Magnesium as an Adjuvant to Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials : Anesthesia & Analgesia

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Pain Medicine: Research Report

Magnesium as an Adjuvant to Postoperative Analgesia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Trials

Lysakowski, Christopher MD*; Dumont, Lionel MD*†; Czarnetzki, Christoph MD, MBA*; Tramèr, Martin R. MD, DPhil*

Author Information
doi: 10.1213/
  • Free

Magnesium inhibits calcium entry into the cell via a noncompetitive blockade of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (1). Magnesium and the NMDA receptor are thought to be involved in the modulation of pain (2). Magnesium is also a physiological calcium antagonist at different voltage-gated channels (3), which may be important in the mechanisms of antinociception (4).

In a rat model, intrathecal magnesium sulfate induced spinal anesthesia (5). In clinical trials, magnesium treatment improved symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea (6), and had a beneficial effect in patients affected by menstrual migraine (7), or headache (8). Patients undergoing major surgery without magnesium supplementation are at risk of developing hypomagnesemia in the first postoperative 24 h (9). This decrease is probably due to the large loss of fluids and fluid movement between body compartments. Thus, perioperative magnesium supplementation may prevent postoperative hypomagnesemia and have a beneficial effect on postoperative pain. However, results from randomized, controlled trials studying the impact of magnesium on the quality of postoperative analgesia have been conflicting (10–12). It remains unclear whether magnesium has a clinically relevant effect on postoperative pain and analgesia requirements, and what the optimal regimen is. We performed a systematic review of all relevant, published, randomized trials on magnesium and postoperative pain outcomes.


We followed the recommendations of the QUOROM statement (13).

Literature Search

Requirements for inclusion were 1) Randomized treatment allocation; 2) Placebo or no treatment control group; 3) Pre- or intraoperative, with or without postoperative, IV or IM magnesium administration; 4) Reporting on postoperative analgesic requirements or postoperative pain intensity. Studies on intrathecal magnesium, on magnesium added to a patient-controlled analgesia opioid pump, animal studies, experimental studies in healthy volunteers, or trials that reported on intraoperative outcomes only (for instance, anesthetic requirements) were not considered. Relevant full reports were searched in Medline, Embase, Biosis, Cinahl, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register. Keywords used alone and in combination were magnesium; surgery OR surgical OR postoperative OR post adj operative; randomized OR randomised; human; and pain OR analgesia OR nociception. The last electronic search was in April 2006. We also checked bibliographies of retrieved reports.

Critical Appraisal

Two authors screened all retrieved papers. Reports that did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded at this stage. The remaining papers were read by two authors independently and scored for methodological validity using a modified 7-point Oxford scale (14,15). Authors met to agree consensus; discrepancies were resolved by discussion.


From the individual reports we extracted data on type of surgery, number of randomized and analyzed patients, magnesium regimens, outcomes, and adverse effects. There was an intention to combine data from independent trials using classic methods of meta-analyses and to express summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). However, the relevant trials tested many different magnesium regimens and reported on a large variety of efficacy end-points; meta-analysis of pain outcomes was deemed inappropriate. Instead, we extracted from the original studies information on postoperative pain intensity and analgesic requirements and compared the results qualitatively. Results of statistical significance were taken as reported in the original trials. Dichotomous data on further outcomes (for instance, adverse effects) were combined using a fixed effect model and were expressed as relative risks with 95% CI and numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) or -harm (16–18).


Retrieved Trials

We retrieved 37 potentially relevant randomized trials; 23 had to be subsequently excluded (Fig. 1). Fifteen were not on postoperative surgical pain: they studied prevention of pain on injection with propofol (20) or of succinylcholine-induced myalgia (21), experimental pain in healthy volunteers (22), dysmenorrhea (6), headache (23), fibromyalgia (24), migraine (25–28), neuropathic pain (29,30), or intraoperative anesthetic requirements (31–33). Eight trials had to be excluded for a variety of reasons: they tested magnesium added to tramadol or morphine in a patient-controlled analgesia pump (34,35), intrathecal magnesium (36,37), magnesium as an adjuvant to IV regional anesthesia (Bier’s block) for acute (38) or chronic pain (39), magnesium as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen and the effect of magnesium could not be isolated (40), and one did not include an inactive control group (41).

Figure 1.:
Flowchart of retrieved, excluded, and analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCT). Mg, magnesium; IV, intravenous. *Number of patients receiving magnesium. Number of trials does not add up since one trial tested IV bolus and IV bolus + infusion.

We eventually analyzed data from 14 placebo or no treatment controlled trials (Tables 1 and 2) (10–12,42–52). Data from 778 patients were analyzed; 404 received magnesium. The quality scale ranged from 2 to 7 (median, 3); 2 trials scored 2, 5 scored 3, 3 scored 4, 1 each scored 5 or 6, and 2 scored 7. One trial was performed in children (52), all others in adults.

Table 1:
Analyzed Randomized Controlled Trials—Part I
Table 2:
Analyzed Randomized Controlled Trials—Part II

Magnesium Regimens

Magnesium was tested as laevulinate (50) or gluconate (49) in one trial each, and as sulfate in all others. In nine trials, magnesium sulfate was administered as a pre- or intraoperative IV bolus followed by a continuous infusion that lasted up to 24 h; in those, the median cumulative dose of magnesium sulfate was 8.5 g (range, 2.6–16.3).

Pain Intensity

Four trials (29% of all) reported on a significant decrease in postoperative pain intensity in patients treated with magnesium compared with placebo (42,44,49,51); observation times were between 7 and 24 h. From only one of those trials, could actual pain intensity data be extracted; with placebo, average pain intensity at 12 h was 15 mm on a 100 mm visual analog scale, with magnesium, it was reported to be 10 mm (42). Seven trials (50%) were unable to find any difference in pain intensities between magnesium and placebo (10–12,43,45,47,52). In one trial (7%), patients treated with magnesium laevulinate had significantly increased pain scores at 3 h postoperatively; on a 5-point verbal rating scale, pain intensity increased from 1 with placebo to 2 with magnesium (50). Two trials did not report on postoperative pain intensity.

Analgesic Requirements

Eight trials (57% of all) reported a significant decrease in postoperative analgesic requirements in patients treated with magnesium compared with those who received placebo. In 4 of those, cumulative morphine consumption at 24 or 48 h was decreased on average by 12% to 47% (median, 28%) (10,42,44,48); in 2, fentanyl consumption at 2 and 4 h postoperatively was decreased by 53% and 80% (46,47); and in 1 each, remifentanil consumption at 12 h and piritramide consumption at 24 h was decreased by 67% and 36%, respectively (49,51). Five trials (36%) were unable to find any difference in the postoperative consumption of epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl (45), or morphine (11,43,50), or different opioids (morphine, fentanyl, meperidine) and nonopioid analgesics (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, acetaminophen) (12). In one trial (7%), children treated with magnesium consumed significantly more codeine postoperatively, but not fentanyl or acetaminophen (52).

Four trials reported on both a significant decrease in pain intensity and analgesic requirements with magnesium (42,44,49,51). Four trials reported on absence of both a significant decrease in pain intensity and analgesic requirements (11,12,43,45). There was no obvious relationship between the tested magnesium regimens and pain outcomes.

Further Outcomes

Data on further, potentially magnesium-related, beneficial or harmful outcomes came from eight studies (Table 3). Shivering, vomiting, and dizziness occurred less often with magnesium. For shivering, the difference was statistically significant; the average incidence with placebo was 11.8%, with magnesium was 4.5% (NNT 14). Nausea, arterial hypotension, and bradycardia occurred more often with magnesium. None of the differences, however, was statistically significant. Some trials reported on decreased scores of discomfort (43), or insomnia during the first postoperative night (10,43,51), or increased scores of satisfaction (51) in patients who received magnesium. None of those results was statistically significant.

Table 3:
Additional Beneficial and Harmful Effects

Magnesium Serum Concentrations

Seven trials reported on magnesium serum concentrations before and after the end of study drug administration (Table 4). Six tested an IV bolus and a subsequent continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate (10,41,43–45,47), and one tested an IV bolus and continuous infusion of magnesium gluconate (49). In five of the seven trials, average magnesium serum concentrations in control patients decreased significantly by −9% to −27%; the median of all average changes was −11%. In 6 of the 7 trials, average magnesium serum concentrations in patients receiving magnesium increased significantly by 31%–84%; the median of all average changes was +79%. No correlation between the administered cumulative doses of magnesium and the increase in the magnesium serum concentrations was apparent. The trials were too heterogeneous and data reporting was too inconsistent to allow for a relationship between the degree of hypomagnesemia and pain intensity in controls.

Table 4:
Magnesium Serum Concentrations in Patients Treated with Magnesium and in Controls


Three main results emerged from this systematic review. First, in some trials, magnesium had a beneficial effect on postoperative pain intensity and analgesic requirements. Second, magnesium treatment decreased the incidence of postoperative shivering. Third, in most trials, magnesium serum concentrations in control patients decreased.

The beneficial effects of magnesium were not unequivocal. In some trials, the benefit seemed to be obvious; others were unable to show any improvement or even showed some deterioration in patients treated with magnesium. Perhaps the clearest beneficial result was the decrease in postoperative analgesic consumption in patients who received magnesium. For instance, in four trials, the reported degree of morphine sparing (median, 28%) was similar to what has been reported with intraoperative ketamine (15) or postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (53). However, morphine-sparing per se is of questionable clinical relevance. The main issue is whether or not the decrease in morphine consumption is followed by a decrease in the incidence of morphine-related adverse effects. This was not the case; the incidence of nausea or vomiting, for instance, was not reduced with magnesium treatment. Further potentially morphine-related adverse effects, such as sedation, pruritus, or respiratory depression, were not reported in these trials. Yet another reason that would justify the concomitant use of a nonopioid adjuvant for postoperative opioid-based analgesia, would be a decrease in postoperative pain intensity compared with the opioid alone. Four trials reported on a significant decrease in pain intensity in magnesium-treated patients. However, one of those trials only provided actual visual analog scale data, and the reported average decrease in pain intensity with magnesium (from 15 to 10 mm) could not necessarily be regarded as clinically relevant. Against these trials that provided some evidence that magnesium supplementation may have a beneficial effect on analgesic requirements or pain intensity, all the trials need to be weighted that were unable to find any benefit for both outcomes.

The quantity and quality of the trials did not allow for the necessary subgroup analyses to evaluate the degree of efficacy with various regimens of magnesium. There was a large variability in doses; some trials tested a single bolus, and in the majority, a subsequent infusion was added. The largest trial tested a single bolus dose of magnesium sulfate 4 g and was unable to find any benefit in favor of magnesium (12). Zarauza et al. (11) infused more than 16 g of magnesium sulfate in their patients and were unable to find a beneficial effect. On the other hand, Levaux et al. (51) injected a bolus dose of magnesium sulfate 3.6 g and reported a significant decrease in opioid consumption and pain intensity. As a consequence, we still do not know whether there is dose-responsiveness for the analgesic efficacy with magnesium. Similarly, it remains unknown whether there is a difference between magnesium sulfate, laevulinate, and gluconate. One trial tested a cumulative dose of magnesium laevulinate 1.2 g for 5 h (50). Cumulative morphine consumption up to 4 h after surgery, and the number of episodes without any pain, did not differ between patients treated with magnesium laevulinate and those receiving placebo. However, those who had received magnesium laevulinate reported significantly more episodes with severe or unbearable pain and they had higher pain scores. In another trial, a cumulative dose of magnesium gluconate that exceeded 25 g for 12 h was given (49). The number of patients with inadequate pain control before tracheal extubation, average pain intensity at 7 and 8 h after surgery, and remifentanil consumption during the first 12 h after surgery, were all significantly decreased in patients who had received magnesium gluconate. Thus, it remains unclear whether these differences in efficacy were due to differences in doses and regimens (1.2 g during 5 h vs 25 g during 12 h), or due to differences in the chemical form of magnesium (gluconate versus laevulinate), or due to other factors.

Not unexpectedly, magnesium treatment was shown to decrease the risk of postoperative shivering. This was perhaps the clearest beneficial effect of magnesium supplementation. In healthy volunteers, magnesium sulfate (80 mg kg−1 bolus followed by an infusion at 2 g h−1) was shown to reduce the shivering threshold (54). In clinical practice, magnesium’s beneficial effect on shivering is of minor importance (NNT about 14) compared with, for instance, the efficacy that was reported with meperidine or clonidine (NNT 3–4) (19).

In trials including patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomies and hernioplasties, average magnesium serum concentrations in control patients who did not receive magnesium supplementation decreased by 11%–27%. Serum levels, which are those generally measured, reflect only a small part of the total content of magnesium; the intracellular magnesium content can be low, despite normal serum levels (55). However, we may infer from the data reported in these trials and from observations from others (9) that longer and larger surgical interventions are more likely to lead to hypomagnesemia. It remains unclear what the clinical relevance of low magnesium serum levels in surgical patients is. There is evidence that the response of the NMDA receptor is greatly enhanced by reducing the extracellular magnesium concentration below the physiological level (56). It may be hypothesized that the reported outcomes in these trials, for instance, decrease in pain intensity or in morphine consumption, were not due to a direct analgesic effect of magnesium but, rather, to the prevention of hypomagnesemia, and thus prevention of subsequent NMDA activation.

Our analysis has two major limitations. First, most trials were small. Small trials may detect a beneficial treatment effect by random chance (57). The largest trial included 200 patients (12); that trial was negative but it tested only a bolus dose of magnesium sulfate. Thus, we do not know whether that trial was negative since it was large, and therefore the risk of random variation was minimal, or because the magnesium regimen in that trial was inadequate. Second, some trials reported on low pain scores in controls. For instance, in the trial by Ko et al. (45), patients postoperatively received epidural fentanyl and bupivacaine with or without systemic magnesium and pain scores were below 40 mm at all time points in both groups. That trial was part of those that were unable to show any benefit with magnesium. However, if there is not enough baseline pain, an experimental intervention has no scope to show analgesic efficacy (58).

In conclusion, these randomized trials do not provide convincing evidence that perioperative magnesium supplementation has favorable effects on postoperative pain intensity and analgesic requirements. Nevertheless, it may be worthwhile to further study the role of magnesium as a supplement to postoperative analgesia, since this molecule is inexpensive, relatively harmless, and the biological basis for its potential antinociceptive effect is promising. There is the possibility that magnesium might have an additive or even synergistic effect with other NMDA antagonists, specifically ketamine or nitrous oxide. However, pharmacological interactions need to be formally tested. Future trials should be large enough to avoid random variations in outcomes, and they should report on clinically relevant end-points, such as pain intensity at short- and at long-term, and opioid-related adverse effects.


1. Mayer ML, Westbrook G, Guthrie PB. Voltage-dependent block by Mg2+ of NMDA responses in spinal cord neurons. Nature 1984;309:261–3.
2. Begon S, Pickering G, Eschalier A, et al. Role of spinal NMDA receptors, protein kinase C and nitric oxide synthase in the hyperalgesia induced by magnesium deficiency in rats. Br J Pharmacol 2001;134:1227–36.
3. Iseri LT, French JH. Magnesium: nature’s physiologic calcium blocker [editorial]. Am Heart J 1984;108:188–94.
4. Mantyh PW, Allen CJ, Rogers S, et al. Some sensory neurons express neuropeptide Y receptors: potential paracrine inhibition of primary afferent nociceptors following peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci 1994;14:3958–68.
5. Bahar M, Chanimov M, Grinspun E, et al. Spinal anaesthesia induced by intrathecal magnesium sulphate. Anaesthesia 1996;51:627–33.
6. Fontana-Klaiber H, Hogg B. [Therapeutic effects of magnesium in dysmenorrhea]. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax 1990;79:491–4.
7. Facchinetti F, Borella P, Sances G, et al. Oral magnesium successfully relieves premenstrual mood changes. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:177–81.
8. Peikert A, Wilimzig C, Kohne-Volland R. Prophylaxis of migraine with oral magnesium: results from a prospective, multi-center, placebo-controlled and double-blind randomized study. Cephalalgia 1996;16:257–63.
9. Sanchez-Capuchino A, McConachie I. Peri-operative effect of major gastrointestinal surgery on serum magnesium. Anaesthesia 1994;49:912–14.
10. Tramèr MR, Schneider J, Marti RA, Rifat K. Role of magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1996;84:340–7.
11. Zarauza R, Saez Fernandez AN, Iribarren MJ, et al. A comparative study with oral nifedipine, intravenous nimodipine, and magnesium sulfate in postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2000;91:938–43.
12. Tramèr MR, Glynn CJ. An evaluation of a single dose of magnesium to supplement analgesia following ambulatory surgery: randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:1374–9.
13. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896–900.
14. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1–12.
15. Elia N, Tramèr MR. Ketamine and postoperative pain—a quantitative systematic review of randomised trials. Pain 2005;113:61–70.
16. Tramèr MR, Walder B. Number needed to treat (or harm). World J Surg 2005;29:576–81.
17. Morris JA, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for relative risk, odds ratio, and standardised ratios and rates. Statistics with confidence. In: Altman DG, Gardner MJ, eds. Confidence intervals and statistical guidelines. London: BMJ Books, 1995:50–63.
18. Altman D. Confidence intervals for the number needed to treat. BMJ 1998;317:1309–12.
19. Kranke P, Eberhart LH, Roewer N, Tramèr MR. Single-dose parenteral pharmacological interventions for the prevention of postoperative shivering – A quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2004;99:718–27.
20. Memis D, Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, et al. The use of magnesium sulfate to prevent pain on injection of propofol. Anesth Analg 2002;95:606–8.
21. Laveneziana D, Riva A, Zorzetto C. [Magnesium sulfate and pain caused by succinylcholine]. Minerva Anestesiol 1983;49:713–15.
22. Mikkelsen S, Dirks J, Fabricius P, et al. Effect of intravenous magnesium on pain and secondary hyperalgesia associated with the heat/capsaicin sensitization model in healthy volunteers. Br J Anaesth 2001;86:871–3.
23. Ginder S, Oatman B, Pollack M. A prospective study of i.v. magnesium and i.v. prochlorperazine in the treatment of headaches. J Emerg Med 2000;18:311–15.
24. Russell IJ, Michalek JE, Flechas JD, Abraham GE. Treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome with Super Malic: a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover pilot study. J Rheumatol 1995;22:953–8.
25. Bigal ME, Bordini CA, Tepper SJ, Speciali JG. Intravenous magnesium sulphate in the acute treatment of migraine without aura and migraine with aura. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia 2002;22:345–53.
26. Corbo J, Esses D, Bijur PE, et al. Randomized clinical trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate as an adjunctive medication for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann Emerg Med 2001;38:621–7.
27. Demirkaya S, Vural O, Dora B, Topcuoglu MA. Efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute migraine attacks. Headache 2001;41:171–7.
28. Cete Y, Dora B, Ertan C, et al. A randomized prospective placebo-controlled study of intravenous magnesium sulphate versus metoclopramide in the management of acute migraine attacks in the Emergency Department. Cephalalgia 2005;25:199–204.
29. Brill S, Sedgwick PM, Hamann W, Di Vadi PP. Efficacy of intravenous magnesium in neuropathic pain. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:711–14.
30. Felsby S, Nielsen J, Arendt-Nielsen L, Jensen TS. NMDA receptor blockade in chronic neuropathic pain: a comparison of ketamine and magnesium chloride. Pain 1996;64:283–91.
31. Choi JC, Yoon KB, Um DJ, et al. Intravenous magnesium sulfate administration reduces propofol infusion requirements during maintenance of propofol-N2O anesthesia, Part 1: comparing propofol requirements according to hemodynamic responses. Part 2: comparing bispectral index in control and magnesium groups. Anesthesiology 2002;97:1137–41.
32. Altan A, Turgut N, Yildiz F, et al. Effects of magnesium sulphate and clonidine on propofol consumption, haemodynamics and postoperative recovery. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:438–41.
33. Schulz-Stübner S, Wettmann G, Reyle-Hahn SM, Rossaint R. Magnesium as part of balanced general anaesthesia with propofol, remifentanil and mivacurium: a double-blind, randomized prospective study in 50 patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001;18:723–9.
34. Unlügenç H, Guenduez M, Oezalevli M, Akman H. A comparative study on the analgesic effect of tramadol, tramadol plus magnesium, and tramadol plus ketamine for postoperative pain management after major abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:1025–30.
35. Unlügenç H, Ozalevli M, Guler T, Isik G. Postoperative pain management with intravenous patient-controlled morphine: comparison of the effect of adding magnesium or ketamine. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:416–21.
36. Buvanendran A, McCarthy RJ, Kroin JS, et al. Intrathecal magnesium prolongs fentanyl analgesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2002;95:661–6.
37. Ozalevli M, Cetin TO, Unlugenc H, et al. The effect of adding intrathecal magnesium sulphate to bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2005;49:1514–19.
38. Turan A, Memis D, Karamanlioglu B, et al. Intravenous regional anesthesia using lidocaine and magnesium. Anesth Analg 2005;100:1189–92.
39. Tramèr MR, Glynn CJ. Magnesium Bier’s block for treatment of chronic limb pain: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study. Pain 2002;99:235–41.
40. Feld JM, Laurito CE, Beckerman M, et al. Non-opioid analgesia improves pain relief and decreases sedation after gastric bypass surgery. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:336–41.
41. Wilder-Smith OH, Arendt-Nielsen L, Gaumann D, et al. Sensory changes and pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a comparison of anesthetic supplementation with fentanyl versus magnesium or ketamine. Anesth Analg 1998;86:95–101.
42. Apan A, Buyukkocak U, Ozcan S, et al. Postoperative magnesium sulphate infusion reduces analgesic requirements in spinal anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:766–9.
43. Bhatia A, Kashyap L, Pawar DK, Trikha A. Effect of intraoperative magnesium infusion on perioperative analgesia in open cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:262–5.
44. Kara H, Sahin N, Ulusan V, Aydogdu T. Magnesium infusion reduces perioperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:52–6.
45. Ko SH, Lim HR, Kim DC, et al. Magnesium sulfate does not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesthesiology 2001;95:640–6.
46. Koinig H, Wallner T, Marhofer P, et al. Magnesium sulfate reduces intra- and postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 1998;87:206–10.
47. Mavrommati PD, Gabopoulou ZT, Papadimos CN, et al. The perioperative infusion of low doses of sulfate reduces analgesic in patients undergoing hernioplasty. Acute Pain 2004;5:81–7.
48. Seyhan TO, Tugrul M, Sungur MO, et al. Effects of three different dose regimens of magnesium on propofol requirements, haemodynamic variables and postoperative pain relief in gynaecological surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:247–52.
49. Steinlechner B, Dworschak M, Birkenberg B, et al. Magnesium moderately decreases remifentanil dosage required for pain management after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:444–9.
50. Wilder Smith CH, Knopfli R, Wilder Smith OHG. Perioperative magnesium infusion and postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:1023–7.
51. Levaux CH, Bonhomme V, Dewandre PY, et al. Effect of intra-operative magnesium sulphate on pain relief and patient comfort after major lumbar orthopaedic surgery. Anaesthesia 2003;58:131–5.
52. O’Flaherty JE, Lin CX. Does ketamine or magnesium affect post-tonsillectomy pain in children? Paediatr Anaesth 2003;13:413–21.
53. Elia N, Lysakowski C, Tramèr MR. Acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or selective cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors used in conjunction with morphine PCA: do they benefit patients? Meta-analyses of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005;103:1296–304.
54. Wadhwa A, Sengupta P, Durrani J, et al. Magnesium sulphate only slightly reduces the shivering threshold in humans. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:756–62.
55. Reinhart RA. Magnesium metabolism. A review with special reference to the relationship between intracellular content and serum levels. Arch Intern Med 1988;148:2415–20.
56. Nowak L, Bregestovski P, Ascher P, et al. Magnesium gates glutamate-activated channels in mouse central neurones. Nature 1984;307:462–5.
57. Moore RA, Gavaghan D, Tramèr MR, et al. Size is everything—the impact of event rate variation on clinical trials and meta-analysis. Pain 1998;78:208–16.
58. Kalso E, Smith L, McQuay HJ, Andrew Moore R. No pain, no gain: clinical excellence and scientific rigour—lessons learned from IA morphine. Pain 2002;98:269–75.
© 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society