In contrast, 1 study observed the incidence of back pain after spinal anesthesia to be significantly higher than after general anesthesia (26% vs 4%).42 The backache lasted for only 2 days, was mild in intensity, and did not interfere with the patients’ normal activities. In this study, the authors specifically noted the lack of a radicular component, i.e., there was no radiation to the lower extremities. One can conclude from the studies6,39,40,42 that the incidence of back pain after spinal anesthesia is not different from general anesthesia (level 2).
INCIDENCE OF BACK PAIN AFTER NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA: PREEXISTING BACK PAIN AS A PREDISPOSING FACTOR
In the seminal articles by Dripps and Vandam,1,2 8460 patients undergoing 10,098 spinal anesthetics were studied. Although the incidence was not reported, Dripps and Vandam noted the occurrence of back pain after spinal anesthesia. Other studies in the 1950s and 1960s showed the incidence to be 2% to 3% after epidural anesthesia.3,4 Another study, which looked specifically into the incidence of back pain after epidural anesthesia, demonstrated the incidence to be 7% (11 of 167 patients).5 In this study, the authors examined their patients, which showed limited back flexion in some but with negative neurologic findings. Spine radiographs, when ordered, showed degenerative osteoarthritis. There was tenderness and “minor superficial injury” at the site of injection and they attributed the patients’ pain to these findings. Most back pain disappeared within 24 to 48 hours (7 patients) or, at worst, within several days.5
More recent studies on back pain after spinal anesthesia have reported the incidence to be 10% to 29% (Table 4).43–45 One study noted the backaches to be mild in intensity, characterized by local tenderness at the site of injection, and responded to oral anti-inflammatory drugs or resolved spontaneously.44 The exact duration of the back pain was not noted. The most recent study noted that the incidence of back pain decreased from 29% on postoperative day 1 to 5% 4 weeks after the spinal.45 Not only did the incidence decrease, but the intensity of pain also diminished. The authors noted that at 4 weeks after the spinal anesthesia, only a history of back pain was related to the occurrence of back pain. The 5% incidence of back pain at 4 weeks, observed by Tekgül et al.,45 is closer to the 10% to 11% incidence noted earlier by other investigators.43,44 From the studies mentioned,43–45 it can be stated that the incidence of back pain after spinal anesthesia ranges from 9% to 29%. The pain is mild in intensity and decreases with time (level 1).
Other studies looked at the incidence of back pain after epidural anesthesia (Table 4).41,46,47 In a prospective survey of 105 patients who received epidural anesthesia, the incidence of back pain was 27% (28 of 105).46 Although it appears to be high, the authors’ criteria for back pain were not strict. All the patients characterized their pain as “injection site tenderness,” which lasted for <4 days. In this study,46 patients were only seen or contacted by telephone at 1 week after the surgery. Another study showed an incidence of 18% within 5 days and 11% at 3 months after epidural anesthesia.47 A more recent study noted the incidence of persistent back pain (pain that was consistently reported at day 2, day 10, and week 13 after surgery) after epidural anesthesia to be 2% (10 of 483 patients).41 Seventy-one patients (15%) complained of clinically significant back pain 2 days after epidural anesthesia but it was not persistent; the pain subsided by the 10th day in 38 patients or by the 13th week in 33 patients. The risk factors that were identified by the investigators included higher body mass index, >2 attempts at block placement, lithotomy position, and surgery exceeding 2.5 hours. No patient experienced paresthesia, numbness, or weakness of their lower extremities.41 The relationship of the duration of surgery and development of back pain was noted in the earlier studies of Brown and Elman6 and Urbach et al.39 The incidence of back pain after epidural anesthesia ranges from 7% to 27%. Similar to spinal anesthesia, the back pain is not persistent (level 1).
A randomized study compared the incidence and duration of back pain after spinal and epidural anesthesia.48 In their study of 192 patients younger than 50 years (96 per group), the investigators noted that the incidence of back pain was significantly more frequent (P < 0.05) after epidural compared with spinal anesthesia at postoperative day 1 (29/96 patients [30%] vs 11/96 patients [11%]), day 2 (5 patients [16%] vs 2 patients [2%]), and day 3 (9 patients [(9%] vs 1 patient [1%]). There were no differences in the age, height, weight, sex distribution, or duration of surgery between the 2 groups. The needles used were a 24G Sprotte spinal needle or an 18G Touhy epidural needle. The number of attempts was not noted nor the criteria for back pain stated in the study. It can be stated that the incidence of back pain is higher after epidural anesthesia compared with spinal anesthesia (level 2).
Although most studies reported only short-term follow-up (Table 4), 2 studies observed their patients for 1 year.43,47 In 1 study in which the incidence of back pain before the spinal anesthesia was 19% (23/122), 11% of the patients developed back pain (12/122) within 5 days after the spinal anesthesia and 12% (15/122) at 3 months.43 Seven of the 12 patients who complained of back pain at 5 days and 14 of the 15 patients who still experienced back pain at 3 months suffered from back pain before the spinal anesthesia. One patient with no history of back problems still complained of back pain at 3 months and at 1 year, resulting in a 0.8% incidence of new-onset back pain. Preexisting back pain was the only variable associated with back pain persisting for 3 months. Associations were not found with technical factors or patient characteristics. In another study, 195 patients undergoing epidural anesthesia for knee arthroscopy were followed up for 1 year.47 The incidence of back pain at 5 days was 18% (24/131) and 12% at 3 months (15 of 131 patients); 13 of the 15 patients at the 3-month follow-up suffered from back pain before the epidural anesthetic, making the incidence of new back pain 1.5%. At the 1-year follow-up, 6 of the 7 patients who had back pain before the epidural blockade continued to experience back pain. Their results were similar to the observational findings of Schwabe and Hopf43 and Tekgül et al.45 who stated that long-term back pain after epidural anesthesia was almost exclusively associated with preexisting back pain. Preexisting low back pain is a risk factor for persistent back pain after neuraxial anesthesia (level 2).
WORSENING OF BACK PAIN AFTER NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA
Although preexisting back pain may be a risk factor for the occurrence of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia,39,43,45,47 neuraxial anesthesia does not appear to worsen the severity of the pain (Table 5). In the study by Urbach et al.39, only 1 of 11 patients noted worsening of their back pain after spinal anesthesia, an incidence similar to that seen after general anesthesia (1 of 14 patients). Three of 11 patients who underwent spinal anesthesia noted improvement, whereas 7 did not notice any change. In the general anesthesia group, 1 of 14 patients with a history of back pain experienced worsening of symptoms, whereas 13 noted no change. In the study by Schwabe and Hopf,43 6 of the 23 patients with preexisting back pain still complained of persistent back pain 1 year after their spinal anesthesia. Another study showed no exacerbation of the patients’ lumbar radicular symptoms after epidural anesthesia.49 As previously noted, some patients can have “relief” of their back pain after spinal anesthesia.39 There can also be improvement in the numbness50 reflecting the transient nature of this problem.51 The improvement of symptoms after the epidural local anesthetic injection has been documented.52 It can be stated that although preexisting back pain is a risk factor for back pain after neuraxial anesthesia, the intensity of the back pain is not worse after a neuraxial procedure (level 2).
A more recent study of 937 patients with history of spinal stenosis, disk disease, or previous lumbar surgery showed 10 of the patients developed postoperative neurologic complications (Table 5).53 Of the 10 patients, 3 experienced new sensory or motor deficits and 7 noted worsening of their symptoms. One of the 3 patients who complained of new deficits also noted complete resolution of her deficits 8 weeks after resection of an epidural ependymoma (case 5). The other 2 patients with new deficits had persistent symptoms at 3 and 7 years after surgery (cases 1 and 6, respectively). Four of the 7 patients with progression of their deficits noted improvement in their preoperative baseline status after 6 years (case 2), 3 months (case 3), 6 weeks (case 4), and 1 week (case 9). Of the remaining 3 patients, 1 partially improved 4 weeks after laminectomy (case 7), whereas the other 2 patients experienced partial resolution after 8 weeks (case 8) and after 4 weeks (case 10).
The reported improvements in back pain after neuraxial anesthesia39 should be contrasted with the reports of worsening of neurologic symptoms after neuraxial anesthesia in patients with spinal stenosis.54 In the study by Hebl et al.,53 4 of the 10 patients who developed new deficits or complained of progression of their deficits after neuraxial anesthesia suffered from spinal stenosis. The patients’ symptoms may have been related to progression of their stenosis. Taking these reports into consideration, the ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications recommended that risk-to-benefit analysis should be made before neuraxial anesthesia is performed and increased perioperative vigilance be observed in patients with known severe spinal stenosis or those with symptoms suggestive of the problem (class II, as per ASRA’s recommendation).35 Such symptoms include neurogenic claudication or “shopping cart position” of the patient while walking (back flexed forward).
MECHANISMS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF BACK PAIN AFTER NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA
Back pain after spinal anesthesia has been attributed to tears or other trauma to the ligaments, fascia, or bone with localized bleeding or to injury to the nerve roots in the cauda equina.2,41,42 Potential musculoskeletal mechanisms include immobility of the spine, relaxation of the paraspinal muscles under anesthesia, flattening of the normal lumbar convexity, and stretching of the paraspinal ligaments and joint capsules, especially during the lithotomy position.6,39 Pelvic rotation during the lithotomy position can accentuate the reduction in the normal lumbar lordosis from paraspinal muscle relaxation during neuraxial anesthesia, thus straining the lumbosacral ligaments.41 Increased stress to the lumbosacral ligaments also occurs during relaxation of the back muscles during spinal anesthesia.41 The risk factors for development of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia include preexisting back pain, immobilization during the surgery >2.5 hours, lithotomy position during surgery, body mass index ≥32 kg/m2, and multiple attempts at neuraxial placement.6,39,41,43,45,47
Studies examining the occurrence of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia frequently fail to describe the characteristics of the back pain. Although the back pain is typically localized to the lower back, a few studies noted the occurrence of radiation of the pain to the buttock and/or lower extremities.39,42 Most studies did not comment on the characteristics of the back pain, whether it was axial (localized to the low back), radicular, or there were signs and symptoms of facet syndrome, discogenic pain, sacroiliac joint syndrome, or piriformis syndrome. Future studies should involve a back pain specialist because a more detailed description of the patient’s symptoms and an appropriate physical examination would help define the exact nature of the back pain. It would also assist in determining the appropriate treatment of the back pain.55
EFFECTIVENESS OF NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA IN BACK PAIN PATIENTS
The efficacy of neuraxial anesthesia in patients with low back pain has been the subject of several studies. Publications on the subject can be divided into spinal or epidural anesthesia, whether the patient underwent back surgery and whether the anesthesia was for obstetrical or general surgery. In a detailed study of the onset of sensory blockade after epidural local anesthetic injection in patients with back pain, Benzon et al.56 showed that 7 of 15 patients (46%) experienced delayed sensory blockade of some dermatomes, ranging from 35 to 95 minutes (Table 6). These nerve roots were blocked 10 to 70 minutes after the corresponding nerve roots in the contralateral lower extremity. The dermatomes with delayed onset of block corresponded to the nerve roots identified as demonstrating pathologic changes in the electromyogram or myelogram studies. They cited inflammation of the nerve roots, intraneural fibrosis, and extradural adhesions as possible reasons for the delayed onset of sensory blockade. In a prospective study of 57 patients who had had spine surgery, 52 patients received successful epidural anesthesia for their total hip or total knee replacements.49 Technical difficulty was noted in 3 patients, whereas inadequate spread in the lumbosacral segments was seen in 2 patients. None of the patients complained of exacerbation of their radiculopathy. In a retrospective study of 937 patients with spinal stenosis or lumbar disk disease, 207 of whom had previous spine surgery, the overall success rate of neuraxial anesthesia (spinal, epidural, and combined spinal–epidural [CSE] anesthesia) was 97%.53 The authors showed that previous spine surgery did not affect the success rate or frequency of technical complications. However, they reported patchy blockade in 10 patients and lack of sensory block in 16 patients. New deficits were noted in 3 patients and worsening of preexisting symptoms in 4 patients. Of the 10 patients who developed complications, 4 complications were associated with surgical etiology, 1 of the remaining cases may have been worsened by the epidural, whereas another may have been exacerbated by positioning of the patient during surgery.
With regard to the efficacy of spinal anesthesia in patients with back pain, a study noted successful placement in 41 of 42 spinal anesthetics57; spinal anesthesia was adequate for surgery in all 41 cases with full recovery of both sensory and motor functions. In non-obstetric cases, spinal anesthesia is effective in patients with back pain, whereas epidural anesthesia may result in incompletely blocked or delayed blockade of the lumbosacral nerve roots (level 2 evidence).
Published literature on epidural anesthesia in obstetric patients who had previous spine surgery has been limited to case reports,58,59 retrospective reports,60–62 a prospective observational study (Table 7),63 a prospective case-controlled study,64 or a prospective case-matched study (Table 7).65 In a retrospective study of patients who had Harrington rod instrumentation, Crosby and Halpern60 noted problems in placing the epidural catheter in 4 of 9 patients (Table 7). In the other retrospective study,61 continuous lumbar epidural anesthesia was established in 20 of 21 attempts although excessive local anesthetic requirements were noted in 8 patients. Incomplete sensory anesthesia was noted in 8 patients (Table 7). In the third retrospective study, Villevieille et al.62 noted technical failure in 2 of 22 patients and analgesic failure in another 2 patients. In a recent prospective, case-matched study in patients who had surgery for correction of scoliosis, neuraxial analgesia failure (defined as inability to initiate satisfactory neuraxial analgesia or any epidural catheter requiring replacement for inadequate analgesia at any time during labor or operative delivery) was sought.65 Such failures were noted in 12% (5 of 41) of patients who underwent surgery compared with none in the control group (0 of 41). The time to complete the neuraxial technique was longer and required more needle redirections in the patients who had surgery for correction of their scoliosis (Table 7).65 In summary, placement of the epidural needle or insertion of the epidural catheter can be difficult in patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery (level 2). Incomplete sensory blockade may occur after epidural anesthesia in obstetric patients who had previous back surgery (level 2).
In a prospective observational study, epidural anesthesia was used for women in labor who had scoliosis with or without previous spine surgery.63 CSE anesthesia or single-shot spinal anesthesia was offered for those with mild uncorrected scoliosis and continuous spinal anesthesia for women with severe scoliosis with or without surgery (Table 7).63 In that study, epidural catheters were placed in 7 women with uncorrected scoliosis, which resulted in satisfactory analgesia for labor, and continuous spinal anesthesia provided effective analgesia for labor and delivery. In the patients who underwent cesarean delivery, anesthesia was provided by CSE, single-shot spinal, or continuous spinal anesthesia. The authors noted that epidural anesthesia was effective for labor in patients with uncorrected scoliosis. A prospective, case-controlled, observational study did not look at completeness of sensory blockade but rather the bupivacaine consumption per hour of labor analgesia.64 The authors noted no difference in the hourly bupivacaine consumption in parturients with previous lumbar discectomy compared with control subjects. In this study, the majority of patients received a CSE anesthesia for initiation of their analgesia. The same investigators repeated their study in patients who had surgery for correction of scoliosis.65 Although they noted more analgesic failures and longer times to do the epidural anesthesia (Table 7), they noted no difference in the bupivacaine hourly consumption between the patients who had back surgery (median, 15 mg/h; interquartile range, 12.5–18.7 mg/h) compared with the patients who did not have previous surgery (median, 14 mg/h; interquartile range, 11.8–16 mg/h; Table 7).65 Overall, studies showed the efficacy of epidural for labor analgesia in women who had previous lumbar spine surgery (level 2).
PREVENTION OF BACK PAIN FROM NEURAXIAL INJECTION
Field block anesthesia, wherein the local anesthetic is injected into the interspinous space near the lamina, resulted in a decreased incidence of backache: 6% (18 of 322 epidural and spinal anesthetics) vs 14% (286 of 2046 “lumbar punctures”).66 This study, published as a Letter to the Editor, was retrospective, and it was not clear whether the “lumbar punctures” were spinal anesthetics or diagnostic lumbar punctures. It also appears that the control group was the patients who had the neuraxial procedure earlier, before the field block anesthesia was performed by the authors.
Controlled studies evaluating the prevention of back pain after neuraxial anesthesia involved mostly the use of an anti-inflammatory medication or steroid, given epidurally or as part of the intradermal injectate. Wang et al.67,68 and Wang and coworkers69 performed a series of studies wherein they added a steroid into their epidural injectate or added an anti-inflammatory medication to the local anesthetic for skin infiltration. In their first study, they noted that the addition of 5 mg dexamethasone to the epidural anesthesia resulted in a significantly lower incidence of back pain at 24, 48, and 72 hours after the epidural anesthesia (Table 8).67 In their second study, the addition of tenoxicam to the lidocaine for skin infiltration not only decreased the incidence of back pain after epidural anesthesia but also shortened the duration of the pain.68 In their third study, the addition of ketoprofen, a more lipid-soluble anti-inflammatory drug, to the lidocaine for skin infiltration also reduced the incidence and decreased the severity of back pain after epidural anesthesia.69 It is tempting to impart a high evidence score because the studies were randomized, controlled, and double blinded. However, it appears that the same control group was used in all 3 studies (the same incidences of back pain at 24, 48, and 72 hours). All patients in the 3 studies had hemorrhoidectomy, implying that 2000 patients had the surgery in the same hospital within 3 years and 4 months. In view of these limitations, we consider level 2 evidence and grade II recommendation on the efficacy of epidural dexamethasone for preventing back pain after epidural anesthesia.
Another group of investigators noted the beneficial effect of adding 6 mg ketorolac to the lidocaine for skin infiltration for reducing the incidence of back pain after epidural labor analgesia.70 In their vaginal delivery group, a difference in back pain scores was noted at 24 but not at 72 hours after delivery. In the cesarean delivery group, significant differences were noted at the 24 and 72 hours. Although randomized, placebo controlled, and double blinded, the study has limitations (Table 8). The results of the 3 controlled studies on the addition of an anti-inflammatory drug to the local anesthetic for skin infiltration68–70 led us to conclude that such intervention may decrease the incidence of back pain after an epidural (level 2). The presence of limitations in the 3 studies calls for prospective, randomized-controlled studies on the subject.
SUMMARY STATEMENTS ON BACK PAIN AND NEURAXIAL ANESTHESIA WITH LEVELS OF EVIDENCE
- The incidence of TNS after lidocaine spinal anesthesia is higher than after the other local anesthetics (level 1).
- The incidence of TNS after spinal anesthesia with 40 to 50 mg 2-chloroprocaine spinal is low (level 1).
- The occurrence of back pain after caudal anesthesia in children is low, mild in intensity, and self-limiting (level 2).
- The incidence of back pain after spinal anesthesia in adult non-obstetric patients is not substantially different from that seen after general anesthesia (level 2).
- The incidence of back pain is higher after epidural anesthesia compared with spinal anesthesia (level 2).
- Back pain after spinal or epidural anesthesia is mild in intensity and decreases with time (level 1).
- Preexisting low back pain is a risk factor for persistent back pain after neuraxial anesthesia. The intensity of back pain, however, is not worse after neuraxial anesthesia (level 2).
- In non-obstetric cases, spinal anesthesia is effective in patients with back pain. Epidural anesthesia, however, may result in unblocked or delayed onset of block of the lumbosacral nerve roots (level 2). This is especially true if the patient had previous spine surgery.
- The placement of an epidural needle or insertion of an epidural catheter can be difficult in patients with previous spine surgery (level 2). Incomplete sensory blockade may occur after epidural anesthesia in obstetric patients who had lumbar spine surgery (level 2).
- Epidural blockade is effective for labor analgesia in women who had previous lumbar spine surgery (level 2).
- Patients with back and radicular leg pain may improve after epidural local anesthetic injection. However, worsening of neurologic symptoms may occur after neuraxial procedures in patients with spinal stenosis (level 2).
- The addition of dexamethasone to the epidural local anesthetic may decrease the incidence of back pain (level 2).
- The addition of an anti-inflammatory drug to the local anesthetic infiltration may be effective for the prevention of back pain after epidural anesthesia (level 2).
- The number of published studies on 2-chloroprocaine spinal is not sufficient to determine the risk of neurotoxicity of the drug (class III).
- The use of neuraxial anesthesia in patients with low back pain should depend on the advantages offered by the technique and not on the possibility of worsening the patient’s symptoms (class II).
- A risk-to-benefit analysis should be made before neuraxial anesthesia is performed in patients with known severe spinal stenosis or those with symptoms suggestive of the problem. Increased perioperative vigilance after neuraxial anesthesia should be used in these patients (class II).35
- An anti-inflammatory drug may be added to the local anesthesia for skin infiltration before the neuraxial injection to prevent back pain after epidural anesthesia (class II).
Name: Honorio T. Benzon, MD.
Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.
Attestation: Honorio T. Benzon approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: Honorio T. Benzon consulted for Pacira.
Name: Yogen G. Asher, MD.
Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.
Attestation: Yogen G. Asher approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: Yogen G. Asher declares no conflicts of interest.
Name: Craig T. Hartrick, MD.
Contribution: This author helped write the manuscript.
Attestation: Craig T. Hartrick approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest: Craig T. Hartrick declares no conflicts of interest.
This manuscript was handled by: Terese T. Horlocker, MD.
1. Dripps RD, Vandam LDLong-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics: failure to discover major neurological sequelae.J Am Med Assoc1954156148691
2. Vandam LD, Dripps RDLong-term follow-up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics. IV. Neurological disease incident to traumatic lumbar puncture during spinal anesthesia.J Am Med Assoc196017214837
3. Bonica JJ, Backup PH, Anderson CE, Hadfield D, Crepps WF, Monk BFPeridural block: analysis of 3,637 cases and a review.Anesthesiology19571872384
4. Lund PC, Cwik JC, Quinn JRExperiences with epidural anesthesia: 7730 cases. I.Anesth Analg19614015363
5. Cotev S, Robin GC, Davidson JTBack pain after epidural analgesia.Anesth Analg19674625963
6. Brown EM, Elman DSPostoperative backache.Anesth Analg1961406835
7. Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SCFactors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia.Korean J Anesthesiol2010592604
8. Bernards CM, Hostetter LSBarash PG, Cullen BF, Stoelting RK, Cahalan MK, Stock MC, Ortega REpidural and spinal anesthesia.In: Clinical Anesthesia20137th edPhiladelphia, PALippincott Williams & Wilkins90533
9. Brull R, Macfarlane AJR, Chan VWSMiller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleischer LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Cohen NH, Young WLSpinal, epidural, and caudal anesthesia.In: Miller’s Anesthesia20158th ed.Philadelphia, PAElsevier16841720
10. Vercauteren M, Waets P, Pitkänen M, Förster JNeuraxial techniques in patients with pre-existing back impairment or prior spine interventions: a topical review with special reference to obstetrics.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2011559107
11. Zaric D, Pace NLTransient neurologic symptoms (TNS) following spinal anesthesia with lidocaine versus other local anesthetics.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2009CD003006
13. Eagle KA, Berger PB, Calkins H, Chaitman BR, Ewy GA, Fleischmann KE, Fleisher LA, Froehlich JB, Gusberg RJ, Leppo JA, Ryan T, Schlant RC, Winters WL Jr, Gibbons RJ, Antman EM, Alpert JS, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gregoratos G, Jacobs AK, Hiratzka LF, Russell RO, Smith SC Jr; American College of Cardiology; American Heart AssociationAmerican College of Cardiology; American Heart AssociationACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgery—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1996 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery).J Am Coll Cardiol20023954253
14. Stevens RABack pain following epidural anesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine.Reg Anesth199722299302
15. Ravindran RS, Bond VK, Tasch MD, Gupta CD, Luerssen TGProlonged neural blockade following regional analgesia with 2-chloroprocaine.Anesth Analg19805944751
16. Reisner LS, Hochman BN, Plumer MHPersistent neurologic deficit and adhesive arachnoiditis following intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine injection.Anesth Analg1980594524
17. Moore DC, Spierdijk J, vanKleef JD, Coleman RL, Love GFChloroprocaine neurotoxicity: four additional cases.Anesth Analg1982611559
18. Gissen AJ, Datta S, Lambert DThe chloroprocaine controversy II. Is chloroprocaine neurotoxic?Reg Anesth1984913545
19. Kalichman MW, Powell HC, Reisner LS, Myers RRThe role of 2-chloroprocaine and sodium bisulfite in rat sciatic nerve edema.J Neuropathol Exp Neurol19864556675
20. Taniguchi M, Bollen AW, Drasner KSodium bisulfite: scapegoat for chloroprocaine neurotoxicity?Anesthesiology20041008591
21. Fibuch EE, Opper SEBack pain following epidurally administered Nesacaine-MPF.Anesth Analg1989691135
22. Ackerman WEBack pain after epidural Nesacaine MPF.Anesth Analg1990702245
23. Hynson JM, Sessler DI, Glosten BBack pain in volunteers after epidural anesthesia with chloroprocaine.Anesth Analg1991722536
24. Stevens RA, Chester WL, Artuso JD, Bray JG, Nellestein JABack pain after epidural anesthesia with chloroprocaine in volunteers: preliminary report.Reg Anesth199116199203
25. Stevens RA, Urmey WF, Urquhart BL, Kao TCBack pain after epidural anesthesia with chloroprocaine.Anesthesiology1993784927
26. Toledo P, McCarthy RJ, Ebarvia MJ, Huser CJ, Wong CAThe interaction between epidural 2-chloroprocaine and morphine: a randomized controlled trial of the effect of drug administration timing on the efficacy of morphine analgesia.Anesth Analg200910916873
27. Tarkkila P, Huhtala J, Tuominen MTransient radicular irritation after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lignocaine.Br J Anaesth1995743289
28. Hartrick CTTransient radicular irritation: a misnomer?Anesth Analg19978413923
29. Freedman JM, Li DK, Drasner K, Jaskela MC, Larsen B, Wi STransient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia.Anesthesiology19988963341
30. Hampl KF, Schneider MC, Thorin D, Ummenhofer W, Drewe JHyperosmolarity does not contribute to transient radicular irritation after spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric 5% lidocaine.Reg Anesth1995203638
31. Hampl KF, Schneider MC, Pargger H, Gut J, Drewe J, Drasner KA similar incidence of transient neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia with 2% and 5% lidocaine.Anesth Analg19968310514
32. Pollock JE, Liu SS, Neal JM, Stephenson CADilution of spinal lidocaine does not alter the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms.Anesthesiology19999044550
33. Tong D, Wong J, Chung F, Friedlander M, Bremang J, Mezei G, Streiner DProspective study on incidence and functional impact of transient neurologic symptoms associated with 1% versus 5% hyperbaric lidocaine in short urologic procedures.Anesthesiology20039848594
34. Aouad MT, Siddik SS, Jalbout MI, Baraka ASDoes pregnancy protect against intrathecal lidocaine-induced transient neurologic symptoms?Anesth Analg2001924014
35. Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R, Hadzic A, Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, Huntoon MA, Kopp SL, Rathmell JP, Watson JCThe Second ASRA Practice Advisory on Neurologic Complications Associated With Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine: executive summary 2015.Reg Anesth Pain Med20154040130
36. Llewellyn N, Moriarty AThe national pediatric epidural audit.Paediatr Anaesth20071752033
37. Lacroix FEpidemiology and morbidity of regional anaesthesia in children.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2008213459
38. Valois T, Otis A, Ranger M, Muir JGIncidence of self-limiting back pain in children following caudal blockade: an exploratory study.Paediatr Anaesth20102084450
39. Urbach KF, Lee WR, Sheely LL, Lang FL, Sharp RPSpinal or general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair? A comparison of certain complications in a controlled series.JAMA1964190259
40. Standl T, Eckert S, Schulteam Esch JPostoperative complaints after spinal and thiopentone-isoflurane anaesthesia in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery. Spinal versus general anaesthesia.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1996402226
41. Hakim SM, Narouze S, Shaker NN, Mahran MARisk factors for new-onset persistent low-back pain following nonobstetric surgery performed with epidural anesthesia.Reg Anesth Pain Med20123717582
42. Dahl JB, Schultz P, Anker-Møller E, Christensen EF, Staunstrup HG, Carlsson PSpinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth19906417882
43. Schwabe K, Hopf HBPersistent back pain after spinal anaesthesia in the non-obstetric setting: incidence and predisposing factors.Br J Anaesth2001865359
44. Pan PH, Fragneto R, Moore C, Ross VIncidence of postdural puncture headache and backache, and success rate of dural puncture: comparison of two spinal needle designs.South Med J20049735963
45. Tekgül ZT, Pektaş S, Turan M, Karaman Y, Çakmak M, Gönüllü MAcute back pain following surgery under spinal anesthesia.Pain Pract20151570611
46. Chan STIncidence of back pain after lumbar epidural anaesthesia for non-obstetric surgery—a preliminary report.Med J Malaysia1995502415
47. Kock S, Hopf HB[Incidence and predisposing factors of persistent backache after lumbar catheter epidural anesthesia in a non-obstetrical settingø].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther19983364852
48. Seeberger MD, Lang ML, Drewe J, Schneider M, Hauser E, Hruby JComparison of spinal and epidural anesthesia for patients younger than 50 years of age.Anesth Analg19947866773
49. Sharrock NE, Urquhart B, Mineo RExtradural anaesthesia in patients with previous lumbar spine surgery.Br J Anaesth1990652379
50. Schachner SM, Abram SEUse of two epidural catheters to provide analgesia of unblocked segments in a patient with lumbar disc disease.Anesthesiology1982561501
51. Benzon HTEpidural steroid injections for low back pain and lumbosacral radiculopathy.Pain19862427795
52. Bicket MC, Gupta A, Brown CH IV, Cohen SPEpidural injections for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the “control” injections in randomized controlled trials.Anesthesiology201311990731
53. Hebl JR, Horlocker TT, Kopp SL, Schroeder DRNeuraxial blockade in patients with preexisting spinal stenosis, lumbar disk disease, or prior spine surgery: efficacy and neurologic complications.Anesth Analg201011115119
54. Kopp SL, Peters SM, Rose PS, Hebl JR, Horlocker TTWorsening of neurologic symptoms after spinal anesthesia in two patients with spinal stenosis.Reg Anesth Pain Med2015405025
55. Trindle MR, McKay WRDorsal primary ramus nerve block for treatment of low back pain after epidural analgesia.Anesth Analg199275103840
56. Benzon HT, Braunschweig R, Molloy REDelayed onset of epidural anesthesia in patients with back pain.Anesth Analg1981608747
57. Berkowitz S, Gold MISpinal anesthesia for surgery in patients with previous lumbar laminectomy.Anesth Analg1980598812
58. Feldstein G, Ramanathan SObstetrical lumbar epidural anesthesia in patients with previous posterior spinal fusion for kyphoscoliosis.Anesth Analg198564835
59. Kardash K, King BW, Datta SSpinal anaesthesia for caesarean section after Harrington instrumentation.Can J Anaesth1993406679
60. Crosby ET, Halpern SHObstetric epidural anaesthesia in patients with Harrington instrumentation.Can J Anaesth1989366936
61. Daley MD, Rolbin SH, Hew EM, Morningstar BA, Stewart JAEpidural anesthesia for obstetrics after spinal surgery.Reg Anesth1990152804
62. Villevieille T, Mercier FJ, Benhamou D[Is obstetric epidural anaesthesia technically possible after spinal surgery and does it work?].Ann Fr Anesth Reanim200322915
63. Smith PS, Wilson RC, Robinson AP, Lyons GRRegional blockade for delivery in women with scoliosis or previous spinal surgery.Int J Obstet Anesth2003121722
64. Bauchat JR, McCarthy RJ, Koski TR, Cambic CR, Lee AI, Wong CAPrior lumbar discectomy surgery does not alter the efficacy of neuraxial labor analgesia.Anesth Analg201211534853
65. Bauchat JR, McCarthy RJ, Koski TR, Wong CALabor analgesia consumption and time to neuraxial catheter placement in women with a history of surgical correction for scoliosis: a case-matched study.Anesth Analg20151219817
66. Peng AT, Behar S, Blancato LSReduction of postlumbar puncture backache by the use of field block anesthesia prior to lumbar puncture.Anesthesiology1985632278
67. Wang YL, Tan PP, Yang CH, Tsai SC, Chung HSEpidural dexamethasone reduces the incidence of backache after lumbar epidural anesthesia.Anesth Analg1997843768
68. Wang YL, Hsieh JR, Chung HS, Yu CL, Ho AC, Lu PP, Tan PPThe local addition of tenoxicam reduces the incidence of low back pain after lumbar epidural anesthesia.Anesthesiology19988914147
69. Hsieh JR, Hui YL, Yu CC, Lau WM, Ng YT, Wang YLLocal supplementation of ketoprofen reduces the incidence of low back pain after lumbar epidural anesthesia.Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi19992243944
Copyright © 2016 International Anesthesia Research Society
70. Todd G, John A, Vacchiano C, Pellegrini JIntradermal ketorolac for reduction of epidural back pain.Int J Obstet Anesth2002111004