Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness : Annals of Surgery

Journal Logo

Original Articles

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness

Heinrich, Stefan MD*; Goerres, Gerhard W. MD; Schäfer, Markus MD*; Sagmeister, Markus MD; Bauerfeind, Peter MD; Pestalozzi, Bernhard C. MD§; Hany, Thomas F. MD; von Schulthess, Gustav K. MD; Clavien, Pierre-Alain MD, PhD*

Author Information
Annals of Surgery 242(2):p 235-243, August 2005. | DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84

Objective: 

We sought to determine the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the management of presumed resectable pancreatic cancer and to assess the cost of this new staging procedure.

Summary Background Data: 

PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer, but anatomic information is limited. Integrated PET/CT enables optimal anatomic delineation of PET findings and identification of FDG-negative lesions on computed tomography (CT) images and might improve preoperative staging.

Material and Methods: 

Patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who had a PET/CT between June 2001 to April 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Routine staging included abdominal CT, chest x-ray, and CA 19-9 measurement. FDG-PET/CT was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed by histology. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on charged cost of PET/CT and pancreatic resection and included the time frame of staging and surgery.

Results: 

Fifty-nine patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40–80 years) were included in this analysis. Fifty-one patients had lesions in the head and 8 in the tail of the pancreas. The positive and negative predictive values for pancreatic cancer were 91% and 64%, respectively. PET/CT detected additional distant metastases in 5 and synchronous rectal cancer in 2 patients. PET/CT findings changed the management in 16% of patients with pancreatic cancer deemed resectable after routine staging (P = 0.031) and was cost saving.

Conclusions: 

PET/CT represents an important staging procedure prior to pancreatic resection for cancer, since it significantly improvespatient selection and is cost-effective.

© 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid