Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Scientific Fraud

Impact of Fujii’s Data on Our Current Knowledge and Practice for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Habib, Ashraf S., MBBCh, MSc, MHSc, FRCA; Gan, Tong J., MD, MHS, FRCA

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31827ab7d8
Editorials
Free

From the Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Accepted for publication October 23, 2012.

Supported by departmental funds.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Address correspondence to Tong J. Gan, MD, MHS, FRCA, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710. Address e-mail to gan00001@dm.duke.edu.

Between 1999 and 2001, Kranke et al.1–3 published 3 articles highlighting concerns with data from the numerous studies published by Dr. Yoshitaka Fujii on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) management. Approximately 10 years later, Toho University Faculty of Medicine started to investigate the credibility of 9 publications by Dr. Fujii and announced in March 2012 that 8 of those studies lacked appropriate ethics committee approval. The Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA) subsequently set up a special investigation committee to assess the allegations of scientific fraud. The committee investigated 212 articles and concluded that 172 studies were fabricated and 3 were not. For 37 articles, the JSA stated that the evidence was inconclusive as to whether or not the studies were fabricated.

Based on fabrication of at least 172 studies, this likely represents the largest fraud in the history of anesthesia literature. The purpose of this editorial is to provide an overview of the scope of Dr. Fujii’s publications relating to PONV, and the extent to which our knowledge and management of PONV have been affected by removing these data from the literature.

Of the 249 articles published by Fujii, 122 dealt with PONV. Of these, 110 articles were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the remaining 12 articles were reviews. Of the 110 PONV RCTs, all but 1 were determined to be fabricated by the JSA investigation. The sole study not found to be fabricated was among those with no evidence to prove whether it was fabricated.

There are several common themes in Dr. Fujii’s publications. Many of his studies were repeated in different patient populations using the same drugs or combination of drugs, and reporting very similar results. Using a meta-analytic approach, Carlisle4 demonstrated that there was almost no heterogeneity among the majority of outcomes in the studies published by Fujii (I2 = 0). The I2 test assesses the degree of heterogeneity among included studies. It can be interpreted as the percentage of the total variability in a set of effect sizes due to true heterogeneity, that is, between-studies variability. When testing similar drugs in different patient populations, some degree of heterogeneity is expected. For instance, among RCTs comparing granisetron versus metoclopramide, the I2 was 0% in Fujii’s studies for all the end points tested (nausea, vomiting, nausea or vomiting, and need for rescue antiemetics) compared with I2 ranging from 5% to 51% for studies by all other authors.4

The main focus of Dr. Fujii’s fabricated publications has been granisetron, which was allegedly investigated in 70 of his published RCTs. This included single-dose studies, dose-finding studies, and comparisons with other antiemetics mainly ramosetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide, as well as comparisons of the combination of granisetron with dexamethasone or droperidol versus single agents. In Dr. Fujii’s articles, granisetron was reported to be more effective than all those other antiemetics with the exception of ramosetron, which was more effective than granisetron from 24 to 48 hours after surgery, but had similar effectiveness from 0 to 24 hours.5 In his dose-ranging studies, the minimum effective dose for PONV prophylaxis was 40 μg/kg in adults6 and children7 when given IV, 2 mg in adults8 and 40 μg/kg in children9 when given orally, and 20 μg/kg for the treatment of PONV in adults.10

In 2001, Kranke et al.3 performed a meta-analysis on granisetron for PONV prophylaxis and found that Fujii’s results differed from those reported by other centers. Specifically, pooled results from Fujii’s studies suggested that low-dose granisetron (≤20 μg/kg) was ineffective for PONV prophylaxis and only high doses (>20 μg/kg) were effective. This was in contrast to pooled results from other centers where there was no difference in effectiveness between low-dose and high-dose granisetron. Furthermore, pooled results from the Fujii studies suggested much higher effectiveness of high-dose granisetron compared with other centers. More recent studies by other investigators have confirmed that granisetron doses as low as 0.1 mg/kg are effective for PONV prophylaxis in adults.11

In his meta-analysis comparing the results of the studies by Fujii with other authors, Carlisle4 reported that granisetron was 1.3 to 1.5 times more effective in RCTs by Fujii than by other authors. Similar to other literature, Fujii reported that the combination of granisetron with other antiemetics was more effective than each antiemetic alone. However, his publications suggested that granisetron was unique in terms of acting synergistically with other antiemetics, a finding that was not supported by the work of other authors.4

Another focus of Dr. Fujii’s publications was ramosetron, the subject of 15 published RCTs. Fujii reported that ramosetron was effective for PONV prophylaxis for 48 hours after surgery, with a minimum effective dose of 0.3 mg in adults12 and 6 μg/kg in children.13 In 7 studies, he compared granisetron with ramosetron and reported that both had similar effectiveness from 0 to 24 hours, but ramosetron was more effective from 24 to 48 hours.5 The doses used in these studies are similar to those used by other investigators. Unfortunately, the only dose versus response studies published for ramosetron seem to come from Fujii. As a result, ramosetron dosing needs to be assessed by other investigators. The effectiveness of ramosetron was also much higher in Fujii’s publications; for instance, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for reducing postoperative vomiting in pooled studies by Fujii was 0.39 (0.30–0.51) compared with 0.65 (0.47–0.90) in pooled studies by other investigators.4

Seven of Dr. Fujii’s studies reported on the dose response of perioperative administration of dexamethasone. Most of those studies suggested that dexamethasone 8 mg and 16 mg, but not 4 mg, were effective for PONV prophylaxis.14 Dexamethasone 4 mg was reported to be effective for PONV prophylaxis in only 2 of his 7 studies.15,16 Other large studies have, however, confirmed the antiemetic effectiveness of dexamethasone 4 mg,17 which is the currently the recommended dose by the PONV consensus guidelines of the Society of Ambulatory Anesthesia (SAMBA).18

Sixteen of Dr. Fujii’s studies reported antiemetic effects of propofol given as a small bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg or 0.5 mg/kg at the end of surgery or as a continuous low-dose infusion at 1 mg/kg/h in women undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The main findings were that propofol 0.5 mg/kg, but not 0.25 mg/kg, given at skin closure19 was effective for reducing PONV for 24 hours and was more effective than metoclopramide in all reported studies and droperidol in some of the reported studies.20 In Fujii’s studies, infusion of propofol at 1 mg/kg/h was also effective at reducing emetic symptoms during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.21 Data from other investigators suggest that propofol has prophylactic antiemetic effects mainly if used for maintenance of anesthesia.22 Studies investigating the effectiveness of subhypnotic doses of propofol have reported mixed results.23,24 The administration of a small dose of propofol at the end of surgery was not shown to have the significant antiemetic effects reported by Fujii.25

Metoclopramide and droperidol were included, mainly as comparators with granisetron, in many of Fujii’s studies. In his meta-analysis, Carlisle4 reported that droperidol was less effective in studies by Fujii compared with others. Midazolam was investigated in 2 studies with both concluding that preinduction 50 μg/kg and 75 μg/kg doses were effective for PONV prophylaxis for 24 hours after surgery.26 The effectiveness of the 75 μg/kg dose was also reported by other investigators,27 but no other studies compared 50 μg/kg versus 75 μg/kg. One study by Fujii reported that oral clonidine was more effective than diazepam in reducing PONV after strabismus surgery in children.28 It is interesting to note that this was the only PONV study that the JSA could not determine whether it was fabricated. Another study reported that oxygen was effective for reducing PONV in women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.29 The current evidence suggests, however, that oxygen supplementation is not an effective modality for PONV prophylaxis.30

Because of the large amount of literature on the topic of PONV, numerous meta-analyses, review articles, and consensus guidelines have been published to summarize this literature and guide the clinician. It is, therefore, important when reading those reviews to assess whether its authors are using articles published by Fujii. While some meta-analyses, particularly earlier ones, have included studies by Fujii,31–33 others have conducted sensitivity analyses excluding his studies.34–36 Similarly, many of the published guidelines such as the SAMBA consensus guidelines for the management of PONV18 and recommendations by French37and German38 experts did not include any of the articles published by Fujii in formulating their recommendations.

Fujii’s fabricated data differed from data reported by other authors. His data compromised, at least in part, review articles and meta-analyses that used his fabricated data. Some published systematic reviews performed sensitivity analyses and noted that their conclusions were not significantly different when excluding Fujii’s studies.35,39 Others, however, indicated that including Fujii’s data changed some of the results of their meta-analyses.34,36,40 It is impossible to determine to what extent the reviews that included Fujii’s data, but did not undertake a sensitivity analysis, were compromised. However, it is likely modest, because of the enormous amount of data generated by other investigators.

Although Dr. Fujii published extensively, the effect of his fraud on the management of PONV has been minimal. The lack of inclusion of his data in the current commonly used guidelines should minimize the effect of these retractions on the practice of PONV management, particularly in North America, where the SAMBA guidelines have been widely adopted.

Back to Top | Article Outline

DISCLOSURES

Name: Ashraf S. Habib, MBBCh, MSc, MHSc, FRCA.

Contribution: This author helped analyze the data and write the manuscript.

Attestation: Ashraf S. Habib approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Name: Tong J. Gan, MD, MHS, FRCA.

Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.

Attestation: Tong J. Gan approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: Tong J. Gan received research funding from Cara Therapeutics, Premier Inc., AcelRx., Cheetah Medical, and Acacia, Speaker’s Bureau: Baxter, Hospira, Cadence, Fresenius-Kabi.

This manuscript was handled by: Steven L. Shafer, MD.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Kranke P, Apfel CC, Greim CA, Roewer N. Methodological problems arising from “serial publishing” on the effectiveness of granisetron in PONV. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:481–3
2. Kranke P, Apfel CC, Roewer N, Fujii Y. Reported data on granisetron and postoperative nausea and vomiting by Fujii et al. are incredibly nice! Anesth Analg. 2000;90:1004–7
3. Kranke P, Apfel CC, Eberhart LH, Georgieff M, Roewer N. The influence of a dominating centre on a quantitative systematic review of granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45:659–70
4. Carlisle JB. A meta-analysis of prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: randomised controlled trials by Fujii et al. compared with other authors. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:1076–90
5. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Comparison of granisetron and ramosetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy. Clin Ther. 2002;24:766–72
6. Fujii Y, Toyooka H, Tanaka H. Granisetron in the prevention of nausea and vomiting after middle-ear surgery: a dose-ranging study. Br J Anaesth. 1998;80:764–6
7. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Granisetron reduces post-operative vomiting in children: a dose-ranging study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999;16:62–5
8. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Kawasaki T. Preoperative oral granisetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. Eur J Surg. 2001;167:184–7
9. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Preoperative oral granisetron for the prevention of vomiting following paediatric surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12:267–71
10. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Efficacy of granisetron for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing breast surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2006;26:203–8
11. Gan TJ, Candiotti KA, Klein SM, Rodriguez Y, Nielsen KC, White WD, Habib AS. Double-blind comparison of granisetron, promethazine, or a combination of both for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing outpatient laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:829–36
12. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study of ramosetron for the prevention of nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy. Clin Ther. 2002;24:1148–53
13. Fujii Y, Tanaka H. Results of a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial to determine the effective dose of ramosetron for the prevention of vomiting after tonsillectomy in children. Clin Ther. 2003;25:3135–42
14. Fujii Y, Nakayama M. Dexamethasone for reduction of nausea, vomiting and analgesic use after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;100:27–30
15. Fujii Y, Nakayama M. Dexamethasone for the reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting and analgesic requirements after middle ear surgery in adult Japanese patients. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009;31:337–40
16. Fujii Y, Nakayama M. Reduction of postoperative nausea and vomiting and analgesic requirement with dexamethasone in women undergoing general anesthesia for mastectomy. Breast J. 2007;13:564–7
17. Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer NIMPACT Investigators. . A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2441–51
18. Gan TJ, Meyer TA, Apfel CC, Chung F, Davis PJ, Habib AS, Hooper VD, Kovac AL, Kranke P, Myles P, Philip BK, Samsa G, Sessler DI, Temo J, Tramèr MR, Vander Kolk C, Watcha MSociety for Ambulatory Anesthesia. . Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:1615–28
19. Fujii Y, Itakura M. Low-dose propofol to prevent nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106:50–2
20. Fujii Y, Tanaka H, Kobayashi N. Small doses of propofol, droperidol, and metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;124:266–9
21. Numazaki M, Fujii Y. Reduction of emetic symptoms during cesarean delivery with antiemetics: propofol at subhypnotic dose versus traditional antiemetics. J Clin Anesth. 2003;15:423–7
22. Tramèr M, Moore A, McQuay H. Propofol anaesthesia and postoperative nausea and vomiting: quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled studies. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:247–55
23. Kim SI, Han TH, Kil HY, Lee JS, Kim SC. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by continuous infusion of subhypnotic propofol in female patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85:898–900
24. Montgomery JE, Sutherland CJ, Kestin IG, Sneyd JR. Infusions of subhypnotic doses of propofol for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anaesthesia. 1996;51:554–7
25. Gan TJ, Ginsberg B, Grant AP, Glass PS. Double-blind, randomized comparison of ondansetron and intraoperative propofol to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:1036–42
26. Fujii Y, Itakura M. Antiemetic efficacy of low-dose midazolam in patients undergoing thyroidectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;144:206–9
27. Jung JS, Park JS, Kim SO, Lim DG, Park SS, Kwak KH, Cho JD, Jeon YH. Prophylactic antiemetic effect of midazolam after middle ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137:753–6
28. Handa F, Fujii Y. The efficacy of oral clonidine premedication in the prevention of postoperative vomiting in children following strabismus surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2001;11:71–4
29. Fujii Y, Itakura M. Supplemental oxygen prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Resus. 2008;44:47–50
30. Orhan-Sungur M, Kranke P, Sessler D, Apfel CC. Does supplemental oxygen reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1733–8
31. Kim WO, Koo BN, Kim YK, Kil HK. Ramosetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV): a meta-analysis. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2011;61:405–12
32. Henzi I, Sonderegger J, Tramèr MR. Efficacy, dose-response, and adverse effects of droperidol for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:537–51
33. Domino KB, Anderson EA, Polissar NL, Posner KL. Comparative efficacy and safety of ondansetron, droperidol, and metoclopramide for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:1370–9
34. Leslie JB, Gan TJ. Meta-analysis of the safety of 5-HT3 antagonists with dexamethasone or droperidol for prevention of PONV. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:856–72
35. Kovac AL. Meta-analysis of the use of rescue antiemetics following PONV prophylactic failure with 5-HT3 antagonist/dexamethasone versus single-agent therapies. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40:873–87
36. Habib AS, El-Moalem HE, Gan TJ. The efficacy of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists combined with droperidol for PONV prophylaxis is similar to their combination with dexamethasone. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Can J Anaesth. 2004;51:311–9
37. Diemunsch PSociété française d’anesthésie et de réanimation. . [Conference of experts–short text. Management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. French Society of Anesthesia and Resuscitation]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008;27:866–78
38. Rüsch D, Becke K, Eberhart LH, Franck M, Hönig A, Morin AM, Opel S, Piper S, Treiber H, Ullrich L, Wallenborn J, Kranke P. [Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)—recommendations for risk assessment, prophylaxis and therapy—results of an expert panel meeting]. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2011;46:158–70
39. Tang DH, Malone DC. A network meta-analysis on the efficacy of serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists used in adults during the first 24 hours for postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis. Clin Ther. 2012;34:282–94
40. Eberhart LH, Morin AM, Bothner U, Georgieff M. Droperidol and 5-HT3-receptor antagonists, alone or in combination, for prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2000;44:1252–7
© 2013 International Anesthesia Research Society