Journal Logo

Preclinical Reports

High expression of TRAF4 predicts poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer and promotes tamoxifen resistance

Zhou, Jun*,; Li, Wenhui*,; Ming, Jie; Yang, Wen; Lu, Linlin; Zhang, Qiulei; Ruan, Shengnan†,; Huang, Tao†,

Author Information
doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000943

Abstract

Introduction

Breast cancer is continually known as the most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death among women [1]. Approximately, 70–75% of breast cancer patients express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) which has been demonstrated to play an important role in promoting tumor progression [2,3]. Endocrine therapy, as a means of systemic therapy, is a major treatment strategy for both premenopausal and postmenopausal estrogen receptor positive patients [4,5]. Tamoxifen, classified as selective estrogen receptor modulators, has been the first choice in adjuvant endocrine therapy [6]. The introduction of tamoxifen has significantly reduced the risk of cancer recurrence and metastasis for estrogen receptor positive patients [7–9]. However, approximately half of the cases have intrinsic resistance or develop acquired resistance after receiving tamoxifen treatment, which makes the resistance become a serious clinical problem to be solved [10–12]. Therefore, it is important to seek predictive biomarkers for tamoxifen-treated patients and take a deeper insight into the underlying molecular mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance.

TRAF4 is the member of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor (TRAF) family, which functions as a signal transducer for the tumor necrosis factor receptors and interleukin-1/Toll-like receptors [13,14]. TRAF4 was originally found to be amplified and overexpressed in breast cancer and then demonstrated overexpression in multiple other cancer types [15]. Recent studies have shown that TRAF4 played an important role in carcinogenesis and TRAF4 overexpression led to a poor prognosis in breast cancer patients [16–19]. However, whether TRAF4 has prognostic significance in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer or is involved in tamoxifen resistance remains unknown.

In this study, we aimed to identify a novel potential predictive biomarker of tamoxifen resistance and explore the role of TRAF4 in tamoxifen resistance. Using multiple gene expression analyses, we identified that high expression of TRAF4 was associated with poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer and TRAF4 was upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Moreover, the results of cell experiments confirmed that tamoxifen resistance was positively correlated with the expression level of TRAF4.

Materials and methods

Cell culture and establishment of tamoxifen-resistant sublines

Estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells T47D were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, USA) and authenticated by STR profiling analysis. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (H7904, Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). To establish the tamoxifen-resistant subline T47DR, T47D cells were treated with 1 μM 4-Hydroxytamoxifen and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Massachusetts, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Beyotime, Jiangsu, China) in a humidified conditions containing 5% CO2 at 37°C for more than six months. After six months, the resistance of T47DR cells to tamoxifen was verified by colony formation experiments and cell count kit-8 (CCK-8) assay. Then, T47DR cells were cultured in the above-mentioned medium containing 0.1 μM tamoxifen to maintain the resistance.

High-throughput sequencing and bioinformatics analysis

High-throughput sequencing was performed using T47D and T47DR cell lines. Nearly 5 × 106 cells of each cell line were prepared and subjected to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). The paired-end sequencing on an Illumina Hiseq platform was performed following the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Transcripts per million (TPM) of each gene were calculated for relative quantitative analysis. |Fold change| > 2 and q value < 0.05 between two cell lines were selected to represent statistical significance. The raw sequence data have been submitted to Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (accession code GSE129544).

Another two datasets (GSE9893 and GSE31831) related to tamoxifen treatment or resistance were obtained from GEO. Standardized gene expression levels in 155 primary tumor samples of tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients were analyzed based on GSE9893. Differential gene expression analysis between tamoxifen-sensitive cells (MCF7) and tamoxifen-resistant cells (MCF7R) was based on GSE31831 at the same time.

Colony formation experiments

The proliferation ability of different cell lines under tamoxifen treatment was analyzed with colony formation experiments. Cells in logarithmic growth phase were collected and seeded into six-well plates in triplicates at a density of 1000 cells/well. All cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 5 μM tamoxifen, and the medium was renewed every three days over the next two weeks. Cell clones were stained with 0.2% crystal violet (Beyotime) and then photographed.

Cell count kit-8 assay

To evaluate the response of different cell lines to tamoxifen treatment, a CCK-8 assay was also performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Different cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 5000 cells/well with different concentrations (0, 0.1, 1, 5, and 10 μM) of tamoxifen and then cultured for 48 h. Subsequently, RPMI-1640 containing 10% CCK-8 solution (Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan) was supplemented into each well and incubated in a 37°C incubator for 1–3 h. The spectrometric absorbance of each well at 450 nm was measured on a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher, Massachusetts, USA) to evaluate the cytotoxicity of tamoxifen to cell lines.

Western blot

The total protein of cells was isolated with protein extraction reagent RIPA buffer (Beyotime) and quantified by the BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime). After SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and PVDF membrane transfer, the target protein was detected with primary antibodies against TRAF4 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China) and GAPDH (Cell Signaling Technology, Massachusetts, USA). The protein signals were determined with the ChemiDoc XRS+ System (Bio-Rad, California, USA) using the ECL detection kit (Beyotime).

RNA extraction and real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells using RNAiso Plus reagent (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. mRNAs were reverse transcribed to cDNAs with a PrimeScript RT Master Mix Kit (TaKaRa, Japan). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in triplicate using synthesized primers (Tsingke, Beijing, China) with an SYBR Premix Ex Taq II Kit (TaKaRa to detect the mRNA levels. The expression levels of the target genes were quantitated utilizing the method of 2−ΔΔCT normalized according to the mean levels of GAPDH.

Primers for TRAF4 and GAPDH were as follows:

TRAF4 forward: TATTGGGCCTGCCTATCCG.

TRAF4 reverse: CAAAACTCGCACTTGAGGCG.

GAPDH forward: GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT.

GAPDH reverse: GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG.

Cell transfection

Short interference RNAs for TRAF4 and corresponding siRNA negative controls were purchased from RiboBio (Guangzhou, China). Overexpression of pcDNA-TRAF4 plasmid and negative control vector were provided by GeneChem (Shanghai, China). Transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The transfection efficiency was evaluated using western blot and qRT-PCR. The siRNA target sequences for TRAF4 were as follows:

TRAF4-si1: GAGAGTGTCTACTGTGAGA

TRAF4-si2: CTAAGGAGTTCGTCTTTGA

TRAF4-si3: CATCCGTGCTGCTGTTGAA

Statistical analysis

SPSS 23.0, R 3.5.3 and Graphpad Prism 7.0 were used for statistical analysis. The identification of differentially expressed genes was conducted using the ‘limma’ package in R and the ‘survivalROC’ package was used to determine the optimal cutoff value of the TRAF4 expression level for survival analysis. The experiment data are presented as the means ± SDs. Pearson’s chi-square test was used to compare differences between TRAF4 low and TRAF4 high groups. Differences between groups in CCK-8 assay were analyzed by the Student’s t or two-way ANOVA test. Survival rates of patients were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze the prognostic significance of TRAF4. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

TRAF4 is upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells

T47D cells were treated with 1 μM tamoxifen for more than six months to establish the tamoxifen-resistant subline T47DR. Morphological changes were observed and T47DR cells appeared as spindle shape which was different from T47D (Fig. 1a). To verify whether T47DR cells were resistant to tamoxifen, colony formation experiments and CCK-8 assay were conducted to compare the cell proliferation ability and viability of T47D and T47DR cells under tamoxifen treatment. The results of colony formation experiments showed that cell colonies of T47DR cells were more than that of T47D cells when treated with tamoxifen (Fig. 1b). The results of the CCK-8 assay showed that the cell viability of T47DR cells was higher than that of T47D cells when the concentrations of tamoxifen were 5 and 10 μM (Fig. 1c). In order to compare the gene expression profile of T47D and T47DR cells, the RNA sequencing was conducted, and all the data were shown in GSE129544. To obtain an accurate and reliable result, we also conduct bioinformatic analysis based on another two GEO datasets. Genes with prognostic significance from GSE9893 and genes with differences in expression between MCF7R and MCF7 from GSE31831 were also included in the study. Finally, we found that several genes (the full list is shown in Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental digital content 1, http://links.lww.com/ACD/A335), including TRAF4, were in the intersection of the three datasets. As shown in Fig. 1d, the mRNA levels of TRAF4 were higher in T47DR cells and MCF7R cells whether MCF7R cells were treated with tamoxifen or estrogen.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1:
TRAF4 is upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. (a) Morphological differences between T47D and T47DR cells. Scale bars, 100 μm. Colony formation experiments (b) and CCK-8 (c) assay showed that the cell proliferation ability of T47DR was higher than that in T47D when they were treated with tamoxifen. Error bars represent means ± SD of triplicate. *P < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (d) The intersection of the three datasets (GSE9893, GSE31831, and GSE129544). TRAF4 was upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells MCF7R and T47DR. CCK-8, cell count kit-8.

High TRAF4 expression correlated with poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer

To explore the prognosis implication of TRAF4, we analyzed the association between TRAF4 expression and clinical outcomes based on dataset GSE9893. We compared the expression levels of TRAF4 in different subgroups for whether local recurrence or distant metastasis, overall death, and breast cancer-specific death occurred, respectively. The subgroups with these worse outcomes had higher TRAF4 expression (Fig. 2ac). We then divided the 155 patients into two groups according to the TRAF4 expression for further analysis. To identify the optimal cutoff value for subdivision, we conducted a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses in R to distinguish five-year survivors from deceased patients. In overall survival analysis, the cutoff value for TRAF4 (AUC = 0.636) was 0.7500217 (Fig. 2d). In cancer-specific survival analysis, the cutoff value for TRAF4 (AUC = 0.656) was 0.8154676 (Fig. 2e). For more precise analysis, we chose 0.8154676 as the optimal cutoff value and patients were divided into TRAF4 low and TRAF4 high groups. In the cohort of 155 tamoxifen-treated patients, patients with high TRAF4 run a higher risk of local recurrence or distant metastasis (P < 0.001), overall death (P = 0.003), and breast cancer-specific death (P = 0.007) (Table 1). Survival analyses showed that TRAF4 high group was significantly associated with worse overall survival (P = 0.0083, Fig. 2f) and cancer-specific survival (P = 0.013, Fig. 2g), respectively. The hazard ratios for overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality were listed in Table 2 to investigate the clinical significance. Unadjusted hazard ratios of TRAF4 for overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality were 2.608 (P = 0.011) and 2.940 (P = 0.018), respectively. Multivariate Cox analyses adjusted for age, T stage, Scarff–Bloom–Richardson grade, and adjuvant therapy confirmed the independent prognostic significance of TRAF4 for both overall mortality (hazard ratio = 2.538, P = 0.017) and cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio = 2.713, P = 0.036).

Table 1
Table 1:
Clinical characteristics of 155 patients according to TRAF4 high or low expression
Table 2
Table 2:
Hazard ratio values of TRAF4 for overall mortality and cancer-specific mortality
Fig. 2
Fig. 2:
High expression of TRAF4 correlated with poor outcomes in GSE9893 cohort. TRAF4 was significantly higher in overall death group (a), cancer-specific death group (b), and local recurrence or distant metastases group (c) compared with other groups, respectively. ROC curves for five-year overall survival (d) and cancer-specific survival (e) according to TRAF4 gene expression. Cutoff values and AUC values are described in the figures. Overexpression of TRAF4 was correlated with worse overall survival (f) and cancer-specific survival (g). ROC, receiver operating characteristic.

Confirmation of overexpression of TRAF4

In order to verify the results of sequencing and bioinformatic analysis, we further conducted western blot to detect the protein levels of TRAF4 in T47D and T47DR cell lines and found that TRAF4 was significantly overexpressed in T47DR cells (Fig. 3a). Moreover, the mRNA levels of TRAF4 examined by qRT-PCR were also higher in T47DR cells than that in T47D cells, which was consistent with the results of bioinformatic analysis (Fig. 3b). Taken together, our results strongly suggested that TRAF4 was upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant T47DR cells and may play an important role in tamoxifen resistance.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3:
Western blot (a) and qRT-PCR (b) confirmed TRAF4 overexpression in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells T47DR. Error bars represent means ± SD of triplicate. qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

Knockdown of TRAF4 expression inT47DR cells reversed tamoxifen resistance

Given the above findings that TRAF4 was upregulated in tamoxifen-resistant cells, we then explored the potential involvement of TRAF4 in tamoxifen resistance of T47DR cells. To this end, we knocked down the expressing levels of TRAF4 in T47DR cells with exogenous introduction of TRAF4 siRNAs (TRAF4-si1, TRAF4-si2, and TRAF4-si3). Western blot and qRT-PCR assays were conducted to detect the knockdown efficiency, and the results showed that TRAF4-si1 and TRAF4-si2 led to a significant reduction of TRAF4 expression in T47DR cells (Fig.4a and b). Then, T47DR cells transfected with TRAF4-si1 and TRAF4-si2 were selected to further investigate the effects of TRAF4 knockdown on the resistance to tamoxifen. The results of colony formation experiments indicated that the introduction of TRAF4 siRNAs caused a remarkable decline of cell colonies of T47DR cells treated with tamoxifen (Fig. 4c). Besides, CCK-8 assay confirmed that knockdown of TRAF4 reduced the resistance to tamoxifen in T47DR cells (Fig. 4d). These results indicated that TRAF4 knockdown led to T47DR cells resensitization to tamoxifen and TRAF4 is required for sustaining tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4:
Knockdown of TRAF4 in T47DR cells reversed tamoxifen resistance. TRAF4 was significantly downregulated in T47DR cells after transfection with TRAF4-si1, TRAF4-si2 detected by western blot (a) and qRT-PCR (b). (c) Colony formation experiments showed that TRAF4 knockdown caused a remarkable decline of cell colonies of T47DR cells treated with tamoxifen. (d) CCK-8 assay showed that TRAF4 knockdown reduced the resistance of T47DR cells to tamoxifen. Error bars represent means ± SD of triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. CCK-8, cell count kit-8; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

TRAF4 overexpression in T47DR cells increased tamoxifen resistance

To further demonstrate the role of TRAF4 in tamoxifen resistance, we transfected the overexpression plasmid of TRAF4 in T47DR cells. The increased expression of TRAF4 after transfection was confirmed by the western blot and qRT-PCR assays at protein and mRNA levels (Fig. 5a and b). We then performed colony formation experiments and CCK-8 assay to detect alteration in tamoxifen resistance after the transfection of the TRAF4 overexpression plasmid. The results showed that the resistance to tamoxifen of T47DR cells was further enhanced on account of TRAF4 overexpression (Fig. 5c and d). These results demonstrated that TRAF4 overexpression promoted tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer cells.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5:
TRAF4 overexpression in T47DR cells increased tamoxifen resistance. TRAF4 expression was significantly upregulated in T47DR cells after transfection with the overexpression plasmid of TRAF4 detected by western blot (a) and qRT-PCR (b). (c) Colony formation experiments showed that TRAF4 overexpression further enhanced cell proliferation ability of T47DR treated with tamoxifen. (d) CCK-8 assay showed that TRAF4 overexpression increased the resistance of T47DR cells to tamoxifen. Error bars represent means ± SD of triplicate. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. CCK-8, cell count kit-8; qRT-PCR, quantitative real-time PCR.

Discussion

Tamoxifen as an effective endocrine treatment in the management of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer has significantly improved prognosis in breast cancer patients [20]. However, the resistance to tamoxifen has been one of the major causes of breast cancer recurrence and death [10,11]. Many studies have attempted to figure out the underlying mechanisms involved in the resistance to tamoxifen. So far, several mechanisms have been demonstrated to be involved in tamoxifen resistance. These include estrogen receptor mutations, loss of ERα expression, overexpression of estrogen receptor coactivators, activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, etc. [21–24].

The TRAF4 gene, which is located in an amplified region of chromosome 17, is amplified in breast cancer and correlated with ERBB2 amplification [25,26]. Follow-up studies showed that TRAF4 overexpression existed in multiple cancer types, which implied the oncogenic role of TRAF4 [15,27–29]. Some studies revealed that TRAF4 was mainly implicated in TGF-β-induced SMAD and non-SMAD oncogenic signal pathways and played an indispensable role in TGF-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, migration, invasion, and metastasis of breast cancer cells [16]. It is interesting to note that TGF-β signaling pathway can interfere with estrogen receptor signaling pathways. The crosstalk of the two signaling pathways may influence the development of antihormone resistance [30,31]. Another study showed that TRAF4 overexpression in breast cancer patients participated in the destabilization of p53 and functioned in mediating breast cancer resistance to drug therapies and regulating cell resistance to cytotoxic stress [18]. Given the important role of TRAF4 in the progression of breast cancer, we investigated whether TRAF4 might be associated with tamoxifen resistance.

In our study, the high-throughput sequencing was performed to identify the gene expression profile of tamoxifen-sensitive cell line T47D and tamoxifen-resistant cell line T47DR. Among the previously uncharacterized genes correlated with endocrine resistance, we focused on the TRAF4, which also exhibited differential expression levels in another two datasets (GSE9893 and GSE31831) from GEO database. Different from previous studies that used the median level of mRNA expression as the cutoff value to classify low or high levels of expression [32,33], we used time-dependent ROC curve analyses to find the appropriate cutoff value of TRAF4 expression levels, which made our results more reliable. Based on the clinical information of GSE9893 cohort, high expression of TRAF4 was found to be associated with poor prognosis in tamoxifen-treated breast cancer and a good prognostic indicator of these patients. Then, the following cell experiments showed that TRAF4 promoted tamoxifen resistance and might be a potential predictive biomarker of tamoxifen resistance.

There are also some limitations in this study. As with many other previous studies [34–36], we established only one tamoxifen-resistant cell line, which might make our conclusion less general. Another limitation is that we only performed cell experiments to explore the roles of TRAF4 in tamoxifen resistance and potential signaling pathways that TRAF4 might be involved were not explored, which deserves further validation in a larger cohort of in-vitro and in-vivo studies. As shown in Supplementary Table 1, Supplemental digital content 1, http://links.lww.com/ACD/A335, several genes might be involved in tamoxifen resistance, but they have not been thoroughly studied.

Conclusion

According to our study, we found that overexpression of TRAF4 was strongly related to a poor prognosis of tamoxifen-treated breast cancer. Besides, TRAF4 was significantly involved in tamoxifen resistance and might provide new insights into underlying mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. In the future, the role of TRAF4 in a complicated network of tamoxifen resistance may develop our understanding of cancer and may provide novel target therapy opportunities.

Acknowledgements

We thank everyone in our department for discussion and suggestions.

Our research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants: 8167101523).

The high-throughput sequencing data (GSE129544) used to support the findings of this study have not been made available before it is released in GEO database. ‘Reviewer access’ to GSE129544: ityxssamvbqbvct. The other data used to support the findings of this study are included in the article or GEO database.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Fitzmaurice C, Dicker D, Pain A, Hamavid H, Moradi-Lakeh M, MacIntyre MF, et al; Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration. The global burden of cancer 2013. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1:505–527
2. Patel HK, Bihani T.. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) in cancer treatment. Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 186:1–24
3. Siersbæk R, Kumar S, Carroll JS.. Signaling pathways and steroid receptors modulating estrogen receptor α function in breast cancer. Genes Dev. 2018; 32:1141–1154
4. Tryfonidis K, Zardavas D, Katzenellenbogen BS, Piccart M.. Endocrine treatment in breast cancer: cure, resistance and beyond. Cancer Treat Rev. 2016; 50:68–81
5. Harbeck N, Gnant M.. Breast cancer. Lancet. 2017; 389:1134–1150
6. Orlando L, Schiavone P, Fedele P, Calvani N, Nacci A, Rizzo P, et al. Molecularly targeted endocrine therapies for breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010; 36Suppl 3S67–S71
7. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005; 365:1687–1717
8. Burstein HJ, Temin S, Anderson H, Buchholz TA, Davidson NE, Gelmon KE, et al. Adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline focused update. J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32:2255–2269
9. Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, Darby S, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011; 378:771–784
10. Musgrove EA, Sutherland RL.. Biological determinants of endocrine resistance in breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009; 9:631–643
11. Ring A, Dowsett M.. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2004; 11:643–658
12. Rani A, Stebbing J, Giamas G, Murphy J.. Endocrine resistance in hormone receptor positive breast cancer-from mechanism to therapy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:245
13. Chung JY, Park YC, Ye H, Wu H.. All TRAFs are not created equal: common and distinct molecular mechanisms of TRAF-mediated signal transduction. J Cell Sci. 2002; 115:679–688
14. Yang XD, Sun SC.. Targeting signaling factors for degradation, an emerging mechanism for TRAF functions. Immunol Rev. 2015; 266:56–71
15. Camilleri-Broët S, Cremer I, Marmey B, Comperat E, Viguié F, Audouin J, et al. TRAF4 overexpression is a common characteristic of human carcinomas. Oncogene. 2007; 26:142–147
16. Zhang L, Zhou F, García de Vinuesa A, de Kruijf EM, Mesker WE, Hui L, et al. TRAF4 promotes TGF-β receptor signaling and drives breast cancer metastasis. Mol Cell. 2013; 51:559–572
17. Zhou F, Li F, Xie F, Zhang Z, Huang H, Zhang L.. TRAF4 mediates activation of TGF-β signaling and is a biomarker for oncogenesis in breast cancer. Sci China Life Sci. 2014; 57:1172–1176
18. Yi P, Xia W, Wu RC, Lonard DM, Hung MC, O’Malley BW.. SRC-3 coactivator regulates cell resistance to cytotoxic stress via TRAF4-mediated p53 destabilization. Genes Dev. 2013; 27:274–287
19. Rousseau A, McEwen AG, Poussin-Courmontagne P, Rognan D, Nominé Y, Rio MC, et al. TRAF4 is a novel phosphoinositide-binding protein modulating tight junctions and favoring cell migration. Plos Biol. 2013; 11:e1001726
20. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2015; 386:1341–1352
21. Mills JN, Rutkovsky AC, Giordano A.. Mechanisms of resistance in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer: overcoming resistance to tamoxifen/aromatase inhibitors. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018; 41:59–65
22. Rondon-Lagos M, Villegas VE, Rangel N, Sanchez MC, Zaphiropoulos PG.. Tamoxifen resistance: emerging molecular targets. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17:1357
23. Stender JD, Nwachukwu JC, Kastrati I, Kim Y, Strid T, Yakir M, et al. Structural and molecular mechanisms of cytokine-mediated endocrine resistance in human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell. 2017; 65:1122–1135.e5
24. Nayar U, Cohen O, Kapstad C, Cuoco MS, Waks AG, Wander SA, et al. Acquired HER2 mutations in ER+ metastatic breast cancer confer resistance to estrogen receptor-directed therapies. Nat Genet. 2019; 51:207–216
25. Bièche I, Tomasetto C, Régnier CH, Moog-Lutz C, Rio MC, Lidereau R.. Two distinct amplified regions at 17q11-q21 involved in human primary breast cancer. Cancer Res. 1996; 56:3886–3890
26. Moelans CB, van der Groep P, Hoefnagel LDC, van de Vijver MJ, Wesseling P, Wesseling J, et al. Genomic evolution from primary breast carcinoma to distant metastasis: few copy number changes of breast cancer related genes. Cancer Lett. 2014; 344:138–146
27. Singh R, Karri D, Shen H, Shao J, Dasgupta S, Huang S, et al. TRAF4-mediated ubiquitination of NGF receptor TrkA regulates prostate cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2018; 128:3129–3143
28. Li W, Peng C, Lee MH, Lim D, Zhu F, Fu Y, et al. TRAF4 is a critical molecule for Akt activation in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2013; 73:6938–6950
29. Liu K, Wu X, Zang X, Huang Z, Lin Z, Tan W, et al. TRAF4 regulates migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition via PI3K/AKT signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Res. 2017; 25:1329–1340
30. Buck MB, Knabbe C.. TGF-beta signaling in breast cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006; 1089:119–126
31. Busch S, Sims AH, Stål O, Fernö M, Landberg G.. Loss of TGFβ receptor type 2 expression impairs estrogen response and confers tamoxifen resistance. Cancer Res. 2015; 75:1457–1469
32. Xu T, Ruan H, Song Z, Cao Q, Wang K, Bao L, et al. Identification of CXCL13 as a potential biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma via comprehensive bioinformatics analysis. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 118:109264
33. Wang K, Xu T, Ruan H, Xiao H, Liu J, Song Z, et al. LXRα promotes cell metastasis by regulating the NLRP3 inflammasome in renal cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2019; 10:159
34. Gao A, Sun T, Ma G, Cao J, Hu Q, Chen L, et al. LEM4 confers tamoxifen resistance to breast cancer cells by activating cyclin D-CDK4/6-Rb and ERα pathway. Nat Commun. 2018; 9:4180
35. Hiscox S, Morgan L, Green TP, Barrow D, Gee J, Nicholson RI.. Elevated Src activity promotes cellular invasion and motility in tamoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006; 97:263–274
36. Choi HK, Yang JW, Roh SH, Han CY, Kang KW.. Induction of multidrug resistance associated protein 2 in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2007; 14:293–303
Keywords:

breast cancer; prognosis; resistance; tamoxifen; TRAF4

Supplemental Digital Content

Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.