We merged direct, multisource, and systematic assessments of surgeon behavior with malpractice claims, to analyze the relationship between surgeon 360-degree reviews and malpractice history.
Previous work suggests that malpractice claims are associated with a poor physician-patient relationship, which is likely related to behaviors captured by 360-degree review. We hypothesize that 360-degree review results are associated with malpractice claims.
Surgeons from 4 academic medical centers covered by a common malpractice carrier underwent 360-degree review in 2012 to 2013 (n = 385). Matched, de-identified reviews and malpractice claims data were available for 264 surgeons from 2000 to 2015. We analyzed 23 questions, highlighting positive and negative behaviors within the domains of education, excellence, humility, openness, respect, service, and teamwork. Regression analysis with robust standard error was used to assess the potential association between 360-degree review results and malpractice claims.
The range of claims among the 264 surgeons was 0 to 8, with 48.1% of surgeons having at least 1 claim. Multiple positive and negative behaviors were significantly associated with the risk of having malpractice claims (P < 0.05). Surgeons in the bottom decile for several items had an increased likelihood of having at least 1 claim.
Surgeon behavior, as assessed by 360-degree review, is associated with malpractice claims. These findings highlight the importance of teamwork and communication in exposure to malpractice. Although the nature of malpractice claims is complex and multifactorial, the identification and modification of negative physician behaviors may mitigate malpractice risk and ultimately result in the improved quality of patient care.
*Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA
†CRICO, Boston, MA
‡Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
§Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
¶Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
||Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA.
Reprints: Alex B. Haynes, MD, MPH, Ariadne Labs, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02114; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
This study was supported by a grant from The Risk Management Foundation of the Harvard Medical Institutions, Inc. The study design, analysis, and decision to publish were considered independently of these funding sources and individual data were not available to the insurer. The data collected by the institution will not be used for any purpose other than those stated in this manuscript.
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal's Web site (www.annalsofsurgery.com).