To determine the effect of cumulative volume on all-cause morbidity and operative time.
Gastric bypass is an important public health procedure, but it is difficult to master with little data about how surgeon cumulative volume affects outcomes longitudinally.
This was a longitudinal study of 29 surgeons during the first 6 years of performing bariatric surgery in a high-volume, regionalized center of excellence system. Cumulative volume was determined using date and time of the procedure. Cumulative volume was analyzed in blocks of 75 cases. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity during the index admission and the secondary outcome was operative time.
Overall, 11,684 gastric bypasses were performed by 29 surgeons at 9 centers of excellence. The overall morbidity rate was 10.1% and short-term outcomes were related significantly to cumulative volume. Perioperative risk plateaued after approximately 500 cases and was lowest for surgeons who had completed more than 600 cases (odds ratio 0.53 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.96 P = 0.04) compared to the first 75 cases. Operative time also stabilized after approximately 500 cases, with an operative time 44.7 minutes faster than surgeons in their first 75 cases (95% confidence interval 37.0–52.4 min P < 0.001).
The present study demonstrated the clear, substantial influence of surgeon cumulative volume on improved perioperative outcomes and operative time. This finding emphasizes role of the individual surgeon in perioperative outcomes and that the true learning curve needed to master a complex surgical procedure such as gastric bypass is longer than previously thought, in this case requiring approximately 500 cases to plateau.
*Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
†Division of General Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Reprints: Dennis Hong, MD, MSc, Division of General Surgery, St Joseph's Healthcare, Room G814, 50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 4A6. E-mail: email@example.com.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.