All cases of acute PPs (11 patients) were treated conservatively; of them, nine (81.8%) improved completely with conservative management (seven traumatic and two nontraumatic), whereas the remaining two patients needed surgical intervention because one had ruptured PP and the other showed no signs of improvement during the follow-up period.
Seven patients classified as chronic PPs (four traumatic and three nontraumatic) required surgical intervention. The intervention was elective in six patients and emergency in one patient who had intestinal obstruction due to gastrointestinal compression. Only one of 19 patients had congenital PP and required surgical intervention. Thus, the total number of cases that required surgical intervention was 10 (52.6%).
There was no significant difference between traumatic and nontraumatic PP as regards PP type, chance of spontaneous resolution, and need for surgery (Table 3).
The follow-up period ranged from 6 to 24 months (13.6 months). One patient had wound infection, and two patients had external pancreatic fistulae, which was managed conservatively for 3–4 weeks, and closed spontaneously. No recurrence or mortality was recorded during the follow-up period (Table 1). The histopathological results of all specimens confirmed the provisional diagnosis.
Although pancreatitis is uncommon in the pediatric population, it often has a severe clinical course. Less than 5% of patients with pancreatitis develop complications, which include PP, pancreatic necrosis, and hemorrhagic pancreatitis 5. The cause of PP in children is somewhat different from that in adults; alcohol and gall stone are more common causes in adults, whereas trauma is the leading cause of PPs in children, especially blunt abdominal trauma (more than 60%) 6,7. These nearly match with that reported in our study, in which the history of trauma was detected in 63.2% of cases, whereas 36.8% had no history of trauma. There was one case that was discovered during the prenatal period and confirmed after surgical exploration. This case is extremely rare and was not documented before, except in two cases in one literature 8.
According to the Atlanta classification 9, PPs are classified into acute PPs and chronic PPs on the basis of the nature of underlying diseases. Acute PP arises as a consequence of acute pancreatitis or pancreatic trauma, whereas a chronic PP arises as a consequence of chronic pancreatitis. The PP is also classified into acute and chronic on the basis of the time interval between etiological insult and presentation (usually 4–6 weeks) in an attempt to help decide the timing of surgical intervention 10. In this work, the PP that had history less than 6 weeks was considered as acute PP, whereas PP that had a history 6 weeks or more was considered as chronic PP.
Govil and colleagues stated that, most PPs are uncomplicated with few nonspecific symptoms, except when they are large. Complicated PP may have uncommon modes of presentation, including bleeding, rupture, infection, gastric outlet obstruction, and jaundice due to obstruction of the common bile duct 11. In our study, constant abdominal pain was the main presenting symptom: abdominal mass was palpated in 10 cases (52.6%); one patient presented with acute rupture and another two cases presented with gastrointestinal compression.
Abdominal ultrasound and computed tomographic scan were the main diagnostic modalities used in the diagnosis of PPs in this study. Other modalities can be used in the diagnosis and evaluation of PPs. Endoscopic ultrasonography can visualize the cyst and its relationship with the vascular structure, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography can provide better images of the pancreatic ductal anatomy and detect any communication between the duct and pseudocyst. However, these investigations are difficult to be applied in children in comparison with adults and need experienced personnel 12,13.
The natural history of PPs in children differs from that in adults. The spontaneous resolution of acute PP on medical therapy is more frequent in children than in adults (about 70% in post-traumatic PPs) 14,15. The mechanism of spontaneous resolution is unclear. It has been postulated that it may be due to spontaneous drainage into pancreatic duct or into the neighboring gut 16.
Teh et al.17 treated PPs in a series of 24 children. They noted that the resolution of symptoms during expectant management occurred in 29% of patients, whereas 71% of patients required surgical intervention. In our study, 47.4% of our patients improved completely with conservative treatment and 52.6% of patients needed surgical intervention.
Many investigators recommended intervention for PP that persists longer than 6 weeks because spontaneous resolution is unlikely to happen after this time and the wall of the cyst becomes mature enough with good thickness, which allows internal drainage 7,14,18. Parks and colleagues 19 reported in their study that spontaneous resolution occurred in 42 patients who had PPs for more than 6 weeks and in 8% of 13 pseudocysts that had been present for 7–12 weeks. The management of PP in our study depended on the time of PP presentation. PP with a history of less than 6 weeks was managed with expectant treatment, whereas PP that had a history of 6 weeks or more was managed with surgical operation.
In our study, 72.7% of PPs greater than 6 cm needed surgery, whereas 27.3% improved with conservative treatment. However, in PPs less than 6 cm in diameter, 25% needed surgery and 75% improved with conservative approach. These results are nearly in agreement with that of Yeo et al.20, who reported that 67% of PPs greater than 6 cm in diameter required surgical intervention, whereas 40% of those less than 6 cm in size required operative intervention. More recent studies, however, have found that PPs greater than 10 cm in diameter may also resolve spontaneously 21. All cases of PPs with a size of 10 cm or more encountered in our study were managed with surgical intervention.
In contrast, Teh et al.17 stated that the size of PP in children was not a significant factor in determining the need for surgical intervention, instead the etiology was more important in choosing the method of management: 45% of post-traumatic PPs required intervention, whereas 92% of nontraumatic PPs improved with conservative approach. In our series, the cause of PPs was statistically insignificant in determining the method of treatment.
According to many authors, the initial conservative treatment is the treatment of choice of early cases of PPs in children because the liability of occurrence of complications, unlike in adults, is low 12,22–24. The complication rate of conservative treatment in the study by Teh et al.17 was 8.3%. In our study, the complication rate of conservative management was 15.7% (two patients out of 11).
There are three interventional approaches for the active management of PP, including percutaneous drainage, endoscopic drainage, and surgical interventions (excision, external drainage, and internal drainage) 11. The choice of treatment modality depends on the nature of the cyst, its position, and the local experience. In our institution, surgical intervention was the only available approach.
Percutaneous drainage is the least invasive method, but it is associated with higher complications, including recurrence and pancreatic fistula and higher mortality rates 25,26. Endoscopic drainage requires experienced surgically minded endoscopist and sophisticated endoscopy armamentarium Despite encouraging results with this therapeutic modality, direct translation of their results into the pediatric population cannot be assumed 22,27–29.
Surgical internal drainage is the mainstay of treatment. It is still a valid option with good results in children. The recurrence rate ranges from 0 to 6% 11,17,22. In our research, three types of operations were applied, including cystgastrostomy, cystoduodenostomy, or cystjejunostomy. Selection of drainage procedure was largely determined by the anatomic location of the PP (Table 1) 30.
External drainage of PPs is associated with a mortality rate of 6%, recurrence rate of 22%, and an incidence of external fistula of 10–29% 31,32. The persistence of fistula is usually due to communication of PP with main pancreatic duct. In our series, two patients were managed with partial excision and external drainage. They developed external fistula that fortunately responded to conservative management and closed spontaneously after 3–4 weeks.
Although the conservative management of PPs is a successful effective method of treatment in children with acute, small-sized, and post-traumatic cysts with low incidence of occurrence of complication, surgical treatment is a valid, safe, effective, and satisfactory treatment in complicated cases.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Klippel G. Pseudocysts and other non-neoplastic cysts of the pancreas. Semin Diagn Pathol 2000; 17:7–15.
2. Andren-Sandberg A, Christos D. Pancreatic pseudocyst in the 21st century: classification, pathophysiology, anatomic consideration and treatment. J Pancreas 2004; 5:8–24.
3. Bhattacharya D, Ammori BJ. Minimally invasive approaches to the management of pancreatic pseudocysts: review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003; 13:141–148.
4. Wade JW. Twenty-five year experience with pancreatic pseudocysts. Are we making progress? Am J Surg 1985; 149:705–708.
5. Weizman Z, Durie PR. Acute pancreatitis in childhood. J Pediatr 1988; 113 (Pt 1):24–29.
6. Cooney DR, Crosfeld JL. Operative management of pancreatic pseudocysts in infants and children: a review of 75 cases. Ann Surg 1975; 182:590–596.
7. Ford EG, Hardin WD Jr, Mahour GH, woolley MM. Pseudocysts of the pancreas in children. Am Surg 1990; 56:384–387.
8. Kurrer MO, Ternberg JL, Langer JC. Congenital pancreatic pseudocyst: report of two cases. J Pediatr Surg 1996; 31:1581–1583.
9. Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, GA, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993; 128:586–590.
10. D’Egidio A, Schein M. Pancreatic pseudocysts: a proposed classification and its management implications. Br J Surg 1991; 78:981–984.
11. Govil D, Khanna S, Virmani S, Jha A, Kumar S. Surgery for complicated pancreatic pseudocysts – report from a tertiary center. Indian J Gastroenterol 2004; 23:33–34.
12. Haluszka O, Campbell A, Horvath K. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocyst in children. Gastroenterol Endosc 2002; 55:128–131.
13. Bridoux-Henno L, Dabadie A, Rambeau M, Gall EL, Bretagne JF. Successful endoscopic drainage of a pancreatic pseudocyst in a 17-month-old boy. Eur J Pediatr 2004; 163:482–484.
14. Kisra M, Ettayebi F, Benhammou M. Pseudocysts of the pancreas in children in Morocco. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34:1327–1329.
15. Vane DW. Ashcraft KW, Holder TM. Lesions of the pancreas. Textbook of pediatric surgery, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1993. 525–534.
16. Warshaw AL, Castillo CF, Rattner DW. Zinner MJ, Schwartz SI, Ellis H, Ashley SW, Mc Fadder DW. Pancreatic cysts, pseudocysts and fistulas. Textbook of Maingot’s abdominal surgery. London, UK: Mc-Graw Hill; 2001. 1917–1940.
17. Teh SH, Pham TH, Lee A, Stavlo PL, Hanna AM, Moir C. Pancreatic pseudocyst in children: the impact of management strategies on outcome. J Pediatr Surg 2006; 41:1889–1893.
18. Vitas GJ, Sarr MG. Selected management of pancreatic pseudocysts: operative versus expectant management. Surgery 1992; 111:123–130.
19. Parks RW, Tzovaras G, Diamond T, Rowlands BJ. Management of pancreatic pseudocysts. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2000; 82:383–387.
20. Yeo CJ, Bastidas JA, Lynch-Nyhan A, Fishman EK, Zinner MJ, Cameron JL. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts documented by computed tomography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170:411–417.
21. Bradley EL, Clements JL Jr, Gonzalez AC. The natural history of pancreatic pseudocysts: a unified concept of management. Am J Surg 1979; 137:135–141.
22. Gumaste VV, Aron J. Pseudocyst management: endoscopic drainage and other emerging techniques. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44:326–331.
23. Karaguzel G, Senocak ME, Buyukpamukcu N, Hicsonmez A. Surgical management of the pancreatic pseudocyst in children: a long-term evaluation. J Pediatr Surg 1995; 30:777–780.
24. Miyano T. O’Neill JA, Rowe MI, Grosfeld JL, Fonkalsrud EW, Coran AG. The pancreas. Textbook of pediatric surgery, 5th ed. London, UK: Mosby; 1998. 1527–1544.
25. Ratan SK, Rattan KN, Rohilla S, Magu S. Cystogastrostomy: a valid option for treating pancreatic pseudocysts of children in developing countries. Pediatr Surg Int 2006; 22:532–535.
26. Moran B, Rew DA, Johnson CD. Pancreatic pseudocyst should be treated by surgical drainage. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1994; 76:54–58.
27. Nealon WH, Walser E. Surgical management of complications associated with percutaneous and/or endoscopic management of pseudocyst of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2005; 241:948–960.
28. Baron TH. Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts. J Gastrointest Surg 2008; 12:369–372.
29. Lehman GA. Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts continues to evolve. Gastrointest Endosc 1995; 42:273–275.
30. Melman L, Azar R, Beddow K, Brunt LM, Halpin VJ, Eagon JC, et al.. Primary and overall success rates for clinical outcomes after laparoscopic, endoscopic, and open pancreatic cystgastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocysts. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:267–271.
31. Bumpers HL, Bradley EL. Howard J, Idezuki Y, Ihse I, Prinz R. Treatment of pancreatic pseudocysts. Surgical diseases of the pancreas. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1998. 423–432.
© 2015 Annals of Pediatric Surgery
32. Bradley EL, Gonzalez AC, Clements JL Jr. Acute pancreatic pseudocysts: incidence and implications. Ann Surg 1976; 184:734–737.