Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Improved Communication Facilitates Chronic Wound Care for Patients, Families, and Professionals

Sibbald, R. Gary, BSc, MD, DSc (Hons), MEd, FRCPC (Med Derm), FAAD, MAPWCA, JM; Ayello, ElizabethA., PhD, RN, CWON, ETN, MAPWCA, FAAN

Advances in Skin & Wound Care: November 2018 - Volume 31 - Issue 11 - p 485
doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000546578.64802.54
DEPARTMENTS: EDITORIAL

R. Gary Sibbald, BSc, MD, DSc (Hons), MEd, FRCPC (Med Derm), FAAD, MAPWCA, JM, is the co–Editor-in-Chief of Advances in Skin & Wound Care; Professor, Medicine and Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Director, International Interprofessional Wound Care Course & Masters of Science in Community Health (Prevention & Wound Care), Dalla Lana Faculty of Public Health, University of Toronto; and President (2008-2012), World Union of Wound Healing Societies. Elizabeth A. Ayello, PhD, RN, CWON, ETN, MAPWCA, FAAN, is the co–Editor-in-Chief of Advances in Skin & Wound Care; Faculty, Excelsior College School of Nursing, Albany, New York; President, World Council of Enterostomal Therapists, President, Ayello Harris & Associates, Inc, Copake, New York; and President (1999) National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel.

November is family caregiver recognition month in the US.1 This is an ideal time to reflect on skin and wound care challenges faced by our patients and their families. Implementation of the Caregiver Advise Record Enable (CARE) Act has resulted in an urgent call for professionals to facilitate care through enhanced communication and patient/caregiver education. We need to use this opportunity to develop new ways to partner with our patients and their families, especially when wounds are not healing at the expected rate.2–4

This month’s CE/CME article provides a framework or supporting structure to systematically review and optimize care for persons with nonhealing wounds. This framework could evolve into a useful checklist if the items are validated as compulsory criteria to establish a healing trajectory. The components of the framework can be divided into the Wound Bed Preparation model, including patient-centered concerns along with the treatment of the cause, ability to heal, and local wound care.5

Patient-centered concerns revolve around pain, activities of daily living, and the patients’ circle of care. If pain is categorized on an 11-point numerical rating scale (0–10, where 0 is no pain), most patients can live with a pain level of 3 or 4 and carry out activities of daily living. Wound care providers need to take coresponsibility for care negotiated with the patient and his or her circle of care. For example, patients with pain should be offered options for treating both nociceptive and neuropathic pain with adjustable medications and diversional therapies. An adequate support network can facilitate attendance at healthcare appointments, good nutrition, adherence to treatment, and a clean home environment.

Most wound care professionals agree that persons with chronic wounds can present with a variety of comorbidities and factors that can impact on wound healing. The complexity of these cases requires care coordination and communication to facilitate a mutually agreeable plan of care. Wounds that are not in a healing trajectory especially require a comprehensive assessment (ideally with an interprofessional team) to establish a precise diagnosis and identify modifying factors that may or may not be correctable.6 These assessments should involve the “whole patient” and not only the “hole in the patient!”

In addition to vascular function, the CE/CME discusses a number of other variables that can delay healing:

  • Suboptimal nutrition corrected with dietary counseling and healthy eating
  • Smoking tobacco with counseling to reduce or stop
  • Inadequate diabetes control optimized with hemoglobin A1c as close to 7 as possible
  • Abnormal laboratory studies (low hemoglobin, impaired liver and kidney function)
  • Other coexisting diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, malignancy) or drugs (steroids, immunosuppressive agents) that can impair healing
  • Clinical signs of infection that need to be treated with antimicrobial therapy

Outlining key factors to consider facilitates interprofessional team communication and ultimately potentially enhances treatment. Ideally, we can heal most wounds with a framework for improved diagnosis, identification of modifiable factors, and evaluation of patient response to the treatment. The quality of life can also be improved for patients with nonhealable wounds by addressing patient-centered concerns and concentrating on the needs of the whole person.

Figure

Figure

R. Gary Sibbald, BSc, MD, DSc (Hons), MEd, FRCPC (Med Derm), FAAD, MAPWCA, JM

Figure

Figure

Elizabeth A. Ayello, PhD, RN, CWON, ETN, MAPWCA, FAAN

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. National Alliance for Caregiving. http://www.caregiving.org/caregiversmonth. Last accessed September 27, 2018.
2. Reinhard SC, Ryan E. From Home Alone to the CARE Act: collaboration for family caregivers. AARP. August 2017. http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/ppi/2017/08/from-home-alone-to-the-care-act.pdf. Last accessed September 27, 2018.
3. AARP. Family caregiving: care at home. http://www.aarp.org/caregiving/home-care. Last accessed September 27, 2018.
4. Reinhard SC, Levine C, Samis S. Home alone: family caregivers providing complex chronic care. AARP. October 2012. http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/research/public_policy_institute/health/home-alone-family-caregivers-providing-complex-chronic-care-rev-AARP-ppi-health.pdf. Last accessed September 27, 2018.
5. Sibbald RG, Elliott JA, Ayello EA, Somayaji R. Optimizing the moisture management tightrope with wound bed preparation 2015. Adv Skin Wound Care 2015;28(10):466–76.
6. Lau J, Tatsioni A, Balk E, et al. Usual Care in the Management of Chronic Wounds: A Review of the Recent Literature. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.
Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.