Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Measurement of penile size in healthy Nigerian newborns using conventional penile length measurement technique

Ogundoyin, Olakayode O.; Lawal, Taiwo A.; Olulana, Dare I.

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/01.XPS.0000491012.28417.28
  • Free



Examination of the external genitalia is an integral part of physical examinations of all newborns at birth. A penis of inadequate length or appearance in a newborn or infant can cause parental anxiety and may also be a source of severe psychological disturbance in the child at puberty, affecting body image 1. Normal penile length (PL) and penile width (PW) are important functionally and for cosmetic reasons 2. Penile dimension is also important as a rough guide for some corrective surgeries of anomalies of the penis. Measurement of penile dimensions (PL and PW) at birth represents the endocrine environment in utero; therefore, size abnormalities of the penis in neonates might be the first sign of underlying pituitary or hypothalamic hormonal deficiencies or genetic disorders such as congenital hypopituitarism 3,4. Since a normal reference value for the newborn penis (length: 3.5±0.7 cm and width: 1.1±0.2 cm) was established by Feldman and Smith 5, various studies have developed standards for different ethnic groups 6–8. These reference values are valuable in the diagnosis and assessment of penile anomalies such as micropenis, macropenis and ambiguous genitalia in the newborn 9. In determining the reference values, the authors 2,8 have used the Schonfeld’s method, which is the standard [conventional penile length measurement (CPLM)], whereas Ozbey, et al.10 developed another method that makes use of the syringe to measure penile size in newborns. Although both methods are reliable and comparable, one can be selected for use instead of the other in any paediatric setting.

This study seeks to establish a standard for male newborn Nigerians using the CPLM technique.

Patients and methods

This prospective cross-sectional study of full-term male infants within the first 72 h of life was conducted over a year period from April, 2013 to March, 2014 in Ibadan, South–West Nigeria. Ibadan is home to the Yoruba ethnic group in Nigeria, and as such the majority of mothers in the town are of the Yoruba ethnic group. The study thus included only mothers from that ethnic group. A total of 675 healthy, male neonates were recruited into the study from among the 1508 male neonates delivered at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Adeoyo Maternity Hospital, Ibadan, and Our Lady of Apostles Catholic Hospital, Oluyoro, Ibadan, over the study period. These hospitals are known for delivering standard obstetric care and account for the majority of hospital deliveries in Ibadan. Informed consent was obtained from the mothers of all individual participating newborns. Neonates with hypospadias, epispadias, disorders of sexual differentiation and other anomalies of the penis or abnormalities of testicular descent were excluded. Children of mothers from other ethnic groups apart from Yorubas, those with family histories of birth defects or delayed pregnancies and mothers who had illnesses in the first trimester or used medications – both orthodox and traditional during the first trimester of pregnancy – were excluded. Children who were delivered at gestational ages less than 37 completed weeks and those who were postdate were also excluded from the study. Children of elderly mothers and those with delayed pregnancies were excluded. In addition, neonates whose mothers refused to provide consent to carry out the examination were excluded. Under warm environmental conditions, all newborn babies of consenting mothers had complete examination of their external genitalia, including measurement of penile size (PL and PW), whereas perinatal history was obtained from the mothers and were entered into a proforma.

For measuring PL, the Schonfeld’s method (CPLM) was used. Using the CPLM technique, PL was determined by measuring the stretched distance from the symphysis pubis to the tip of the glans penis. The rounded end of a wooden spatula was placed against the pubic ramus alongside the stretched penis, and the shaft of the penis was stretched to the point of increased resistance; the length between the pubic ramus and the tip of the glans (excluding the prepuce) was marked on the spatula and this was measured with a ruler. The width of the mid penile shaft was also measured to determine the width of the penis using a Vernier calliper. The callipers were sterilized before use on each patient. The penile measurements were performed twice on each participant, and the mean values were recorded.

All procedures (including examination and measurement of penile dimensions of the newborns) performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the joint University of Ibadan/University College Hospital Ethical Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. Ethics approval was obtained from the joint University of Ibadan/University College Hospital Ethical Committee before the study commenced.

Statistical analysis

Analysis of the data was carried out using statistical package for the social sciences (version 21; SPSS Inc., USA). The mean±SD of the PLs and PWs were determined, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to express the relationship between the penile dimensions (PL and PW) and birth weight, gestational age, maternal age at birth and the parity of the mothers.


A total of 675 male newborns were recruited into the study. The mean age of the babies was 2.51±6.05 days, and the gestational age at delivery ranged from 37 to 42 weeks with a mean of 39.55±1.32 weeks. The mean age of the mothers was 30.00±4.91 years with a range of 16–45 years, and the mean parity of the mothers was 2.1±1.22 with a range of 1–7. PL ranged between 1.4 and 5.5 cm with a mean of 3.14±0.65 cm (Fig. 1) Using the third percentile, the following penile dimensions could be considered as micropenis – PL of 2.0 cm and PW of 0.8 cm (Fig. 2). PW ranged between 0.8 and 1.4 cm with a mean of 0.97±0.15 cm.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
Histogram showing the distribution of penile lengths.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
Percentile distribution of penile length.

There were significant correlations between gestational age and birth weight and PL (r=0.13, P=0.001 and r=0.15, P=0.046) as well as between gestational age and PW (r=0.10, P=0.015). Maternal age was inversely related to PL (r=−0.04, P=0.257) and PW (r=−0.09, P=0.821), respectively, and parity was inversely related to PW (r=−0.02, P=0.628), but these were not statistically significant (Table 1). There was a significant correlation between PL and PW (r=0.22, P<0.001).

Table 1
Table 1:
Relationship between penile dimensions and maternal age, maternal parity, gestational age and birth weight of the neonates


Defining the normal penile size in neonates is paramount to making accurate diagnosis of abnormalities of the penis and the medical and surgical management of these anomalies. Accurate evaluation of penile size is critical in determining the prognosis of the anomaly. When comparing the mean PL from this study (3.14±0.65) with similar ones from other parts of the world, the mean PL measured by the CPLM technique is similar to lengths reported in Iran (3.21±0.35 cm) 4, China (3.1±0.41 cm) 11, Saudi Arabia (3.55±0.57 cm) 2, Singapore (3.5±0.4 cm) 12, UK (3.04±0.43 cm) 13 and Turkey (3.26±0.56 cm) 10 using the same technique.

The CPLM may be associated with significant interobserver variation, especially when used on a circumcised penis; however, the elimination of the prepubic fat when the syringe method is used to give objective results makes it a credible alternative 10. Variations observed in different studies may be explained by ethnic differences between populations, the size of the population studied, the sizes and selection of participants and the methods used to determine penile dimensions 14. Other contributory factors may include nutrition, genetic 15 and endocrine 16 status of the patients. The third percentile value of penile dimensions obtained in this study can be used as a standard in assessing the penile size of the newborns in this environment to reduce the rate of over diagnosing micropenis as this may impact on its management and prevent undue delay in the surgical management of such micropenis with hypospadias and other penile anomalies that may be amenable to surgical correction.

The penile size (PL and PW) is a clinical measure of the degree of androgenization in utero. The inverse relationship observed between penile dimensions and maternal age and parity in this study, although not significant, is similar to the reported findings of Romano-Riquer et al. 16, who observed that PL decreased with increasing maternal age, whereas PW increased with increasing birth weight but decreased with increasing maternal age. Therefore, the fact that older pregnant women tend to have lower testosterone levels 17,18 and testosterone levels seem to be inversely related to the birth size 19 may explain the reported inverse relationship observed between maternal age and penile dimensions 16, in this study.


The penile dimensions obtained in this study are comparable with reported values in previous studies in other parts of the world. However, the fact that this study was carried out among one of the three major ethnic groups in Nigeria may make a larger and multicentre study across various ethnic and age groups necessary to develop normative values typical of an African population.


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


1. Reilly JM, Woodhouse CR. Small penis and the male sexual role. J Urol 1989; 142 (Pt 2):569–571.
2. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002; 23:314–316.
3. Tuladhar R, Davis PG, Batch J, Doyle LW. Establishment of a normal range of penile length in preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health 1998; 34:471–473.
4. Alaee E, Gharib MJ, Fouladinejad M. Penile length and anogenital distance in male newborns from different Iranian ethnicities in golestan province. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16:e16729.
5. Feldman KW, Smith DW. Fetal phallic growth and penile standards for newborn male infants. J Pediatr 1975; 86:395–398.
6. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter: penile size in the newborn infant. J Pediatr 1975; 87:663–664.
7. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, Schmidt IM, et al.. Postnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 154:125–129.
8. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F, Beyazova U. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology 2007; 70:572–575.
9. Scommegna S, Galeazzi D, Picone S, Farinelli E, Agostino R, Bozzao A, et al.. Neonatal identification of pituitary aplasia: a life-saving diagnosis. Review of five cases. Horm Res 2004; 62:10–16.
10. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring penile length in newborns and infants. BJU Int 1999; 84:1093–1094.
11. Fork TF, Hon KL, So HK, Wong E, Ng PC, Chang A, et al.. Normative data of penile lengths for term Chinese newborn. Biol Neonate 2005; 87:242–245.
12. Ting TH, Wu LL. Penile length of term newborn infants in multiracial Malaysia. Singapore Med J 2009; 50:817–821.
13. Thankamony A, Ong KK, Dunger DB, Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Anogenital distance from birth to two years: a population study. Environ Health Perspect 2009; 11:1786–1790.
14. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary according to ethnicity? Horm Res 2001; 55:278–281.
15. Wang CH, Lin WD, Bau DT, Tsai CH, Liu DC, Tsai FJ. Penile length of normal boys in Taiwan. Acta Paediatr Taiwan 2006; 47:293–296.
16. Romano-Riquer SP, Hernández-Avila M, Gladen BC, Cupul-Uicab LA, Longnecker MP. Reliability and determinants of anogenital distance and penis dimensions in male newborns from Chiapas, Mexico. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21:219–228.
17. Carlsen SM, Jacobsen G, Bjerve KS. Androgen levels in pregnant women decrease with increasing maternal age. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2003; 63:23–26.
18. Troisi R, Potischman N, Roberts J, Siiteri P, Daftary A, Sims C, Hoover RN. Associations of maternal and umbilical cord hormone concentrations with maternal, gestational and neonatal factors (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14:347–355.
19. Carlsen SM, Jacobsen G, Romundstad P. Maternal testosterone levels during pregnancy are associated with offspring size at birth. Eur J Endocrinol 2006; 155:365–370.
© 2016 Annals of Pediatric Surgery