Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Nasal Tip Volume Analysis After Butterfly Graft

Chaiet, Scott R. MD; Marcus, Benjamin C. MD


The article appearing on pages 9–12 in the January, 2014, issue contained errors in some figure legends and figures.

The legends to figures 1 and 2 should have contained the following attribution:

Reprinted from Clark JM, Cook TA. The “butterf ly” graft in functional secondary rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope . 2002;112:1917–25. Used with permission of John Wiley and Sons.

Informed consent was received for publication of the Figures 3 and 4 .

The publisher regrets the errors.

Annals of Plastic Surgery. 72(4):490, April 2014.

doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182586b5d
Aesthetic Surgery

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative changes of the nasal tip in patients who underwent internal nasal valve reconstruction with the auricular cartilage butterfly graft. It is believed that this graft may alter the nasal tip appearance, potentially limiting the technique’s broad use despite its proven efficacy.

Methods or Design A retrospective chart and photograph review, between 2005 and 2009, identified 157 patients who underwent butterfly grafting without other tip modifications at a single institution by 1 surgeon. Changes in supratip projection were measured in the lateral view, and changes in tip width were measured in the frontal view from preoperative to 3-month postoperative photographs.

Results For 21 subjects (12 female and 9 male), the change in tip width ranged from −10.2% to +15.7% (absolute mean 6.4%), and the change in supratip projection ranged from −23.4% to +15.0% (absolute mean 8.5%). Nine subjects with increased projection showed a mean increase of 7.0%, and a mean decrease of 9.7% was found in the 12 subjects with decreased supratip projection.

Conclusions The butterfly graft for internal nasal valve dysfunction results in cosmetic alteration to nasal tip width with a mean change of 6.4%. The change in supratip projection showed greater variability possibly related to purposeful cosmetic changes. Depending on the patient’s level of nasal dysfunction, the 6.4% mean change in nasal tip width may be more or less personally significant.

From the Division of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

Received September 22, 2011 and accepted for publication, after revision April 2, 2012.

Presented as an oral presentation at the AAFPRS 2010 Fall Meeting, September 24, 2010, Boston, MA.

Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.

Reprints: Scott R. Chaiet, MD, Division of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, UW Department of Surgery, K4/764 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53726-7375. E-mail:

© 2014 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins