Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Kim, Say-June MD, PhD*; Ryu, Gil-O MD*; Choi, Byung-Jo MD*; Kim, Jeong-Goo MD*; Lee, Kwan-Ju MD*; Lee, Sang Chul MD*; Oh, Seong-Taek MD, PhD*,†

doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b
Original Articles

Objective: The aim of this study was to show the safety and feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) by comparing its short-term outcomes with those following conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Summary Background Data: Single-port laparoscopic surgery maximizes the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, and therefore it can be an ultimate attainment of laparoscopic surgery. However, no comparative study has addressed its role in colorectal cancer.

Methods: Prospectively collected data of patients who had undergone either conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 106) or SPLS (n = 73) for colorectal cancer between March 2006 and May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The short-term outcomes of these 2 operative modalities were compared.

Results: Of the 179 study subjects, 103 (57.5%) had colon cancer and 76 (42.5%) had rectal cancer. Various operative methods, from right hemicolectomy to abdominoperineal resection, were used according to location through either conventional laparoscopic or SPLS approach. In its comparison, mean surgical time was greater in the SPLS group (255 vs 276 minutes, P < 0.008). Acquired length of sufficient surgical margins and the number of harvested lymph nodes were comparable. Postoperative recovery was faster in the SPLS group, in terms of shorter time duration before first flatus (SPLS vs conventional laparoscopic surgery; 2.5 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 1.8 days, P = 0.004), earlier initiation of free oral fluids (1.8 ± 2.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.7 days, P = 0.000) and of a solid diet (4.2 ± 2.9 vs 6.5 ± 2.7 days, P = 0.000), less frequent usage of parenteral narcotics (2.2 ± 3.2 vs 3.5 ± 4.0 times, P = 0.029), and shorter hospital stay (9.6 ± 9.6 vs 15.5 ± 9.8 days, P = 0.000).

Conclusion: This study shows that SPLS is both safe and feasible in colorectal cancer, and that it has equivalent or better short-term outcomes than conventional laparoscopic surgery. Accordingly, the authors conclude that SPLS can be an alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

This retrospective analysis of short-term operative outcomes after conventional laparoscopic surgery (n = 106) and SPLS (n = 73) for colorectal cancer shows that the latter procedure is both safe and feasible, and has acceptable or better short-term outcomes than the former.

*Department of Surgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea

Department of Surgery, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Reprints: Sang Chul Lee, MD, Department of Surgery, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea, 520-2 Daeheung-dong, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. E-mail:

Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

© 2011 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.