Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Perioperative Crystalloid and Colloid Fluid Management in Children: Where Are We and How Did We Get Here?

Bailey, Ann G., MD*†; McNaull, Peggy P., MD*†; Jooste, Edmund, MBCHB, DA; Tuchman, Jay B., MD

Section Editor(s): Davis, Peter J.

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b6b3b5
Pediatric Anesthesiology: Review Article
Free
SDC
Chinese Language Editions

It has been more than 50 yr since the landmark article in which Holliday and Segar (Pediatrics 1957;19:823–32) proposed the rate and composition of parenteral maintenance fluids for hospitalized children. Much of our practice of fluid administration in the perioperative period is based on this article. The glucose, electrolyte, and intravascular volume requirements of the pediatric surgical patient may be quite different than the original population described, and consequently, use of traditional hypotonic fluids proposed by Holliday and Segar may cause complications, such as hyperglycemia and hyponatremia, in the postoperative surgical patient. There is significant controversy regarding the choice of isotonic versus hypotonic fluids in the postoperative period. We discuss the origins of perioperative fluid management in children, review the current options for crystalloid fluid management, and present information on colloid use in pediatric patients.

Published ahead of print December 2, 2009

From the Departments of *Anesthesiology, and †Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; and ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Accepted for publication June 19, 2009.

Published ahead of print December 2, 2009

Reprints will not be available from the author.

Address correspondence to Ann G. Bailey, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, CB# 7010, 223 Burnett-Womack, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7010. Address e-mail to abailey@aims.unc.edu.

Fluid management of the pediatric surgical patient presents challenges to both the anesthesia and surgical teams. Typically, the intraoperative management is the responsibility of the anesthesiologist, whereas postoperative orders are written by the surgeons. Both groups rely on formulas and concepts once thought to be certain, but these are presently being examined and challenged, especially in the pediatric literature. The purpose of this review is to outline the history supporting current fluid management strategies and to discuss the effect of recent controversies on future practice decisions.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CRYSTALLOIDS

The “4-2-1 Rule”

Fluid therapy for the ill child was first described in the early 20th century. In 1918, Blackfan and Maxcy1 reported instilling 0.8% isotonic saline intraperitoneally to successfully treat infants with diarrheal dehydration. Karelitz and Schick, in 1931, administered a continuous IV solution of 5% dextrose combined with either isotonic saline or lactated Ringer's solution (LR) to “detoxify” dehydrated children. Their institution of IV therapy decreased the current mortality rate for childhood dehydration from 63% to 23%.2 Over the next 30 yr, work by Gamble, Darrow, Crawford, Wallace, and others further defined the nature of the body's extracellular fluid and the rationale for fluid therapy.3–6

The 1957 publication by Holliday and Segar7 first presented a practical method for clinicians to prescribe IV fluids. The suggestions made in this classic article evolved into what is now termed the “4-2-1 rule” for maintenance fluid therapy in children. Based on earlier research done by their peers, the authors described the intimate relationship between physiologic fluid losses and caloric expenditure. The physiologic deficits from urine output and insensible losses of the skin and respiratory tract are equal to approximately 100 mL per 100 kcal metabolized per day. Simply stated, 1 mL of “water” is required for every 1 kcal of energy expended. Based on the computed caloric needs of the average hospitalized patient (Fig. 1), the daily fluid requirements, as proposed by Holliday and Segar, for patients weighing 0–10 kg are 100 mL/kg, for patients 11–20 kg are 1000 mL + 50 mL/kg for each kilogram between 11 and 20 kg, and for patients weighing more than 20 kg are 1500 mL + 20 mL/kg for each kilogram over 20 kg.7 A weight-based, hourly IV fluid rate, extrapolated from the above formulas, led to what is most frequently used today in pediatric practice, hence the “4-2-1 rule”8 (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Table 1

Table 1

In this article, the authors also defined daily maintenance electrolyte requirements. Considering the electrolyte composition of human milk and cow's milk, they recommended 2 mEq · 100 kcal−1 · d−1 of both potassium and chloride and 3 mEq · 100 kcal−1 · d−1 of sodium. These electrolyte requirements are theoretically met by the hypotonic maintenance fluid more commonly used in hospitalized children in the United States today, 5% dextrose with 0.2% normal saline. In their conclusions, it was emphasized that “these figures provide only maintenance needs for water. It is beyond the scope of this paper to consider repair of deficits or replacement of continuing abnormal losses of water.”7 Unfortunately, clinicians may often extrapolate the “4-2-1 rule” and the accompanying hypotonic solutions to clinical situations where they may not be appropriate and could, in fact, be harmful.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Perioperative Fluid Requirements

Historically, accepted intraoperative practice has been to administer IV fluids to meet maintenance requirements as well as to replace preoperative deficits and ongoing losses incurred during the surgical procedure. Today, most anesthesiologists have adopted the use of either normal saline or LR for both maintenance and deficit fluid replacement in the operating room setting. There has been little controversy regarding the acceptable maintenance fluid rate as described above. However, considerable debate has occurred regarding the amount of deficit generated by the nil per os (NPO) status and the existence of “third space losses.”

As a result of the fasting state, children are presumed to develop preoperative fluid deficits secondary to continuing insensible losses and urine output. In 1975, Furman et al.9 proposed calculating the preoperative deficits by multiplying the hourly rate, as dictated by the Holliday and Segar method, by the number of hours the patient was NPO. They then suggested replacing half of this volume during the first hour of surgery, followed by the other half over the next 2 h. This practice was adopted for many years without questioning its utility. However, in 1986, Berry10 simplified the method of Furman et al. by delivering a bolus of basic salt solution to otherwise healthy children over the first hour of surgery. Berry concluded that children 3 years and younger should receive 25 mL/kg, whereas children 4 years and older should receive 15 mL/kg.

The methods of both Furman et al. and Berry were developed based on the assumption that patients had been NPO for at least 6 to 8 hours. Fortunately, the debate about the significance of preoperative dehydration secondary to NPO status has become less important due to the liberalization of fasting requirements. In 1999, the American Society of Anesthesiologists published new fasting guidelines for elective surgery. Current recommendations allow administration of clear liquids up to 2 h before procedures requiring anesthesia.11 Despite the revised guidelines, patients may still present to the operating room having been NPO for more than the recommended 2 h or having significant deficits related to their disease process. Whereas there are no data to determine the exact amount of fluid deficit that occurs in normal fasting children, strong evidence suggests that healthy adult patients will maintain normal intravascular volumes despite a prolonged fast.12

Back to Top | Article Outline

Perioperative Dextrose: The Risks of Hypoglycemia Weighed Against the Risks of Hyperglycemia

In the early 1900s, Karelitz and Schick reported that the addition of glucose to IV fluids in dehydrated children allowed them “to fall into a restful sleep.” The authors used a 5% dextrose solution to render the IV fluid isosmolar and to prevent hypoglycemia.2 Intraoperative dextrose infusion subsequently became common practice in the pediatric population. Although researchers and clinicians acknowledged the deleterious effects of hypoglycemia, Holliday and Segar 7 and Furman et al.9 warned that the hyperglycemia often occurring subsequent to glucose administration is not without risk.

Hypoglycemia, depending on the severity, can have devastating effects on the central nervous system, especially in neonates. Low blood glucose invokes a stress response and alters cerebral blood flow and metabolism.13 Permanent neurodevelopmental impairment can result if hypoglycemia goes unrecognized and untreated. In 1967, Anderson et al.14 first described 6 cases of neonatal hypoglycemia and the disastrous clinical and pathological sequelae associated with prolonged low blood glucose. Animal experiments have further demonstrated that cerebral injury is caused not only by severe prolonged hypoglycemia but also mild hypoglycemia combined with mild hypoxia or ischemia.15 In a recent study of 35 term neonates with symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose level <45 mg/dL or 2.6 mmol/L), magnetic resonance imaging detected white matter abnormalities in 94%, with severe abnormalities noted in 43% of the studied population. Furthermore, at 18-mo follow-up, 26 of the 35 patients studied continued to exhibit some level of impairment.16 Hypoglycemia has also been found to be associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality in pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients.17

In the 1970s, research suggested that fasted children may become hypoglycemic while under anesthesia.18–21 In 1986, Welborn et al.22 evaluated preoperative hypoglycemia in 446 children, 1 mo to 6 yr old, scheduled for outpatient minor surgical procedures. There were 2 asymptomatic children with preoperative blood glucose values of <50 mg/dL. Both of these children had fasted in excess of 17 h before presenting to the operating room. The more recent studies on this topic estimate the incidence of preoperative hypoglycemia to be between 0% and 2.5% and usually associated with fast durations from 8 to 19 h, well beyond the current American Society of Anesthesiologists recommended guidelines.23

Hyperglycemia has also been recognized as detrimental for the brain. In the presence of ischemia or hypoxia, it is proposed that the impaired metabolism of excess glucose causes an accumulation of lactate, a decrease in intracellular pH, and subsequently severely compromised cellular function that may result in cell death.13 Hyperglycemia can also induce an osmotic diuresis that may lead to dehydration and electrolyte abnormalities.23–25 Furthermore, there is evidence in the pediatric literature suggesting that hyperglycemia, especially in the setting of an ischemic or hypoxic event, worsens neurologic outcomes as well as morbidity and mortality statistics in the pediatric population.17,26–28

In the 1986 study by Welborn et al., the patients were randomized to intraoperatively receive either LR or 5% dextrose in LR (D5LR). Both the LR and D5LR groups had statistically significant increases in blood glucose. However, the D5LR group had a much larger increase in blood glucose (83 ± 14 mg/dL preoperatively to 244 ± 60 mg/dL postoperatively) than the LR group (85 ± 14 mg/dL preoperatively to 111 ± 22 mg/dL postoperatively).22

Based on these results and those of other studies, there is a growing consensus to selectively administer intraoperative dextrose only in those patients at greatest risk for hypoglycemia and, in such situations, to consider the use of fluids with lower dextrose concentrations (e.g., 1% or 2.5%).23–25,29,30 It should be noted that there are no IV fluids with dextrose concentrations less than 5% commercially available in the United States. The populations at highest risk of hypoglycemia include neonates, children receiving hyperalimentation, and those with endocrinopathies, in whom monitoring blood glucose levels and adjusting the rate of infusion is also recommended.24,25,30 Routine dextrose administration is no longer advised for otherwise healthy children receiving anesthesia.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Third Space Losses

“Third space losses” refers to the sequestration of fluid to a nonfunctional extracellular space that is beyond osmotic equilibrium with the vascular space.31,32 In the original study documenting this phenomenon, 13 adults having elective major surgeries (primarily cholecystectomies) were injected with I131-tagged serum albumin, chromate51-tagged red blood cells (RBCs), and sulfur35-tagged sodium sulfate to determine plasma volumes, red cell mass, and extracellular fluid volumes. Additionally, the “trauma” associated with the surgery was rated based on the observed amount of necessary retraction, difficulty in exposure, and depth of anesthesia.32 The data suggested that extracellular fluid volume was redistributed or sequestered into areas that no longer communicated with a functional extracellular space and that this correlated with the observed degree of trauma. We have long assumed that the surgical trauma incurred by cell membranes causes hypoxic injury creating a loss of integrity allowing fluids to traverse cell membranes indiscriminately. Isotonic fluids were recommended to replace the losses from the functional extracellular space to the “third space.” In pediatrics, it has been proposed that, depending on the nature of the surgical procedure, 1 mL · kg−1 · h−1 to as much as 15 mL · kg−1 · h−1 of additional isotonic fluids are necessary to compensate for these continuing losses. In fact, it has been stated that up to 50 mL · kg−1 · h−1 is required for premature neonates undergoing surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis, a surgery associated with significant trauma and ischemia of the bowel.25 A recent review of predominantly adult literature concludes that a classic “third space” does not exist.33 Several studies using multiple blood samples and steady-state tracer kinetics revealed that the functional fluid space is either unchanged or expanded rather than contracted after surgery.34–36 Substantial amounts of fluid accumulate in the interstitial space secondary to factors including volume overload with crystalloid infusions and iatrogenic deterioration of the vascular barrier.33

There is little evidence regarding this topic in pediatric patients. It is possible that our traditional practice of liberal isotonic fluid delivery in major pediatric surgeries may have adverse implications. Several studies in adults demonstrate that, in abdominal surgery, outcomes may be improved by conservative fluid management in the perioperative period.37–39 Individualized goal-directed fluid management using only the amount of crystalloid and/or colloid necessary to optimize flow-related variables such as stroke volume can alter the incidence of postoperative complications.40–43 Unfortunately, perioperative studies in pediatric patients using the esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, or mixed venous oxygen saturation to guide and determine optimum fluids are lacking. Instead, we are left to wonder if a smaller amount of crystalloid combined with an appropriate colloid might reduce the amount of tissue edema and improve recovery from surgery previously thought to generate a third space.

Back to Top | Article Outline

COLLOIDS

When determining the particular colloid fluid to administer, the type of fluid deficit (fluid loss or plasma loss) and the effect that these replacement fluids might have on the intravascular volume, coagulation cascade, microcirculation, and any possible allergic reactions must be considered.44,45 Colloid fluids can be divided into natural protein colloids (albumin) and synthetic colloids (hydroxyethyl starches [HESs], dextrans, and gelatins). These products vary significantly in their chemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties, and consequently, these products differ with respect to their impact on hemodynamic variables.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Protein Colloid: Albumin

Albumin occurs naturally and is regarded as the colloid “gold standard.” Albumin is derived from pooled human plasma by the Cohn cold ethanol fractionation process: human plasma is heated to 60°C for 10 h and then sterilized by ultrafiltration, thus eliminating the risk of disease transmission.46 Albumin has a molecular weight (MW) of approximately 69 kDa. In the United States, albumin is produced in concentrations of both 5% and 25%. An albumin 5% solution is osmotically equivalent to an equal volume of plasma, whereas a 25% solution is osmotically equivalent to 5 times its plasma volume. In other words, the administration of 100 mL of 25% albumin will increase the intravascular volume approximately 3–5 times the amount infused. In contrast, the administration of 500 mL of 5% albumin is necessary to increase the intravascular volume by a similar amount of 100 mL of 25% albumin.47 This intravascular volume expansion occurs because of fluid translocation from the interstitial compartment into the intravascular space. However, in subjects with increased intravascular permeability (e.g., critically ill, sepsis, trauma, and burn), the translocation of fluid from the interstitial compartment to the intravascular compartment may be decreased and colloids may actually leak into the interstitial space, thereby worsening edema by pulling fluid from the intravascular compartment.

Side effects from albumin are rare but have been reported. Although considered to have negligible effects on the coagulation cascade, albumin might still have weak anticoagulation effects through inhibition of platelet aggregation48 or heparin-like effects on antithrombin III.49 These effects are thought to be clinically insignificant if volume replacement with albumin is kept below 25% of the patient's blood volume. Tobias et al.,50 using thromboelastography (TEG®, Haemonetics Corp, Braintree, MA), demonstrated that hemodilution with large amounts of albumin (>25% hemodilution of the blood volume) may produce a hypocoagulable state. Allergic reactions are another possible complication of albumin administration; however, albumin is associated with significantly fewer anaphylactic reactions compared with other colloids.51

Albumin's safety has been questioned in 2 separately conducted meta-analyses.52,53 In the 2004 Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation study, Finfer et al.54 noted no difference in outcomes between albumin and saline in adults. This 7000-patient multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, comparing the effects of saline and albumin fluid on the 28-day patient mortality rate, showed no significant difference in mortality (726 deaths in albumin group and 729 deaths in saline group) or secondary end points (length of stay in the ICU or hospital, days of mechanical ventilation, and days of renal replacement therapy) between the groups. However, there seemed to be an increased mortality in a subset of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). A post hoc follow-up study was undertaken (Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation–TBI study) that, in fact, substantiated these findings and concluded that critically ill patients with TBI had a higher mortality rate if resuscitated acutely with albumin as opposed to saline.55

Pediatric studies are few in number and small in size. In a study of critically ill children with meningococcal disease in the United Kingdom, early aggressive fluid resuscitation with albumin helped to reduce mortality from 50% to <5%.56,57 Furthermore, in a randomized trial of 30 ventilator-dependent hypoalbuminemic preterm infants, the administration of albumin was associated with a reduction in edema (as judged by weight loss) and inspired oxygen concentration requirements compared with infants who received an equal volume of crystalloid maintenance fluid.58 In another randomized trial of 30 children younger than 3 yr undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, the urinary output was 57% lower after intravascular volume expansion with HES 200/0.5 than after albumin administration.59 In a separate study of children undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass, Riegger et al.60 compared a pure crystalloid prime with an albumin-added prime solution. The authors noted that patients exposed to the albumin prime had a negative fluid balance and less weight gain after surgery. However, there were no differences between the 2 groups with regard to ICU length of stay, ventilation days, or mortality. In addition, the patients receiving albumin actually had lower hemoglobin levels and higher transfusion requirements.

Albumin has been considered the gold standard for maintenance of colloid osmotic pressure in infants and neonates61 and continues to be the most frequently used plasma expander in this population.62 However, the expense and decreased availability of albumin have led some countries to pursue other colloids. The Association of Pediatric Anesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland favor the use of gelatins and the Association of French Speaking Pediatric Anesthetists members from France frequently use hetastarch solutions,63 whereas in the United States, albumin remains the first choice. There are a multitude of alternative synthetic colloid fluid options accessible in Europe that are not currently available in the United States. Interestingly, in the United States, there is a reduced price differential between albumin and its synthetic alternatives (500 mL of 5% albumin [$82], Hespan (B. Braun Medical Inc. Bethlehem, PA) [$18], Hextend (Hospira Inc. Lake Forest, IL) [$28], Volvulen (Frensenius-Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) [$45] LR [$0.77]), whereas in Europe, 500 mL of 5% albumin may cost as much as €150 ($190) and HES fluids may cost €30 ($38). Additionally, the manufacturers of albumin make a concerted monetary effort to encourage the use of albumin.64 However, data supporting the continued use of albumin for general fluid resuscitation in children are lacking, and in children with TBI, it may actually be harmful. Its utility may exist in specific subgroups such as neonates and patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nonprotein Colloids: HES

HESs are a class of synthetic colloids that are modified natural polysaccharides. Naturally occurring starches are unstable and are rapidly broken down by circulating amylases in the circulation. Substituting hydroxyethyl groups for the naturally occurring hydroxyl groups at carbon positions C2, C3, and C6 results in a more soluble product, resistant to hydrolysis, with subsequent prolonged effectiveness (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Unlike other colloids, HES colloids are characterized not only by their concentration and weighted average mean MW in kilodalton but also by their molar substitution (MS) and C2:C6 ratio (Table 2). Hetastarches are made in concentrations of 3%, 6%, and 10%. Their weighted average mean MW may be divided into low (<70 kDa), medium (130–270 kDa), and high (>450 kDa) brackets. MS is defined as the molar ratio of the total number of hydroxyethyl groups to the total number of glucose units, and these molar ratios may be divided into a low (0.4–0.5) or high (0.62–0.7) molecular ratio. Finally, the C2:C6 ratio describes the position of the hydroxyethyl groups on the glucose molecule. As a rule, the solutions with a higher MW and MS ratio have a prolonged volume effect, but are also associated with a greater side effect profile. Initially, HES solutions are broken down rapidly by amylase. The hydroxyethyl groups specific to the C2 carbon position of the glucose molecule hinder this breakdown and are therefore responsible for prolonging the solution's half-life. Therefore a higher ratio of C2:C6 hydroxyethylation substitution results in slower enzymatic degradation and prolonged action without increasing side effects. Hence, the newest-generation HES fluids are designed with low MW and MS ratios to minimize side effects, as well as a high C2:C6 hydroxyethylation ratio to prolong duration of action.

Table 2

Table 2

HES solutions expand the plasma volume with effects lasting 2–6 h, depending on the specific characteristics of the HES fluid. In addition to the volume expansion, HES solutions also affect the microcirculation and tissue oxygenation. In a study of adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery, Lang et al.65 compared a medium MW, low MS HES solution with LR. In this study, the HES solution was noted to have improved tissue oxygenation. As with other colloids, side effects of HES solutions may also include hypocoagulation, renal toxicity, and pruritus.66,67 These side effects are influenced by the specific characteristics of the HES fluid.68,69 The older high MW, high MS, first-generation HES solutions (e.g., HES 450/0.7) have more significant hemostatic side effects66,67 compared with the newer low MW, low MS solutions (e.g., HES 130/0.4).70,71 The exact mechanism of the hypocoagulable effect associated with the HES solutions is unclear; however, HES seems to interfere with the function of von Willebrand factor, factor VIII, and platelets.72,73 These hemostatic side effects may be especially concerning in cardiac surgery patients, in whom the use of cardiopulmonary bypass creates further coagulopathies and platelet dysfunction.45,74,75

HES solutions may also worsen renal function75–77 by inducing renal tubular cell swelling and creating a hyperviscous urine. Both tubular cell swelling and hyperviscous urine can cause renal tubular obstruction and medullary ischemia.78 However, the hyperviscous urine may be preventable, either by prior adequate hydration with crystalloids or by the use of the newer-generation, less-oncotic HES solutions (low MW and MS).79–81

Pruritus occurs in 0%–22% of patients exposed to HES solutions and is thought to be caused by the accumulation and storage of the HES solution in the skin. Metze et al.82 demonstrated the formation of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in the skin after HES fluid administration. The number and size of these vacuoles were noted to be dose dependent. Patients experiencing pruritus consistently showed additional deposits of HES in the small peripheral cutaneous nerves, with symptomatic clinical improvement closely associated with the resolution of these neural vacuoles. These findings led to the conclusion that HES deposits in cutaneous nerves may account for the itching seen after HES infusion.82 Pruritus may manifest months after the infusion83,84 and seems to be resistant to current available forms of therapy.85 The incidence of pruritus seems to be determined by the type of HES solution and the volume administered,51,86 with less-frequent pruritic symptoms with the new-generation HES solutions.51,84

Initially, the only HES solution available in the United States was Hespan® (6% HES 450/0.7 in saline). Hextend® was then introduced (6% HES 670/0.7) and marketed as a balanced colloid solution containing 6% hetastarch, balanced electrolytes, a lactate buffer, and a physiological level of glucose. Hextend seems to be as effective as 6% hetastarch in saline for the treatment of hypovolemia and seems to be a better choice during major surgery than Hespan, with fewer negative effects on the TEG, less blood loss, and less need for calcium supplementation.87,88

Voluven® is a 6% HES (130/0.4) solution in 0.9% sodium chloride. It was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2007 for the treatment of serious blood volume loss during surgery. Voluven, with its lower MS and MW has relatively little effect on hemostasis. Kozek-Langenecker89 noted that Voluven use decreased perioperative blood loss and RBC transfusion requirements compared with HES solutions with higher MS ratios. This was further substantiated in a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials when Voluven 130/0.4 was compared with a second-generation HES 200/0.5 solution.90 Furthermore, Voluven does not have the negative renal side effects observed with older-generation HES solutions and may, in fact, preserve effective renal plasma flow compared with normal saline.91 Thus, these newer rapidly degradable HES solutions seem to be a suitable volume expander in the routine perioperative setting because of their adequate volume efficacy and low risk of hemostatic derangements.

Pediatric studies involving synthetic colloids are scant. Paul et al.92 noted, in a randomized controlled study of children aged 1–38 mo undergoing urologic surgery longer than 2 h duration, that the administration of 20 mL/kg of 6% HES (70/0.5) during the first hour of the procedure resulted in a larger decrease in hemoglobin concentration (more effective plasma expansion) compared with a similar volume of LR. In addition, Paul et al.92 noted no differences between the groups with regard to amounts of intraoperative fluid administration, postoperative edema, weight changes, or incidence of pruritus.

Earlier studies in pediatric tumor resection noted that HES was well tolerated and effective in preserving global tissue oxygenation during normovolemic hemodilution in children.93,94 In a prospective, randomized, double-blind pilot study involving 26 neonates without cardiac, renal, or hemostatic abnormalities undergoing central line placement, the use of 6% HES did not increase creatinine or bleeding when compared with neonates receiving an equal volume of 5% albumin.95 However, in another small sample size, prospective, randomized, blinded study by the same investigators, no improvement in cardiac output could be shown in 21 hypotensive neonates with low cardiac output states after the administration of HES, isotonic saline, or 5% albumin.96 Similarly, in a prospective randomized study comparing the new third-generation 6% HES (130/0.4) (Voluven) and 5% albumin, Standl et al.97 noted no difference in perioperative hemodynamic stability, coagulation variables, blood gas, or other laboratory values in 81 pediatric patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery. Concerns regarding this study relate to the fact that cardiac surgical patients and preterm patients were not included. Thus, the applicability of these results is limited.

A European prospective, multicenter, observational, postauthorization safety study was designed to evaluate the safety of HES (130/0.42) for perioperative plasma replacement in children. The study was only performed in countries where the use of HES was approved and HES was already indicated for pediatric volume replacement.98 Three hundred sixteen children, aged 3–12 yr, were infused with a mean volume of 11 ± 4.8 mL/kg of HES (130/0.42). Cardiovascular stability was maintained in all cases. There were no serious adverse drug reactions, such as anaphylaxis, renal failure, or clotting disorder. In this study, only patients with normal renal function and intact coagulation symptoms were investigated, suggesting that although HES may be safe in patients with normal renal and clotting function, further studies are still necessary before presuming safety in patients with renal failure or those at increased risk of bleeding. One potential side effect of HES (130/0.42) noted in this study, however, was a decrease in the anion gap as well as an increase in the chloride concentration. The increase in chloride concentration occurs to maintain electroneutrality because the electroneutral HES replaces the negatively charged plasma proteins, thereby decreasing the amount of unmeasured negative charges.99 This may be of clinical importance when using anion gap and strong ion difference for acid base interpretation of metabolic disturbances during pediatric surgery. A low anion gap caused by HES infusion could mask a high gap acidosis signifying acute renal failure or sepsis. In addition, the hyperchloremia resulting from HES infusion might have negative effects on arterial blood pressure,100 renal blood flow,101 and postoperative nausea and vomiting.102

In pediatric cardiac surgery, the data are quite varied. When comparing HES to albumin for postoperative intravascular volume expansion after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass, there were no differences found in the amount of required replacement fluids or coagulation variables in children receiving 20 mL/kg or less of either colloid replacement therapy. Although an increase in prothrombin time was noted in children who received more than 20 mL/kg of 6% hetastarch, no differences in clinical bleeding or blood product requirement were demonstrated.103 Similarly, in a randomized trial of 42 patients aged 6 mo to 10 yr, comparing the administration of 10 mL/kg of HES (130/0.4) or fresh frozen plasma (FFP) after cardiopulmonary bypass, Chong Sung et al.104 reported only a minor effect on coagulation variables. Specifically, there was a prolonged international normalized ratio in the HES group, but no differences were shown between the groups with regard to activated partial thromboplastin time values, transfusion requirements, or blood loss. Haas et al.,105 in a study measuring coagulation variables with TEG, compared the effects of 15 mL/kg 5% albumin, 4% gelatin, and HES (130/0.4) administered to 42 infants. In this study, there was an increase in activated partial thromboplastin time values with the use of all fluids but a greater reduction of maximal clot firmness (MA value) after gelatin administration when compared with albumin. Median TEG values for both albumin and gelatin, however, remained within the normal range. Patients administered HES, however, exhibited a decrease (below the normal range) both in the speed of clot formation (MA value and α angle) and in fibrinogen/fibrin polymerization (a special additional test that measured clot stability). The authors suggested that this might explain the increase in blood loss after pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass associated with HES use.105,106 The authors also concluded that from a hemostatic point of view, gelatin was preferable to HES. These hemostatic concerns regarding HES have been further substantiated by a meta-analysis of children and adults receiving HES during cardiac surgery, which showed increased blood loss in those patients receiving HES compared with albumin.66

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nonprotein Colloids: Gelatins

Gelatins are polypeptides produced by degradation of bovine collagen. There are currently 3 gelatin products available commercially (crosslinked [Gelofundiol®, Biotest Pharmazeutika, Vienna, Austria], urea crosslinked [Hemacel®, Aventis Pharma, Vienna, Austria], and succinylated gelatin [Gelofusine®, B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany]). None are available in the United States. Gelatin has not been available in the United States since 1978 because of a high incidence of hypersensitivity reactions with the initial formulations.107 The MWs of these gelatins are approximately 30–35,000 Da and are lower than the other colloids. It is this lower MW that is responsible for the gelatin's decreased colloid oncotic effects compared with the other colloid fluids. Furthermore, the actual increase in blood volume is less than the infused volume of gelatin because of the rapid but transient passage of gelatins into the interstitial space, rapid glomerular filtration, and gelatin's susceptibility to enzymatic cleavage by proteases. Therefore, repeated infusions are necessary to maintain adequate blood volume. The disadvantage of repeat infusions is balanced by the lack of a gelatin dose limitation. This lack of a dose limitation is distinct from the other nonprotein colloids. There is no accumulation of gelatin in the body, and gelatins have few adverse effects. Other advantages of gelatin include its cost (the least expensive of the synthetic colloids) and its long shelf life.108 Although initially it was thought that gelatins did not have any negative hemostatic effects, gelatins have been shown to negatively affect TEG values and should be used with caution in patients with bleeding tendencies such as von Willebrand disease.68,105,109

The data supporting the use of gelatin in children are limited. A randomized, prospective, double-blind study focused on children with dengue shock syndrome, which is distinguished by hypovolemia secondary to increased vascular permeability. In these children, initial resuscitation was achieved with 1 of 4 fluid regimens (20 mL/kg of dextran, gelatin, LR, or normal saline). All of the children survived, and there was no clear advantage of any of the 4 fluids. However, the LR group was associated with longer recovery times. The authors suggested that the most significant factor determining clinical response was the pulse pressure at presentation and that colloids, which restore the intravascular volume efficiently, might be the better choice of fluids.110 In a multicenter study, the Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group compared early mortality and morbidity in preterm infants after administration of FFP, gelatin, and glucose. They were unable to show evidence of any adverse short-term outcomes related to gelatin use,111 and developmental outcome after 2 yr was similar in all 3 groups.112 However, there was no attempt to evaluate the efficacy of gelatin as an intravascular volume expander in neonates in this study.

Adverse events have been associated with the use of gelatins in infants and older children. In a Cochrane review of early volume expansion in preterm infants (including 7 randomized controlled trials), it was noted that the use of gelatin or no treatment was associated with an increased risk of developing necrotizing enterocolitis, when compared with patients receiving FFP.113 In a randomized study of children with malaria comparing volume expansion with albumin or gelatin, Akech et al.114 reported no significant differences regarding success in the treatment of shock or acidosis between the 2 solutions. However, fatal neurological events were more frequent in the gelatin group. In an adult study comparing the use of gelatin or HES for blunt trauma resuscitation, Allison et al.115 suggested that gelatin was associated with a worse posttrauma capillary leak than HES fluids. Their findings might have implications regarding fluid resuscitation in septic newborns with respect to the severity of their capillary leak syndrome.116 However, data in animals with regard to capillary leak and septic shock indicate that gelatin and HES actually maintain plasma volume more effectively than albumin.117

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nonprotein Colloids: Dextrans

Dextran is a water-soluble glucose polymer (polysaccharide) synthesized by specific bacteria from sucrose. The current formulations available are 10% dextran 40 and 6% dextran 70. Dextran 40 is regarded as a low-MW dextran of approximately 40,000 Da, whereas dextran 70 is a high-MW dextran of approximately 70,000 Da. This leads to a differential excretion of these 2 products by the kidneys, because the renal threshold for these dextrans is approximately 55,000 Da. The result of this differential excretion is that dextran 70 remains in the intravascular space for 5–6 h, whereas dextran 40 remains intravascular for 3–4 h.

Although these dextrans have excellent colloid oncotic powers, they probably should not be used because of their negative coagulation effects and high anaphylactic potential. Their negative coagulation effects are well documented and lead to an increased bleeding tendency.68 Dextran not only induces a dose-dependent von Willebrand–type syndrome but also enhances fibrinolysis. This fibrinolytic phenomenon is worse with the high-MW dextrans. Furthermore, dextran use has been associated with acute renal failure in patients with acute ischemic strokes.118 The anaphylactic/ anaphylactoid reactions are the result of dextran reactive antibodies, which trigger the release of vasoactive mediators. The current suggestion is to limit the use of dextrans to 1500 mL in an adult or 20 mL/kg in a child per day. It has also been suggested that patients should be pretreated with a hapten inhibition prior to the infusion of a dextran to decrease the incidence of allergic reactions.119

Back to Top | Article Outline

HYPERTONIC SALINE

Hypertonic saline solutions have been used in the treatment of refractory hypovolemic shock because of their ability to rapidly mobilize fluid into the intravascular space and thus expand the plasma volume. They have been shown to improve organ blood flow and microcirculation and may even have positive inotropic effects. These solutions are only given in small amounts (4 mL/kg) because of their hypertonicity, but are able to improve preload and thereby cardiac output.120,121

The greatest concern with hypertonic saline solutions is their short duration of action. There has been an interest in combining these solutions with colloid solutions, such as HES and dextran, to prolong their positive intravascular effects. These combinations seem to have a beneficial effect and may lead to an improved survival rate in adult patients after trauma compared with the hypertonic saline alone.122 However, these results have been questioned in a meta-analysis in which patients receiving hypertonic solutions were not shown to have any better outcomes than the patients receiving crystalloids.123

Hypertonic saline solutions have, however, been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of TBI by reducing cerebral edema and subsequently decreasing high intracranial pressure.124–126 Because the blood-brain barrier has a low permeability for sodium, it is thought that the hypertonic saline creates an osmotic gradient to decrease cerebral edema and has a reflection coefficient even better than mannitol. Hypertonic saline may improve brain cell function by reestablishing electrochemical gradients that restore normal resting membrane potential, as well as modulating the inflammatory response, thereby helping to maintain the integrity of the blood-brain barrier and prevent brain cell death.127–130 In 2 separate studies of children with TBI, hypertonic saline was shown to increase cerebral perfusion pressure in the 3 days after head trauma, when compared with LR.131,132

In pediatric burn patients, there seems to be evidence in favor of a combined hypertonic/hyperosmotic solution. In an experimental animal study involving burned pigs, small volumes of hypertonic saline combined with 6% dextran 70 improved heart contractility, reduced cardiac myocyte damage, and reduced total fluid volume compared with LR alone.133 In a study of burned patients, Murphy et al.134 noted that a combination of hypertonic saline/dextran 70 solution had no deleterious hemodynamic or metabolic side effects compared with standard LR resuscitation.

There are a number of potential concerns regarding the use of hypertonic saline. There is the theoretical possibility of the development of osmotic demyelination syndrome, rebound increases in intracranial pressure, and acute renal failure from an increase in serum osmolarity.135 However, in a retrospective chart review by Peterson et al.,125 no children developed renal failure after the use of hypertonic saline. Hyperkalemia and a nonanion gap metabolic acidosis were common electrolyte abnormalities associated with its use. However, both are easily managed and are not clinically relevant if the serum sodium is kept below 155 mmol/L.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONTROVERSIES

Crystalloid Versus Colloids

Despite the recognition and focus on the importance of both colloid and crystalloid solutions, there is still a dearth of evidence supporting any particular method of volume expansion in the pediatric population.136 The International Guidelines 2000 Conference for Neonatal Resuscitation recommended that emergency volume expansion should be accomplished with either isotonic crystalloid solution or O-negative RBCs.137 A more recent clinical practice guideline from the Dutch Pediatric Society concluded that because of the limited number and quality of available pediatric research studies, recommendations for volume expansion should be made based on the solution's side effects, mechanisms of action, and cost. Thus, isotonic saline was recommended as safe, effective, and 100 times less expensive than albumin.63

In the most recent Cochrane database review of colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill adult patients (2007), the authors concluded that there is no evidence to support the use of colloids over crystalloids in the resuscitation of patients with burns, trauma, or after surgery, because they are significantly more expensive and not associated with improved survival.138 In a letter to the editor, Drs. Jacob and Chappell suggested that patients who do not have substantial blood losses should not generally require the substitution of colloid for crystalloids in their fluid management. Rather, patients with continuing urinary output and insensible losses, representing colloid-free losses, primarily require crystalloid fluid replacement.139 A further meta-analysis analyzing the different colloid solutions available for fluid resuscitation concluded that when measuring mortality, blood administration, and the incidence of allergic reactions, there was no evidence to suggest that one colloid solution is more effective or safer than another.140

There is a tremendous need for well-controlled studies in all pediatric patients that adequately assess the various types of fluid regimens with clearly defined end points. Unitil such studies exist, we continue to extrapolate from adult studies and use a combination of crystalloid and colloids to achieve the desired outcomes.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Postoperative Hyponatremia

In 1983, a study of children undergoing scoliosis surgery demonstrated that hyponatremia developed when hypotonic IV fluids were used postoperatively.141 In 1986, a report was published of 15 previously healthy women who developed severe postoperative hyponatremia, which resulted in neurologic devastation or death.142 Six years later, similar catastrophic results were reported in hospitalized children, many of whom were recovering from surgery. The hyponatremia (mean 115 mmol/L) was primarily caused by extrarenal loss of electrolytes, in the presence of increased antidiuretic hormone (ADH) activity, followed by the administration of hypotonic fluids.143

Hyponatremia produces osmotic movement of free water across cell membranes from the extracellular to the intracellular compartments, and the brain is the most seriously affected organ. Estrogens seem to impair the ability of the brain to adapt to hyponatremia. In a review of the adult literature, Arieff144 reported that women are much more likely to experience permanent neurologic sequelae or even death secondary to hyponatremia. Additionally, menstruant women seem to be at an even greater risk. Ayus et al.145 reviewed 65 cases of postoperative hyponatremia in adults and found that of the 40 women and 25 men, there were 34 cases of permanent brain damage: 33 of these were women (97%) and 25 were menstruant. The brain Na-K ATPase system, which helps the brain adapt to lower serum concentrations of sodium, is impaired by vasopressin plus estrogen but is stimulated by testosterone.144 Female rats given vasopressin plus estrogen have greatly reduced cerebral perfusion compared with male rats.146

Postmenarchal girls may be at a higher risk of complications than their male counterparts because of these gender differences. In prepubescent children, there are no gender differentials. Rather, all children, regardless of gender, are more prone to cerebral edema than adults. This results from differences in the ratio of intracranial capacity to brain size, cerebrospinal fluid volume, and brain water and electrolyte content. The brain of a child grows rapidly, achieving adult size by age 6 yr, whereas the skull continues to grow until age 16 yr. The volume of cerebral spinal fluid buffers brain expansion, but this is relatively smaller in children than adults. The brain intracellular concentration of sodium is about 27% higher in children than adults.143 Early in hyponatremia, the brain responds by transporting intracellular sodium to the extracellular environment using the Na+-K+ ATPase mechanism.147 This enzyme activity is decreased in prepubertal animal models.148 Newborn puppies with hyponatremia are unable to extrude cations from brain cells.149 The inability of the pediatric brain to adapt to excess free water, along with the high brain-to-skull ratio, help to explain the relatively rapid cerebral edema seen with hyponatremia in pediatric patients.

Another factor that may contribute to a poor outcome in children with hyponatremia is the lack of timely treatment resulting from a low index of suspicion. The early symptoms of lethargy, headache, nausea, and vomiting are common occurrences in many disease states and are often seen in the postoperative period. In children, a respiratory arrest may be the event that triggers identification and subsequent treatment of the electrolyte imbalance. In a series of 16 hospitalized children with symptomatic hyponatremia, all had a respiratory arrest after a mean of 37 h from the start of IV fluid administration, although other milder symptoms were present earlier.134 Unfortunately, in this series, 10 patients died, 5 survived in a vegetative state, and 1 survived with neurologic deficits. The single patient who survived with moderate deficits was treated within 10 min of the respiratory arrest; therapy was delayed or absent in the others.

The ubiquity of increased ADH, the propensity of the medical community to prescribe hypotonic IV fluids to children, and the lack of routine electrolyte monitoring create the potential for frequent occurrences of hyponatremia. ADH release is associated with many clinical scenarios, resulting from both hemodynamic and nonhemodynamic stimuli (Table 3).150 The pediatric surgical patient is certainly at risk for increased ADH, given the pain, stress, narcotics, hypovolemia, and/or hemorrhage associated with the postoperative period. Moreover, recent surveys demonstrate that it is common practice to administer hypotonic fluids postoperatively in children.151–153 Additionally, routine electrolyte monitoring is often not performed unless clinically indicated. Therefore, the true incidence of hyponatremia in these patients is not known but may be much higher than suspected. In a meta-analysis comparing hypotonic versus isotonic fluids in all hospitalized children, the odds of developing hyponatremia after the administration of hypotonic solutions was 17 times greater than with isotonic fluids.154

Table 3

Table 3

For several years, the general pediatric community has been intensely debating the wisdom of continuing routine hypotonic maintenance IV fluid therapy in hospitalized children. Proponents of maintaining the hypotonic requirements outlined by Holliday and Segar argue that extracellular deficits should be replaced first with isotonic fluids, followed by only the amount of fluid and electrolytes required to replace insensible losses and urine output.155–159 Recognizing that increased ADH levels may affect urine output, decreased volumes are recommended. On the other hand, those who favor using isotonic fluids recognize the potential for iatrogenic hyponatremia and wish to minimize this risk, albeit at the expense of a precise replacement of exact sodium and free water requirements.160–163 In postsurgical patients, the concern over ADH release causing decreased urine output is confounded by the possibility of volume depletion caused by blood loss or other fluid shifts. The natural inclination when faced with decreased urine output in this scenario is typically to give more volume, not less. The risk of hyponatremia, when faced with oliguria, could be lessened with isotonic fluids regardless of the volume status.

There are at least 2 potential problems when using only isotonic fluids to avoid hyponatremia. The first of these, described only in the adult population, is the phenomenon of desalination. In a study of 22 young women having gynecologic surgery with minimal blood loss, it was described that plasma sodium concentrations decreased an average of 4.2 mmol/L after the administration of large volumes of isotonic fluids.164 The large volume of fluid administered resulted in hypertonic urine, likely secondary to ADH release both intraoperatively and postoperatively. Researchers proposed that when the extracellular space expands with isotonic fluids, the urinary excretion of a hypertonic solution leaves excess electrolyte-free water leading to hyponatremia and subsequent intracellular swelling (Fig. 3). This process is known as desalination. and may be the etiology of the slight hyponatremia reported in some children receiving isotonic fluids.141,165–168 Although the potential for significant hyponatremia is lower with isotonic fluids than with hypotonic fluids, large volumes of any IV solution, which may collect in the extracellular space, can increase the risk for low serum sodium.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Second, there is a concern that patients who are given isotonic fluids may develop hypernatremia.158 In a retrospective study of postoperative surgical ICU patients, 11 of 29 patients who received isotonic fluids had at least 1 measurement of sodium larger than 145 mmol/L, compared with 0 of 116 who received hypotonic fluids; no values were considered dangerously increased.165 The authors also found that 15 of 116 patients receiving hypotonic fluids had moderate or severe hyponatremia in addition to 1 of 29 patients in the isotonic fluid group. In a study of 12 posterior spine fusion patients randomized to isotonic or hypotonic fluids at a rate of 1.5 mL · kg−1 · h−1, 4 of 7 patients in the hypotonic group had a sodium <130 mEq/mL postoperatively.166 The control group did not exhibit hypernatremia; rather, there was a small decrease in serum sodium. Hypernatremia was also not observed in 122 primarily postoperative surgical ICU patients randomized to receive either hypotonic or isotonic fluids.167 At 24 h, the incidence of hyponatremia was 20.6% in the hypotonic fluid group compared with 5.1% in the isotonic fluid group. This finding was replicated by Yung and Keley168 in their study of both medical and surgical ICU patients who were randomized to 0.9% saline or 4% dextrose with 0.18% saline. Hypotonic fluids were associated with a decrease in serum sodium, with surgical patients experiencing the greatest decrease; no patient was found to have hypernatremia.

This debate regarding hypotonic fluids became the focus of a national inquiry in Great Britain after the deaths of 4 children who became profoundly hyponatremic after receiving hypotonic fluids while hospitalized. In 2007, The National Patient Safety Agency of the United Kingdom issued an alert recommending the removal of 4% dextrose with 0.18% saline from general use in children.169 The preferred fluids for maintenance therapy are either 0.45% saline with dextrose or isotonic fluids. Additionally, they recommended measuring plasma sodium, potassium, and urea and/or creatinine at baseline and at least once daily in any child who receives IV fluids.

In most countries, there is neither consensus nor mandate about the composition of maintenance fluids in children despite the continuing controversy in the literature. An editorial in a specialty anesthesia journal highlighted the issue and proposed the creation of a new IV solution with a fraction of the glucose and a higher concentration of sodium in comparison to currently available solutions.29 No such commercial solution is available in the United States. A review of the presently marketed IV solutions demonstrates that most are hypotonic (Table 4).170 A 2007 edition of a pediatric textbook has acknowledged the potential for hyponatremia in the postoperative period and advises this generation of pediatricians to expect the administration of isotonic fluids intraoperatively and also immediately postoperatively, albeit at two-thirds of the calculated maintenance rate in the recovery room. It further suggests that subsequent maintenance fluids should contain 0.45% saline in the absence of a specific indication for 0.25% saline. Most importantly, this text stresses the importance of daily electrolyte measurements, regardless of the type of IV solution chosen.171 This is an important advance in the care of postoperative pediatric patients. Education of all who care for children in the perioperative period about the current recommendations will reduce the potential complications associated with parenteral IV fluids.

Table 4

Table 4

Back to Top | Article Outline

CONCLUSIONS

The classic article of Holliday and Segar promoting hypotonic maintenance fluids for hospitalized children provides a solid basis for physiologic management of children's needs relating to insensible losses and urine output. To maintain homeostasis in the intraoperative period, crystalloid fluids should be isotonic in composition. Routine intraoperative dextrose administration is no longer necessary, but high-risk populations such as neonates do require dextrose infusions and monitoring of serum glucose levels. More studies are necessary in the pediatric population to define optimal amounts of fluids to maintain the intravascular space, especially during major surgical procedures. Rather than extrapolating adult and animal data to a susceptible population, research should be directed toward safety and outcomes of synthetic colloid use in children. We should ultimately change our approach to major intraoperative fluid shifts by a rational, monitored, goal-directed combination of both crystalloid and colloid therapy, similar to that occurring in adult surgical patients.33

Although no consensus has been reached on postoperative fluid management, recognition of the potential problems associated with “routine” hypotonic solutions is the first step. Other countries have addressed the issue in a decisive way by mandating a change in IV fluids to reduce the occurrence of severe hyponatremia. At the very least, we should change our practice of using D5 0.2 normal saline and educate others (surgeons and pediatricians) who are responsible for the care of the postoperative pediatric surgical patient.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Blackfan KD, Maxcy KF. Intraperitoneal injection of saline. Am J Dis Child 1918;15:19–28
2. Karelitz S, Schick B. Treatment of toxicosis with the aid of a continuous intravenous drip of dextrose solution. Am J Dis Child 1931;42:781–802
3. Darrow DC, Pratt EL. Fluid therapy, relation to tissue composition and expenditure of water and electrolyte. Council on Food and Nutrition. JAMA 1950;143:365–73
4. Crawford JK, Terry ME, Rourke GM. Simplification of drug dosage calculation by application of the surface area principle. Pediatrics 1950;5:783–90
5. Wallace WM. Quantitative requirements of infant and child for water and electrolyte under varying conditions. Am J Clin Pathol 1953;23:1133–41
6. Holliday MA. Gamble and Darrow: pathfinders in body fluid physiology and fluid therapy for children, 1914–1964. Pediatr Nephrol 2000;15:317–24
7. Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid therapy. Pediatrics 1957;19:823–32
8. Oh T. Formulas for calculating fluid maintenance requirements. Anesthesiology 1980;53:351
9. Furman E, Roman DG, Lemmer LA, Jairabet J, Jasinska M, Laver MB. Specific therapy in water, electrolyte and blood-volume replacement during pediatric surgery. Anesthesiology 1975;42:187–93
10. Berry F. Practical aspects of fluid and electrolyte therapy. In: Berry F, ed. Anesthetic management of difficult and routine pediatric patients. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1986:107–35
11. ASA Task Force on preoperative fasting. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:896–905
12. Jacob M, Chappell D, Conzen P, Finsterer U, Rehm M. Blood volume is normal after preoperative overnight fasting. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2008;552:522–9
13. Sieber FE, Traystman RJ. Special issues: glucose and the brain. Crit Care Med 1992;20:104–14
14. Anderson JM, Milner RD, Strich SJ. Effects of neonatal hypoglycemia on the nervous system: a pathological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1967;30:295–310
15. Inder T. How low can I go? The impact of hypoglycemia on the immature brain. Pediatrics 2008;122:440–1
16. Burns CM, Rutherford MA, Boardman JP, Cowan FM. Pattern of cerebral injury and neurodevelopmental outcomes after symptomatic neonatal hypoglycemia. Pediatrics 2008;122:65–74
17. Wintergerst KA, Buckingham B, Gandrud L, Wong BJ, Kache S, Wilson DM. Association of hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and glucose variability with morbidity and death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics 2006;118:173–9
18. Watson BG. Blood glucose levels in children during surgery. Br J Anaesth 1972;44:712–5
19. Bevan JC, Burn MC. Acid-base and blood glucose levels of pediatric cases at induction of anesthesia: the effects of preoperative starvation and feeding. Br J Anaesth 1973;45:115–8
20. Thomas DKM. Hypoglycemia in children before operation: its incidence and prevention. Br J Anaesth 1974;46:66–8
21. Kelnar CJ. Hypoglycaemia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Br Med J 1976;1:751–2
22. Welborn L, McGill W, Hannallah R, Nisselson C, Ruttimann U, Hicks J. Perioperative blood glucose concentrations in pediatric outpatients. Anesthesiology 1986;65:543–7
23. Leelanukrom R, Cunliffe M. Intraoperative fluid and glucose management in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2000;10:353–9
24. Paut O, Lacroix F. Recent developments in the perioperative fluid management for the paediatric patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2006;19:268–77
25. Murat I, Dubois M. Perioperative fluid therapy in pediatrics. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:363–70
26. Steward DJ, Da Silva CA, Flegel T. Elevated blood glucose levels may increase the danger of neurological deficit following profoundly hypothermic cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology 1988;68:653
27. Chiaretti A, De Benedictis R, Langer A, Di Rocco C, Bizzarri C, Iannelli A, Pollidori G. Prognostic implications of hyperglycaemia in paediatric head injury. Childs Nerv Syst 1998;14:455–9
28. Hirshberg E, Larsen G, Van Duker H. Alterations in glucose homeostasis in the pediatric intensive care unit: hyperglycemia and glucose variability are associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:361–6
29. Lonnqvist P. Inappropriate perioperative fluid management in children: time for a solution? Paediatr Anaesth 2006;17:203–5
30. Berry F. There is a solution for perioperative fluid management in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:332
31. Filston HC, Edwards CH, Chitwood R, Larson RM, Marsicano TH, Hill RC. Estimation of postoperative fluid requirements in infants and children. Ann Surg 1982;196:76–81
32. Shires T, Williams J, Brown F. Acute change in extracellular fluids associated with major surgical procedures. Ann Surg 1961;154:803–10
33. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Rehm M. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anesthesiology 2008;109:723–40
34. Roth E, Lax LC, Maloney JV. Ringer's lactate solution and extracellular fluid volume in the surgical patient: a critical analysis. Ann Surg 1969;169:149–64
35. Reid DJ. Intracellular and extracellular fluid volume during surgery. Br J Surg 1968;55:594–6
36. Cleland J, Pluth JR, Tauxe WN, Kirklin JW. Blood volume and body fluid compartment changes soon after closed and open intracardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1966;52:698–795
37. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, Hjortso E, Ording H, Lindorff-Larsen K, Rasmussen MS, Lanng C, Wallin L, Iversen LH, Grankow CS, Okholm M, Blemmer T, Svendsen PE, Rottensten HH, Thage B, Riis J, Jeppsen IS, Teilum D, Christensen AM, Graungaard B, Pott F; Danish Study Group on Perioperative Fluid Therapy. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2003;238:641–8
38. Nisanevich V, Felsenstein I, Almogy G, Weissman C, Einav S, Matot I. Effect of intraoperative fluid management on outcome after intraabdominal surgery. Anesthesiology 2005;103:25–32
39. MacKay D, Fearon K, McConnachie A, Serpell MG, Molloy RG, O'Dwyer PJ. Randomized clinical trial of the effect of postoperative intravenous fluid restriction on recovery after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2006;93:1469–74
40. Gan TJ, Soppitt A, Maroof M, el-Moalem J, Robertson KM, Moretti E, Dwane P, Glass PS. Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:820–6
41. Wakeling HG, McFall MR, Jenkins CS, Woods WG, Miles WF, Barclay GR, Fleming SC. Intraoperative esophageal Doppler guided fluid management shortens postoperative hospital stay after major bowel surgery. Br J Anaesth 2005;95:634–42
42. Noblett SC, Snowden CP, Shenton BK, Horgan AF. Randomized clinical trail assessing the effect of Doppler-optimized fluid management on outcome after elective colorectal resection. Br J Surg 2006;93:1069–76
43. Kehlet H. Goal-directed perioperative fluid management. Why, when and how? Anesthesiology 2009;110:453–5
44. Ring J, Messmer K. Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet 1977;1:466–9
45. Mastroianni L, Low HB, Rollman J, Wagle M, Bleske B, Chow MS. A comparison of 10% pentastarch and 5% albumin in patients undergoing open-heart surgery. J Clin Pharmacol 1994;34:34–40
46. McClelland DB. Safety of human albumin as a constituent of biologic therapeutic products. Transfusion 1998;38:690–9
47. De Gaudio AR. Therapeutic use of albumin. Int J Artif Organs 1995;18:216–24
48. Jorgensen KA, Stoffersen E. On the inhibitory effect of albumin on platelet aggregation. Thromb Res 1980;17:13–18
49. Joorgensen KA, Stoffersen E. Heparin like activity of albumin. Thromb Res 1979;16:569–74
50. Tobias MD, Wambold D, Pilla MA, Greer F. Differential effects of serial hemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch, albumin, and 0.9% saline on whole blood coagulation. J Clin Anesth 1998;10:366–71
51. Barron ME, Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ. A systematic review of the comparative safety of colloids. Arch Surg 2004;139:552–63
52. Human albumin administration in critically ill patients: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Injuries Group Albumin Reviewers. BMJ 1998;317:235–40
53. Schierhout G, Roberts I. Fluid resuscitation with colloid or crystalloid solutions in critically ill patients: a systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ 1998;316:961–4
54. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R; SAFE Study Investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2247–56
55. SAFE Study Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group; Australian Red Cross Blood Service; George Institute for International Health, Myburgh J, Cooper DJ, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Norton R, Bishop N, Kai Lo S, Vallance S. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in patients with traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007;357:874–84
56. Pollard AJ, Britto J, Nadel S, DeMunter C, Habibi P, Levin M. Emergency management of meningococcal disease. Arch Dis Child 1999;80:290–6
57. Booy R, Habibi P, Nadel S, de Munter C, Britto J, Morrison A, Levin M. Reduction in case fatality rate from meningococcal disease associated with improved healthcare delivery. Arch Dis Child 2001;85:386–90
58. Greenough A, Emery E, Hird MF, Gamsu HR. Randomised controlled trial of albumin infusion in ill preterm infants. Eur J Pediatr 1993;152:157–9
59. Boldt J, Knothe C, Schindler E, Hammermann H, Dapper F, Hempelmann G. Volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch solution in children. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:661–5
60. Riegger LQ, Voepel-Lewis T, Kulik TJ, Malviya S, Tait AR, Mosca RS, Bove EL. Albumin versus crystalloid prime solution for cardiopulmonary bypass in young children. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2649–54
61. Schwarz U. Intraoperative fluid therapy in infants and young children. Anaesthesist 1999;48:41–50
62. Soderlind M, Salvignol G, Izard P, Lonnqvist PA. Use of albumin, blood transfusion and intraoperative glucose by APA and ADARPEF members: a postal survey. Paediatr Anaesth 2001;11:685–9
63. Boluyt N, Bollen CW, Bos AP, Kok JH, Offringa M. Fluid resuscitation in neonatal and pediatric hypovolemic shock: a Dutch Pediatric Society evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:995–1003
64. Roberts I, Bunn F. Egg on their faces. The story of human albumin solution. Eval Health Prof 2002;25:130–8
65. Lang K, Boldt J, Suttner S, Haisch G. Colloids versus crystalloids and tissue oxygen tension in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;93:405–9
66. Wilkes MM, Navickis RJ, Sibbald WJ. Albumin versus hydroxyethyl starch in cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: a meta-analysis of postoperative bleeding. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:527–33
67. Cope JT, Banks D, Mauney MC, Lucktong T, Shockey KS, Kron IL, Tribble CG. Intraoperative hetastarch infusion impairs hemostasis after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:78–82
68. de Jonge E, Levi M. Effects of different plasma substitutes on blood coagulation: a comparative review. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1261–7
69. Treib J, Haass A, Pindur G. Coagulation disorders caused by hydroxyethyl starch. Thromb Haemost 1997;78:974–83
70. Gallandat Huet RC, Siemons AW, Baus D, van Rooyen-Butijn WT, Haagenaars JA, van Oeveren W, Bepperline F. A novel hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) for effective perioperative plasma volume substitution in cardiac surgery. Can J Anaesth 2000;47:1207–15
71. Haisch G, Boldt J, Krebs C, Suttner S, Lehmann A, Isgro F. Influence of a new hydroxyethylstarch preparation (HES 130/0.4) on coagulation in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001;15:316–21
72. Falk JL, Rackow EC, Astiz ME, Weil MH. Effects of hetastarch and albumin on coagulation in patients with septic shock. J Clin Pharmacol 1988;28:412–5
73. Rackow EC, Mecher C, Astiz ME, Griffel M, Falk JL, Weil MH. Effects of pentastarch and albumin infusion on cardiorespiratory function and coagulation in patients with severe sepsis and systemic hypoperfusion. Crit Care Med 1989;17:394–8
74. Palanzo DA, Parr GV, Bull AP, Williams DR, O'Neill MJ, Waldhausen JA. Hetastarch as a prime for cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34:680–3
75. Schortgen F, Lacherade JC, Bruneel F, Cattaneo I, Hemery F, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Effects of hydroxyethylstarch and gelatin on renal function in severe sepsis: a multicentre randomised study. Lancet 2001;357:911–6
76. Cittanova ML, Leblanc I, Legendre C, Mouquet C, Riou B, Coriat P. Effect of hydroxyethylstarch in brain-dead kidney donors on renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Lancet 1996;348:1620–2
77. Davidson IJ. Renal impact of fluid management with colloids: a comparative review. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006;23:721–38
78. Legendre C, Thervet E, Page B, Percheron A, Noel LH, Kreis H. Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic-nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplantation. Lancet 1993;342:248–9
79. Vogt NH, Bothner U, Lerch G, Lindner KH, Georgieff M. Large-dose administration of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 total hip arthroplasty: plasma homeostasis, hemostasis, and renal function compared to use of 5% human albumin. Anesth Analg 1996;83:262–8
80. Neff TA, Doelberg M, Jungheinrich C, Sauerland A, Spahn DR, Stocker R. Repetitive large-dose infusion of the novel hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in patients with severe head injury. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1453–9
81. Jungheinrich C, Scharpf R, Wargenau M, Bepperling F, Baron JF. The pharmacokinetics and tolerability of an intravenous infusion of the new hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%, 500 mL) in mild-to-severe renal impairment. Anesth Analg 2002;95: 544–51
82. Metze D, Reimann S, Szepfalusi Z, Bohle B, Kraft D, Luger TA. Persistent pruritis after hydroxyethyl starch infusion therapy: a result of long-term storage in cutaneous nerves. Br J Dermatol 1997;136:553–9
83. Morgan PW, Berridge JC. Giving long-persistent starch as volume replacement can cause pruritus after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2000;85:696–9
84. Bothner U, Georgieff M, Vogt NH. Assessment of the safety and tolerance of 6% hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) solution: a randomized, controlled epidemiology study. Anesth Analg 1998;86:850–5
85. Gall H, Kaufmann R, von Ehr M, Sterry W. [Persistent pruritus after hydroxyethyl starch infusions. Retrospective long-term study of 266 cases]. Hautarzt 1993;44:713–6.
86. Sirtl C, Laubenthal H, Zumtobel V, Kraft D, Jurecka W. Tissue deposits of hydroxyethyl starch (HES): dose-dependent and time-related. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:510–5
87. Gan TJ, Bennett-Guerrero E, Phillips-Bute B, Wakeling J, Moskowitz DM, Olufolabi Y, Konstadt SN, Bradford C, Glass PS, Machin SJ, Mythen MG. Hextend, a physiologically balanced plasma expander for large volume use in major surgery: a randomized phase III clinical trial. Hextend Study Group. Anesth Analg 1999;88:992–8
88. Martin G, Bennett-Guerrero E, Wakeling H, Mythen MG, el-Moalem H, Robertson K, Kucmeroski D, Gan TJ. A prospective, randomized comparison of thromboelastographic coagulation profile in patients receiving lactated Ringer's solution, 6% hetastarch in a balanced-saline vehicle, or 6% hetastarch in saline during major surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002;16:441–6
89. Kozek-Langenecker SA. Effects of hydroxyethyl starch solutions on hemostasis. Anesthesiology 2005;103:654–60
90. Kozek-Langenecker SA, Jungheinrich C, Sauermann W, Van der Linden P. The effects of hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 (6%) on blood loss and use of blood products in major surgery: a pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials. Anesth Analg 2008;107:382–90
91. Fenger-Eriksen C, Hartig Rasmussen C, Kappel Jensen T, Anker-Moller E, Heslop J, Frokiaer J, Tonnesen E. Renal effects of hypotensive anaesthesia in combination with acute normovolaemic haemodilution with hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 or isotonic saline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:969–74
92. Paul M, Dueck M, Joachim Herrmann H, Holzki J. A randomized, controlled study of fluid management in infants and toddlers during surgery: hydroxyethyl starch 6% (HES 70/0.5) vs lactated Ringer's solution. Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:603–8
93. Adzick NS, deLorimier AA, Harrison MR, Glick PL, Fisher DM. Major childhood tumor resection using normovolemic hemodilution anesthesia and hetastarch. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:372–5
94. Aly Hassan A, Lochbuehler H, Frey L, Messmer K. Global tissue oxygenation during normovolaemic haemodilution in young children. Paediatr Anaesth 1997;7:197–204
95. Liet JM, Bellouin AS, Boscher C, Lejus C, Roze JC. Plasma volume expansion by medium molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch in neonates: a pilot study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2003;4:305–7
96. Liet JM, Kuster A, Denizot S, Caillaux-Varin G, Gras-Legun D, Roze JC. Effects of hydroxyethyl starch on cardiac output in hypotensive neonates: a comparison with isotonic saline and 5% albumin. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:555–60
97. Standl T, Lochbuehler H, Galli C, Reich A, Dietrich G, Hagemann H. HES 130/0.4 (Voluven) or human albumin in children younger than 2 yr undergoing non-cardiac surgery. A prospective, randomized, open label, multicentre trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2008;25:437–45
98. Sumpelmann R, Kretz FJ, Gabler R, Luntzer R, Baroncini S, Osterkorn D, Haeger MC, Osthaus WA. Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.42/6:1 for perioperative plasma volume replacement in children: preliminary results of a Eur Prospective Multicenter Observational Postauthorization Safety Study (PASS). Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:929–33
99. Sumpelmann R, Schurholz T, Marx G, Thorns E, Zander R. Alteration of anion gap during almost total plasma replacement with synthetic colloids in piglets. Intensive Care Med 1999;25:1287–90
100. Kellum JA, Song M, Venkataraman R. Effects of hyperchloremic acidosis on arterial pressure and circulating inflammatory molecules in experimental sepsis. Chest 2004;125:243–8
101. Wilcox CS. Regulation of renal blood flow by plasma chloride. J Clin Invest 1983;71:726–35
102. Wilkes NJ, Woolf R, Mutch M, Mallet SV, Peachey T, Stephens R, Mythen MG. The effects of balanced versus saline-based hetastarch and crystalloid solutions on acid-base and electrolyte status and gastric mucosal perfusion in elderly surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:811–6
103. Brutocao D, Bratton SL, Thomas JR, Schrader PF, Coles PG, Lynn AM. Comparison of hetastarch with albumin for postoperative volume expansion in children after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1996;10:348–51
104. Chong Sung K, Kum Suk P, Mi Ja Y, Kyoung Ok K. Effects of intravascular volume therapy using hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) on post-operative bleeding and transfusion requirements in children undergoing cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:108–11
105. Haas T, Preinreich A, Oswald E, Pajk W, Berger J, Kuehbacher G, Innerhofer P. Effects of albumin 5% and artificial colloids on clot formation in small infants. Anaesthesia 2007;62:1000–7
106. Miller BE, Guzzetta NA, Tosone SR, Levy JH. Rapid evaluation of coagulopathies after cardiopulmonary bypass in children using modified thromboelastography. Anesth Analg 2000;90: 1324–30
107. Nearman HS, Herman ML. Toxic effects of colloids in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Clin 1991;7:713–23
108. Salmon JB, Mythen MG. Pharmacology and physiology of colloids. Blood Rev 1993;7:114–20
109. Tabuchi N, de Haan J, Gallandat Huet RC, Boonstra PW, van Oeveren W. Gelatin use impairs platelet adhesion during cardiac surgery. Thromb Haemost 1995;74:1447–51
110. Ngo NT, Cao XT, Kneen R, Wills B, Nguyen VM, Nguyen TQ, Chu VT, Nguyen TT, Simpson JA, Solomon T, White NJ, Farrar J. Acute management of dengue shock syndrome: a randomized double-blind comparison of 4 intravenous fluid regimens in the first hour. Clin Infect Dis 2001;32:204–13
111. A randomized trial comparing the effect of prophylactic intravenous fresh frozen plasma, gelatin or glucose on early mortality and morbidity in preterm babies. The Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative [NNNI] Trial Group. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155:580–8
112. Randomised trial of prophylactic early fresh-frozen plasma or gelatin or glucose in preterm babies: outcome at 2 years. Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group. Lancet 1996;348:229–32
113. Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD002055
114. Akech S, Gwer S, Idro R, Fegan G, Eziefula AC, Newton CR, Levin M, Maitland K. Volume expansion with albumin compared to gelofusine in children with severe malaria: results of a controlled trial. PLoS Clin Trials 2006;1:e21
115. Allison KP, Gosling P, Jones S, Pallister I, Porter KM. Randomized trial of hydroxyethyl starch versus gelatine for trauma resuscitation. J Trauma 1999;47:1114–21
116. Abrahamov D, Erez E, Tamariz M, Dagan O, Pearl E, Abrahamov Y, Gendel B, Desai N, Kats J, Vidne B, Barak V. Plasma vascular endothelial growth factor level is a predictor of the severity of postoperative capillary leak syndrome in neonates undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Surg Int 2002;18:54–9
117. Marx G, Cobas Meyer M, Schuerholz T, Vangerow B, Gratz KF, Hecker J, Sumpelmann R, Rueckoldt H, Leuwer M. Hydroxyethyl starch and modified fluid gelatin maintain plasma volume in a porcine model of septic shock with capillary leakage. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:629–35
118. Biesenbach G, Kaiser W, Zazgornik J. Incidence of acute oligoanuric renal failure in dextran 40 treated patients with acute ischemic stroke stage III or IV. Ren Fail 1997;19:69–75
119. Laxenaire MC, Charpentier C, Feldman L. [Anaphylactoid reactions to colloid plasma substitutes: incidence, risk factors, mechanisms. A French multicenter prospective study]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 1994;13:301–10
120. Goertz AW, Mehl T, Lindner KH, Rockermann MG, Schirmer U, Schwilk B, Georgieff M. Effect of 7.2% hypertonic saline/6% hetastarch on left ventricular contractility in anesthetized humans. Anesthesiology 1995;82:1389–95
121. Kreimeier U, Messmer K. Small-volume resuscitation: from experimental evidence to clinical routine. Advantages and disadvantages of hypertonic solutions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:625–38
122. Wade CE, Kramer GC, Grady JJ, Fabian TC, Younes RN. Efficacy of hypertonic 7.5% saline and 6% dextran-70 in treating trauma: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical studies. Surgery 1997;122:609–16
123. Bunn F, Roberts I, Tasker R, Akpa E. Hypertonic versus near isotonic crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004:CD002045
124. Cooper DJ, Myles PS, McDermott FT, Murray LJ, Laidlaw J, Cooper G, Tramayne AB, Bernard SS, Ponsford J; HTS Study Investigators. Prehospital hypertonic saline resuscitation of patients with hypotension and severe traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1350–7
125. Peterson B, Khanna S, Fisher B, Marshall L. Prolonged hypernatremia controls elevated intracranial pressure in head-injured pediatric patients. Crit Care Med 2000;28:1136–43
126. Vialet R, Albanese J, Thomachot L, Antonini F, Bourgouin A, Allliez B, Martin C. Isovolume hypertonic solutes (sodium chloride or mannitol) in the treatment of refractory posttraumatic intracranial hypertension: 2 mL/kg 7.5% saline is more effective than 2 mL/kg 20% mannitol. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1683–7
127. Cross JS, Gruber DP, Gann DS, Singh AK, Moran JM, Burchard KW. Hypertonic saline attenuates the hormonal response to injury. Ann Surg 1989;209:684–91
128. Hartl R, Medary MB, Ruge M, Arfors KE, Ghahremani F, Ghajar J. Hypertonic/hyperoncotic saline attenuates microcirculatory disturbances after traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 1997;42:S41–7
129. Hartl R, Schurer L, Schmid-Schonbein GW, del Zoppo GJ. Experimental antileukocyte interventions in cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1108–19
130. Doyle JA, Davis DP, Hoyt DB. The use of hypertonic saline in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 2001;50: 367–83
131. Fisher B, Thomas D, Peterson B. Hypertonic saline lowers raised intracranial pressure in children after head trauma. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1992;4:4–10
132. Simma B, Burger R, Falk M, Sacher P, Fanconi S. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study of fluid management in children with severe head injury: lactated Ringer's solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med 1998;26:1265–70
133. Horton JW, White DJ, Baxter CR. Hypertonic saline dextran resuscitation of thermal injury. Ann Surg 1990;211:301–11
134. Murphy JT, Horton JW, Purdue GF, Hunt JL. Cardiovascular effect of 7.5% sodium chloride-dextran infusion after thermal injury. Arch Surg 1999;134:1091–7
135. Huang PP, Stucky FS, Dimick AR, Treat RC, Bessey PQ, Rue LW. Hypertonic sodium resuscitation is associated with renal failure and death. Ann Surg 1995;221:543–54
136. Osborn DA, Evans N. Early volume expansion for prevention of morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001:CD002055
137. Niermeyer S, Kattwinkel J, Van Reempts P, Nadkarni V, Phillips B, Zideman D, Axxopardi D, Berg R, Boyle D, Boyle R, Burchfield D, Carlo W, Chameides L, Denson S, Fallat M, Gerardi M, Gunn A, Hazinski MF, Keenan W, Knaebel S, Milner A, Perlman J, Saugstad OD, Schleien C, Solimano A, Speer M, Toce s, Wiswell T, Zaritsky A. International Guidelines for Neonatal Resuscitation: an excerpt from the Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care: International Consensus on Science. Contributors and Reviewers for the Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines. Pediatrics 2000;106:E29
138. Perel P, Roberts I. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD000567
139. Jacob M, Chappell D. Saline or albumin for fluid resuscitation in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2634–5
140. Bunn F, Trivedi D, Ashraf S. Colloid solutions for fluid resuscitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD001319
141. Burrows F, Shutack J, Crone R. Inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone in a postsurgical pediatric population. Crit Care Med 1983;11:527–31
142. Arieff AI. Hyponatremia, convulsions, respiratory arrest, and permanent brain damage after elective surgery in healthy women. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1529–35
143. Arieff AI, Ayus J, Fraser C. Hyponatremia and death or permanent brain damage in healthy children. BMJ 1992;304: 1218–22
144. Arieff A. Influence of hypoxia and sex on hyponatremic encephalopathy. Am J Med 2006;119(7 suppl 1):S59–64
145. Ayus JC, Wheeler JM, Arieff AI. Postoperative hyponatremic encephalopathy in menstruant women. Ann Intern Med 1992;117:891–7
146. Arieff AI, Kozniewska E, Roberts TP, Vexler ZS, Ayus JC, Kucharczyk J. Age, gender and vasopressin affect survival and brain adaptation in rats with metabolic encephalopathy. Am J Physiol 1995;268:R1143–52
147. Cunliffe M, Potter F. Four and a fifth and all that. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:274–7
148. Jinna RR, Uzodinma JE, Desaiaah D. Age-related changes in rat brain ATPases during treatment with chlordecone. J Toxicol Environ Health 1989;27:199–208
149. Nattie EE, Edwards WH. Brain and CSF water in newborn puppies during acute hypo- and hypernatremia. J Appl Physiol 1981;51:1086–91
150. Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Hospital-acquired hyponatremia—why are hypotonic parenteral fluids still being used? Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 2007;3:374–82
151. Way C, Dhamrait R, WadeA, Walker I. Perioperative fluid therapy in children: a survey of current prescribing practice. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:371–9
152. Davies P, Hall T, Ali T, Lakhoo K. Intravenous postoperative fluid prescriptions for children: a survey of practice. BMC Surg 2008;8:10–14
153. Snaith R, Peutrell J, Ellis D. An audit of intravenous fluid prescribing and plasma electrolyte monitoring; a comparison with guidelines from the National Patient Safety Agency. Paediatr Anaesth 2008;18:940–6
154. Choong K, Kho ME, Menon K, Bohn D. Hypotonic versus isotonic saline in hospitalized children: a systemic review. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:828–35
155. Hatherill M. Rubbing salt in the wound. The case against isotonic parenteral maintenance solution. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:414–8
156. Finberg L. Hospital-acquired hyponatremia. Pediatrics 2004;114:1741
157. Holliday MA. Isotonic saline expands extracellular fluid and is inappropriate for maintenance therapy. Pediatrics 2005;115: 193–4
158. Coulthard MG. Will changing maintenance intravenous fluid from 0.18% to 0.45% saline do more harm than good? Arch Dis Child 2008;93:335–40
159. Holliday MA, Segar WE, Firedman A, Chesney R, Finberg L. Intravenous fluids for seriously ill children. Lancet 2004;363:241
160. Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Prevention of hospital-acquired hyponatremia: a case for using isotonic saline. Pediatrics 2003;111:227–30
161. Duke T, Molyneux EM. Intravenous fluids for seriously ill children: time to reconsider. Lancet 2003;362:1320–3
162. Moritz ML, Ayus JC. Hospital-acquired hyponatremia: why are there still deaths? Pediatrics 2004;113:1395–6
163. Taylor D, Durward A. Pouring salt on troubled waters. The case for isotonic parenteral maintenance solution. Arch Dis Child 2004;89:411–4
164. Steele A, Gowrishankar M, Abrahamson S, Mazer D, Feldman R, Haperin M. Postoperative hyponatremia despite near-isotonic saline infusion: a phenomenon of desalination. Ann Intern Med 1997;126:20–5
165. Au A, Ray R, McBryde K, Newman K, Weinstein S, Bell M. Incidence of postoperative hyponatremia and complications in critically ill children treated with hypotonic and normotonic solutions. J Pediatr 2008;152:33–8
166. Brazel P, McPhee I. Inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone in postoperative scoliosis patients: the role of fluid management. Spine 1996;21:724–7
167. Alvarez Montanana P, Modesto I Alapont V, Perez Ocon A, Ortega Lopez P, Lopez Prats JL, Toledo Parreno JD. The use of isotonic fluid as maintenance therapy prevents iatrogenic hyponatremia in pediatrics: a randomized, controlled open study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2008;9:589–97
168. Yung M, Keley S. Randomized controlled trial of intravenous maintenance fluids. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;49:9–14
169. National Patient Safety Agency. Reducing the risk of harm when administering intravenous fluids to children. Safety Alert 22, March 2007. Available at: http:/www.npsa.nhs.uk. Accessed January 25, 2009
170. Kuster JW, Rau RE, eds. John Hopkins: the Harriet Lane handbook. 18th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Mosby, 2008
171. Greenbaum L. The pathophysiology of body fluids and fluid therapy. In: Kliegman R, Behrman R, Jenson H, Stanton B, eds. Kliegman: Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 18th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier, 2007
© 2010 International Anesthesia Research Society