Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Peg-Dox) is a useful drug for the treatment of various malignancies, including AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma, ovarian cancer, lymphoma, metastatic breast cancer and multiple myeloma. In hematological malignancies, good outcomes were achieved in lymphoma and multiple myeloma by using Peg-Dox, with reduced cardiotoxicity and improved pharmacokinetic profiles when compared to those of doxorubicin [1–3]. In a recent study, Peg-Dox was used to treat elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia . The outcome showed that Peg-Dox had reduced myelosuppression, reduced infections and less cardiac events with similar outcomes compared to that of continuous-infusion doxorubicin. Peg-Dox was mainly taken up by cells in the liver, spleen and bone marrow, with a higher concentration and a more prolonged period spent in these tissues compared to those of conventional doxorubicin [5, 6]. The mice with lymphocytic leukemia that were treated with Peg-Dox had a longer survival time compared to that of mice that were treated with conventional doxorubicin . However, no indications and no reports have included the use of Peg-Dox in myeloid neoplasms, although non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been reported for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [7, 8]. However, it is still unknown whether Peg-Dox can be used to treat myeloid neoplasms. In this study, we first examined the cell killing effect of Peg-Dox in myeloid cell lines and in primary myeloid leukemia cells. Then, Peg-Dox-based regimens were used to treat myeloid neoplasms.
Materials and methods
Cell killing effect of Peg-Dox in different cell lines
The K562, HL60 and MOLM13 cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Sigma-Aldrich, America) culture media containing 10% fetal calf serum (Sigma) and 1% antibiotics. Cells were harvested during logarithmic-phase growth, and 1200 cells were distributed into each well of a 384-well plate in 50 μl of growth media. One hundred nanoliters of diluted compound was added to the appropriate wells in triplicate, and the cells were cultured for 72 h at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Viability was determined by adding 10 μl CellTiter-Glo [Promega Corporation (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd.] and the relative light units (RLU) were measured on an Envision Plate reader. The rate of inhibition = 100% − (RLUDrug − RLUBackground)/(RLUDMSO − RLUBackground) × 100%.
The following four groups were included: (1) Peg-Dox (40 mg/m2) (CSPC Ouyi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hebei, China) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) (Shenzhen Wan Le Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China); (2) PLDAC1 [cladribine (5 mg/m2) (Hanhui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China) combined with cytarabine (1 g/m2) (Pfizer Pharmaceuticals Ltd; America) and Peg-Dox (40 mg/m2)] and DAC1 [cladribine (5 mg/m2) combined with cytarabine (1 g/m2) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2)]; (3) PLDAC2 [cladribine (5 mg/m2) combined with cytarabine (100 mg/m2) and Peg-Dox (40 mg/m2)] and DAC2 [cladribine (5 mg/m2) combined with cytarabine (100 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2)] and (4) HAPLD [homoharringtonine (2 mg/m2) (Hangzhou people’s livelihood Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., China) combined with cytarabine (15 mg/m2) and Peg-Dox (40 mg/m2)] and HAD [homoharringtonine (2 mg/m2) combined with cytarabine (15 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (40 mg/m2)].
Cell killing effect of Peg-Dox in primary myeloid leukemia cells
Bone marrow was collected from three patients with newly diagnosed AML. The red cells were removed with red blood cell lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA). The primary leukemia cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 culture media containing 10% fetal calf serum and 1% antibiotics. Cells were harvested during logarithmic-phase growth, and 5000 cells were distributed into each well of a 384-well plate with 50 μl of growth media. One hundred nanoliters of diluted compound was added to appropriate wells in triplicate, and the cells were cultured for 72 h at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Viability was determined by adding 10 μl CellTiter-Glo (Promega, Wisconsin, American), and the RLU were measured on an Envision Plate reader. The groups were divided as described above for the cell lines. The rate of inhibition = 100% − (RLUDrug − RLUBackground)/(RLUDMSO − RLUBackground) × 100%.
Patients were eligible for study enrollment if they had relapsed/refractory AML and newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome-refractory anemia with excess blasts (MDS-RAEB), according to the 2008 WHO classification [9, 10]. Patients with relapsed AML had received at least one cycle of chemotherapy, and the blast cells had decreased by less than 50%. This study was approved by the ethics committee of Xinqiao Hospital, and written informed consent was obtained from the patients in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients provided informed consent for the publication of the cases and gave permission to be included in the article.
The patients with relapsed/refractory AML received the PLDAC protocol: Peg-Dox (15 mg/m2/day for 3 days) combined with cytarabine (1 g/m2/day for 5 days) and cladribine (5 mg/m2/day for 5 days). The patients with newly diagnosed MDS-RAEB received the HAPLDG protocol: homoharringtonine (2 mg/m2/day for 7 days) combined with cytarabine (15 mg/m2 q12 h for 7 days) and Peg-Dox (40 mg/m2 divided into 3 days), and recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) was used before chemotherapy (300 μg/day for 8 days).
The toxic effects were continuously monitored. The response to treatment was assessed according to the International Working Group’s response criteria . The primary endpoint was the complete remission (CR) rate after chemotherapy. The secondary objective was toxicity. A CR was defined as the presence of <5% blasts in the bone marrow aspirate with >1 × 109/L neutrophils and ≥100 × 109/L platelets in the peripheral blood, with no evidence of extramedullary disease. A CR with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) was defined as a response meeting the criteria for CR and MRD-negativity, as detected by multiparameter flow cytometry performed on remission bone marrow specimens at the time of achievement of CR.
The median and range are used to report noncategorical data. The SPSS software (version 19.0, SPSS, Inc. Chicago, IL) was used to perform statistical evaluation using t-tests. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Cell killing effect of Peg-Dox in myeloid cells
In cell lines, the cell killing effect of Peg-Dox was similar in the K562, HL60 and MOLM13 cell lines compared to that of doxorubicin in these cell lines (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1a–c). A similar cell killing effect was found for the PLDAC1 protocol compared to that of the DAC1 protocol, for the PLDAC2 protocol compared to that of the DAC2 protocol, and for the HAPLD protocol compared to that of the HAD protocol (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1a–c).
In primary AML cells, the cell killing effect of Peg-Dox was similar in the cells from three patients compared to that of doxorubicin in those cells (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1d–f). A similar killing effect was found for the PLDAC1 protocol compared to that of the DAC1 protocol, for the PLDAC2 protocol compared to that of the DAC2 protocol, and for the HAPLD protocol compared to that of the HAD protocol (P > 0.05) (Fig. 1d–f).
Eight patients with relapsed/refractory AML and three patients with newly diagnosed MDS-RAEB were enrolled in this study. Most of these patients had gene mutations and abnormal karyotypes (Table 1).
Outcome of treatment
Seven patients (87.5%) achieved CR with a 75.0% negative-MRD rate (6/8) for patients with refractory/relapsed AML after the first cycle. The CR rate with negative MRD was 87.5% after two cycles of chemotherapy. Three patients (100%) achieved CR with a 66.8% negative-MRD rate (2/3) for patients with MDS-RAEB after the first cycle. The CR rate with negative MRD was 100% after two cycles of chemotherapy (Table 1).
All patients with AML developed grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity, and four patients experienced infections. All patients recovered approximately 2 weeks after completing chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. No other serious complications were observed.
All patients with MDS-RAEB developed grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity, and two patients experienced infections. The patients recovered approximately 2 weeks after completing chemotherapy. No treatment-related deaths occurred. No other serious complications were observed.
This is the first study to explore the treatment outcome of Peg-Dox in myeloid neoplasms. Our study primarily showed that the Peg-Dox-based protocols achieved good outcomes in the treatment of refractory/relapsed and newly diagnosed myeloid neoplasms.
Although Peg-Dox has been used to treat many types of tumors, it is still unclear whether Peg-Dox can be used to treat myeloid neoplasms. In this study, we first explored the cell killing effect of Peg-Dox in myeloid cell lines, and the outcome showed that Peg-Dox had a similar cell killing ability compared to that of conventional doxorubicin, which is commonly used in the treatment of leukemia. In primary cells from patients with AML, similar results were also observed. Further experiments also showed that the Peg-Dox-based protocol had a similar cell killing ability compared to that of the conventional doxorubicin-based protocol.
A protocol that used cladribine combined with cytarabine and daunorubicin (DAC) has better outcomes with regard to remission and long-term survival for AML patients compared to that of a protocol that used cytarabine and daunorubicin (DA) or fludarabine combined with cytarabine and daunorubicin . The DAC protocol also resulted in more CR than that of the DA protocol for AML with FLT3-ITD positivity and a normal karyotype . A meta-analysis thoroughly compared the effect of idarubicin versus that of other anthracyclines for induction therapy for newly diagnosed leukemia . The outcome showed that idarubicin increases the CR rate compared to that of daunorubicin and doxorubicin in newly diagnosed AML. No difference was found between the CR rates of idarubicin and mitoxantrone. In patients with refractory/relapsed AML, anthracyclines have been used in the past. Therefore, new drugs should be explored. In the DAC protocol, we switched from daunorubicin to Peg-Dox to treat patients with refractory/relapsed AML. Surprisingly, these patients achieved a high CR with high MRD negativity.
MDS is a clonal hematopoietic disorder. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a curative treatment for MDS-RAEB. However, the blast cell level before transplantation is an independent factor that correlates with the outcome after allo-HSCT [14, 15]. In addition, a study showed that MRD negativity after allo-HSCT is related to a better outcome for patients with MDS-RAEB . Therefore, it is very important to achieve CR with MRD negativity for patients with MDS-RAEB before transplantation. Hypomethylating agents, such as decitabine and 5-azacitidine, and AML-like chemotherapy, such as aclacinomycin, cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, are common protocols for the treatment of patients with MDS-RAEB [17–19]. However, the CR rate was very low after the first two cycles [20, 21]. After most of the patients received several cycles, the CR rate remained low, at approximately 30% [22, 23]. All of these factors affect the treatment outcomes and limit the performance of allo-HSCT, increasing the nonrelapse mortality due to the decreases in the tolerance of patients during long-term chemotherapy. Therefore, a new treatment protocol should be used to help the patients to achieve CR or CR with negative MRD after the first or second cycles. Homoharringtonine, a G1 and G2 cell cycle phase-specific drug, blocks protein synthesis by competing with the amino acid side chains of incoming aminoacyl-tRNAs for binding to the A-site cleft in the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. Cytarabine, an S cell cycle phase-specific drug, can incorporate into DNA and interfere with DNA synthesis. Doxorubicin, a cell cycle-nonspecific agent, can inhibit cancer cell growth by acting as a DNA intercalator that inhibits topoisomerase II. The rhG-CSF priming can cause more tumor cells to enter the cell cycle and become sensitive to these drugs. In addition, Peg-Dox has a higher concentration and a more prolonged period of residence in the bone marrow compared with those of doxorubicin, and Peg-Dox causes milder myelosuppression compared to that of doxorubicin [5, 6]. Therefore, HAPLDG was used to treat MDS-RAEB in this study. The outcome showed that all patients reached CR without severe adverse effects, although the case numbers were small.
The rhG-CSF-primed low-dose chemotherapy caused good outcomes for refractory and relapsed AML treatment . The recommended dose of Peg-Dox is usually 40 mg/m2 for one day [25, 26]. In this study, we divided the total dose of 40 mg/m2 Peg-Dox into 3 days and combined it with rhG-CSF priming, which may have enhanced the curative effect and further decreased the toxicity.
Non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin has been shown to improve therapeutic efficacy by significantly reducing the risk of cardiotoxicity compared with that of conventional doxorubicin . Peg-Dox also had a reduced cardiotoxicity and an improved pharmacokinetic profile compared to those of doxorubicin in the treatment of various malignancies [1–3]. Peg-Dox was also associated with milder myelosuppression and lower number infections compared to those of conventional doxorubicin . In this study, slight myelosuppression and mild infections were observed with Peg-Dox treatment, although there are no data comparing those of Peg-Dox to those of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and of conventional doxorubicin.
This study indicated that Peg-Dox can be used in myeloid neoplasms with a good outcome and low toxicity, which extends the scope of Peg-Dox in the treatment of tumors. This treatment is especially suitable for older patients and for patients with heart dysfunction because of the low cardiotoxicity and mild myelosuppression of Peg-Dox.
Altogether, our study showed that the Peg-Dox-based protocol can be used in myeloid neoplasms. However, additional patients and well-designed, double-blinded, randomized and controlled clinical trials that evaluate the Peg-Dox-based protocol in myeloid neoplasms are warranted.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
1. Gabizon AA, Patil Y, La-Beck NM. New insights and evolving role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in cancer therapy. Drug Resist Updat. 2016; 29:90–106
2. Zhou D, Li L, Bao C, Zhu J, Zhu L, Yang X, et al. Replacement of conventional doxorubicin by pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in standard RCHOP chemotherapy
for elderly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study in China. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015; 8:22497–22502
3. Casadei B, Pellegrini C, Tonialini L, Argnani L, Zinzani PL. Interesting activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in primary refractory and multirelapsed hodgkin lymphoma patients: bridge to transplant. Hematol Oncol. 2018; 36:489–491
4. Hunault-Berger M, Leguay T, Thomas X, Legrand O, Huguet F, Bonmati C, et al. Group for Research on Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (GRAALL)A randomized study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus continuous-infusion doxorubicin in elderly patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the GRAALL-SA1 study. Haematologica. 2011; 96:245–252
5. Gabizon A, Shmeeda H, Barenholz Y. Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003; 42:419–436
6. Vail DM, Amantea MA, Colbern GT, Martin FJ, Hilger RA, Working PK. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: proof of principle using preclinical animal models and pharmacokinetic studies. Semin Oncol. 2004; 31:16–35
7. Quarello P, Berger M, Rivetti E, Galletto C, Masetti R, Manicone R, et al. FLAG-liposomal doxorubicin (myocet) regimen for refractory or relapsed acute leukemia pediatric patients. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2012; 34:208–216
8. Melillo L, Valente D, D’Arena G, Dell’Olio M, Falcone A, Minervini MM, et al. Combination treatment of flag with non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (MYOCET™) in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011; 24:703–709
9. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, et al. The 2008 revision of the world health organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood. 2009; 114:937–951
10. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, Büchner T, Willman CL, Estey EH, et al. International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid LeukemiaRevised recommendations of the international working group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:4642–4649
11. Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Giebel S, Robak T, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Kuliczkowski K, et al. Cladribine, but not fludarabine, added to daunorubicin and cytarabine during induction prolongs survival of patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30:2441–2448
12. Holowiecki J, Grosicki S, Robak T, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Giebel S, Hellmann A, et al. Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG)Addition of cladribine to daunorubicin and cytarabine increases complete remission rate after a single course of induction treatment in acute myeloid leukemia. Multicenter, phase III study. Leukemia. 2004; 18:989–997
13. Li X, Xu S, Tan Y, Chen J. The effects of idarubicin versus other anthracyclines for induction therapy of patients with newly diagnosed leukaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 20156CD010432
14. Kobos R, Steinherz PG, Kernan NA, Prockop SE, Scaradavou A, Small TN, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for pediatric patients with treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myelogenous leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2012; 18:473–480
15. Park SS, Jeon YW, Min GJ, Park S, Yahng SA, Yoon JH, et al. Graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019; 25:63–72
16. Mo XD, Qin YZ, Zhang XH, Xu LP, Wang Y, Yan CH, et al. Minimal residual disease monitoring and preemptive immunotherapy in myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ann Hematol. 2016; 95:1233–1240
17. Xu ZF, Qin TJ, Zhang HL, Fang LW, Zhang Y, Pan LJ, et al. The efficacy and safety of the patients of myelodysplastic syndromes-refractory anemia with excess blasts treated with decitabine alone or CAG/HAG regimen. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2017; 38:572–577
18. Locatelli F, Strahm B. How I treat myelodysplastic syndromes of childhood. Blood. 2018; 131:1406–1414
19. Wei G, Ni W, Chiao JW, Cai Z, Huang H, Liu D. A meta-analysis of CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin, G-CSF) regimen for the treatment of 1029 patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome. J Hematol Oncol. 2011; 4:46
20. Garcia-Manero G. Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2015 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management. Am J Hematol. 2015; 90:831–841
21. Bejar R. Clinical and genetic predictors of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2014; 99:956–964
22. Lübbert M, Suciu S, Baila L, Rüter BH, Platzbecker U, Giagounidis A, et al. Low-dose decitabine versus best supportive care in elderly patients with intermediate- or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy
: final results of the randomized phase III study of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer leukemia group and the German MDS study group. J Clin Oncol. 2011; 29:1987–1996
23. Jeong SH, Kim YJ, Lee JH, Kim YK, Kim SJ, Park SK, et al. A prospective, multicenter, observational study of long-term decitabine treatment in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Oncotarget. 2015; 6:44985–44994
24. Zhang X, Li Y, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhang C, Gao L, et al. Etoposide in combination with low-dose CAG (cytarabine, aclarubicin, G-CSF) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a multicenter, randomized control trial in southwest China. Leuk Res. 2013; 37:657–664
25. Visani G, Guiducci B, D’Adamo F, Mele A, Nicolini G, Leopardi G, et al. Cyclophosphamide, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CDOP) plus rituximab is effective and well tolerated in poor performance status elderly patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2005; 46:477–479
26. Rifkin RM, Gregory SA, Mohrbacher A, Hussein MA. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone provide significant reduction in toxicity compared with doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a phase III multicenter randomized trial. Cancer. 2006; 106:848–858
27. Batist G, Harris L, Azarnia N, Lee LW, Daza-Ramirez P. Improved anti-tumor response rate with decreased cardiotoxicity of non-pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer in patients who had received prior adjuvant doxorubicin: results of a retrospective analysis. Anticancer Drugs. 2006; 17:587–595