An inverted U-shaped incision was made in the perineum. The dissection was carried out between the urethra and the anterior rectal wall, which led to the identification of the urethrorectal channel with the help of the guidewire. The channel was disconnected from the rectal wall and closed with 6-0 PDS sutures. The abdomen was then opened using a lower midline incision. The left rectus abdominis muscle was then dissected preserving the inferior blood supply. Further dissection from the abdominal side resulted in the opening up of the space between the rectum and the bladder/urethra. This left rectus abdominis muscle flap was then interposed between the urethra and the rectum. A 6-Fr catheter was passed through the ventral penile urethral meatus into the bladder and retained. A covering colostomy was performed.
The postoperative period was uneventful. The urethral catheter was removed after 2 weeks. The covering colostomy was closed after 3 months. At 18-month follow-up the child is voiding with a good urinary stream through the ventral penile meatus.
Urethral triplication or trifurcation is a congenital anomaly characterized by the presence of accessory urethra originating from the bladder, bladder neck or urethra, and opening externally at any position on the penis, perineum or the anorectum. A tract is said to be complete when the accessory tract opens externally or onto the distal part of the normal urethra. It is considered incomplete when the accessory tract is blind ending 1.
Many theories have been proposed to explain the embryology of an accessory urethra. These include abnormal termination of the Mullerian duct, failure of growth of the urogenital sinus, defective fusion of the mesoderm in the midline and continued splitting of the urorectal septum 2. However, none of the theories was able to adequately explain the complete spectrum of urethral triplication. In 2008, Van der Putte 3 suggested that urethral triplication may be due to an abnormal division of the urogenital sinus. Currently, this theory has been accepted widely to explain the embryology of urethral triplication.
There are two broad categories of urethral triplication reported in the literature: three orifices ending on the penis or penoscrotum (anterior), or Y triplication with an anorectal or perineal opening. Clinical presentation depends on the anatomical subtype, which includes urinary incontinence, urinary tract infection, multiple urinary streams, discharging sinuses, abnormal appearance or a primarily anal urinary stream as in our case. Radiological investigations such as voiding cystourethrogram and retrograde urethrogram are useful in delineating the anatomy. Urodynamic study may be helpful in determining the status of the bladder and the external sphincter in those presenting with incontinence.
Eleven cases reported in the literature are summarized to provide a comprehensive understanding of this rare lower urinary tract anomaly (Table 1) 1–2,5–12.
Determining the dominant functional urethra is a critical first step in the management of a patient with accessory urethra 12. In the majority of cases of Y duplication of the urethra the ventral perineal meatus is dominant, whereas the dorsal penile meatus is hypoplastic. Hence, the ventral perineal meatus is preserved and lengthened by means of various methods to reach the glans penis. A previous study from our centre by Sinha et al. described the use of anterior rectal wall for posterior urethral lengthening 13. However, in some instances of Y triplication the penile meatus may be of adequate calibre, which can serve as the functional urethra once the rectal opening is closed. Thus, determining the adequacy and functionality of the penile urethra in Y triplication can simplify and improve surgical outcome.
Urethral triplication is an extremely rare entity. Unlike a Y duplication in which the penile meatus is hypoplastic, a Y triplication can have a penile meatus of adequate calibre, which can be used as a functional conduit. Most patients with urethral triplication have been found to have associated malformations. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of urethral triplication seen in association with fatty filum terminale, tethered cord and vertebral anomalies.
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Forgaard DM, Ansell JS. Trifurcation of the anterior urethra: a case report. J Urol 1966; 95:785–787.
2. Kajbafzadeh A-M, Taleb S, Montaser-Kouhsari L, Tanhaeivash R, Monajemzadeh M, Mehdizadeh M. Urethral triplication and urethrovasal reflux in 5-day-old male infant. Urology 2011; 78:186–188.
3. Van der Putte SCJ. Duplication of Accessory Phallic Urethra (Urethra Triplication) in the Female, Signaling Mesenchymal Interruptions of the Cloacal Membrane as a Cause for Sagittal Urethral Duplications. Pediatr Dev Pathol
4. Toguri AG, Churchill BM, Rabinowitz R. Y-type urethral triplication. J Urol 1977; 118:684.
5. Zimmermann H, Mildenberger H. Posterior urethral duplication and triplication in the male. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15:212–214.
6. Wirtshafter A, Carrion HM, Morillo G, Politano VA. Complete trifurcation of the urethra. J Urol 1980; 123:431–432.
7. Schmeller NT, Schirmer HK. Trifurcation of the urethra: a case report. J Urol 1982; 127:545–546.
8. Zattoni F, Gennari T, Rovasio A. Y-type urethral triplication. Br J Urol 1982; 54:195.
9. Gülerçe Z, Nazli O, Killi R, Girgin C, Erhan O. Trifurcation of the urethra: a case report. J Urol 1992; 148:403–404.
10. Hirselj DA, Lowe GK, Jayanthi VR. Urethral triplication with meatuses terminating on the penis: a rare case presenting with bifid urinary stream. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39:1227–1229.
11. Lin H, Shen X, Geng H, Xu M. Treatment and medical followup of a boy with urethral triplication. Urology 2012; 80:214–215.
12. Tourchi A, Kajbafzadeh A-M, Khakpour M, Mohammadi Nejad P, Mousavian A-A, Kalantary M. Concomitant urethral triplication, bladder, and colon duplication. Int Urol Nephrol 2012; 44:41–44.
13. Sinha S, Sen S, Chacko J, Thomas G, Karl S, Mathai J. Yduplication of the male urethra: use of anterior anorectal wall for posterior urethral lengthening. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22:529–531.