Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

How Low Can You Go: Mechanical Ventilation Over Time

Wanderer, Jonathan P. MD, MPhil; Nathan, Naveen MD

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004245
Infographics: Infographic
Free

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (jon.wanderer@vanderbilt.edu)

Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (n-nathan@northwestern.edu).

Published ahead of print 23 April 2019.

The Infographic is composed by Jonathan P. Wanderer, MD, MPhil, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine (jon.wanderer@vanderbilt.edu), and Naveen Nathan, MD, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine (n-nathan@northwestern.edu). Illustration by Naveen Nathan, MD.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Clinical practices around mechanical ventilation have changed significantly over time in both the operating room and intensive care unit setting, shifting from a methodology focused on relatively large tidal volume ventilation to one characterized by smaller tidal volume ventilation and usage of positive end-expiratory pressure. These changes have been due to the accumulation of evidence over time that better pulmonary outcomes are achieved with more modern ventilation practices. In this infographic, we review the timeline across which these changes occurred, the major pieces of evidence supporting the change, and a recent systematic review that has measured these changes over time across hundreds of cohorts of patients.

ICU indicates intensive care unit; OR, operating room; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; RCTs, randomized controlled trials; Vt, tidal volume

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. Schaefer MS, Neto AS, Pelosi P, et al. Temporal changes in ventilator settings in patients with uninjured lungs: a systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:129140.
    2. Bendixen HH, Hedley-Whyte J, Laver MB. Impaired oxygenation in surgical patients during general anesthesia with controlled ventilation. A concept of atelectasis. N Engl J Med. 1963;269:991–996.
    3. Visick WD, Fairley HB, Hickey RF. The effects of tidal volume and end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary gas exchange during anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1973;39:285–290.
    4. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al.; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1301–1308.
    5. Determann RM, Royakkers A, Wolthuis EK, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with conventional tidal volumes for patients without acute lung injury: a preventive randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14:R1.
    6. Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308:1651–1659.
    7. Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, et al. A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:428–437.
    8. Severgnini P, Selmo G, Lanza C, et al. Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1307–1321.
    Copyright © 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society