Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

PAIN MEDICINE: Review Article

The Role of N-Methyl-d-Aspartate (NMDA) Receptors in Pain: A Review

Petrenko, Andrei B. MD; Yamakura, Tomohiro MD, PhD; Baba, Hiroshi MD, PhD; Shimoji, Koki MD, PhD, FRCA

Author Information
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000081061.12235.55
  • Free


The mechanisms by which tissue injuries produce a state of pain represent one of the most intensely investigated areas in the biomedical sciences over several decades. A major advance in this field came in the late 1980s when two groups demonstrated that the spinal delivery of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) antagonists inhibits the hyperexcitability of spinal cord nociceptive neurons induced by C-fiber stimulation (1,2). Since then, hundreds of papers have been published emphasizing that activation of NMDARs after tissue injury and inflammation enables facilitated processing in the spinal cord.

In this review, recent data on the role of NMDARs in pain will be examined in the context of subunit composition, particularly focusing on the importance of the NR2B subunit. The review introduces background information on receptor structure and functional properties. The contribution of peripheral somatic and visceral NMDARs to nociception is also discussed.

NMDA Receptor: Definition, Subunit Composition and Functional Properties

Glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain and spinal cord, exerts its postsynaptic effects via a diverse set of membrane receptors, ionotropic, and metabotropic. Ionotropic receptors directly gate ion channels and are divided into three major subclasses: AMPA, kainate, and NMDA, named according to the types of synthetic agonists that activate them (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxasolepropionic acid, kainate, and N-methyl-d-aspartate, respectively). Of these, NMDARs have received particular attention because of their crucial roles in excitatory synaptic transmission, plasticity, and neurodegeneration in the central nervous system (CNS).

NMDARs display a number of unique properties that distinguish them from other ligand-gated ion channels. First, the receptor controls a cation channel that is highly permeable to monovalent ions and calcium. Second, simultaneous binding of glutamate and glycine, the coagonist, is required for efficient activation of NMDAR. Third, at resting membrane potential the NMDAR channels are blocked by extracellular magnesium and open only on simultaneous depolarization and agonist binding.

Native NMDARs are composed of NR1, NR2 (A, B, C, and D) and NR3 (A and B) subunits. Co-expression studies have demonstrated that formation of functional NMDAR channels requires a combination of NR1, an essential channel-forming subunit, and at least one of the NR2 subunits (3). Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modeling studies have disclosed critical determinants of the glutamate and glycine binding sites and demonstrated that they are located on the homologous regions of the NR2 and NR1 subunits, respectively (4,5). The co-expression studies have also shown that many biophysical and pharmacological properties of the heteromeric NR1/NR2 NMDAR channels, such as sensitivity to magnesium block, kinetics of desensitization and offset decay, susceptibility to modulation by glycine, reducing agents, polyamines and phosphorylation, and affinity for agonists and antagonists, depend on the type of NR2 subunit included in a heteromeric complex (6,7). For example, a brief application of glutamate onto NR1/NR2A assemblies generates a macroscopic current with a deactivation time constant of tens of milliseconds, compared with several seconds for NR1/NR2D receptors. In addition, NR1/NR2A assemblies are less sensitive to glutamate than other heteromeric channels. Aside from these kinetic differences, the most obvious subunit-dependent properties of NMDARs are their single-channel conductance and sensitivity to magnesium block. For example, the NR2A or NR2B subunits-containing NMDARs generate high-conductance channel openings with a high sensitivity for blocking by magnesium, whereas NR2C- or NR2D-containing receptors give rise to low-conductance openings with a lower sensitivity to magnesium. A number of pharmacological agents have been shown to distinguish between certain NMDAR subtypes. The best characterized of these compounds is ifenprodil, which inhibits NR2B-containing receptors at concentrations 400-fold lower than those required for inhibition of other NR2-containing receptors (8). Thus, ifenprodil and several structurally related compounds (eliprodil, CP-101,606, Ro25–6189, and CI-1041) are highly selective for NMDARs containing NR2B subunits. Importantly, they are better tolerated than other classes of NMDAR antagonists (9).

Similar to NR2, NR3 subunits do not by themselves generate agonist-activated currents; however, when co-expressed with NR1 and NR2, NR3A/3B subunits act in a dominant-negative manner against NMDARs to reduce such currents (10–12). Surprisingly, in contrast to conventional NR1/NR2 receptors, co-assembly of NR1 with NR3A or -3B subunits forms excitatory glycine receptors that are unaffected by glutamate or NMDA, are impermeable to calcium, and are resistant to magnesium block and NMDAR antagonists (13).

No experimental studies have been performed related to the role of NR3 subunits in pain mechanisms. Therefore, when addressing the role of NMDAR in pain, this article will emphasize the contribution of NR2 subunits, particularly NR2B, in nociception.

NMDA Receptor Activation and Persistent Pain

There is considerable evidence that pain associated with peripheral tissue or nerve injury involves NMDAR activation (14). Consistent with this, NMDAR antagonists have been shown to effectively alleviate pain-related behavior in animal models as well as in clinical situations (15,16). However, NMDARs are important for normal CNS functions, and the use of NMDAR antagonists can often be limited by serious side effects, such as memory impairment, psychotomimetic effects, ataxia, and motor incoordination. In this regard, a reduced side effect profile and an improved efficacy of NR2B-selective antagonists in animal pain models bring optimism for this class of compounds becoming useful for the treatment of pain in humans (9).

Although central NMDARs, especially ones located in the spinal cord, still receive a great deal of attention, evidence is accumulating that suggests that NMDARs located in peripheral somatic tissues and visceral pain pathways play an important role in nociception. Thus, in chronic pain settings, NMDAR activation occurs at each level of the neural axis, and therefore, each level should be considered as a potential target for therapeutical intervention. The contribution of peripheral NMDARs to the generation of pain is discussed first.

Peripheral NMDA Receptors

Morphologic studies in animals have identified NMDARs on unmyelinated and myelinated axons in peripheral somatic tissues (17,18). NMDARs are expressed on nerves in human tendons and, together with increased concentrations of glutamate, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic pain from tendons (19).

Consistent with the presence of NMDARs in the periphery, local injections of glutamate or NMDA result in nociceptive behaviors that can be attenuated by peripheral administration of NMDAR antagonists (20–22). In addition, peripheral administration of MK-801, a noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist, produces local anesthetic-like effects (23). Furthermore, hyperalgesia and spontaneous pain behavior observed in a formalin test or after inflammation can be effectively inhibited by peripheral administration of NMDAR antagonists, including those clinically available, and by NR2B-selective compounds (20,24–27). The number of NMDARs on peripheral nerve fibers increases during inflammation, and this may contribute to peripheral sensitization in inflammation (28). The nociceptive responses induced by injection of glutamate into the mouse paw appear to involve not only peripheral but also spinal and supraspinal NMDARs and are largely mediated by release of nitric oxide (NO) (29). Unlike inflammatory pain, which can be attenuated by peripheral administration of NMDAR antagonists, intradermal MK-801 failed to affect the established hyperalgesia in four models of metabolic/toxic and trauma-induced neuropathic pain, suggesting that NMDARs do not contribute to peripheral sensitization of nociceptors in this setting (30).

In humans, the peripheral administration of ketamine enhanced the local anesthetic and analgesic actions of bupivacaine used for infiltration anesthesia (31) and inhibited the development of primary and secondary hyperalgesia after an experimental burn injury (32). Another study demonstrated a dose-dependent antihyperalgesic effect for IV ketamine in patients with neuropathic pain (33). Because only minimal CNS side effects were encountered, it was suggested that these effects of ketamine were mediated, at least in part, by peripheral neurons. Finally, topical application of ketamine ointment has been recently reported to reduce pain intensity and to attenuate allodynia in patients with an acute early dystrophic stage of complex regional pain syndrome type I (34). Ketamine interacts with many receptors related to nociceptive transmission (35), and although further studies using pure NMDAR antagonists are needed to clarify the exact mechanism of ketamine’s action, local administration of ketamine appears to be beneficial for some patients with chronic pain.

Recently, it has been shown that peripheral nociceptive fibers express NR2B and NR2D subunits, whereas NR2A subunits appear to be absent from the peripheral terminals of primary afferents (Fig. 1A) (36,37). Because NR2B-selective antagonists potentiate NMDAR inhibition by endogenous protons (38), this mode of action may be beneficial under conditions of tissue injury, ischemia, or inflammation (presumably accompanied by acidosis) when a greater degree of inhibition of NMDARs can be expected in the affected tissues than normal (9). This could also explain the improved efficacy of NR2B-selective antagonists under these conditions.

Figure 1:
Schematic representation of possible subunit composition of peripheral (A) and spinal (B) NMDARs. Based on References 17 , 18 , 36 , 37 , 39 , 40, and 55. DRG = dorsal root ganglion; Glu = glutamate; SP = substance P.

Central NMDA Receptors

Spinal NMDA Receptors.

Changes in the periphery after trauma lead to the phenomenon of peripheral sensitization and primary hyperalgesia. The sensitization that occurs, however, can only be partly explained by the changes in the periphery, indicating that the hyperalgesia and allodynia after injury has a central component. This is the phenomenon of central sensitization (14). Central sensitization is the state where dorsal horn excitability is increased and, as a consequence, its response to sensory input is facilitated. A low-intensity stimulus acting via low-threshold afferents then generates pain (the phenomenon of allodynia) and noxious inputs result in a pain response that is augmented in amplitude and duration, so-called “hyperalgesia.” Convincing evidence has demonstrated that the development of spinal hyperexcitability and persistent pain involves activation of NMDARs (Fig. 2). The increased NMDAR function is expressed as an increase in channel openings and may involve transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational modulation.

Figure 2:
Schematic illustration of the role of NMDARs in central sensitization. A: Normal synaptic transmission. NMDARs do not participate in normal synaptic transmission because of their voltage-dependent block by extracellular magnesium. B: Postsynaptic depolarization and removal of the magnesium block of NMDARs. A constant drive of noxious afferent input after tissue damage depolarizes membrane strong enough to permit participation of NMDARs in synaptic transmission. Nociceptive input to the dorsal horn is further increased via positive feedback through presynaptic NMDARs. C: Posttranslational changes of NMDARs. Calcium entry causes activation of protein kinases and results in phosphorylation of NMDARs. As a consequence, the magnesium block at resting membrane potentials is decreased and channel opening time is prolonged. AMPAR = α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxasolepropionic acid receptor; NK1R = neurokinin 1 receptor; NMDAR =N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor; VSCC = voltage-sensitive calcium channel; Glu = glutamate; SP = substance P; PLC = phospholipase C; PKC = protein kinase C; Src = protein tyrosine kinase; P = phosphate group.

Recent data suggest that the mRNA expression pattern of NMDAR subunits is altered as a consequence of peripheral tissue or nerve injury. For example, one study using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) investigated the effect of formalin injection into the hind paw on NR subunit expression in rat lumbar spinal cord (39). In control animals, NR2B exhibited the largest expression among NR2 subunits, followed by decreasing proportions of NR2C, NR2A, and NR2D (Fig. 1B). Formalin treatment did not affect the expression of NR1 splice variants or NR2B, but it significantly increased and decreased the proportion of NR2A and NR2C mRNA, respectively. Of note, NR1/NR2C heteromers have a much longer deactivation time, lower conductance, higher affinity for glutamate, and weaker magnesium block than NR1/NR2A receptors, but they have comparable calcium permeability (7). Speculatively, the observed changes in the NR subunit expression may represent an adaptive response aimed to reduce excessive neuronal excitability resulting from tissue injury.

As demonstrated by single-cell PCR, fewer rat dorsal horn neurons expressed NR2A mRNA compared with controls 1–2 wk after L5 spinal nerve transection (40). As NR2B was the subunit most commonly expressed in rat dorsal horn, the reduction of NR2A expression after a peripheral nerve lesion could make the contribution of the former subunit proportionally larger. Indeed, the observed changes in the dose-response curve of NMDAR currents were consistent with a relative increase in NR2B expression. The authors suggested the importance of the NR2B but not the NR2A subunit in neuropathic pain conditions. Also, the relative increase in NR2B, NR2C, and NR2D populations could well be part of an adaptive or “fail safe” response that would serve to enhance NMDAR-mediated currents, thereby ensuring the adequacy of neurotransmission compromised by nerve damage (41).

Peripheral inflammation may alter the properties of NMDARs in the spinal dorsal horn (42). After complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) treatment, the magnesium blockade of NMDA responses was reduced and the current-voltage relationship of NMDAR channels was shifted in the hyperpolarized direction. These changes, which were mediated by protein kinase C (PKC) and resulted in enhanced NMDA responses at negative potentials, could lead to an increase in synaptic transmission in the dorsal horn and contribute to the development of pathological nociceptive responses associated with tissue injury.

Protein phosphorylation is a major mechanism for the regulation of NMDAR function (Fig. 2C). Indeed, direct phosphorylation may be one mechanism by which PKC regulates the function of NMDARs (43). Also, PKC potentiates NMDA responses indirectly by activation of the tyrosine kinase (Src) signaling cascade (44). In addition, increasing evidence also suggests that PKC modulates the function of NMDARs by participating in their interactions with postsynaptic density and cytoskeletal proteins (45).

Although PKC enhances NMDA-evoked currents in most preparations, its effects on the magnesium blockade of NMDA currents vary. One obvious factor that can contribute to the dissimilar PKC effects found among the various studies is the differential NMDAR subunit expression in the CNS. Compared with NR1/NR2C and NR1/NR2D receptors, NR1/NR2A and NR1/NR2B receptors are more sensitive to magnesium block and PKC potentiation. Thus, consistent with the larger expressions of NR2B and NR2A subunits in the superficial dorsal horn, PKC resulted in magnesium-dependent potentiation of NMDAR-mediated responses in rat dorsal horn neurons that receive sensory inputs from an inflamed hind paw (42).

As noted above, protein phosphorylation is important for the up-regulation of NMDAR function. Although both NR2A and NR2B subunits can be tyrosine phosphorylated in vitro, tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B, but not the NR2A, is associated with the development of persistent pain after inflammation (46). The increase in NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation is dependent on primary afferent drive from the inflamed hind paw and correlates with the development and maintenance of inflammatory hyperalgesia. Signal transduction upstream to NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation involves G-protein-coupled receptors, PKC and the Src family protein tyrosine kinases. Thus, the enhanced tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of NMDAR may contribute to the development of nociceptor activity-dependent changes in the spinal cord.

NMDARs are anchored in the postsynaptic membrane by interactions between the cytoplasmic C-terminal tails of their NR2 subunits and the PDZ domains of PSD-95/SAP90, an abundant scaffold protein that assembles a specific set of signaling proteins around the NMDAR. These proteins, such as neuronal NO synthase, SynGAP, and SPAR, may participate in downstream signaling by NMDARs (47). Not surprisingly, the NMDAR-PSD-95/SAP90 interaction has been recently implicated in the processing of spinal nociceptive information. PSD-95/SAP90 mRNA and protein are enriched in the spinal cord and are selectively distributed in the superficial dorsal horn neurons, where PSD-95/SAP90 interacts with NR2A/2B subunits (48). Additionally, PSD-95/SAP90 is required for NMDAR-mediated thermal hyperalgesia. Furthermore, PSD-95/SAP90 knockdown can delay the onset of mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia in the chronic neuropathic pain model (49).

Another protein that is likely to mediate many aspects of postsynaptic signaling by NMDAR is calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII). It has received much attention because it is persistently activated after NMDAR stimulation. The activation of CaMKII stimulates its binding to the cytoplasmic domain of the NMDAR subunit NR2B. By interfering with autoinhibitory interactions within CaMKII, binding to NR2B locks CaMKII in an activated state that cannot be reversed by phosphatases (50). In addition, the CaMKII-NR2B interaction leads to the trapping of CaM that may reduce down-regulation of NMDA receptor activity. It is interesting that although CaMKII binds to the NR2B subunit of NMDAR in more than one mode, its affinity to the closely related NR2A subunit is decreased (51).

Recently, evidence has pointed to a key role for CaMKII in nociceptive transmission. In fact, CaMKIIα, which is a major CaMKII isoform expressed in the brain, is preferentially localized in pain-processing regions in the CNS such as lamina II of the spinal cord dorsal horn and the dorsal root ganglion (DRGs) (52). Also, CaMKII is up-regulated in the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn and DRG cells after inflammation or injuries to peripheral tissues (53,54). Thus, the ability of CaMKII to specifically interact with NR2B, together with their co-localization in the superficial dorsal horn (a region strongly involved in nociception), indicates the particular importance of the NR2B-CaMKII interaction in the development and maintenance of nociceptive hypersensitivity and provides a novel target for treatment of chronic pain.

Interestingly, NR2A and NR2B, the prevailing NR2 subunits in the spinal cord, have different locations at the cellular level (Fig. 1B) (55). In adult rat lamina II neurons, identified on the basis of patch-clamp recordings, NR2A subunits predominate at synapses, whereas NR2B subunits are present extrasynaptically and do not participate in synaptic transmission. However, during pain states, the building-up of extracellular glutamate can potentially activate extrasynaptic NMDARs, thus suggesting a possible role of NR2B subunits in this situation.

It has been assumed that central sensitization in the spinal cord dorsal horn is mediated by activation of postsynaptic NMDARs. However, one of the features unique to the spinal cord is the presence of presynaptic NMDARs (Figs. 1B, 2B). In fact, many small-diameter primary afferent fibers terminating in the dorsal horn express NMDARs, and activation of presynaptic NMDARs causes the release of substance P (SP) from primary afferents (56). In addition, glutamate released from the presynaptic terminal can potentially enhance its own release in a feed-forward manner in response to subsequent stimuli. Rat DRG neurons contain NR1, NR2B, NR2C, and NR2D, but not NR2A, subunits (37). Furthermore, NR2B subunits are predominantly expressed on small-diameter primary afferents (36). Therefore, because SP, calcitonin gene-related peptide and glutamate co-occur in small-diameter primary afferent terminals, presynaptic NR2B-containing NMDARs can facilitate and prolong the transmission of nociceptive messages through the release of these neurotransmitters.

The particular importance of NR2B subunits in mediating pain is further substantiated by the fact that changes in pain-related behaviors in NR2A subunit knockout mice have not been demonstrated compared with wild controls in several acute and chronic pain models (57).

Consistent with an increasing number of reports implicating the importance of the NR2B subunit in pain mechanisms, several experimental studies have demonstrated the efficacy of NR2B-selective NMDAR antagonists (24,58,59). In support of these data, spinal administration of Conantokin G, a 17 amino acid peptide isolated from the cone snail that selectively inhibits the NR2B subunit of the NMDAR, produced potent antinociception in formalin tests and in models of peripheral nerve injury and inflammation at doses approximately 20 times smaller than those required to impair motor function (60). Although some data suggest that the spinal cord is not the primary site of action of NR2B-selective compounds (61), this study argues for an action at a spinal NR2B site and further supports the notion that drugs directed against NR2B-containing NMDARs hold promise as novel therapeutics for the control of pain.

Supraspinal NMDA Receptors.

There is evidence to suggest a role for NMDARs in mediating supraspinal sensitization as well. Indeed, increased NMDAR activation underlies inflammation-induced neuronal hyperexcitability of brainstem circuitry (62). Furthermore, as indicated by RT-PCR analysis, there is an up-regulation of NR1, NR2A, and NR2B mRNA subunits gene expression in the brainstem after inflammation (63).

Transgenic mice overexpressing NR2B subunits in the forebrain exhibited enhanced responsiveness to the peripheral injection of two inflammatory agents, formalin and CFA (64). Neuronal c-Fos expression was most prominent, and significantly different from wild type controls, in the anterior cingulate (ACC) and insular cortices. Interestingly, the ACC is tonically activated in chronic pain states (65), and its activity is correlated with the suffering component of pain (66).

Blockade of Inhibitory Mechanisms Leads to NMDA Receptor Activation

Although many reports have demonstrated a pivotal role for increased excitation in facilitating the processing of afferent input in the dorsal horn after tissue or nerve injury, similar changes may potentially occur because of the blockade of the inhibitory mechanisms (disinhibition). Disinhibition may be caused by a number of factors, such as a reduction in inhibitory transmitters, for example γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) or its receptors (67), or losses of inhibitory neurons (68). However, irrespective of the cause of disinhibition, the unopposed activation of NMDARs is the underlying mechanism. In a normal state (Fig. 2A), the participation of NMDARs in synaptic transmission is prevented by GABAA receptor-mediated currents (69), which restore the depolarized membrane potential to a resting level, thus preventing the relief of the magnesium block of NMDAR, and only C-fiber input can reliably trigger central sensitization (70). However, the situation changes after the removal of GABAergic inhibition, and low-intensity stimulation begins to induce central sensitization, which never occurs under a physiological state.

It is noteworthy that although the enhancement of NMDAR function is essential for persistent pain, a drug that potentiates NMDA responses is not necessarily pain promoting because NMDARs are located on both excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Indeed, in rats with inflammation, gabapentin, a widely prescribed analgesic, may exert its antinociceptive effects by increasing the activity of inhibitory neurons in the dorsal horn by NMDAR activation (71). Interestingly, the activation of extrasynaptic NMDARs in the spinal dorsal horn (presumably containing NR2B subunits) may contribute to the antinociceptive action of gabapentin (72).

NMDA Receptors and Visceral Pain

Despite extensive experimental and clinical literature related to somatic nociception, relatively few studies have been performed in models of visceral pain. However, accumulating evidence indicates a possible role for NMDARs in mediating pain from internal organs. In fact, IV ketamine dose-dependently attenuated increases in blood pressure evoked by graded distentions of the ureter in rats (73). Intrathecally administered NMDA facilitated dorsal horn neuronal and behavioral responses to noxious colorectal distention (CRD) (74). NMDARs have been found on peripheral terminals of primary afferent nerves innervating the colon (75). That study also demonstrated that systemically, but not intrathecally, administered NMDAR antagonists attenuate the reflex responses to noxious CRD, suggesting that peripherally located NMDARs mediated the response. However, the mechanism and site of action of such an effect remains controversial. Indeed, the effect of ketamine on pain originating in the urinary bladder has recently been characterized in intact, halothane-anesthetized rats (76). A direct inhibitory effect on cardiovascular and visceromotor responses (VMR) to urinary bladder distention (UBD) was observed when ketamine was administered IV and intrathecally, with a similar effect from two other clinically available NMDAR antagonists, dextromethorphan and memantine. A spinally mediated effect was thereby suggested. A related study examining spinal cord dorsal horn neuronal responses to UBD in acutely spinalized decerebrate rat confirmed that a site of action of ketamine appears to be localized in the spinal cord (77).

Another study has examined the role of NMDARs in processing of visceral stimuli of graded intensities (78). The NMDAR channel blocker MK-801 attenuated c-Fos expression, widely used as a correlative indicator for neuronal activity, in the lumbosacral spinal cord induced by noxious, as well as innocuous, CRD. Additionally, in awake rats, intrathecally administered competitive NMDAR antagonist 2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (APV) dose-dependently attenuated VMRs to both stimulus paradigms. In contrast to a previous report (75), these data also suggest that spinally located NMDARs mediated the response to colorectal stimulation. Interestingly, unlike somatic sensory system, an innocuous visceral stimulus appears to be susceptible to NMDAR antagonism.

In visceral pain pathways, NMDARs may also be involved under inflammatory conditions. For, example, systemically administered NMDAR antagonists can attenuate visceral pain because of cyclophosphamide-induced cystitis in rats (79). The stronger antinociceptive effect produced by intrathecal MK-801 suggests the spinal localization of NMDARs involved in vesical pain. Another possible site of action for the effects of NMDAR antagonists, that is peripheral afferents, was not eliminated in that study. Although in a previous report the inhibition of responses to UBD was not observed after intravesical application of ketamine (76), the situation may be different in the chemically damaged bladder when better delivery of the drug to nociceptors can be expected.

Thus, experimental evidence currently available suggests that NMDAR antagonists may be useful analgesics for the treatment of visceral pain, (e.g, irritable bowel syndrome).


It is clear that NMDARs are critically involved in the induction and maintenance of neuronal hyperexcitability after noxious events. Until recently, only central NMDARs were a primary focus of investigations. With the recognition of peripheral somatic and visceral NMDARs, it is now apparent that the role of NMDARs in pain is much greater than thought previously.

Over the past decade, accumulating evidence has suggested that the NR2B subunit of NMDAR is particularly important for pain perception. Given the small side effect profile and good efficacy of NR2B-selective compounds, it is quite likely that NR2B-selective blockade will emerge as a viable strategy for pharmacological treatment of pain.


1. Davies SN, Lodge D. Evidence for involvement of N-methylaspartate receptors in “wind-up” of class 2 neurones in the dorsal horn of the rat. Brain Res 1987; 424: 402–6.
2. Dickenson AH, Sullivan AF. Evidence for a role of the NMDA receptor in the frequency dependent potentiation of deep rat dorsal horn nociceptive neurones following C fibre stimulation. Neuropharmacology 1987; 26: 1235–8.
3. Mori H, Mishina M. Structure and function of the NMDA receptor channel. Neuropharmacology 1995; 34: 1219–37.
4. Hirai H, Kirsch J, Laube B, et al. The glycine binding site of the N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor subunit NR1: identification of novel determinants of co-agonist potentiation in the extracellular M3–M4 loop region. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996; 93: 6031–6.
5. Laube B, Hirai H, Sturgess M, et al. Molecular determinants of agonist discrimination by NMDA receptor subunits: analysis of the glutamate binding site on the NR2B subunit. Neuron 1997; 18: 493–503.
6. Yamakura T, Shimoji K. Subunit- and site-specific pharmacology of the NMDA receptor channel. Prog Neurobiol 1999; 59: 279–98.
7. Cull-Candy S, Brickley S, Farrant M. NMDA receptor subunits: diversity, development and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 327–35.
8. Williams K. Ifenprodil discriminates subtypes of N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor: selectivity and mechanisms at recombinant heteromeric receptors. Mol Pharmacol 1993; 44: 851–9.
9. Chizh BA, Headley PM, Tzschentke TM. NMDA receptor antagonists as analgesics: focus on the NR2B subtype. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2001; 22: 636–42.
10. Ciabarra AM, Sullivan JM, Gahn LG, et al. Cloning and characterization of chi-1: a developmentally regulated member of a novel class of the ionotropic glutamate receptor family. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 6498–508.
11. Sucher NJ, Akbarian S, Chi CL, et al. Developmental and regional expression pattern of a novel NMDA receptor-like subunit (NMDAR-L) in the rodent brain. J Neurosci 1995; 15: 6509–20.
12. Nishi M, Hinds H, Lu HP, et al. Motoneuron-specific expression of NR3B, a novel NMDA-type glutamate receptor subunit that works in a dominant-negative manner. J Neurosci 2001; 21: RC185.
13. Chatterton JE, Awobuluyi M, Premkumar LS, et al. Excitatory glycine receptors containing the NR3 family of NMDA receptor subunits. Nature 2002; 415: 793–8.
14. Doubell TP, Mannion RJ, Woolf CJ. The dorsal horn: state-dependent sensory processing, plasticity and the generation of pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, eds. Textbook of pain. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1999: 165–81.
15. Fisher K, Coderre TJ, Hagen NA. Targeting N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor for chronic pain management: preclinical animal studies, recent clinical experience and future research directions. J Pain Symptom Manage 2000; 20: 358–73.
16. Hewitt DJ. The use of NMDA-receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: S73–9.
17. Carlton SM, Hargett GL, Coggeshall RE. Localization and activation of glutamate receptors in unmyelinated axons of rat glabrous skin. Neurosci Lett 1995; 197: 25–8.
18. Coggeshall RE, Carlton SM. Ultrastructural analysis of NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors on unmyelinated and myelinated axons in the periphery. J Comp Neurol 1998; 391: 78–86.
19. Alfredson H, Forsgren S, Thorsen K, Lorentzon R. In vivo microdialysis and immunohistochemical analyses of tendon tissue demonstrated high amounts of free glutamate and glutamate NMDAR1 receptors, but no signs of inflammation, in Jumper’s knee. J Orthop Res 2001; 19: 881–6.
20. Jackson DL, Graff CB, Richardson JD, Hargreaves KM. Glutamate participates in the peripheral modulation of thermal hyperalgesia in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1995; 284: 321–5.
21. Zhou S, Bonasera L, Carlton SM. Peripheral administration of NMDA, AMPA or KA results in pain behaviors in rats. Neuroreport 1996; 7: 895–900.
22. Lawand NB, Willis WD, Westlund KN. Excitatory amino acid receptor involvement in peripheral nociceptive transmission in rats. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 324: 169–77.
23. Ushida T, Tani T, Kawasaki M, et al. Peripheral administration of an N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonist (MK-801) changes dorsal horn neuronal responses in rats. Neurosci Lett 1999; 260: 89–92.
24. Taniguchi K, Shinjo K, Mizutani M, et al. Antinociceptive activity of CP-101, 606, an NMDA receptor NR2B subunit antagonist. Br J Pharmacol 1997; 122: 809–12.
25. Davidson EM, Carlton SM. Intraplantar injection of dextrorphan, ketamine or memantine attenuates formalin-induced behaviors. Brain Res 1998; 785: 136–42.
26. Leem JW, Hwang JH, Hwang SJ, et al. The role of N-methyl- d -aspartate receptors in Freund’s complete adjuvant induced mechanical hyperalgesia in rats. Neurosci Lett 2001; 297: 155–8.
27. You HJ, Chen J, Morch CD, Arendt-Nielsen L. Differential effect of peripheral glutamate (NMDA, non-NMDA) receptor antagonists on bee venom-induced spontaneous nociception and sensitization. Brain Res Bull 2002; 58: 561–7.
28. Carlton SM, Coggeshall RE. Inflammation-induced changes in peripheral glutamate receptor populations. Brain Res 1999; 820: 63–70.
29. Beirith A, Santos AR, Calixto JB. Mechanisms underlying the nociception and paw oedema caused by injection of glutamate into the mouse paw. Brain Res 2002; 924: 219–28.
30. Aley KO, Levine JD. Different peripheral mechanisms mediate enhanced nociception in metabolic/toxic and traumatic painful peripheral neuropathies in the rat. Neuroscience 2002; 111: 389–97.
31. Tverskoy M, Oren M, Vaskovich M, et al. Ketamine enhances local anesthetic and analgesic effects of bupivacaine by peripheral mechanism: a study in postoperative patients. Neurosci Lett 1996; 215: 5–8.
32. Warncke T, Jorum E, Stubhaug A. Local treatment with the N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonist ketamine, inhibit development of secondary hyperalgesia in man by a peripheral action. Neurosci Lett 1997; 227: 1–4.
33. Leung A, Wallace MS, Ridgeway B, Yaksh T. Concentration-effect relationship of intravenous alfentanil and ketamine on peripheral neurosensory thresholds, allodynia and hyperalgesia of neuropathic pain. Pain 2001; 91: 177–87.
34. Ushida T, Tani T, Kanbara T, et al. Analgesic effects of ketamine ointment in patients with complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2002; 27: 524–8.
35. Hirota K, Lambert DG. Ketamine: its mechanism(s) of action and unusual clinical uses. Br J Anaesth 1996; 77: 441–4.
36. Ma QP, Hargreaves RJ. Localization of N-methyl- d -aspartate NR2B subunits on primary sensory neurons that give rise to small-caliber sciatic nerve fibers in rats. Neuroscience 2000; 101: 699–707.
37. Marvizon JC, McRoberts JA, Ennes HS, et al. Two N-methyl- d -aspartate receptors in rat dorsal root ganglia with different subunit composition and localization. J Comp Neurol 2002; 446: 325–41.
38. Mott DD, Doherty JJ, Zhang S, et al. Phenylethanolamines inhibit NMDA receptors by enhancing proton inhibition. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 659–67.
39. Gaunitz C, Schuttler A, Gillen C, Allgaier C. Formalin-induced changes of NMDA receptor subunit expression in the spinal cord of the rat. Amino Acids 2002; 23: 177–82.
40. Karlsson U, Sjodin J, Angeby Moller K, et al. Glutamate-induced currents reveal three functionally distinct NMDA receptor populations in rat dorsal horn: effects of peripheral nerve lesion and inflammation. Neuroscience 2002; 112: 861–8.
41. McCormack K. Signal transduction in neuropathic pain, with special emphasis on the analgesic role of opioids. Part I: The basic science of phenotype expression in normal and regenerating nerve. Pain Rev 1999; 6: 3–33.
42. Guo H, Huang LY. Alteration in the voltage dependence of NMDA receptor channels in rat dorsal horn neurones following peripheral inflammation. J Physiol 2001; 537: 115–23.
43. Liao GY, Wagner DA, Hsu MH, Leonard JP. Evidence for direct protein kinase-C mediated modulation of N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor current. Mol Pharmacol 2001; 59: 960–4.
44. Lu WY, Xiong ZG, Lei S, et al. G-protein-coupled receptors act via protein kinase C and Src to regulate NMDA receptors. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 331–8.
45. Sheng M, Pak DT. Ligand-gated ion channel interactions with cytoskeletal and signaling proteins. Annu Rev Physiol 2000; 62: 755–78.
46. Guo W, Zou S, Guan Y, et al. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the NR2B subunit of the NMDA receptor in the spinal cord during the development and maintenance of inflammatory hyperalgesia. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6208–17.
47. Sheng M, Kim MJ. Postsynaptic signaling and plasticity mechanisms. Science 2002; 298: 776–80.
48. Tao YX, Huang YZ, Mei L, Johns RA. Expression of PSD-95/SAP90 is critical for N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor-mediated thermal hyperalgesia in the spinal cord. Neuroscience 2000; 98: 201–6.
49. Tao F, Tao YX, Gonzalez JA, et al. Knockdown of PSD-95/SAP90 delays the development of neuropathic pain in rats. Neuroreport 2001; 12: 3251–5.
50. Bayer KU, De Koninck P, Leonard AS, et al. Interaction with the NMDA receptor locks CaMKII in an active conformation. Nature 2001; 411: 801–5.
51. Mayadevi M, Praseeda M, Kumar KS, Omkumar RV. Sequence determinants on the NR2A and NR2B subunits of NMDA receptor responsible for specificity of phosphorylation by CaMKII. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1598: 40–5.
52. Bruggemann I, Schulz S, Wiborny D, Hollt V. Colocalization of the mu-opioid receptor and calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II in distinct pain-processing brain regions. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 2000; 85: 239–50.
53. Carlton SM. Localization of CaMKIIalpha in rat primary sensory neurons: increase in inflammation. Brain Res 2002; 947: 252–9.
54. Fang L, Wu J, Lin Q, Willis WD. Calcium-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II contributes to spinal cord central sensitization. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 4196–204.
55. Momiyama A. Distinct synaptic and extrasynaptic NMDA receptors identified in dorsal horn neurones of the adult rat spinal cord. J Physiol 2000; 523 Pt 3: 621–8.
56. Liu H, Mantyh PW, Basbaum AI. NMDA-receptor regulation of substance P release from primary afferent nociceptors. Nature 1997; 386: 721–4.
57. Petrenko AB, Yamakura T, Baba H, Sakimura K. Unaltered pain-related behavior in mice lacking NMDA receptor GluR epsilon 1 subunit. Neurosci Res 2003; 46: 199–204
58. Bernardi M, Bertolini A, Szczawinska K, Genedani S. Blockade of the polyamine site of NMDA receptors produces antinociception and enhances the effect of morphine, in mice. Eur J Pharmacol 1996; 298: 51–5.
59. Boyce S, Wyatt A, Webb JK, et al. Selective NMDA NR2B antagonists induce antinociception without motor dysfunction: correlation with restricted localisation of NR2B subunit in dorsal horn. Neuropharmacology 1999; 38: 611–23.
60. Malmberg AB, Gilbert H, McCabe RT, Basbaum AI. Powerful antinociceptive effects of the cone snail venom-derived subtype-selective NMDA receptor antagonists conantokins G and T. Pain 2003; 101: 109–16.
61. Chizh BA, Reissmuller E, Schlutz H, et al. Supraspinal vs spinal sites of the antinociceptive action of the subtype-selective NMDA antagonist ifenprodil. Neuropharmacology 2001; 40: 212–20.
62. Terayama R, Guan Y, Dubner R, Ren K. Activity-induced plasticity in brain stem pain modulatory circuitry after inflammation. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 1915–9.
63. Miki K, Zhou QQ, Guo W, et al. Changes in gene expression and neuronal phenotype in brain stem pain modulatory circuitry after inflammation. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87: 750–60.
64. Wei F, Wang GD, Kerchner GA, et al. Genetic enhancement of inflammatory pain by forebrain NR2B overexpression. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 164–9.
65. Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, et al. Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995; 63: 225–36.
66. Petrovic P, Ingvar M, Stone-Elander S, et al. A PET activation study of dynamic mechanical allodynia in patients with mononeuropathy. Pain 1999; 83: 459–70.
67. Castro-Lopes JM, Tavares I, Coimbra A. GABA decreases in the spinal cord dorsal horn after peripheral neurectomy. Brain Res 1993; 620: 287–91.
68. Azkue JJ, Zimmermann M, Hsieh TF, Herdegen T. Peripheral nerve insult induces NMDA receptor-mediated, delayed degeneration in spinal neurons. Eur J Neurosci 1998; 10: 2204–6.
69. Yoshimura M, Nishi S. Primary afferent-evoked glycine- and GABA-mediated IPSPs in substantia gelatinosa neurones in the rat spinal cord in vitro. J Physiol 1995; 482: 29–38.
70. Woolf CJ, Wall PD. Relative effectiveness of C primary afferent fibers of different origins in evoking a prolonged facilitation of the flexor reflex in the rat. J Neurosci 1986; 6: 1433–42.
71. Gu Y, Huang LY. Gabapentin potentiates N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor mediated currents in rat GABAergic dorsal horn neurons. Neurosci Lett 2002; 324: 177–80.
72. Moore KA, Baba H, Woolf CJ. Gabapentin–actions on adult superficial dorsal horn neurons. Neuropharmacology 2002; 43: 1077–81.
73. Olivar T, Laird JM. Differential effects of N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor blockade on nociceptive somatic and visceral reflexes. Pain 1999; 79: 67–73.
74. Kolhekar R, Gebhart GF. NMDA and quisqualate modulation of visceral nociception in the rat. Brain Res 1994; 651: 215–26.
75. McRoberts JA, Coutinho SV, Marvizon JC, et al. Role of peripheral N-methyl- d -aspartate (NMDA) receptors in visceral nociception in rats. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1737–48.
76. Castroman PJ, Ness TJ. Ketamine, an N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonist, inhibits the reflex responses to distension of the rat urinary bladder. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1401–9.
77. Castroman PJ, Ness TJ. Ketamine, an N-methyl- d -aspartate receptor antagonist, inhibits the spinal neuronal responses to distension of the rat urinary bladder. Anesthesiology 2002; 96: 1410–9.
78. Traub RJ, Zhai Q, Ji Y, Kovalenko M. NMDA receptor antagonists attenuate noxious and nonnoxious colorectal distention-induced Fos expression in the spinal cord and the visceromotor reflex. Neuroscience 2002; 113: 205–11.
79. Meen M, Coudore-Civiale MA, Parry L, et al. Involvement of N-methyl- d -aspartate receptors in nociception in the cyclophosphamide-induced vesical pain model in the conscious rat. Eur J Pain 2002; 6: 307–14.
© 2003 International Anesthesia Research Society