The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19: A single-center study of 434 patients : Annals of Thoracic Medicine

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Advanced Search
Original Article: PDF Only

The diagnostic accuracy of perfusion-only scan in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the era of COVID-19

A single-center study of 434 patients

Cengiz, Turgut Bora; Abdelrahman, Ahmed; Rohren, Scott A.; Doucette, John; Ghesani, Munir

Author Information

Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA

Address for correspondence: Dr. Turgut Bora Cengiz, 1190 5th Ave MC Level Room NM 160, New York, 10029 NY, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Received February 09, 2023

Received in revised form February 25, 2023

Accepted March 09, 2023

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Annals of Thoracic Medicine ():, May 16, 2023. | DOI: 10.4103/atm.atm_42_23
  • Open
  • PAP

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: 

There is a paucity of data in the literature regarding the diagnostic accuracy of perfusion (Q)-only studies in the absence of ventilation images. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Q-only imaging in the pandemic era.

METHODS: 

Patients who underwent Q-only imaging for pulmonary embolism between March 2020 and February 2021 were analyzed. Patients who underwent lung quantification analysis were excluded. Q-only test results were reported as per modified PIOPED II criteria and single positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging was performed as needed. Patients were considered concordant or discordant by correlating the Q-only results with CT angiogram (CTA) or clinical diagnosis made through chart review. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated after excluding intermediate probability and nondiagnostic studies.

RESULTS: 

Four hundred and thirty-four patients were identified. One hundred and twenty-eight patients (29.4%) underwent ultrasound Doppler, 37 patients (8.5%) underwent CTA, and 16 patients (3.6%) underwent both. After excluding patients with intermediate probability or nondiagnostic studies and who did not have follow-up (a total of 87 patients [20%]), 347 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. The combined planar and SPECT/CT sensitivity and specificity were 85.4% (72.2%–93.9% confidence interval [CI]) and 98.7% (96.9%–98.6% CI), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) of the Q-only imaging was 89.1% (77.3%–95.1% CI) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.2% (96.4%–99% CI). The sensitivity with SPECT/CT reached 100% (CI: 71.5%–100%) with a specificity of 92.3% (CI: 64%–99.8%). The PPV was 85.7% (CI: 62.1%–95.6%) and the NPV was 100%.

CONCLUSION: 

Q-only imaging provides clinically acceptable results. The sensitivity of the Q-only scan is increased when coupled with SPECT/CT.

© 2023 Annals of Thoracic Medicine | Published by Wolters Kluwer – Medknow