Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Article - Retrospective Study

Prevalence of Anterior Loop and other Patterns of Mental Nerve in a Sample Population of an Indian City: A Retrospective Study

Giroh, Versha Rani,; Hebbale, Manjula; Mhapuskar, Amit; Modak, Rakhee; Agarwal, Priya1

Author Information
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery: Jan–Jun 2022 - Volume 12 - Issue 1 - p 11-16
doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_103_21
  • Open

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The mental nerve (MN), which is one of the terminal branches of the inferior alveolar nerve, emerges through the mental foramen to supply the skin and mucous membrane of the buccal vestibule of the lower jaw from the medial border of the masseter muscle to the midline.[1] In the mental canal, the MN continues upward and emerges from the mental foramen in conjunction with blood vessels. The mental portion of the inferior alveolar canal is also classified into three types according to the course of the canal: straight, vertical, and anterior loop (AL) [Figure 1]. The final portion of the inferior alveolar nerve sometimes passes below the inferior border and the anterior wall of the mental foramen and after giving off a small incisive branch, it curves back to enter the foramen and emerge into the soft tissues becoming the MN. This anatomical feature is also known as “anterior loop” of the MN.[2] Beltrán etal.[3] have described the interforaminal region of the mandible as possessing a MN with a path that creates an AL before entering the mental foramina and another division in this point (anterior to AL) as mandibular incisive canal.

F1
Figure 1:
Reconstructed panoramic images showing different patterns of mental nerve

Failure to identify this loop preoperatively may result in iatrogenic damage to the nerve. Damage to the AL results in paraesthesia, anaesthesia, dysaesthesia, or even overt pain in the area innervated by the MN. To avoid injury to this entity, varying safety margins from the mental foramen of up to 6 mm have been advocated by different authors.[4]

Hence, the study was intended to estimate the prevalence of AL and other patterns as well as the morphometric analysis of AL relative to the defined standard references using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was a retrospective study where the data was collected from a randomly selected CBCT centre during 2016 - 2017. Four hundred eighty-seven (487) CBCT scans were visualised, of which four hundred CBCT (400) scans which met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. Four hundred (400) CBCT scans consisting of 800 hemimandibles bilaterally were analysed.

The Ethical Clearance (OMR-IX-3/2015-16) was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee of Bharati Vidyapeeth (deemed to be university) Dental college and Hospital, Pune, India. All procedures performed in the study were conducted in accordance with the ethics standards given in 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, as revised in 2013.

The scan time of the machine used ranged from 13 s to 18.6 s. Resolution ranged from 90 mm to 180 mm and slice thickness range was from 0.09 mm to 0.18 mm. CBCT scans made for any dental or maxillofacial diagnostic or treatment planning purpose with small-to-medium field of view were included in the study.

The patients included in the study were in the age range of 20–60 years; good-quality CBCT scans showing all the mandibular teeth present from the left second premolar to the right second premolar, as well as the mental foramen area, were included in the study.

CBCT scans with any fracture or pathology around the mental foramina and mandibular canal region and with retained teeth, impacted teeth, and missing teeth were eliminated as there may be the possibility of permanent tooth buds which obscure the mental foramen region.

Multiplanar reconstructions including axial, coronal, and sagittal images were obtained and evaluated concurrently by two trained and calibrated observers. Disagreements were discussed and a consensus was reached. The intergroup comparison of continuous variables was done using an independent sample test for two groups. The inter-rater reliability analysis was performed using intraclass correlation analysis. The inter-rater agreement was performed using Cohen’s kappa statistic. There was a significantly higher inter-rater agreement between the two observers.

The criteria given by Iyengar etal.[1] and Sahman and Sisman[5] for the assessment of different patterns of MN were used in the study. Iyengar etal.[1] catergorised the MN pattern as straight, looping, or perpendicular using panoramic radiography, while Sahman and Sisman[5] categorised the patterns as straight, vertical, and ALs using CBCT.

On reconstructed panoramic image[15] [Figure 1], the presence of different patterns of MN – straight, vertical, and ALs was evaluated.

On coronal view[6] [Figure 2], the distance between the AL and the fixed landmarks on the mandible was calculated. The fixed landmarks considered were Buccal cortical plate (BCP), Lingual cortical plate (LCP), and Inferior border of the mandible (IBM).

F2
Figure 2:
(a) Reconstructed panoramic image showing the presence of a straight pattern on the right side and anterior loop on the left side (red arrow). Coronal section showing the distance between the most anterior point of the anterior loop and the (b) Buccal cortical plate (BCP) (c) Lingual cortical plate (LCP) (d) Inferior border of the mandible (IBM)

On axial view[7] [Figure 3], the presence or absence of the AL was evaluated. If AL is present, the length of the AL was measured, i.e., the distance from the medial margin of the mental foramen to the most anterior part of the loop in millimeters.

F3
Figure 3:
Axial section showing the length of the anterior loop (AL length = 3.0mm)

In the entire study, the value of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All the hypotheses were formulated using two-tailed alternatives against each null hypothesis (hypothesis of no difference). The entire data were statistically analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 23.0, IBM Corporation, USA) for Microsoft Windows.

RESULTS

The CBCT scans of 400 cases comprising 800 hemimandibles were evaluated. In the present study, the straight pattern was the most common type observed in a total of 537 sides (67.1%) which comprised 270 (67.5%) on the right side and 267 (66.8%) on the left side.

The vertical pattern was observed in a total of 208 sides (26%), 101 (25.3%) on the right side and 107 (26.8%) on the left side. The distribution of right- and left-sided patterns of MN did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) [Graph 1].

F4
Graph 1:
The prevalence of different patterns of mental nerve

A total of 55 (6.9%) ALs were detected in 42 (10.8%) cases. The prevalence of AL pattern was found to be 29 (7.3%) on the right side and 26 (6.5%) on the left side. Of these cases, 29 (7.5%) had a unilateral AL and 13 (3.3%) had bilateral AL. The overall (both sides) prevalence of AL pattern was 6.9% [Table 1].

T1
Table 1:
Represents the prevalence of the anterior loop of mental nerve

The straight pattern was more common in females, whereas the vertical pattern and the AL were more common in males. The distribution of overall (on either side) pattern of MN was highly significant between male and female participants studied (P < 0.01) [Graph 2].

F5
Graph 2:
The prevalence of different patterns of mental nerve according to the sides (right and left) and gender

AL length was found to be in a range of 2.4–6.6 mm. The mean length of the AL was 3.3 ± 0.63 mm. AL was longer on the right side than on the left side [Graph 3]. The length of the AL was found to be more in males than the females, i.e., 3.46 ± 0.865 mm in males and 3.2 ± 0.6 mm in females. However, this difference in the measurement was not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

F6
Graph 3:
The distribution of the mean of various measurements of the anterior loop to reference points on the mandible according to sides

Of the 55 ALs identified, the distance of the AL from the BCP, LCP, and IBM was also calculated. The distance between the AL and BCP was 2.27 ± 0.94 mm on the right side and 2.43 ± 1.36 mm on the left side. The distance of AL from the LCP was 4.50 ± 1.83 mm on the right side and 4.35 ± 1.44 mm on the left side. The distance of the AL to IBM was 10 ± 1.84 mm on the right side and 10 ± 1.93 mm on the left side. The distance between the AL to BCP, LCP, and IBM was not significantly different in terms of sides. The mean distance from the AL to IBM was 10.18 ± 1.805 mm in males and 8.07 ± 1.9 mm in females, respectively. The mean distance from the AL to IBM was found to be significantly higher in males compared to females (P < 0.05 for both). These findings were analysed according to the age of the patient [Graph 4].

F7
Graph 4:
The distribution of the mean of various measurements of the anterior loop to reference points on the mandible, according to gender and sides (right and left)

DISCUSSION

Various studies have been done to determine the different patterns of MN. Many authors have used panoramic radiography to assess the different patterns of MN into straight, perpendicular, and vertical patterns.[5] Al-Mahalawy etal.[8] have classified the patterns into linear, perpendicular, and anterior looping.

In the present study, the straight pattern (67.1%) was the most common pattern, followed by the vertical pattern (26%) and AL (6.9%). Al-Mahalawy etal.[9] assessed 302 CBCT scans and found linear (straight) patterns in 46.2% of cases followed by perpendicular patterns (vertical) in 38.6%. Sahman and Sisman[5] assessed 494 patients and observed vertical pattern in 34.6% of images, straight pattern in 34.1% and ALs was detected in 28.5% of the cases. However, the study carried out by Demir etal.[9] who studied 279 CBCT scans found that the most common pattern was type 3 (AL – 59.5%), followed by type 2 (vertical – 31.9%) and type 1 (straight – 8.6%), which showed a contrast result to the present study.

Studies conducted by Rodrigues Genú etal.,[10] Najm etal.,[11] Panjnoush etal.,[12] Eren etal.,[6] do Nascimento etal.,[13] and Apostolakis and Brown[4] have given a special emphasis on the prevalence of AL using CBCT. Rodrigues Genú etal.,[10] conducted a study on 143 CBCT scans and AL was visualised in 18.9% of the images, and Sinha etal.,[14] observed AL in 97 scans (9.7%) of 1000 scans. Al-Mahalawy etal.,[9] observed AL only in 15.2%. These studies showed a low prevalence, similar to the present study. Siddiqui etal.,[15] and do Nascimento etal.,[13] visualised AL 37.3% and 41.6% of scans. Similarly, Apostolakis and Brown,[4] Najm etal.,[11] and other authors have reported a higher prevalence of AL, ranging from 48% to 86%.[121617]

The wide range of current values in the literature may be attributed to interindividual anatomical variability associated with gender, age, and race and the use of different measurement techniques. Another relevant factor could be the degree of cortication since it is related to the canal visibility. Better cortication may lead to improved visibility and better visualisation of the canal.[13] The degree of resorption of the mandible dictates the visualisation of the canal on the radiographic examination. The visibility of ALs reduced as the age of subjects increased. As the age advances, there is a marked increase in resorption and the marrow space enlarges, and disordered trabeculae are often seen, affecting the identification of the AL.[18]

The study conducted by Najm etal.,[11] Siddiqui etal.,[15] Ritter etal.,[19] Todorovic etal.,[17] and Sinha etal.[14] showed a higher AL prevalence in males than in females, similar to the present study. However, the study conducted by Rodrigues Genú etal.[10] and Eren etal.[6] showed a higher prevalence of AL in females than males which was in contrast to the present study. The varied observations found in different studies could be due to the ethnic differences and genetic constitution among the genders.

Various authors such as Rodrigues Genú etal.[10] and Najm etal.[11] had carried out studies to assess the prevalence of AL based on sides. These studies showed AL to be prevalent on the left side which is in contrast to the present study, as more ALs were seen on the right side. Ngeow etal.[18] showed more bilateral ALs than any other study.

Studies conducted by Rodrigues Genú etal.[10] and Eren etal.[6] found the mean length of AL to be 3.14 mm ± 1.25 mm and 2.9–3.3 mm (mean, 3.15 mm). Apostolakis and brown conducted CBCT study which showed the mean length of AL to be 0.89 mm. Puri etal.[17] found that the mean value of the AL was 1.07 mm ± 1.42 mm. The mean length of the AL found in the present study was 3.3 mm, a value close to that has been reported in the literature. The longest AL observed in the present study was 6.6 mm. Despite being clinically relevant in extent, this length was far lower than the maximum length of 11 mm reported by Neiva etal.[20]

Not many studies were found in regard to various parameters related to AL. The study conducted by Eren etal.[6] found that the distance between the AL to BCP was 1.9–2.54 mm (mean, 2.24 mm), AL to LCP was 3.8–4.9 mm (mean, 4.24 mm), and AL to IBM was in the range of 8.2–9.0 mm (mean, 8.63 mm), which was similar to the present study. Another study conducted by Najm etal.[14] considered the similar parameters and found that the mean distance between AL to BCP was 1.06 ± 0.3 mm, AL to LCP was 4.25 ± 0.4 mm, and AL to IBM was 7.69 ± 0.9 mm. These values were found to be slightly lower than in the present study. It is found that the distance of the AL from BCP, LCP and IBM was slightly larger in males than females. The possible cause for this variant finding in males could be due to the larger volume of the mandible, greater height and buccolingual width of the mandible.[9] The length of AL was found to be significantly longer in males than females. Also, race related physique could be an important influencing factor while considering the length of AL.[21]

CONCLUSION

The parameters discussed in the study help to determine the morphology, course, and exact location of the mandibular canal and mental foramen which will help in preimplant and presurgical planning. Surgical trauma or injury to the AL of MN is possible during implant surgery in the interforaminal area of the mandible if AL is not assessed preoperatively. The length of the AL plays a significant role in the use of tilted implants. The most distal implant should be placed at least 2 mm anterior to the anterior-most portion of the loop to allow for surgical error. In this case, the AL becomes the landmark rather than the foramen itself.[22] Furthermore, the vertical distance below the mental foramen/anterior border must be determined to enable safe sliding osteotomy.[23] Awareness about the AL helps to avoid anatomical risks in the interforaminal region of the mandible. The most important being the possible damage to the AL of the MN.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Iyengar AR, Patil S, Nagesh KS, Mehkri S, Manchanda A Detection of anterior loop and other patterns of entry of mental nerve into the mental foramen:A radiographic study in panoramic images J Dent Implant 2013 3 21 5
2. Vujanovic-Eskenazi A, Valero-James JM, Sánchez-Garcés MA, Gay-Escoda C A retrospective radiographic evaluation of the anterior loop of the mental nerve:Comparison between panoramic radiography and cone beam computerized tomography Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2015 20 e239 45
3. Beltrán V, Cantín M, Fuentes Fernández R, Engelke W Bilateral presence of mandibular incisive canal. An anatomical structure with clinical relevance Int J Morphol 2011 29 543 9
4. Apostolakis D, Brown JE The anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve:Prevalence, measurement of its length and a recommendation for interforaminal implant installation based on cone beam CT imaging Clin Oral Implants Res 2012 23 1022 30
5. Sahman H, Sisman Y Anterior loop of the inferior alveolar canal:A cone-beam computerized tomography study of 494 cases J Oral Implantol 2016 42 333 6
6. Eren H, Orhan K, Bagis N, Nalcaci R, Misirli M, Hincal E Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of mandibular canal anterior loop morphology and volume in a group of Turkish patients Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 2016 30 346 53
7. Von Arx T, Friedli M, Sendi P, Lozanoff S, Bornstein MM Location and dimensions of the mental foramen:A radiographic analysis by using cone-beam computed tomography J Endod 2013 39 1522 8
8. Al-Mahalawy H, Al-Aithan H, Al-Kari B, Al-Jandan B, Shujaat S Determination of the position of mental foramen and frequency of anterior loop in Saudi population. A retrospective CBCT study Saudi Dent J 2017 29 29 35
9. Demir A, Izgi E, Namdar-Pekiner F Anterior loop of the mental foramen in a Turkish subpopulation with dentate patients:A cone beam computed tomography study MÜSBED 2015 5 231 8
10. Rodrigues Genú P, de Holanda Vasconcellos RJ, de Oliveira BP, de Vasconcelos BC Analysis of anatomical landmarks of the mandibular interforaminal region using CBCT in a Brazilian population Braz J Oral Sci 2014 13 303 7
11. Najm AA, Al-Sudani RJ, Mahdi AS Radiographical evaluation of anterior mental loop presence, position and length in Iraqi sample using cone beam computed tomography IJSR 2017 6 920 5
12. Panjnoush M, Rabiee ZS, Kheirandish Y Assessment of location and anatomical characteristics of mental foramen, anterior loop and mandibular incisive canal using cone beam computed tomography J Dent (Tehran) 2016 13 126 32
13. do Nascimento EH, Dos Anjos Pontual ML, Dos Anjos Pontual A, da Cruz Perez DE, Figueiroa JN, Frazão MA, et al. Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal:A study using cone-beam computed tomography Imaging Sci Dent 2016 46 69 75
14. Sinha S, Kandula S, Sangamesh NC, Rout P, Mishra S, Bajoria AA Assessment of the anterior loop of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography in Eastern India:A record-based study J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019 9 290 5
15. Siddiqui Z, Rai S, Ranjan V Efficacy and evaluation of cone beam computed tomography in determining the prevalence and length of anterior loop of inferior alveolar nerve in North Indian population J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2018 30 32 7
16. Puri A, Verma P, Mahajan P, Bansal A, Kohli S, Faraz SA CBCT evaluation of the vital mandibular interforaminal anatomical structures Ann Maxillofac Surg 2020 10 149 57
17. Todorovic VS, Postma TC, van Zyl AW Assessment of the anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve using reformatted computed tomography:A retrospective study Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018 56 186 91
18. Ngeow WC, Dionysius DD, Ishak H, Nambiar P A radiographic study on the visualization of the anterior loop in dentate subjects of different age groups J Oral Sci 2009 51 231 7
19. Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, Rothamel D, Richter U, et al. Evaluation of the course of the inferior alveolar nerve in the mental foramen by cone beam computed tomography Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012 27 1014 21
20. Neiva RF, Gapski R, Wang HL Morphometric analysis of implant-related anatomy in Caucasian skulls J Periodontol 2004 75 1061 7
21. Santana RR, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Al-Ardah A, Herford A, Chen JW Accuracy of cone beam computerized tomography and a three-dimensional stereolithographic model in identifying the anterior loop of the mental nerve:A study on cadavers J Oral Implantol 2012 38 668 76
22. Parnia F, Moslehifard E, Hafezeqoran A, Mahboub F, Mojaver-Kahnamoui H Characteristics of anatomical landmarks in the mandibular interforaminal region:A cone-beam computed tomography study Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012 17 e420 5
23. Juan del VL, Grageda E, Gómez Crespo S Anterior loop of the inferior alveolar nerve:Averages and prevalence based on CT scans J Prosthet Dent 2016 115 156 60
Keywords:

Anatomical variation; anterior loop; interforaminal region; mental nerve

Copyright: © 2022 Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery