Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Featured Articles: Narrative Review Article

The Neural Circuits Underlying General Anesthesia and Sleep

Moody, Olivia A. PhD*,†; Zhang, Edlyn R. BSc*; Vincent, Kathleen F. PhD*,†; Kato, Risako PhD*,†; Melonakos, Eric D. PhD*,†,‡; Nehs, Christa J. PhD*,†,‡; Solt, Ken MD*,†

Author Information
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005361
  • Free
  • Take the CME Test
  • Continuing Medical Education

Abstract

General anesthetics produce a reversible state of unconsciousness, amnesia, analgesia, and immobility in response to pain. Since the introduction of general anesthesia into clinical practice, research in anesthetic mechanisms has been shaped by several influential theories. Claude Bernard proposed that anesthetics share a single, unified mechanism of action.1 This hypothesis was strongly reinforced by the findings of Meyer and Overton, who independently discovered that anesthetic potency correlated strongly with lipophilicity.2 Thus, the lipid theory—stating that anesthetics act by disrupting the lipid bilayer of neuronal cell membranes—dominated thinking in the field for nearly a century.

In the 1980s, it was discovered that general anesthetics interact with hydrophobic sites on proteins,3 commencing a new era of identifying relevant protein targets for anesthetics. It is now evident that anesthetics act at specific molecular sites on ionotropic receptors, voltage-gated ion channels, and metabotropic receptors to produce neuronal inhibition.4 Substantial work has focused on anesthetic potentiation of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors, which are responsible for the majority of inhibitory neurotransmission in the brain.5

Despite important advances in the molecular pharmacology of general anesthetics, the neuroanatomic sites of anesthetic action were largely unknown until it was reported that the spinal cord—not the brain—is the predominant site where anesthetics act to block motor responses to painful stimuli.6,7 Another seminal finding was that the microinjection of barbiturates into the upper brainstem of rodents produces general anesthesia.8 These important findings demonstrated that discrete neuroanatomic sites underlie different end points of anesthesia such as immobility and unconsciousness.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in studying how anesthetic drugs converge onto neural pathways of natural sleep to produce unconsciousness.9 Sleep serves as a useful metaphor for anesthesiologists to explain general anesthesia to patients, as the 2 share the behavioral trait of reversible unconsciousness.10 However, the states are distinct and clarity of terminology should be a goal in clinical and scientific discourse. In this review, the states of general anesthesia and sleep will be compared, highlighting important similarities and differences in neurophysiology and the neural circuit mechanisms underlying unconsciousness.

COMPARISON OF ANESTHESIA AND SLEEP STATES

Important characteristics of general anesthesia and natural sleep are summarized in the Table. Reversible loss of consciousness is a common feature, but the depth of unconsciousness differs markedly. During natural sleep, responsiveness to loud verbal or strong tactile stimulation remains intact, as well as the ability to maintain or restore a patent airway with adequate spontaneous ventilation. Based on the degree of unresponsiveness and airway patency, natural sleep is akin to the American Society of Anesthesiologists’ definition of “moderate sedation.”11 This is in contrast to general anesthesia, which is defined by behavioral unresponsiveness, even to painful stimuli. It is worth noting, however, that individuals with anatomically compromised airways may be vulnerable to reduced muscle activation and ventilatory drive during unconsciousness, in the setting of both general anesthesia and sleep (for a comprehensive review of this topic, please see the review by Hillman and Chung12). Individuals with obstructive sleep apnea are particularly vulnerable to developing a compromised upper airway when administered sedatives, analgesics, and muscle relaxants. Preoperative screening tools to identify individuals with obstructive sleep apnea can mitigate vulnerabilities and other comorbidities that normally increase perioperative risk of hypoventilation and asphyxia during general anesthesia.13

Table. - A Comparison of General Anesthesia and Sleep
Natural sleep General anesthesia
Loss of consciousness? Yes Yes
Reversible? Yes Yes
Arousable? Yes—with sufficient external stimuli No
Cyclical/ultradian rhythm? Yes No
Susceptible to homeostatic pressures? Yes Maybe
Can relieve sleep pressure? Yes Maybe
Memory formation? Important for memory processing and consolidation No
Sense of time passing? Yes No

Sleep is a natural process that occurs rhythmically, alternating between nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep in 90- to 120-minute cycles throughout the night.14–16 In humans, NREM sleep is classified into 3 stages (N1–N3) from lighter to deeper sleep.16 In contrast, during REM sleep, the cerebral cortex is active, more closely resembling the awake state.15

The 2 main mechanisms that affect the timing and duration of sleep are homeostatic mechanisms (ie, the pressure to sleep that increases with prolonged wakefulness) and circadian rhythms.17 In animals, prolonged propofol exposure does not result in sleep deprivation, suggesting that propofol sedation satisfies the homeostatic need for sleep.18 However, in sleep-deprived animals, sevoflurane exposure allows for selective recovery of NREM sleep,19 while REM sleep debt continues to accumulate.20 These studies suggest that different anesthetics may satisfy the homeostatic need for specific components of natural sleep. On the contrary, the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist ketamine has been shown to inhibit light-entrainment to the suprachiasmatic nucleus clock (the process by which the circadian clock is synchronized to light cues), and extended exposure to GABAergic anesthetics is predicted to induce temporary phase shifts in the sleep-wake cycle.21 Phase shift effects could alter the trajectory of postoperative recovery, and clinical research on this topic is ongoing.21 Molecular studies have shown that exposure to sevoflurane, dexmedetomidine, and propofol can each inhibit the expression of key circadian clock genes, though these effects were more notable when anesthetics were administered during the active phase (dark phase for rodents) than during the inactive phase (light phase for rodents).21 Overall, the accrued sleep debt is usually not considered when clinicians administer anesthetics for surgery, but ongoing research has the potential to improve postoperative care by examining postoperative sleep disturbances.

The effects of sleep and anesthesia on memory reveal fundamental differences between the 2 states. People awaken from sleep with the sense that time has passed, and sleep plays an important role in memory processing and consolidation.22,23 On emergence from general anesthesia, patients often describe feeling like no time had passed since induction, even after many hours of surgery. It has been reported that the formation of new memories during emergence does not occur until patients can maintain sustained wakefulness.24 Anesthetics administered after a learning task impair memory consolidation and disrupt hippocampal activity.25–28 It is evident that general anesthetics hamper learning and memory, whereas sleep has beneficial effects on memory formation and consolidation.

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM FINDINGS IN SLEEP AND GENERAL ANESTHESIA

A comparison of the frontal electroencephalogram (EEG) during natural sleep and general anesthesia reveals some shared features, but also many state- and drug-specific differences. On sleep onset, there is an increase in frontal slow (<1 Hz) and delta (1–4 Hz) oscillations, with frontal areas synchronizing earlier than other cortical areas.29 The 3 stages of human NREM sleep are further characterized based on unique EEG features such as high amplitude k-complexes and sleep spindles in the 12–16 Hz range (Figure 1A).17,30 The most prominent EEG feature shared between natural sleep and general anesthesia is the presence of large amplitude slow and delta oscillations.30,31 Slow-delta oscillations can be induced by dexmedetomidine, propofol, and ether anesthetics,32–35 and partly originate from a loss of excitatory inputs from the brainstem arousal nuclei to the cortex.30

Figure 1.
Figure 1.:
EEG features distinct to general anesthesia and sleep. A comparison of frontal EEG recordings from humans during general anesthesia and sleep reveals similarities and differences in the neural oscillations observed. A, A full night’s natural sleep is shown as a spectrogram (lower panel) across hours of the night with the corresponding hypnogram (upper panel) identifying the stages of wake, REM sleep, and NREM stages 1–3 sleep (N1–N3). The pattern of progressing sleep stages can be seen as cyclic increases in power (warmer red colors) for frequencies <10 Hz. Some sleep spindles can be seen at 12–15 Hz during the N1–N2 stages of sleep. B, An EEG of a patient receiving a continuous infusion of low-dose dexmedetomidine (0.65 µg·kg–1·h–1) shows mild sedation in which spindles (9–15 Hz) and increased power of slow-delta (0.1–4 Hz) oscillations can be seen. The presence of spindles and slow-delta activity is similar to those features seen during NREM stage 2 sleep. C, An EEG of a patient receiving a continuous infusion of higher dose dexmedetomidine (0.85 µg·kg−1·h−1) shows moderate-to-deep sedation in which slow-delta oscillations are primarily increased. D, A bolus dose of propofol (100 mg, first green arrow) at 3 min causes the EEG to transit to increased slow oscillation power. Two additional propofol boluses (50 mg each, green arrows) cause the EEG to shift to a burst suppression pattern from 8 to 17 min. Afterward, the EEG shifts again to increased slow-delta and alpha (9–12 Hz) oscillation power (17–25 min), until the patient begins to emerge at 24 min and the slow-delta and alpha oscillation power begins to decrease. Part A was adapted with permission from Prerau et al.36 Parts B–D were adapted with permission from Purdon et al.37 EEG indicates electroencephalogram; NREM, nonrapid eye movement; REM, rapid eye movement.

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic receptor agonist, produces EEG findings most closely resembling

NREM sleep (Figure 1B, C). Spindles, which are commonly observed in NREM stage 2, are also present in the frontal EEG during dexmedetomidine sedation, with peak power around 13 Hz.35,38,39 At higher doses that produce deeper sedation, spindles disappear and slow-delta oscillations dominate the EEG, similar to NREM stage 3 sleep.38,40

Propofol enhances inhibitory neurotransmission by potentiating the activity of GABA at synaptic and extrasynaptic γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors.9 Compared to dexmedetomidine, propofol produces larger amplitude slow oscillations representative of longer periods of neuronal silence and enhanced disconnection from the environment.34,35 On loss of consciousness with propofol, there is an anteriorization of alpha power from the occipital cortex to the frontal cortex that is reversed on return of consciousness.41–43 Unlike sleep spindles that are intermittent and brief, propofol induces continuous alpha (8–12 Hz) oscillations.41,44 Propofol also increases functional connectivity between the anterior and posterior cingulate cortices.34 At very high doses, propofol produces burst suppression, a pattern of intermittent bursts of activity punctuated by electrical silence, a pattern that is not observed during natural sleep (Figure 1D).

Ether anesthetics such as isoflurane and sevoflurane are known to modulate several important molecular targets to produce neuronal inhibition, including GABAA receptors, glutamate receptors, and 2-pore domain potassium channels.5 Like propofol, sevoflurane increases slow-delta and alpha oscillations. The latter is focused in the frontal cortex and has a peak around 10 Hz during unconsciousness.36,45 However, at higher doses, sevoflurane also increases theta (4–8 Hz) oscillations that are not observed during propofol anesthesia.36 At very high doses, ether anesthetics also produce burst suppression like propofol.

Ketamine is a dissociative anesthetic that is thought to act primarily by blocking excitatory NMDA-type glutamate receptors.4 At high doses that induce unconsciousness, ketamine produces a unique “gamma burst” pattern consisting of gamma (30–70 Hz) oscillations alternating with slow-delta oscillations.46,47 Although gamma oscillations can be associated with wakeful consciousness, those observed during ketamine anesthesia are distinct and may be the result of ketamine preferentially inhibiting cortical interneurons, resulting in increased pyramidal neuronal activity.46 In addition, ketamine-induced EEG patterns may originate from decreased brainstem inputs to the thalamus and cortex or from the direct inhibitory actions of ketamine on the thalamus.46

In summary, while many anesthetics produce slow, delta, and alpha oscillations that resemble certain EEG features of NREM sleep, each drug class produces a unique constellation of neurophysiological signatures that are dose- and state-specific. Compared to other anesthetics and sedatives, dexmedetomidine produces EEG patterns that are most similar to NREM sleep, suggesting that the states may share similar underlying mechanisms at the level of neural circuits. On the other hand, high doses of propofol and ether anesthetics produce burst suppression, and ketamine produces “gamma burst” activity, none of which are observed during natural sleep.

CORTICAL EFFECTS OF ANESTHESIA AND SLEEP

During sleep, unconsciousness is primarily driven by sleep-active, subcortical areas that inhibit ascending arousal nuclei.48,49 This inhibition decreases the release of excitatory neurotransmitters—such as acetylcholine, histamine, and norepinephrine—and reduces cortical activation.17 In contrast, anesthetic agents can act directly on a variety of cortical receptors, decreasing the spontaneous activity of cortical neurons50 and the sensitivity of those neurons to subcortical inputs.51

Many recent studies have revealed that the direct actions of anesthetics on cortical neurons—or “top-down” mechanisms—are important for anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.52 Anesthetics may induce unconsciousness by direct actions on cortical neurons, which have been demonstrated in cortical slice preparations. Isoflurane, enflurane, halothane, propofol, pentobarbital, and ketamine have all been shown to inhibit spontaneous action potentials in cortical neurons.50,53 Isoflurane decreases the amplitude of excitatory synaptic potentials,51,54 while ketamine preferentially inhibits NMDA receptors on GABAergic interneurons, leading to disinhibition of pyramidal neurons.55–57

Activity of genetically distinct neuronal types is also affected in ways that causally influence the cortical EEG. For instance, parvalbumin-positive and pyramidal neurons fire most actively during the peak of the slow oscillation during both sleep and chloral hydrate anesthesia.58,59 Such parallels between sleep and anesthesia may underlie the similar slow and delta oscillations observed in both states that are traditionally thought to underlie loss of consciousness.60 The cortical actions of anesthetics may point to a shared mechanism that produces anesthetic-induced unconsciousness: despite affecting diverse molecular targets, propofol, ketamine, and sevoflurane each reduce frontal-to-parietal brain communication.61

Anesthetics likely induce unconsciousness at both the subcortical and cortical levels, acting on subcortical areas to decrease arousal while simultaneously affecting the cortex to degrade the contents of consciousness.62 In support of this hypothesis, the delivery of carbachol to the prefrontal cortex of rats mimics the stimulation of the subcortical ascending cholinergic inputs to the cortex and restores wakefulness during sevoflurane anesthesia.63 However, carbachol delivery does not restore high gamma (85–155 Hz) connectivity between cortical areas, suggesting that the contents of consciousness remain disrupted.64 Additionally, anesthetics modulate information exchanges between auditory stimuli and the primary auditory cortex action potentials that are not linked to the transition to loss of consciousness.65 Together, these results suggest that direct actions on the cortex play a critical role in anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

SUBCORTICAL CIRCUITS UNDERLYING ANESTHESIA AND SLEEP

Based on their profound inhibitory effects on the brain, systemically administered general anesthetics were historically thought to function by widespread neural suppression. This notion was challenged by a study that identified a focal zone in the rat midbrain that produced rapid and reversible loss of consciousness after microinjections of pentobarbital.8 Referred to as the mesopontine tegmentum anesthetic locus (MPTA), this region (Figure 2) has since been implicated in sleep66 and described as a consciousness “switch” for anesthesia.67 While not all anesthetics are equally impacted by MPTA lesions,68 there is substantial evidence supporting the “shared circuits hypothesis” of anesthesia and sleep.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.:
Subcortical areas implicated in the regulation of sleep and anesthesia-induced loss of consciousness. Subcortical areas are shown in the magnified inset of a human brain. Loss of consciousness generally involves silencing wake-active nuclei (yellow) and stimulating sleep-active nuclei (blue). Hypothalamic nuclei: LH, VLPO, MnPO, SON, and TMN. Thalamic nuclei: TRN and LHb. Midbrain: VTA, RMTg, and MPTA. Pons: LC and PB. Not all structures are located midline. For a comprehensive review of the putative sites of action of distinct anesthetics on the brain, please see the review by Brown et al.108 LC indicates locus coeruleus; LH, lateral hypothalamus; LHb, lateral habenula; MnPO, median preopticnucleus; MPTA, mesopontine tegmental anesthetic locus; PB, parabrachial nucleus; RMTg, rostromedial tegmental nucleus; SON, supraoptic nucleus; TMN, tuberomammillary nucleus; TRN, thalamic reticular nucleus; VLPO, ventrolateral preoptic nucleus; VTA, ventral tegmental nucleus.

The role of the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO, Figure 2) in promoting sleep has long been supported by early investigations of neural activity across arousal states, and from lesion studies.68,69 Advanced optogenetic, pharmacogenetic, and RNA sequencing techniques have further characterized the sleep-promoting neurons in the VLPO, which send inhibitory projections to arousal circuits to both induce and maintain sleep.70–72 While GABAergic anesthetics have been shown to activate sleep-promoting VLPO neurons,73,74 lesion studies have yielded conflicting results. Ablating the VLPO attenuates loss of righting induced by propofol,75 but effects on isoflurane are inconsistent with reports showing both increased and decreased sensitivity, possibly due to the long-term sleep disruptions caused by VLPO lesions.74,76 More recently, selective targeting of GABAergic and glutamatergic VLPO neurons using designer receptors has confirmed that isoflurane does not rely on the VLPO to induce loss of consciousness, in contrast to natural sleep.72 Similarly, the median preoptic nucleus (MnPO), a region both functionally and structurally connected to the VLPO,77 initiates and maintains NREM sleep but not isoflurane-induced unconsciousness.72

Another inhibitory brain region that may be involved in both general anesthesia and sleep is the thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), which is involved in NREM sleep69 and generates spindle oscillations.78 TRN stimulation further suppresses cortical activity during isoflurane anesthesia,69 and increases sensitivity to propofol through γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptors.79,80 A recent study found a novel group of GABAergic and glutamatergic neurons in the supraoptic nucleus (SON) of the hypothalamus that was activated by multiple anesthetics and that promoted NREM sleep.81 Using modern genetic techniques, the group also identified neurons that serve as a common substrate for both anesthesia and analgesia in the central amygdala,82 illustrating the potential for new tools to advance our understanding of the neural circuitry underlying anesthesia and sleep.83

Investigations of the lateral habenula (LHb), a region that modulates midbrain dopaminergic neurotransmission, have demonstrated its involvement in facilitating NREM sleep,84,85 as well as maintaining circadian rhythms,86–88 homeostatic sleep regulation,89 and NREM sleep stability.90 A variety of general anesthetics activate LHb neurons, including propofol, ketamine, pentobarbital, and chloral hydrate,73,91 and inhibiting LHb glutamate release reduces sensitivity to propofol. These findings implicate brain areas downstream from the LHb in anesthetic induction.90 The LHb sends projections to multiple regions including the GABAergic rostromedial tegmental nucleus (RMTg), which in turn sends inhibitory projections to dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA).92,93 Although studies of the RMTg have been limited in the context of sleep and anesthesia, it appears to play a role in NREM sleep.93 Furthermore, inhibition of its downstream targets, the dopaminergic VTA and substantia nigra pars compacta, promotes sleep,93–95 and selectively activating a subpopulation of GABAergic VTA projections to the lateral hypothalamus increases anesthetic depth.96 Another target of the VTA implicated in sleep is the core of the nucleus accumbens (NAc),97 which regulates NREM sleep.97,98 Interestingly, although GABAA agonists infused into the NAc do not induce unconsciousness, they do increase sensitivity to halothane anesthesia.99

Additionally, general anesthetics directly inhibit wake-active nuclei, such as the tuberomammilary nucleus (TMN) and locus coeruleus (LC). The TMN is the only brain site containing histaminergic neurons,100 which are active during waking periods and quiescent in sleep. Both GABAA receptor activation101 and NMDA receptor antagonism102 in the TMN promote NREM sleep. Likewise, GABAergic anesthetics inhibit TMN neural activity.73 Although TMN lesions increase sensitivity to isoflurane, they do not affect pentobarbital or propofol anesthesia.84

The LC is comprised of arousal-promoting noradrenergic neurons, which are most active during wake, less active during NREM sleep, and silent during REM sleep.85 Optogenetic studies have demonstrated that reduced LC firing promotes memory consolidation and decreases sensory-evoked awakenings during REM sleep.103,104 Both propofol and isoflurane inhibit LC neural firing.105 However, while stimulating LC neurons impairs isoflurane-induced unconsciousness,106 LC inhibition is not required for propofol’s effects.75 Moreover, halothane has no impact on LC firing rate.105

Finally, although cholinergic neurons in the laterodorsal tegmentum (LDT) and peduculopontine tegmentum (PPT) drive the transition from NREM to REM sleep,107 they are not activated by a broad range of anesthetics, including isoflurane, pentobarbital, and ketamine.73 Overall, while anesthesia and sleep share some overlapping subcortical mechanisms (Figure 2), there are many differences that are often anesthetic-specific. For a comprehensive review of the putative sites of action of distinct anesthetics on the brain, please see the review by Brown et al.108

NEURAL CIRCUITS OF AROUSAL AND ANESTHETIC EMERGENCE

Recently, there has been considerable interest in investigating the role of subcortical arousal circuits in anesthetic emergence.109 The central medial thalamus, part of the ascending reticular activating system, has been studied widely in the context of arousal and anesthetic emergence. Neurons in the central medial thalamus are inhibited by anesthetics.110–113 Microinjection studies of the central medial thalamus have shown that activating nicotinic acetylcholine receptors or blocking voltage-gated potassium channel family 1 (Kv1 potassium channels) increases neural activity and reverses sevoflurane-induced unconsciousness.111,114,115 Microinjections of norepinephrine into the central medial thalamus during propofol anesthesia lead to EEG signs of cortical arousal and accelerates time to emergence.116 These findings suggest that activating neurons in the central medial thalamus during anesthesia can shorten time to emergence and, in some cases, reverse anesthetic-induced unconsciousness.

The arousal-promoting orexinergic system also has notable effects on emergence. Suppressing orexinergic signaling delays emergence from ether anesthetics, but not the alkane anesthetic halothane.105,117–120 Plasma orexin-A levels increase in humans on emergence from propofol and sevoflurane anesthesia, consistent with the notion that the orexinergic system is involved in emergence.121,122

The cholinergic system, which is critical for promoting arousal, also modulates emergence from anesthesia. Intracerebroventricular microinfusions of drugs promoting cholinergic neurotransmission during continuous isoflurane anesthesia lead to EEG and behavioral signs of arousal, although the return of righting reflex was not observed.123 Microinjecting the cholinergic agonist, carbachol, into the prefrontal cortex restores the righting reflex and other conscious behaviors in rats during sevoflurane anesthesia,63 suggesting that cholinergic neurotransmission plays a critical role in emergence.

Enhancing arousal-promoting dopaminergic neurotransmission from the VTA—particularly via activation of dopamine type 1 (D1) receptors—has been shown to restore consciousness in rodents anesthetized with propofol and ether anesthetics.124–130 Of the multiple dopaminergic projections from the VTA, inputs to the NAc provide the most potent arousal stimulus from natural sleep.95

The parabrachial nucleus is a glutamatergic brainstem arousal nucleus involved in wakefulness and anesthetic emergence, with projections to the basal forebrain, thalamus, and arousal-promoting orexinergic neurons of the lateral hypothalamus.131 Parabrachial neurons are suppressed by anesthetics and activated during emergence.131,132 Optogenetic, chemogenetic, and electrical stimulations of parabrachial neurons generate EEG and behavioral evidence of arousal during sleep and general anesthesia by propofol, isoflurane, and sevoflurane.131–133

Neuromodulators have also been found to play a role in emergence. Studies have shown that adenosine antagonists, including caffeine, can facilitate emergence from isoflurane and propofol anesthesia in humans and rodents.134–136 More recently, a study in humans found that intravenous caffeine accelerated the time to emergence from isoflurane anesthesia.137 Finally, the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil has been shown to have modest effects on accelerating emergence time from general anesthesia in rodents and humans.138–140

DISCUSSION

General anesthetics are a diverse class of drugs that appear to produce unconsciousness by targeting numerous neural circuits in cortical and subcortical regions. Each anesthetic produces distinct cortical EEG signatures that are dose-dependent, which suggests that multiple neural circuits contribute to producing unconsciousness. This is evident when comparing dissimilar agents such as the GABAergic anesthetic propofol and the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine. However, the existence of similar neural oscillations during general anesthesia and sleep (eg, slow-delta oscillations) suggests that some general anesthetics converge onto sleep-active neural circuits to induce unconsciousness. However, general anesthetics also directly inhibit cortical neurons, as well as subcortical arousal-promoting neurons. All these actions likely contribute to suppress wakefulness. In addition, activating arousal nuclei accelerates emergence and restores consciousness in anesthetized subjects.

Recent advances in neuroscience such as optogenetics and chemogenetics have enabled detailed studies of the neural circuit mechanisms underlying anesthesia and sleep.83 Recently, a new genetic technique of tracking, targeting, and stimulating specific neural populations has allowed the targeting of specific behavior-associated brain loci, including “anesthesia-activated neurons” (AANs) located in the SON of the hypothalamus.81 These AANs were not only activated by a range of anesthetics, but their activation also promoted slow-wave sleep, illustrating the potential of these emerging techniques to further advance our knowledge of the neural circuitry underlying complex phenomena. Gaining insights into the neural circuitry underlying general anesthesia and sleep will likely lead to improved methods for controlling arousal states in the perioperative setting.

DISCLOSURES

Name: Olivia A. Moody, PhD.

Contribution: This author helped write and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Edlyn R. Zhang, BSc.

Contribution: This author helped write and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Kathleen F. Vincent, PhD.

Contribution: This author helped write and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Risako Kato, PhD.

Contribution: This author helped write and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Eric D. Melonakos, PhD.

Contribution: This author helped write and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Christa J. Nehs, PhD.

Contribution: This author helped to conceptually design and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: None.

Name: Ken Solt, MD.

Contribution: This author helped to conceptually design, write, and edit the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest: K. Solt is a consultant to Takeda Pharmaceuticals.

This manuscript was handled by: Toby N. Weingarten, MD.

    REFERENCES

    1. Perouansky M. The quest for a unified model of anesthetic action: a century in Claude Bernard’s shadow. Anesthesiology. 2012;117:465–474.
    2. Antkowiak B. How do general anaesthetics work?. Die Naturwissenschaften. 2001;88:201–213.
    3. Franks NP, Lieb WR. Do general anaesthetics act by competitive binding to specific receptors? Nature. 1984;310:599–601.
    4. Solt K, Forman SA. Correlating the clinical actions and molecular mechanisms of general anesthetics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2007;20:300–306.
    5. Franks NP. General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:370–386.
    6. Rampil IJ. Anesthetic potency is not altered after hypothermic spinal cord transection in rats. Anesthesiology. 1994;80:606–610.
    7. Antognini JF, Schwartz K. Exaggerated anesthetic requirements in the preferentially anesthetized brain. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:1244–1249.
    8. Devor M, Zalkind V. Reversible analgesia, atonia, and loss of consciousness on bilateral intracerebral microinjection of pentobarbital. Pain. 2001;94:101–112.
    9. Hemmings HC Jr, Riegelhaupt PM, Kelz MB, et al. Towards a comprehensive understanding of anesthetic mechanisms of action: a decade of discovery. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2019;40:464–481.
    10. Mashour GA, Pal D. Interfaces of sleep and anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30:385–398.
    11. Committee on Quality Management and Departmental Administration. Continuum of Depth of Sedation: Definition of General Anesthesia and Levels of Sedation/Analgesia. 2019.American Society of Anesthesiologists;
    12. Hillman DR, Chung F. Anaesthetic management of sleep-disordered breathing in adults. Respirology. 2017;22:230–239.
    13. Nagappa M, Wong J, Singh M, Wong DT, Chung F. An update on the various practical applications of the STOP-Bang questionnaire in anesthesia, surgery, and perioperative medicine. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30:118–125.
    14. Miyazaki S, Liu CY, Hayashi Y. Sleep in vertebrate and invertebrate animals, and insights into the function and evolution of sleep. Neurosci Res. 2017;118:3–12.
    15. Peever J, Fuller PM. The biology of REM sleep. Curr Biol. 2017;27:R1237–R1248.
    16. Le Bon O. Relationships between REM and NREM in the NREM-REM sleep cycle: a review on competing concepts. Sleep Med. 2020;70:6–16.
    17. Brown RE, Basheer R, McKenna JT, Strecker RE, McCarley RW. Control of sleep and wakefulness. Physiol Rev. 2012;92:1087–1187.
    18. Tung A, Lynch JP, Mendelson WB. Prolonged sedation with propofol in the rat does not result in sleep deprivation. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:1232–1236.
    19. Pal D, Lipinski WJ, Walker AJ, Turner AM, Mashour GA. State-specific effects of sevoflurane anesthesia on sleep homeostasis: selective recovery of slow wave but not rapid eye movement sleep. Anesthesiology. 2011;114:302–310.
    20. Pick J, Chen Y, Moore JT, et al. Rapid eye movement sleep debt accrues in mice exposed to volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:702–712.
    21. Poulsen RC, Warman GR, Sleigh J, Ludin NM, Cheeseman JF. How does general anaesthesia affect the circadian clock? Sleep Med Rev. 2018;37:35–44.
    22. Ahuja S, Chen RK, Kam K, Pettibone WD, Osorio RS, Varga AW. Role of normal sleep and sleep apnea in human memory processing. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:255–269.
    23. Vertes RP, Linley SB. No cognitive processing in the unconscious, anesthetic-like, state of sleep. J Comp Neurol. Published online ahead of print August 25, 2020. 2020. doi: 10.1002/cne.24963.
    24. Dutton RC, Smith WD, Smith NT. Wakeful response to command indicates memory potential during emergence from general anesthesia. J Clin Monit. 1995;11:35–40.
    25. Zurek AA, Yu J, Wang DS, et al. Sustained increase in α5GABAA receptor function impairs memory after anesthesia. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:5437–5441.
    26. Zhang J, Zhang X, Jiang W. Propofol impairs spatial memory consolidation and prevents learning-induced increase in hippocampal matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels in rat. Neuroreport. 2013;24:831–836.
    27. Moon DU, Esfahani-Bayerl N, Finke C, et al. Propofol modulates early memory consolidation in humans. eNeuro. 2020;7ENEURO.0537-19.2020.
    28. Dai S, Perouansky M, Pearce RA. Isoflurane enhances both fast and slow synaptic inhibition in the hippocampus at amnestic concentrations. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:816–823.
    29. Marzano C, Moroni F, Gorgoni M, Nobili L, Ferrara M, De Gennaro L. How we fall asleep: regional and temporal differences in electroencephalographic synchronization at sleep onset. Sleep Med. 2013;14:1112–1122.
    30. Akeju O, Brown EN. Neural oscillations demonstrate that general anesthesia and sedative states are neurophysiologically distinct from sleep. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2017;44:178–185.
    31. Mölle M, Marshall L, Gais S, Born J. Grouping of spindle activity during slow oscillations in human non-rapid eye movement sleep. J Neurosci. 2002;22:10941–10947.
    32. Akeju O, Hamilos AE, Song AH, Pavone KJ, Purdon PL, Brown EN. GABAA circuit mechanisms are associated with ether anesthesia-induced unconsciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:2472–2481.
    33. Murphy M, Bruno MA, Riedner BA, et al. Propofol anesthesia and sleep: a high-density EEG study. Sleep. 2011;34:283–91A.
    34. Akeju O, Pavone KJ, Westover MB, et al. A comparison of propofol- and dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram dynamics using spectral and coherence analysis. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:978–989.
    35. Akeju O, Westover MB, Pavone KJ, et al. Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on frontal electroencephalogram power and coherence. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:990–998.
    36. Prerau MJ, Brown RE, Bianchi MT, Ellenbogen JM, Purdon PL. Sleep neurophysiological dynamics through the lens of multitaper spectral analysis. Physiology. 2017;32:60–92.
    37. Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN. Clinical electroencephalography for anesthesiologists: part I: background and basic signatures. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:937–960.
    38. Akeju O, Kim SE, Vazquez R, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of dexmedetomidine-induced electroencephalogram oscillations. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163431.
    39. Huupponen E, Maksimow A, Lapinlampi P, et al. Electroencephalogram spindle activity during dexmedetomidine sedation and physiological sleep. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:289–294.
    40. Scheinin A, Kallionpää RE, Li D, et al. Differentiating drug-related and state-related effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:22–36.
    41. Purdon PL, Pierce ET, Mukamel EA, et al. Electroencephalogram signatures of loss and recovery of consciousness from propofol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E1142–E1151.
    42. Ching S, Cimenser A, Purdon PL, Brown EN, Kopell NJ. Thalamocortical model for a propofol-induced alpha-rhythm associated with loss of consciousness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:22665–22670.
    43. Supp GG, Siegel M, Hipp JF, Engel AK. Cortical hypersynchrony predicts breakdown of sensory processing during loss of consciousness. Curr Biol. 2011;21:1988–1993.
    44. Steriade M, McCormick DA, Sejnowski TJ. Thalamocortical oscillations in the sleeping and aroused brain. Science. 1993;262:679–685.
    45. Gugino LD, Chabot RJ, Prichep LS, John ER, Formanek V, Aglio LS. Quantitative EEG changes associated with loss and return of consciousness in healthy adult volunteers anaesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:421–428.
    46. Akeju O, Song AH, Hamilos AE, et al. Electroencephalogram signatures of ketamine anesthesia-induced unconsciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;127:2414–2422.
    47. Maksimow A, Särkelä M, Långsjö JW, et al. Increase in high frequency EEG activity explains the poor performance of EEG spectral entropy monitor during S-ketamine anesthesia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1660–1668.
    48. Saper CB, Scammell TE, Lu J. Hypothalamic regulation of sleep and circadian rhythms. Nature. 2005;437:1257–1263.
    49. Schwartz MD, Kilduff TS. The neurobiology of sleep and wakefulness. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2015;38:615–644.
    50. Antkowiak B. Different actions of general anesthetics on the firing patterns of neocortical neurons mediated by the GABA(A) receptor. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:500–511.
    51. Puil E, el-Beheiry H. Anaesthetic suppression of transmitter actions in neocortex. Br J Pharmacol. 1990;101:61–66.
    52. Mashour GA. Top-down mechanisms of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8:115.
    53. Antkowiak B, Helfrich-Förster C. Effects of small concentrations of volatile anesthetics on action potential firing of neocortical neurons in vitro. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1592–1605.
    54. el-Beheiry H, Puil E. Anaesthetic depression of excitatory synaptic transmission in neocortex. Exp Brain Res. 1989;77:87–93.
    55. Ali F, Gerhard DM, Sweasy K, et al. Ketamine disinhibits dendrites and enhances calcium signals in prefrontal dendritic spines. Nat Commun. 2020;11:72.
    56. Olney JW, Newcomer JW, Farber NB. NMDA receptor hypofunction model of schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 1999;33:523–533.
    57. Shen G, Han F, Shi WX. Effects of low doses of ketamine on pyramidal neurons in rat prefrontal cortex. Neuroscience. 2018;384:178–187.
    58. Niethard N, Ngo HV, Ehrlich I, Born J. Cortical circuit activity underlying sleep slow oscillations and spindles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E9220–E9229.
    59. Ushimaru M, Kawaguchi Y. Temporal structure of neuronal activity among cortical neuron subtypes during slow oscillations in anesthetized rats. J Neurosci. 2015;35:11988–12001.
    60. Gemignani A, Menicucci D, Laurino M, et al. Linking sleep slow oscillations with consciousness theories: new vistas on slow wave sleep unconsciousness. Arch Ital Biol. 2015;153:135–143.
    61. Lee U, Ku S, Noh G, Baek S, Choi B, Mashour GA. Disruption of frontal-parietal communication by ketamine, propofol, and sevoflurane. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1264–1275.
    62. Mashour GA, Hudetz AG. Bottom-up and top-down mechanisms of general anesthetics modulate different dimensions of consciousness. Front Neural Circuits. 2017;11:44.
    63. Pal D, Dean JG, Liu T, et al. Differential role of prefrontal and parietal cortices in controlling level of consciousness. Curr Biol. 2018;28:2145–2152.e5.
    64. Pal D, Li D, Dean JG, et al. Level of consciousness is dissociable from electroencephalographic measures of cortical connectivity, slow oscillations, and complexity. J Neurosci. 2020;40:605–618.
    65. Banks MI, Moran NS, Krause BM, Grady SM, Uhlrich DJ, Manning KA. Altered stimulus representation in rat auditory cortex is not causal for loss of consciousness under general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018;121:605–615.
    66. Lanir-Azaria S, Meiri G, Avigdor T, Minert A, Devor M. Enhanced wakefulness following lesions of a mesopontine locus essential for the induction of general anesthesia. Behav Brain Res. 2018;341:198–211.
    67. Sukhotinsky I, Minert A, Soja P, Devor M. Mesopontine switch for the induction of general anesthesia by dedicated neural pathways. Anesth Analg. 2016;123:1274–1285.
    68. Minert A, Baron M, Devor M. Reduced sensitivity to anesthetic agents upon lesioning the mesopontine tegmental anesthesia area in rats depends on anesthetic type. Anesthesiology. 2020;132:535–550.
    69. Lewis LD, Voigts J, Flores FJ, et al. Thalamic reticular nucleus induces fast and local modulation of arousal state. Elife. 2015;4:e08760.
    70. Chung S, Weber F, Zhong P, et al. Identification of preoptic sleep neurons using retrograde labelling and gene profiling. Nature. 2017;545:477–481.
    71. Saito YC, Tsujino N, Hasegawa E, et al. GABAergic neurons in the preoptic area send direct inhibitory projections to orexin neurons. Front Neural Circuits. 2013;7:192.
    72. Vanini G, Bassana M, Mast M, et al. Activation of preoptic GABAergic or glutamatergic neurons modulates sleep-wake architecture, but not anesthetic state transitions. Curr Biol. 2020;30:779–787.e4.
    73. Lu J, Nelson LE, Franks N, Maze M, Chamberlin NL, Saper CB. Role of endogenous sleep-wake and analgesic systems in anesthesia. J Comp Neurol. 2008;508:648–662.
    74. Moore JT, Chen J, Han B, et al. Direct activation of sleep-promoting VLPO neurons by volatile anesthetics contributes to anesthetic hypnosis. Curr Biol. 2012;22:2008–2016.
    75. Zhang Y, Yu T, Yuan J, Yu BW. The ventrolateral preoptic nucleus is required for propofol-induced inhibition of locus coeruleus neuronal activity. Neurol Sci. 2015;36:2177–2184.
    76. Eikermann M, Vetrivelan R, Grosse-Sundrup M, et al. The ventrolateral preoptic nucleus is not required for isoflurane general anesthesia. Brain Res. 2011;1426:30–37.
    77. Walter A, van der Spek L, Hardy E, Bemelmans AP, Rouach N, Rancillac A. Structural and functional connections between the median and the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus. Brain Struct Funct. 2019;224:3045–3057.
    78. Halassa MM, Siegle JH, Ritt JT, Ting JT, Feng G, Moore CI. Selective optical drive of thalamic reticular nucleus generates thalamic bursts and cortical spindles. Nat Neurosci. 2011;14:1118–1120.
    79. Zhang Y, Fu B, Liu C, et al. Activation of noradrenergic terminals in the reticular thalamus delays arousal from propofol anesthesia in mice. FASEB J. 2019;33:7252–7260.
    80. Zhang Y, Liu C, Zhang L, et al. Effects of propofol on electrical synaptic strength in coupling reticular thalamic gabaergic parvalbumin-expressing neurons. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:364.
    81. Jiang-Xie LF, Yin L, Zhao S, et al. A common neuroendocrine substrate for diverse general anesthetics and sleep. Neuron. 2019;102:1053–1065.e4.
    82. Hua T, Chen B, Lu D, et al. General anesthetics activate a potent central pain-suppression circuit in the amygdala. Nat Neurosci. 2020;23:854–868.
    83. Melonakos ED, Moody OA, Nikolaeva K, Kato R, Nehs CJ, Solt K. Manipulating neural circuits in anesthesia research. Anesthesiology. 2020;133:19–30.
    84. Luo T, Leung LS. Involvement of tuberomamillary histaminergic neurons in isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:36–43.
    85. Aston-Jones G, Bloom FE. Activity of norepinephrine-containing locus coeruleus neurons in behaving rats anticipates fluctuations in the sleep-waking cycle. J Neurosci. 1981;1:876–886.
    86. Goldstein R. A GABAergic habenulo-raphe pathway mediation of the hypnogenic effects of vasotocin in cat. Neuroscience. 1983;10:941–945.
    87. Bourdy R, Barrot M. A new control center for dopaminergic systems: pulling the VTA by the tail. Trends Neurosci. 2012;35:681–690.
    88. Zhao H, Rusak B. Circadian firing-rate rhythms and light responses of rat habenular nucleus neurons in vivo and in vitro. Neuroscience. 2005;132:519–528.
    89. Zhang B, Gao Y, Li Y, Yang J, Zhao H. Sleep deprivation influences circadian gene expression in the lateral habenula. Behav Neurol. 2016;2016:7919534.
    90. Gelegen C, Miracca G, Ran MZ, et al. Excitatory pathways from the lateral habenula enable propofol-induced sedation. Curr Biol. 2018;28:580–587.e5.
    91. Abulafia R, Zalkind V, Devor M. Cerebral activity during the anesthesia-like state induced by mesopontine microinjection of pentobarbital. J Neurosci. 2009;29:7053–7064.
    92. Jhou TC, Geisler S, Marinelli M, Degarmo BA, Zahm DS. The mesopontine rostromedial tegmental nucleus: a structure targeted by the lateral habenula that projects to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and substantia nigra compacta. J Comp Neurol. 2009;513:566–596.
    93. Yang SR, Hu ZZ, Luo YJ, et al. The rostromedial tegmental nucleus is essential for non-rapid eye movement sleep. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2002909.
    94. Sun HX, Wang DR, Ye CB, et al. Activation of the ventral tegmental area increased wakefulness in mice. Sleep Biol Rhythms. 2017;15:107–115.
    95. Eban-Rothschild A, Rothschild G, Giardino WJ, Jones JR, de Lecea L. VTA dopaminergic neurons regulate ethologically relevant sleep-wake behaviors. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:1356–1366.
    96. Yin L, Li L, Deng J, et al. Optogenetic/chemogenetic activation of gabaergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area facilitates general anesthesia via projections to the lateral hypothalamus in mice. Front Neural Circuits. 2019;13:73.
    97. Qiu MH, Liu W, Qu WM, Urade Y, Lu J, Huang ZL. The role of nucleus accumbens core/shell in sleep-wake regulation and their involvement in modafinil-induced arousal. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45471.
    98. Oishi Y, Xu Q, Wang L, et al. Slow-wave sleep is controlled by a subset of nucleus accumbens core neurons in mice. Nat Commun. 2017;8:734.
    99. Ma J, Leung LS. Limbic system participates in mediating the effects of general anesthetics. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31:1177–1192.
    100. Panula P, Pirvola U, Auvinen S, Airaksinen MS. Histamine-immunoreactive nerve fibers in the rat brain. Neuroscience. 1989;28:585–610.
    101. Xie JF, Fan K, Wang C, et al. Inactivation of the tuberomammillary nucleus by GABAA receptor agonist promotes slow wave sleep in freely moving rats and histamine-treated rats. Neurochem Res. 2017;42:2314–2325.
    102. Yin D, Dong H, Wang TX, et al. Glutamate activates the histaminergic tuberomammillary nucleus and increases wakefulness in rats. Neuroscience. 2019;413:86–98.
    103. Hayat H, Regev N, Matosevich N, et al. Locus coeruleus norepinephrine activity mediates sensory-evoked awakenings from sleep. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eaaz4232.
    104. Swift KM, Gross BA, Frazer MA, et al. Abnormal locus coeruleus sleep activity alters sleep signatures of memory consolidation and impairs place cell stability and spatial memory. Curr Biol. 2018;28:3599–3609.e4.
    105. Gompf H, Chen J, Sun Y, Yanagisawa M, Aston-Jones G, Kelz MB. Halothane-induced hypnosis is not accompanied by inactivation of orexinergic output in rodents. Anesthesiology. 2009;111:1001–1009.
    106. Vazey EM, Aston-Jones G. Designer receptor manipulations reveal a role of the locus coeruleus noradrenergic system in isoflurane general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:3859–3864.
    107. Van Dort CJ, Zachs DP, Kenny JD, et al. Optogenetic activation of cholinergic neurons in the PPT or LDT induces REM sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:584–589.
    108. Brown EN, Purdon PL, Van Dort CJ. General anesthesia and altered states of arousal: a systems neuroscience analysis. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2011;34:601–628.
    109. Kelz MB, García PS, Mashour GA, Solt K. Escape from oblivion: neural mechanisms of emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2019;128:726–736.
    110. Flood P, Ramirez-Latorre J, Role L. Alpha 4 beta 2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the central nervous system are inhibited by isoflurane and propofol, but alpha 7-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are unaffected. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:859–865.
    111. Lioudyno MI, Birch AM, Tanaka BS, et al. Shaker-related potassium channels in the central medial nucleus of the thalamus are important molecular targets for arousal suppression by volatile general anesthetics. J Neurosci. 2013;33:16310–16322.
    112. Vertes RP, Hoover WB, Rodriguez JJ. Projections of the central medial nucleus of the thalamus in the rat: node in cortical, striatal and limbic forebrain circuitry. Neuroscience. 2012;219:120–136.
    113. Violet JM, Downie DL, Nakisa RC, Lieb WR, Franks NP. Differential sensitivities of mammalian neuronal and muscle nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to general anesthetics. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:866–874.
    114. Alkire MT, Asher CD, Franciscus AM, Hahn EL. Thalamic microinfusion of antibody to a voltage-gated potassium channel restores consciousness during anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:766–773.
    115. Alkire MT, McReynolds JR, Hahn EL, Trivedi AN. Thalamic microinjection of nicotine reverses sevoflurane-induced loss of righting reflex in the rat. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:264–272.
    116. Fu B, Yu T, Yuan J, Gong X, Zhang M. Noradrenergic transmission in the central medial thalamic nucleus modulates the electroencephalographic activity and emergence from propofol anesthesia in rats. J Neurochem. 2017;140:862–873.
    117. Dong HL, Fukuda S, Murata E, Higuchi T. Excitatory and inhibitory actions of isoflurane on the cholinergic ascending arousal system of the rat. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:122–133.
    118. Kelz MB, Sun Y, Chen J, et al. An essential role for orexins in emergence from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:1309–1314.
    119. Wasilczuk AZ, Maier KL, Kelz MB. The mouse as a model organism for assessing anesthetic sensitivity. Methods Enzymol. 2018;602:211–228.
    120. Zhang LN, Yang C, Ouyang PR, et al. Orexin-A facilitates emergence of the rat from isoflurane anesthesia via mediation of the basal forebrain. Neuropeptides. 2016;58:7–14.
    121. Kushikata T, Yoshida H, Kudo M, Kudo T, Hirota K. Changes in plasma orexin A during propofol-fentanyl anaesthesia in patients undergoing eye surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:723–727.
    122. Kushikata T, Yoshida H, Kudo M, Kudo T, Hirota K. Plasma orexin A increases at emergence from sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia in patients undergoing ophthalmologic surgery. Neurosci Lett. 2010;482:212–215.
    123. Hudetz AG, Wood JD, Kampine JP. Cholinergic reversal of isoflurane anesthesia in rats as measured by cross-approximate entropy of the electroencephalogram. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:1125–1131.
    124. Kenny JD, Taylor NE, Brown EN, Solt K. Dextroamphetamine (but not atomoxetine) induces reanimation from general anesthesia: implications for the roles of dopamine and norepinephrine in active emergence. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0131914.
    125. Taylor NE, Chemali JJ, Brown EN, Solt K. Activation of D1 dopamine receptors induces emergence from isoflurane general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:30–39.
    126. Solt K, Cotten JF, Cimenser A, Wong KF, Chemali JJ, Brown EN. Methylphenidate actively induces emergence from general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2011;115:791–803.
    127. Chemali JJ, Van Dort CJ, Brown EN, Solt K. Active emergence from propofol general anesthesia is induced by methylphenidate. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:998–1005.
    128. Solt K, Van Dort CJ, Chemali JJ, Taylor NE, Kenny JD, Brown EN. Electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area induces reanimation from general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:311–319.
    129. Taylor NE, Van Dort CJ, Kenny JD, et al. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area induces reanimation from general anesthesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:12826–12831.
    130. Oishi Y, Suzuki Y, Takahashi K, et al. Activation of ventral tegmental area dopamine neurons produces wakefulness through dopamine D2-like receptors in mice. Brain Struct Funct. 2017;222:2907–2915.
    131. Muindi F, Kenny JD, Taylor NE, et al. Electrical stimulation of the parabrachial nucleus induces reanimation from isoflurane general anesthesia. Behav Brain Res. 2016;306:20–25.
    132. Luo T, Yu S, Cai S, et al. Parabrachial neurons promote behavior and electroencephalographic arousal from general anesthesia. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:420.
    133. Wang TX, Xiong B, Xu W, et al. Activation of parabrachial nucleus glutamatergic neurons accelerates reanimation from sevoflurane anesthesia in mice. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:106–118.
    134. Fong R, Khokhar S, Chowdhury AN, et al. Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia via multiple pathways. J Neurophysiol. 2017;118:1591–1597.
    135. Van Dort CJ, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R. Adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors in mouse prefrontal cortex modulate acetylcholine release and behavioral arousal. J Neurosci. 2009;29:871–881.
    136. Wang Q, Fong R, Mason P, Fox AP, Xie Z. Caffeine accelerates recovery from general anesthesia. J Neurophysiol. 2014;111:1331–1340.
    137. Fong R, Wang L, Zacny JP, et al. Caffeine accelerates emergence from isoflurane anesthesia in humans: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Anesthesiology. 2018;129:912–920.
    138. Dahaba AA, Bornemann H, Rehak PH, Wang G, Wu XM, Metzler H. Effect of flumazenil on bispectral index monitoring in unpremedicated patients. Anesthesiology. 2009;110:1036–1040.
    139. Weinbroum AA, Geller E. Flumazenil improves cognitive and neuromotor emergence and attenuates shivering after halothane-, enflurane- and isoflurane-based anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48:963–972.
    140. Safavynia SA, Keating G, Speigel I, et al. Effects of γ-aminobutyric acid type a receptor modulation by flumazenil on emergence from general anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:147–158.
    Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society