photograph prior to and after the debridement. An additional consideration is the degree of undermining or tunneling. Pressure injuries are notorious for having extensive damage that extends beyond the border of the necrotic epithelial layer. After appropriate debridement, the degree of undermining and/or tunneling should be accurately measured using manual techniques and recorded systematically using “clock terms,” with the standard being 12 o’clock toward the patient’s head to evaluate healing progress.2,16

Venous Stasis Ulcerations

The incidence of venous insufficiency has increased recently because of the Western lifestyle, which leads to increased immobility and obesity. Impaired wound healing is the result of venous hypertension secondary to a multitude of factors, leading to chronic nonhealing wounds of the lower extremities. The criterion standard of treatment of open ulcerations is zinc oxide-impregnated, multilayer wraps, such as Unna boots, which provide compression to reduce swelling as well as chemical assistance in wound healing. When preparing a patient to photograph his/her wounds, the dressings must be gently removed in their entirety, and the wound should be copiously irrigated to remove all residual materials as well as any surrounding hyperkeratotic skin. Moreover, venous stasis ulcerations can be difficult to photograph if they are semicircumferential (a semi or half circle) or fully circumferential (a full circle). For the most accurate evaluation, serial photographs should be taken with the same perspective during each visit in order to properly assess edema control, ulcer size, evidence of infection, and other issues related to common treatment modalities (ie, contact dermatitis from zinc oxide dressings).2,16

Closely Grouped Wounds

Often, multiple wounds may be found in the same area of the body. When this is encountered, the recommendation is to treat any wounds <2 cm apart as the same wound. In these cases, the wound should be probed to rule out any subepithelial tunneling.2,16


Four notable aspects contribute to the quality of a photograph: the setting, exposure and background, lighting, and camera positioning (Figure 1). The holistic, methodical incorporation of these characteristics provides optimal outcomes in wound photography, where minutiae are significant for optimal patient care.16 Complete integration of these factors benefits clinical settings by improving accuracy of wound measurements at each stage and decreasing the nursing time required to record measurement at every visit because the standardized, detailed photographs would replace this process.

Figure 1:
PHOTO CAPTURING AND STORAGE FRAMEWORKThe holistic incorporation of setting, exposure and background, lighting, and camera positioning provides optimal outcomes in wound photography. Institutional involvement in implementation is critical for success.


The first step in ensuring quality wound photography is establishing a system appropriate to the patient’s setting. This requires training the clinical staff and establishing set guidelines to ensure standardization. Each institution and setting has a unique culture that influences the feasibility of clinical photography; however, ongoing institutional support of direct care providers increases adherence. For example, studies found that once-weekly multidisciplinary wound care rounds in the inpatient setting improved the rate of wound healing, decreased length of stay, and decreased wound-associated pain.2,16 Such rounds are an opportunity to coach the direct care clinician in best practice in real time. Timely feedback when trends of poor photography are noted can also assist in facilitating change. In addition, sequential, standardized photographs reviewed by wound care specialists in conjunction with other clinical and objective measures enable assessment of the trajectory of wound healing and may decrease time to intervention.

Exposure and Background

The importance of adequate exposure of the wound and surrounding healthy tissue cannot be understated. The patient should be placed in a position that is comfortable and safe while also providing adequate visualization and minimizing staff fatigue. All clothing and dressings should be removed in their entirety if possible, and soiled sheets should be replaced for those who are bedridden. The wound should be irrigated, and any loose necrotic debris discarded because it may obscure the view of the wound base, the most essential aspect of wound evaluation. The photographer should also ensure that any distracting features be removed from the background and surrounding area, with a clean, solid-color drape placed behind the focus area when possible.16


Providing adequate lighting can be difficult, but certain considerations should be considered to optimize image quality. Natural lighting is always preferred to its artificial counterpart; however, the latter may be used to augment darker settings. The camera should be positioned such that it is not facing any light sources, which could wash out the image color, and the flash should be avoided to reduce glare. Although the ideal lighting composition will vary based on the setting, the most important aspect is consistency when recording serial images for a single patient for proper comparison.16

Camera Positioning

The camera should be positioned such that the lens is parallel to the plane of the wound. The wound should be centered within the image, and camera placed at the proper distance for the specific lens being used to optimize focus. Today, many cameras have autofocus features that simplify this process. It is important to include one to two disposable rulers at the edges of the wound to assess the size, especially if digital planimetry will be used.16

Comparisons of substandard versus ideal camera positioning for wound photography are shown in Figures 2 and 3. Poorly photographed wound healing may include additional items within the photograph that do not contribute to clinical assessment (eg, ungloved hands) or display incomplete labeling or shadowing of the wound, blockage of the surrounding tissue of the wound, or an uncleaned wound with inadequate lighting (Figure 2). However, as displayed in Figure 3, ideal wound photography demonstrates full visualization of the cleaned wound and its surrounding tissue, with natural lighting, direct angulation, and the absence of background distractions, complete with a measurement tool to discern the scale of the wound.

Figure 2:
INSUFFICIENT WOUND PHOTOGRAPHYPoorly photographed wound healing may include (A) additional items within the photograph that do not contribute to clinical assessment, (B) blockage of the peripheral borders of the wound or incomplete labeling or shadowing of the wound, (C) an unfocused image, or (A, C, D) an uncleaned wound (eg, necrotic tissue debris, zinc oxide paste) with inadequate lighting.
Figure 3:
IDEAL WOUND PHOTOGRAPHYA-D, Complete visualization of the cleaned wound and its surrounding tissue, with natural lighting, direct angulation, and the absence of background distractions, complete with a measurement tool to discern the scale of the wound in contact with the patient.


Technological innovations will not preclude the need for sound clinical processes; instead, proper implementation of these tools requires patient-centered consideration from all stakeholders. These tools are not poised to replace clinicians but rather, when implemented properly, will likely reduce the burden on clinicians, provide novel clinical insights, augment clinical decision-making capacity, increase transparency for patients, and improve outcomes (Table).

Tool Advantages Disadvantages Future Directives
Hardware Three-dimensional imagery Provides depth perception in images Complicates documentation processes and increases uptake of storage with larger files Ample bandwidth to include depth perception in smart devices
Robotics Eliminates human error and reduces time requirements Costly and is not at the clinical translation phase Potential integration directly into bedside technology with tools equipped to address multiple cases efficiently
Smart glasses Automated documentation supplements clinical perspectives, improving the clinical decision-making process Poses a cybersecurity risk and is not yet at the clinical translation phase Integration with current software and workflow
Advanced imaging and biosensors Capture data not available to human eye Costly and requires advanced interpretation tools and clinical expertise Focus on addressing areas not available through traditional methods and eventually integrate into clinical workflows
Software Machine learning/artificial intelligence Glean novel insights and improve usability of novel hardware Has an inherent risk of bias and requires development team to manage the comprehensive, valid, and robust data Align with clinical judgment and foster device innovations
Transfer and storage Maintains security and privacy while supporting remote monitoring. Enables big data and artificial intelligence and gives patients access to their data Cybersecurity risks and lack of interoperability Focus on security, interoperability, and patient involvement in care; access to health data will empower patients and increase patient-provider rapport
Big data Enables processing of large volumes of data Requires robust information systems teams Engage diverse stakeholders
Clinical decision-making support Supports clinicians in evidence-based medicine, integrates providers, and coordinates care Difficult to integrate with clinical workflow; increased risk of “beeper” fatigue Focus on decreasing effort and not fatiguing clinicians


Three-dimensional Imagery

Three-dimensional (3D) imagery refers to digital renderings that capture height, width, and depth variables for each point. In translation to the clinic, 3D imagery has gained broad use in craniofacial analysis17 and, to a lesser extent, wound healing.18 The two primary modalities for capturing 3D imagery are 3D scans (which generate true 3D images by capturing each of the three data points directly) and 3D photogrammetry (which captures two-dimensional images that are processed to generate a 3D image).


Recently, major strides have been made in the use of robotics in surgery and other medical subspecialties. Demonstrated successes have prompted researchers to explore their use in wound image capture, such as in streamlining and standardizing the photographic process through robotic arms integrated at the bedside.19 The primary advantage of the use of robotics is automation, which reduces the time burden for wound care clinicians and decreases the opportunity for human error. However, at present, these tools remain prohibitively expensive and require technical advancement prior to clinical translation. Future tool development should emphasize cost-effectiveness by focusing on tools that are multipurpose and directly integrated into necessary equipment at the bedside.

Smart Devices (Glasses)

“Smart” devices or the “internet of things” refers to the trend of equipping nondigital devices with sensors and internet connectivity to enable data capture and feedback. At present, these devices are largely relegated to the consumer domain, but clinical use cases are innumerable—examples include digital scribes that automatically document examination findings,20 beds that sense pressure and redistribute weight,21 and wound dressings that sense temperature changes indicative of adverse events.22 In the case of wound photography, the most readily translatable and notable device are “smart” glasses.23 These glasses can be worn by clinicians to capture photographs and video from the wearer’s perspective and may be equipped with augmented reality capabilities as well.

Advantages of smart devices include data capture from the clinician’s perspective, automated documentation of examination findings, and real-time feedback through augmented reality. The primary disadvantage is increased cybersecurity risk in the setting of internet connectivity.

Advanced Imaging and Biosensors

At present, photography aims to render images that most closely resemble the human view, which means capturing data from the visible light spectrum. In the future, “photography” can be expanded to capture other forms of data salient to wound evaluation, including light in the nonvisible spectrum,24 photoacoustic data,25 and chemical analytes.26 These data can be used predictively, by identifying pathophysiologic processes prior to clinical visibility, and analytically. In the future, device developers should focus on addressing specific clinical problems, reducing costs, and ensuring tools integrate easily into clinical workflows.


Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence

Doubtless, the most impactful recent innovation is machine learning/artificial intelligence (ML/AI), which stands to impact nearly every facet of medical practice, wound photography included. Through computational methods, ML/AI analyzes large volumes of data to generate predictive and analytic models. Applications in wound healing include automated wound identification and tracing,27 diagnostic capabilities of specific pathologies,28,29 and treatment development.30

The advantages of ML/AI are numerous, including gleaning new insights, enabling novel hardware (ie, smart glasses using AI software to find wound edges), and reducing human computational burden (ie, parsing medical records and collating relevant data). However, owing to the complexity of these models and the need for large volumes of data for model training, ML/AI algorithms require a high level of expertise to generate. They also produce results through often opaque methods, which can be difficult to interpret and subject to bias. Future innovations should emphasize clinician involvement (to ensure sound tools align with sound clinical judgment)31 and be built on datasets involving broad, representative, and diverse populations.

Transfer, Cloud Storage, and Electronic Health Record Integration

Recent innovations in software and network design have increased the security and usability of transfer and storage processes. For example, novel extra transform load protocols are now capable of processing, transforming, validating, and deidentifying large volumes of data for sharing among multiple users.32 Cloud storage—storing data on off-site servers—enables institutions of all sizes to store and analyze large volumes of data. Further, improvement in data transfers allows patients unprecedented access to their health data, empowering patients to manage their own health.33 The advantages of developments in transfer and storage processes include improving data fidelity, enabling management of large volumes of data, and easing dissemination. However, issues with integration continue as these programs are adapted to unique data and capture/analysis software.

Big Data

Big data refers to the storage and analysis of large volumes of data, which are unmanageable with traditional software.34 These methods are driven by innovations in computation, statistics, and hardware, many of which are discussed above. This innovation is particularly relevant for wound photography because these technical advances enable streamlined storage and analysis of the high-volume, unstructured data generated by sequential digital wound photographs.

Clinical Decision Support Systems

Clinical decision support software (CDSS) encompasses front-end programs that utilize real-time data and integrate evidence-based best practice guidelines to aid clinicians in directing and coordinating care. Although CDSS has been leveraged across various medical specialties, it has particular use in coordinating care that requires interdisciplinary teams. In chronic wound care, CDSS is being explored and met with positive feedback from providers.35


The standardization of wound photography is indispensable for documenting patient healthcare. Further, the proposed algorithm (Figure 4) provides the necessary framework to establish a methodical approach to enable optimal patient care and longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) documentation. In an era of rapidly advancing technology, personal electronic devices pose risks in medical settings when misused, including providing concrete evidence for the medicolegal team in cases of malpractice.36 The benefits and pitfalls of media documentation, such as image capture, warrant a thorough understanding of each stage of capturing, storing, transferring, analyzing, and utilizing media captures in the medical context of wound care.

Figure 4:
PROPOSED ALGORITHM FOR IMAGE CAPTURE AND DATA STORAGEThe proposed algorithm provides the necessary framework to establish a methodical approach to enable optimal patient care and longitudinal electronic health record documentation. Institutions can apply this flexible template within their unique framework while upholding the five essential factors.

Photograph Capture

A complete skin examination, including wound photography when relevant, will document quality patient care in the event of legal complications down the road. Prior legal decisions have deemed the inclusion of clothing, markings, or other unique characteristics of patients in photographs to be breaches of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA),37 so sufficient training is crucial to establish uniform understanding across providers and avoid legal action. Further, clear, color photography is advisable given the admissible nature of images as central evidence in a legal setting. When capturing images, providers risk injuring the patient, particularly those with elevated body mass indices or critically ill patients with multiple infusions. Clinicians who wish to obtain adequate photographs should be properly informed how to best navigate the parameters of patient safety and necessary documentation.

Documenting the complete extent of patient care for third parties establishes the certainty that adequate care is given. However, insufficient imaging can lead to problematic encounters in the legal setting, particularly when dealing with underage patients under the protection of a guardian where clinicians may meet resistance, or when patients cannot consent verbally or physically. To mitigate potential setbacks in a setting where a patient cannot consent, including pediatric or palliative care contexts, US states follow national guidelines enabling consent to be obtained by a legal guardian or advanced care proxy for those patients.38 With established frameworks in place for unique circumstances such as these, patient hospital courses are less likely to have missed days of image documentation resulting from avoidable logistical obstacles that could provoke medicolegal conflicts if mismanaged.

Obtaining Consent

Authorization of the patient’s consent should be incorporated into the admission, including confirming the patient’s decision-making ability and establishing a healthcare proxy for those who lack capacity.39 A documented consent form serves to protect both the patient and provider in the court of law and poses significant risk in medicolegal setting when not implemented appropriately, as witnessed in cases including, but not limited to, Ashcraft v King, Duncan v Scottsdale Medical Imaging, and Siegel v Mt Sinai Hospital of Cleveland.39 Inadequate photography can lead to a false sense of inadequate care in a medicolegal setting; however, standardization of photographs removes bias and decreases the risk of discredited documentations because systematic image capturing will show the progression of wound care.

Ensuring Patient Confidentiality in Data Transfer and Storage

Wound photography poses a significant risk to patient confidentiality and can lead to breaches in HIPAA. Providers must recognize a multitude of factors that could lead to violations. First, consider the device used to capture the image. Although the portability and quality of smartphone cameras today may be tempting, avoid their use at all costs. Hospital-provided, encrypted smartphones and cameras should be provided to the staff and used exclusively for personal protected health information. Storage of the patient images is another important factor to consider: many EHR systems have incorporated a camera function into their software, enabling the clinician to upload photographs directly into a patient’s chart without saving a copy onto the data memory of the device. When required, saving images of multiple patients onto the data memory of an approved device requires safe image-labeling practices. All identifiable patient characteristics (ie, face, tattoos, etc) should be omitted, and neither the patient’s name nor date of birth should be included in image labeling. Instead, the patient’s medical record number along with the date and time should be used to properly identify patient images for upload into the medical record without compromising confidentiality.

In a medicolegal context, standardization is key to confirm that bias was eliminated from the perspective of the photographer. Photographs must only be used to address optimal patient care in order to hinder misuse of photography. Der Rijt and Hoffman40 detail the ethical considerations of clinical photography, specifically in the context of smartphones, attesting to the use of technological advancements in longitudinal data storage in the setting of secure EHR software.40 In Stubbs v North Medical Center, improper dissemination of a patient’s protected health information was ruled in favor of the defendant (the patient) despite the provider receiving consent for the initial photograph capture,39 further emphasizing the need to ascertain security in the transfer and storage of photograph data in adherence to HIPAA guidelines.


Digital photography is an inextricable component of wound care management. To maximize the utility provided by technology in wound photography, the authors proposed an algorithm that entails provider training to ensure adequate photograph background, exposure of the wound and surrounding healthy tissue, lighting, distance, and lens angulation. This algorithm serves as a template to create a precedent as wound photography technology improves and ultimately is incorporated into standard wound care practice. The technological advancements witnessed over the years in photography provide an ideal framework for continued improvement of patient care from a medical documentation perspective.


  • 1. Current smartphones, digital cameras, and the collective efforts toward hardware and software developments have increased clinical data for providers and also created opportunities for a detailed overview of wound healing that would otherwise be unavailable to both patients and their providers.
  • 2. The newfound feasibility in media documentation comes with benefits, including supplying ample data to analyze in a research setting, helping improve medical management, and enabling longitudinal observation in remote settings in which in-person interactions are difficult or prohibited.
  • 3. Photographs should be embedded securely in the patient’s EHR for future reference.
  • 4. Standardizing wound photography provides increased transparency between patients and providers with visual representations capturing the healing process.


1. Zhao R, Liang H, Clarke E, Jackson C, Xue M. Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:2085.
2. Howell RS, Gorenstein S, Gillette BM, et al. A framework to assist providers in the management of patients with chronic, nonhealing wounds. Adv Skin Wound Care 2018;31:491–501.
3. Martinengo L, Olsson M, Bajpai R, et al. Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Epidemiol 2019;29:8–15.
4. Zindle JK, Wolinsky E, Bogie KM. A review of animal models from 2015 to 2020 for preclinical chronic wounds relevant to human health. J Tissue Viability 2021;30:291–300.
5. Levine JM, Brandeis G, Namagiri S, Spinner R. Wound care consultation in postacute/long-term care: characteristics and practice implications. Adv Skin Wound Care 2021;34:417–21.
6. Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, et al. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55:490–500.
7. Gurtner GC, Chapman MA. Regenerative medicine: charting a new course in wound healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2016;5:314–28.
8. Howell RS, Kohan LS, Woods JS, et al. Wound Care Center of Excellence: a process for continuous monitoring and improvement of wound care quality. Adv Skin Wound Care 2018;31:204–13.
9. Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2019;8:39–48.
10. Queen D, Harding K. Is wound photography becoming sloppy?Int Wound J 2020;17(1):5–6.
11. Jørgensen LB, Sørensen JA, Jemec GB, Yderstræde KB. Methods to assess area and volume of wounds—a systematic review. Int Wound J 2016;13:540–53.
12. Foltynski P, Ladyzynski P. Digital planimetry with a new adaptive calibration procedure results in accurate and precise wound area measurement at curved surfaces. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022;16:128–36.
13. Chen L, Cheng L, Gao W, Chen D, Wang C, Ran X. Telemedicine in chronic wound management: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020;25;8:e15574.
14. Kim PJ, Homsi HA, Sachdeva M, Mufti A, Sibbald RG. Chronic wound telemedicine models before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Adv Skin Wound Care 2022;35:87–94.
15. Kummerow Broman K, Gaskill CE, Faqih A, et al. Evaluation of wound photography for remote postoperative assessment of surgical site infections. JAMA Surg 2019;154:117–24.
16. Rennert R, Golinko M, Kaplan D, Flattau A, Brem H. Standardization of wound photography using the wound electronic medical record. Adv Skin Wound Care 2009;22:32–8.
17. Reategui A, Phillips S, Dinis J, Junn A, Parsaei Y, Yang J, Lopez J, Steinbacher DM. Postoperative edema resolution post-orthognathic triple jaw surgery: a three-dimensional volumetric analysis. J Craniofac Surg 2022;33:512–6.
18. Pavlovčič U, Jezeršek M. Handheld 3-dimensional wound measuring system. Skin Res Technol 2018;24:326–33.
19. Filko D, Marijanović D, Nyarko EK. Automatic robot-driven 3D reconstruction system for chronic wounds. Sensors (Basel) 2021;21:8308.
20. Quiroz JC, Laranjo L, Kocaballi AB, Berkovsky S, Rezazadegan D, Coiera E. Challenges of developing a digital scribe to reduce clinical documentation burden. NPJ Digit Med 2019;2:114.
21. Yi C-H, Kim H-S, Yoo W-G, Kim M-H, Kwon O-Y. The effects of different types of automated inclining bed and tilt angle on body-pressure redistribution. Adv Skin Wound Care 2009;22:259–64.
22. Lou D, Pang Q, Pei X, et al. Flexible wound healing system for pro-regeneration, temperature monitoring and infection early warning. Biosens Bioelectron 2020;162:112275.
23. Aldaz G, Shluzas LA, Pickham D, et al. Hands-free image capture, data tagging and transfer using Google Glass: a pilot study for improved wound care management. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121179.
24. Wahabzada M, Besser M, Khosravani M, et al. Monitoring wound healing in a 3D wound model by hyperspectral imaging and efficient clustering. PLoS One 2017;12:e0186425.
25. Wang Y, Zhan Y, Harris LM, Khan S, Xia J. A portable three-dimensional photoacoustic tomography system for imaging of chronic foot ulcers. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2019;9:799–806.
26. Mariani F, Serafini M, Gualandi I, et al. Advanced wound dressing for real-time pH monitoring. ACS Sens 2021;6:2366–77.
27. Wang C, Anisuzzaman DM, Williamson V, et al. Fully automatic wound segmentation with deep convolutional neural networks. Sci Rep 2020;10:21897.
28. Anisuzzaman DM, Wang C, Rostami B, Gopalakrishnan S, Niezgoda J, Yu Z. Image-based artificial intelligence in wound assessment: a systematic review [published online December 20, 2021]. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2021;10.1089/wound.2021.0091.
29. Ohura N, Mitsuno R, Sakisaka M, et al. Convolutional neural networks for wound detection: the role of artificial intelligence in wound care. J Wound Care 2019;28(Supp10):S13–S24.
30. Mukherjee S, Yadav G, Kumar R. Recent trends in stem cell-based therapies and applications of artificial intelligence in regenerative medicine. World J Stem Cells 2021;13:521–41.
31. Howell RS, Liu HH, Khan AA, et al. Development of a method for clinical evaluation of artificial intelligence-based digital wound assessment tools. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e217234.
32. Prasser F, Spengler H, Bild R, Eicher J, Kuhn KA. Privacy-enhancing ETL—processes for biomedical data. Int J Med Inform 2019;126:72–81.
33. Lewinski AA, Drake C, Shaw RJ, et al. Bridging the integration gap between patient-generated blood glucose data and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2019;26:667–72.
34. Woods JS, Saxena M, Nagamine T, et al. The future of data-driven wound care. AORN J 2018;107:455–63.
35. Vogel S, Richter J, Wache S, et al. Evaluation of a clinical decision support system in the domain of chronic wound management. In: Transforming Biomedical Informatics and Health Information Access: Don Lindberg and the U.S. National Library of Medicine. IOS Press. 2022. Last accessed June 20, 2022.
36. Papadakos PJ, Ingham TM. Digital technologies in healthcare: opportunities and risk for health systems and providers. In: Szalados JE, ed. The Medical-Legal Aspects of Acute Care Medicine. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2021.
37. Code of Federal Regulations. 45 CFR § 164.512—Uses and disclosures for which an authorization or opportunity to agree or object is not required. Legal Information Institute.
38. Mahar PD, Foley PA, Sheed-Finck A, Baker CS. Legal considerations of consent and privacy in the context of clinical photography in Australian medical practice. Med J Aust 2013;198:48–9.
39. Underwood PY, Wyatt KD, Greaney C, et al. Mobile point-of-care medical photography: legal considerations for health care providers. J Leg Med 2020;40:247–63.
40. Van der Rijt R, Hoffman S. Ethical considerations of clinical photography in an area of emerging technology and smartphones. J Med Ethics 2014;40:211–2.

chronic wounds; disease progression; documentation; medicolegal implications; photography; wound photography

Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.