Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Letters to the Editor

Indication for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Is 65 Years Old, Too Old?

Giani, Marco,; Forlini, Clarissa; Fumagalli, Benedetta; Rona, Roberto; Pesenti, Antonio,; Foti, Giuseppe,

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001273

To the Editor:

We read with interest the paper by Deatrick et al.1 published in the Journal. The authors assessed the impact of age on mortality for patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO) and found that it represents an independent predictor of survival at hospital discharge. Deatrick et al.1 reported an extremely low survival rate in the (very) small subgroup of patients of 65 years of age and older treated with V-V ECMO support. To confirm these findings, we retrospectively analyzed data of V-V ECMO patients admitted from August 2009 to November 2019 to our ICU, excluding patients under 18 years of age. ANOVA or Wilcoxon test were used to compare baseline variables between groups. Mortality rates at hospital discharge were compared by means of Pearson’s χ2 test. One hundred forty-four ppts were treated with V-V ECMO in the study period. Overall hospital mortality was 30.5%. Table 1, Supplemental Digital Content, http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A541 shows baseline parameters and outcomes of the study population stratified by age.

Despite no difference in severity scores at baseline, higher mortality was observed in older patients, in accordance with the findings of Deatrick et al. However, in contrast to their results, an acceptable survival rate (56%) was recorded in patients over 65 years of age, consistent with other previous studies.2 Except for hypertension, which was present in 69% of patients over 65, patients in this subgroup had few comorbidities: 26% of patients had diabetes, 23% autoimmune disease, 15% chronic heart failure, 8% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 7% chronic liver disease, and 7% immunodepression. No patient had active malignancies, peripheral vasculopathy, or chronic renal disease.

Age is a well-known risk factor for mortality in critical patients.3–5 ECMO represent one of the most invasive procedure in the critical patients, and its application in elderly patients might be associated with poor outcome.1,6 Specific scores7,8 have been developed to predict mortality risk in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome treated with ECMO. Narrowing indications for ECMO to patients with few comorbidities and good performance status at baseline may allow to obtain acceptable survival rates in older patients (i.e., 60–70 years). Our data and previous literature2 show that almost one out of two V-V ECMO patients over 65 years of age can be discharged alive from the hospital. Therefore, in our opinion, age over 65 should not be considered a firm contraindication for the use of ECMO.

References

1. Deatrick KB, Mazzeffi MA, Galvagno SM, Tesoriero RB, Kaczoroswki DJ, Herr DL, et al. Outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when stratified by age: how old is too old? ASAIO J. 66:946–951, 2020.
2. Mendiratta P, Tang X, Collins RT 2nd, Rycus P, Brogan TV, Prodhan P. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for respiratory failure in the elderly: a review of the extracorporeal life support organization registry. ASAIO J. 2014; 60:385–390
3. de Rooij SE, Govers A, Korevaar JC, Abu-Hanna A, Levi M, de Jonge E. Short-term and long-term mortality in very elderly patients admitted to an intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 32:1039–1044
4. Dardaine V, Dequin PF, Ripault H, Constans T, Giniès G. Outcome of older patients requiring ventilatory support in intensive care: impact of nutritional status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001; 49:564–570
5. Sim YS, Jung H, Shin TR, Kim DG, Park SM. Mortality and outcomes in very elderly patients 90 years of age or older admitted to the ICU. Respir Care. 2015; 60:347–355
6. Karagiannidis C, Brodie D, Strassmann S, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: evolving epidemiology and mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2016; 42:889–896
7. Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Rozé H, et al. The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39:1704–1713
8. Schmidt M, Bailey M, Sheldrake J, et al. Predicting survival after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory failure. The Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189:1374–1382

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © ASAIO 2020