Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Which Venous System to Choose for Anastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstructions?

Ross, Gary L. MBChB, MD, FRCS (Plast)*; Ang, Erik S. W. FRCS (Glas)*; Golger, Alex MD*; Lannon, Declan FRCS (Plast)*; Addison, Patrick FRCS (Plast)*; Snell, Laura MD*; Novak, Christine B. PT, MS*; Lipa, Joan E. MD, MSc, FRCS(C), FACS; Gullane, Patrick J. MD, FRCSC, FACS*; Neligan, Peter C. MB, BCh, FRCS (I), FRCSC, FACS*

doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181629a91
Head and Neck Surgery

It has been postulated that venous thrombosis in free flap surgery necessitates the use of 2 venous anastomoses into different venous systems.

We retrospectively analyzed a single surgeon's 10-year experience (August 1993 to August 2003) in primary free flap reconstruction for malignant tumors of the head and neck. Of 492 primary reconstructions that did not need a vein graft, vein loop, or cephalic turnover procedure, 251 used the internal jugular venous system as venous outflow, 140 used the subclavian system as outflow, and 101 used both.

Two hundred thirty-eight of 251 (95%) of flaps utilizing the internal jugular venous system for outflow were successful compared with 129 of 140 (92%) of flaps utilizing the subclavian system. Where both venous systems were used the success rate was 101 of 101 (100%) (P < 0.05).

Where possible, a second venous anastomosis should be performed utilizing both venous drainage systems.

From the *Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Canada; and †Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angelos, CA.

Received August 29, 2007 and accepted for publication, after revision, November 19, 2007.

Reprints: Gary L. Ross, MBChB, MRCS, MD, FRCS, Department of Plastic Surgery, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. E-mail:

© 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.