Ophthalmic surgery accounts for the highest surgical caseload throughout the globe; this year, an estimated 3.6 million cataract procedures will have been performed in the United States, and more than 20 million worldwide.1 Contemporaneously, all ophthalmic subspecialties continue to advance, aided by a seemingly endless evolution of supportive technology and surgical equipment. New surgical modalities now exist to treat a range of previously unmanageable conditions. Hand in hand with these developments, patient expectations have increased. Perioperative intraocular pressure (IOP) changes can dramatically affect clinical outcomes2 and are influenced significantly by anesthetic management.3
IOP is essential to maintain the refractive properties of the eye, and is defined as the pressure exerted by the contents of the eye against its containing wall. An increase in IOP reduces the perfusion of the ocular structures in a linear manner, and at elevated levels, it is more important than blood pressure (BP) in determining retinal function.4 At pressures exceeding the ocular perfusion pressure (OPP), raised IOP causes compression of the vasculature, resulting in retinal ischemia and blindness in animal models. Acute IOP elevation, of the order of 20 mm Hg for 5 minutes, reduces blood flow to the retina, choroid, and optic nerve in healthy volunteers,5 and may interfere with the delivery of essential neurotrophins from the brain to the retina.6 Acute decreases in IOP (<6.5 mm Hg) can induce hypotonic maculopathy, which reduces visual acuity and can cause retinal detachment.7 Acute increases in IOP in an “open” globe (eg, retinal surgery) potentially result in expulsive hemorrhage or extrusion of orbital contents.8
Substantial fluctuations in IOP occur during intraocular surgery, with variations between 0 and 120 mm Hg demonstrated during routine vitrectomy surgery,9 and between 13 and 96 mm Hg in cataract procedures.10 A 0.5-mL intravitreal injection increases IOP by more than 150% from its preinjection baseline level, to 43.81 ± 9.69 mm Hg.11
These intraoperative IOP fluctuations result in compromised blood flow to the optic nerve and retina as the OPP is markedly decreased,5 which may partially account for the variable visual outcome after surgery. The anesthetic challenge is to optimize surgical conditions, minimize the risk of visual and other adverse outcomes by safeguarding retinal perfusion, and to manage the comorbidity challenges that present.
Normal IOP is 16 ± 5 mm Hg, with cyclic fluctuations of 2–3 mm Hg throughout the day,12 peaking in the early morning, and lowest being at night due to circadian regulation of aqueous humor secretion.13 Levels above 24 mm Hg are considered pathologic.
Factors Affecting IOP
Factors affecting IOP include neural influences, rate of aqueous humor flow, and episcleral venous pressure (via its effect on aqueous outflow and choroidal blood volume).
The central nervous system influences IOP directly through neurogenic regulation of extraocular muscle tone from central diencephalic centers.14 Increased tone or contraction of extraocular muscles can markedly increase IOP.
The balance between the aqueous humor production and outflow rates is the chief physiological regulator of IOP.
The aqueous humor circulates from the posterior chamber into the anterior chamber, where temperature-dependent convection currents disseminate flow, allowing nutrient and metabolic exchange between the lens and cornea.15
At the iridocorneal angle, 75% of the aqueous humor drains into Schlemm’s canal, and 25% drains directly through ciliary muscle fibers.16 From here, the aqueous humor flows into the orbital venous system. Resistance to outflow can cause an acute rise in IOP, with an increase of 1 mm Hg for every 0.8 mm Hg increase in episcleral venous pressure (the major determinant for which is the central venous pressure [CVP]).17
Choroidal Blood Volume and Flow.
The retina is one of the most metabolically active tissues in the body, and its functional integrity is dependent on adequate vascular perfusion. Blood flow is 1400 mL/min per 100 g of tissue13—20 times that of the brain grey matter—with a high oxygen extraction rate of 40%–50%.18 This is achieved by flow through 2 morphologically and functionally distinct arterial systems: the retinal circulation and the choroidal circulation, which feed the inner and outer layers of the retina, respectively.19
The retinal circulation is an end-arterial system.20 It receives no autonomic innervation, but is tightly autoregulated and influenced by the metabolic activity of the inner retina and optic nerve head.21 , 22 The choroidal circulation supplies 85% of the retina, including the photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium.13 , 19 Richly innervated by the autonomic nervous system,23 the choroid forms a specialized dense vascular layer between the sclera and outer retina.
While the relationship between OPP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and IOP is complex and shows considerable interindividual variation, both the choroidal and retinal circulations autoregulate in response to changes in OPP.21 , 23 , 24
Impairment of venous outflow will cause engorgement of the choroid, increased intraocular blood volume, and a transient rise in IOP.25 Aqueous humor outflow will increase (over 15–30 minutes) to partially compensate for this IOP rise.
The vitreous cavity comprises two-thirds of the volume of the globe.26 It contains the vitreous humor, an almost acellular extracellular gelatinous matrix composed of 98%–99% water that has a relatively fixed volume and is not typically involved in IOP regulation.27
Although relatively stable under normal conditions, even a small change in vitreous volume may alter IOP. The vitreous is influenced by the osmotic pressure changes in the adjacent choroidal and retinal circulations.28
Ocular Perfusion Pressure
In most tissues, the perfusion pressure is dependent on the pressure differential between the arterial input and venous output. In the eye, the intraocular veins are subject to compression by the IOP and behave like Starling resistors (ie, the venous transmural pressure must exceed the IOP or they will collapse) (Figure 1).29 Therefore, the mean OPP (MOPP) is the MAP in the ophthalmic artery minus the IOP or ocular venous pressure, whichever is highest.30 Because IOP normally approximates the intraocular venous pressure, MOPP can be calculated by: MOPP = MAP − IOP.
In the sitting or standing position, the ophthalmic artery pressure is approximately 2/3 of the brachial artery pressure due to hydrostatic effects: MOPP = 2/3 MAP − IOP.31 This calculation assumes that the MAP as measured at the brachial or radial artery is truly representative of the ophthalmic artery pressure.
Retinal vascular well-being is dependent on IOP; when the latter exceeds MAP, MOPP is 0, and ocular blood flow ceases entirely.31 Increasing IOP while maintaining a constant MAP produces a set of pressure–flow curves (Figure 2).32 Low OPP may be caused by an increase in IOP and/or a decrease in MAP.24 , 32
Autoregulation operates within a critical range of perfusion pressures and breaks down above or below this range. Studies suggest that the lower autoregulatory limit is reached at an IOP of 30–35 mm Hg, and that at an OPP of 30-35 mm Hg, the optic nerve flow becomes dysfunctional.33
Metabolic Control of Ocular Blood Flow
The retina exhibits neurovascular coupling whereby blood flow is increased during neural stimulation to meet tissue demands34 through the release of tone-relaxing or tone-contracting mediators.35 , 36
Within the physiological range, IOP is minimally affected by arterial pressure changes.37 Hyperoxia results in a marked vasoconstriction of retinal arterioles36 that is 3–4 times greater than witnessed in the cerebral circulation.30 Conversely, hypoxia induces arteriolar vasodilation and increases in retinal blood flow. Choroidal blood flow increases by 3.6% for every 1 mm Hg increase in PaCO2, so a low-normal PaCO2 level (25–30 mm Hg) with consequent vasoconstriction reduces IOP.38
CLASSIFICATION OF OPHTHALMIC SURGERY
Perhaps unique to ophthalmic surgery, the surgical procedure itself induces large pressure fluxes that directly influence organ perfusion and affect ocular well-being.
Ophthalmic surgery may be classified as extraocular, intraocular, or mixed.39 In extraocular procedures, where the globe is not incised, IOP has virtually no impact on the surgical procedure or outcome. Intraocular surgical procedures may be subdivided into open or closed, depending on whether intraoperative communication exists between the globe and the atmosphere.
During open-eye procedures, the concept of IOP does not exist because the eye is open to the atmosphere. However “positive vitreous pressure” may be caused by pressure on the scleral wall (extraocular muscle tension) or an intraocular mass (choroidal effusion or hematoma), causing a reduction in the volume of the scleral cavity.40 This may be manifested by iris prolapse and lead to vitreous loss, choroidal effusion, or hemorrhage.
In the evolution toward closed-eye surgery, the first step was self-sealing beveled incisions in the cornea and sclera (eg, in phacoemulsification surgery) followed by surgical microincision vitrectomy (eg, 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge). These advances limit the ocular hypotony that results from fluid egress through open wounds. The modern trend is toward completely closed vitrectomy procedures using a valved trocar system that continuously seals the eye while a separate infusion line pressurizes it (Figure 3).
Closed intraocular surgery induces a varying degree of pressure development in the globe because no communication exists with the atmosphere to mitigate any pressure rise. The extent of IOP increase is directly related to the infusion pressure applied (dependent on the preset line pressure or the height of the infusion bottle). As multiple factors tend to increase IOP intraoperatively, the actual IOP is frequently considerably in excess of the delivered infusion line pressure.9
OPHTHALMIC SURGERY AND PERIOPERATIVE IOP CHANGES
The OPP substantially influences retinal function, and retinal susceptibility to an IOP challenge is linearly related to BP.41 MAP elevation appears unable to fully compensate for the retinal dysfunction induced by the same degree of IOP elevation. For a given OPP level, the higher the IOP elevation, the greater the retinal dysfunction, possibly because raised IOP affects vascular supply and produces a mechanical stress on neurons independent of OPP.24
OPP and Surgical Outcome
Acute IOP elevations block retrograde transport of neurotrophic factors from the brain to the retina,6 induce retinal ganglion cell structural42 and functional43 abnormalities, and reduce ocular blood flow by 7%–8% per 10-mm Hg increase.44 After uneventful vitrectomy, 14% of patients experience visual field defects varying from unnoticed peripheral defects to total loss of vision.45 Nearly 20% of these field defects show changes suggestive of an ischemic component.2 Proposed mechanisms range from preexisting comorbidity problems to perioperative surgical or anesthesia insults. While a multifactorial etiology underlies these visual defects,45 most postulated mechanisms share an ocular hypoperfusion theory in which the MOPP decreases to a potentially critical level perioperatively.2 , 46
The normal MOPP range is 45–55 mm Hg, with nocturnal reductions of 10%–20%.47 But we cannot, as yet, define the critical MOPP value at which retinal or optic nerve function is damaged. Furthermore, this value is likely to show considerable interindividual variation. Nor do we know with certainty how long ischemia can be tolerated by the intraocular structures. Ganglion cell damage occurs after 45 minutes of ischemia, with total optic atrophy at 240 minutes.48
The IOP during surgery depends on constantly changing parameters, including the cutting and suction speed, infusion rate, mechanical indentation of the globe, and fluid injection during the procedure. Nearly all these factors have a more marked effect on IOP during closed intraocular surgery.
Rossi et al49 demonstrated a BP decrease and IOP increase throughout vitrectomy under peribulbar or retrobulbar blockade with deep intravenous sedation. Sustained IOP increases (of the order of 40–50 mm Hg and lasting several minutes) with further sporadic spikes in IOP (exceeding 70 mm Hg for a few seconds) were demonstrated. The sustained IOP increase was frequently due to increased infusion bottle height to facilitate hemostasis or a particular surgical step (eg, removal of silicon oil). The spikes in IOP typically resulted from globe manipulation or injections into the eye. The net result was an average 37.1% reduction in MOPP from baseline values and a MOPP below the physiological range of 50–60 mm Hg throughout surgery in 27.7% of cases. Furthermore, MOPP remained below the critical limit of 30 mm Hg for as much as 50% of the entire surgical time (Figure 4).49
Bansal et al2 compared 7 patients who developed optic neuropathy after retinal detachment surgery with 42 matched controls. A total of 5 of these 7 patients (71%) demonstrated reduced OPP with associated systemic hypotension intraoperatively compared with 7 of the 42 patients (17%) in the control cohort (P = .01), implying that reduced OPP is associated with postvitrectomy optic neuropathy.2
Phacoemulsification also induces substantial IOP fluctuations, especially because maximum vacuum settings are frequently used to shorten the surgical time with a consequent need for higher infusion pressures.10 Zhao et al10 demonstrated an IOP greater than 60 mm Hg (the retinal perfusion pressure) during 3 simulated steps of phacoemulsification, with peak IOP reaching 96 mm Hg. Despite its short duration, cataract extraction increases the incidence of optic neuropathy due to supply/demand blood flow imbalance.50 , 51
Safeguarding the Retinal Circulation
Intraoperatively, the “safety check” of directly observing the effect on optic disk circulation of MAP and IOP alterations may be performed infrequently (Figure 5).52 Ophthalmodynamometry, digitally indenting the globe while visualizing optic disk perfusion, estimates the perfusion closure risk.53
Any damage from reduced ocular perfusion would potentially be exaggerated in those patients with: (1) preexisting conditions that predispose to impaired retinal perfusion (eg, atherosclerosis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, aging, high myopia, and retinal detachment)54; (2) hypotension (eg, from general anesthesia or deep sedation)46 , 49; and (3) increased intraoperative retinal oxygen demand (eg, with surgical trauma, low infusion fluid temperature, or extensive laser treatment). Defective autoregulation may exacerbate the situation. Face-down or prone positioning is associated with increases in IOP and potentially prolongs perfusion imbalance, especially if accompanied by postoperative hypotension (due to dehydration, antihypertensive medication, sedation etc).55
Short-term reduced ocular blood flow produces a gradient of retinal functional deficits, with the precise relationship between the 2 unclear.56 The ischemic threshold appears to differ between patients with both the degree and duration of reduced perfusion important. The “watershed” zones between arterial distribution territories vary greatly in the ocular circulation, and these areas are most vulnerable to reduced perfusion.57
Intraoperatively, the extent of IOP rise should be controlled by keeping the infusion line pressure as low as is consistent with the surgical goals, and not routinely setting it at 30 mm Hg. If further infusion pressure elevation is temporarily required, its duration should be minimized (Figure 5). The anesthetist should communicate these goals clearly to the surgical team.
Newer vitrectomy machines, such as the R-Evolution 2.0 (Optikon, Rome, Italy), measure the globe infusion line pressure and allow a controlled-pressure irrigation system that offers real-time compensation for MOPP fluctuations.58
Choroidal Hemorrhage Risk
Any increase in OPP, by increasing MAP and/or reducing IOP, can precipitate choroidal hemorrhage, a devastating complication. The predisposing factors for which include advanced age, atherosclerosis, hypertension, and sudden ocular decompression.8 The pathogenesis involves an increase in transmural pressure. Surgical incision with resultant ocular decompression decreases IOP and increases the pressure across the wall of all choroidal plexus vessels.59 In this setting, the transmural pressure is highly sensitive to arterial and/or venous pressure elevations such as are produced by the Valsalva maneuver, coughing, sneezing, or bucking on the endotracheal tube (ETT).60 An increase in vascular permeability (secondary to ocular inflammation) may also play a role. Surgical vigilance to prevent ocular hypotony and adequate anesthesia depth are important, as evidenced by the development of massive suprachoroidal hemorrhage in 6 patients who developed coughing while intubated after vitrectomy.61
Therefore, the patient’s ocular ischemic risk factor profile should be reviewed preoperatively. The aim is to minimize retinal ischemic damage risk while limiting the transmural pressure gradient. Accurate BP readings are necessary, and an arterial line should be considered. While no exact “safe” transmural pressure or MOPP can be defined, it seems intuitively sensible to keep both MAP and IOP in their baseline ranges and to synchronously control their levels. Hypotension should be minimized, and BP should be targeted to maintain MOPP in the physiological range of 45–55 mm Hg.47
Careful control of IOP after surgery should be used to bring the IOP to ≤15 mm Hg in high-risk cases. Regular (at least hourly) BP should be checked, and the patient should not be discharged until the BP and IOP are stable and appropriately balanced. Fundoscopy to assess the optic disk and retinal circulation should be performed regularly in high-risk patients until the IOP settles, especially when posturing requirements are known to increase IOP.
ANESTHESIA AND THE IOP
Modern ophthalmic practice demands optimal conditions to achieve best surgical outcomes, including a stationary globe, low-normal IOP, MOPP control, management of transmural pressure, attenuation of the oculo-cardiac reflex, minimal bleeding, good oxygenation and normocarbia, and a smooth emergence from anesthesia. The available data have not indicated a marked difference in outcome between general and regional anesthesia for major complications such as vitreous loss.62
Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia.
All of the commonly used anesthetic induction agents are known to decrease IOP. Propofol, thiopental, and etomidate reduce IOP by up to 40%, 27%, and 30% respectively.63 , 64 Propofol has the most profound effect, even at sedative doses of ≤1 mg/kg, for which an IOP reduction of 17%–27% is reported.65 The mechanism of IOP reduction after induction of anesthesia is incompletely understood, but it includes depression of ocular centers in the brain resulting in extraocular muscle relaxation.14
Convincing evidence has now refuted the belief that ketamine increases IOP. In children, there is no clinically significant IOP increase at doses <4 mg/kg.66 However, the effects of ketamine in adults and those with penetrating eye injuries need further evaluation.
All volatile anesthetic agents cause a reduction in IOP.67 , 68 Sevoflurane and propofol decrease IOP equally during maintenance of anesthesia.69 However, when combined with remifentanil, the IOP reduction is more significant with propofol than with sevoflurane.70 Indeed, total intravenous anesthesia fulfils many of the requirements for ophthalmic anesthesia by lowering BP and IOP and reducing postoperative nausea. Nitrous oxide has no effect on IOP when combined with sevoflurane and remifentanil,71 but it is contraindicated in vitreoretinal surgery involving gas tamponade.72
The overall effect of general anesthesia is a reduction in IOP despite laryngoscopy and intubation producing profound increases in sympathetic outflow.73 Obtunding this sympathetic response is important with an “open” globe and in those vulnerable to ocular perfusion changes.
Opioids and Other Agents.
Short-acting opioids fentanyl, alfentanil, and sufentanil significantly reduce IOP on induction of anesthesia and produce a sustained reduction in IOP below control values after both succinylcholine administration and laryngoscopy.74 , 75 Remifentanil is at least as effective as fentanyl and alfentanil in this regard.76 Premedication with the α-2 agonists clonidine and dexmedetomidine attenuates the IOP increase produced by laryngoscopy,77 but it also decreases MAP, which may reduce the OPP. Gabapentin, as a premedication, has similar effects.78 Midazolam appears to have little effect on IOP, making it a useful agent when evaluating IOP in children or anxious or uncooperative patients.79
Careful avoidance of postoperative nausea and vomiting is required because emesis is a strong predictor of delayed suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Most ophthalmic procedures have minimal systemic impact and are not unduly painful. A sub-Tenon’s block limits the analgesia needs and reduces opioid requirements.
During general anesthesia, the most significant increases in IOP occur at laryngoscopy and emergence. Two groups require meticulous management: those with an open globe,80 and those with glaucoma.81 The latter may already have critical disk perfusion, and the increase in IOP during intubation is exaggerated in glaucomatous eyes.82
Limited intraoperative airway access probably favors endotracheal intubation (ETT) despite the lesser sympathetic response and IOP increase provoked with laryngeal mask (LM) insertion.83 Direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade doubles IOP (mean 6.7–13 mm Hg) on the first attempt, and a second attempt increases IOP by an additional 30% (mean 17.2 mm Hg).84 The McCoy blade induces a smaller increase in IOP and less hemodynamic change.85
Video laryngoscopes appear advantageous with regard to their effect on IOP. In studies comparing the Macintosh blade with the McGrath series 5 VL (Aircraft Medical, Edinburgh, United Kingdom),86 the Glidescope VL (Verathon, Bothell, WA),87 and the Airtraq VL (Prodol Meditec S.A., Vizcaya, Spain),88 the Macintosh groups produced a more significant increase in IOP than any of the video laryngoscopes.
LM insertion produces no change89 or a smaller increase in IOP90 than that induced by direct laryngoscopy and intubation. In patients undergoing intraocular surgery, the IOP was significantly higher in the ETT group at all points reaching peak values around tracheal extubation, probably reflecting the greater sympathetic response to the ETT on emergence from anesthesia.83
Neuromuscular Blocking Agents.
Succinylcholine is known to increase IOP by up to 10 mm Hg.91 Extraocular muscle contraction during depolarization and fasciculation is thought to be an important contributing factor. However, succinylcholine administration elevates IOP despite complete extraocular muscle detachment from the eye.92 Postulated reasons include reduced aqueous humor outflow, increased choroidal blood volume, and possibly increased CVP.93 Pretreatment with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants is inconsistent in preventing this IOP increase.94 , 95
When compared with atracurium and succinylcholine, rocuronium demonstrated a greater reduction in IOP and equally favorable intubating conditions as succinylcholine.96 Chiu et al97 demonstrated that IOP after succinylcholine was significantly higher than after rocuronium (mean 21.6 [SEM 1.4] mm Hg versus 13.3 [1.4] mm Hg), respectively. Rocuronium is therefore a viable alternative to succinylcholine in an open-globe setting.
The incidence of coughing or bucking on the ETT during emergence from anesthesia is estimated at 38%–76%,98 , 99 with an associated IOP elevation of 40 mm Hg.60 An American Society of Anesthesiologists analysis of eye injuries associated with anesthesia found that 30% related to unplanned patient movement during surgery.100 Techniques to minimize intraoperative coughing or bucking include “deep” extubation, a “no-touch” extubation technique, and the use of sympatholytics (such as remifentanil, fentanyl, intravenous lidocaine, and dexmedetomidine).101–103
Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade.
Yagan et al104 found that IOP increased from 13.5 to 21 mm Hg after neostigmine/glycopyrrolate administration, with no change in IOP observed after sugammadex. The IOP was elevated after tracheal extubation in both groups, but was significantly lower in the sugammadex group at 1, 3, and 5 minutes, possibly reflecting the anticholinergic effect of glycopyrrolate that may reduce aqueous outflow.105
Smooth emergence is the goal, and while deep extubation can be performed, awake extubation is very safe, especially after a remifentanil-based technique.
Patient Positioning and Ventilation.
An increase in CVP reduces venous drainage with resultant choroidal engorgement and decreased aqueous drainage. Supine, prone, and steep Trendelenburg positioning consequently increase the IOP,106 , 107 which may be further exaggerated if accompanied by pneumoperitoneum.108 The increased IOP during laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position is attenuated by dexmedetomidine without further OPP reduction.109 A 30° “head-up tilt” or reverse-Trendelenburg reduces supine IOP values by 3 mm Hg, but also affects OPP110 (Table 1).55 , 60 , 106 , 107 , 111 , 112
Although positive pressure ventilation increases the CVP, short-term mechanical ventilation with positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) <15 cm H2O does not cause a clinically significant IOP increase, and allows better manipulation of the PaCO2 than spontaneous ventilation.113 PEEP at levels of 15 and 20 cm H2O increased the IOP by 3 and 6 mm Hg, respectively.114 , 115
The “Open” Globe.
In most open-globe injury cases, surgery can be delayed up to 6 hours to observe standard fasting guidelines. However, even after that interval, an empty stomach cannot be guaranteed. In addition, in cases of polytrauma, a rapid sequence induction might be unavoidable.
The anesthetist must prioritize securing the airway and hemodynamic stability, yet remain cognizant of the risk of ocular content extrusion and/or choroidal hemorrhage. Controlled airway management is therefore important.
Tradition cautions against succinylcholine due to the theoretical risk of expulsion of globe contents. This is perhaps unfair, because the only report of this complication occurring had confounding factors that make directly attributing it to succinylcholine difficult.116 Rocuronium 0.9 mg/kg provides equivalent intubating conditions within 60 seconds, and is a sensible choice in this setting.97 , 117 However, coughing increases IOP to multiples of the potential succinylcholine-induced rise,60 so adequate neuromuscular blockade must be confirmed before laryngoscopy. Use of sympatholytics should be considered on a risk–benefit basis.
The orbital cavity has a capacity of 30 mL, and injection of any fluid would be expected to cause an increase in IOP.118 Studies comparing retrobulbar, peribulbar, and sub-Tenon’s block demonstrate an initial rise of 5–10 mm Hg in the IOP but a fall to below baseline values within 5 minutes.119 , 120 The initial increase in IOP appears most marked in the peribulbar group, perhaps reflecting the higher volume typically injected (8–10 mL) compared with the retrobulbar and sub-Tenon’s techniques (3–5 mL).120
Retrobulbar anesthesia reduces retrobulbar blood flow velocity, and it is theorized that tissue pressure from the local anesthetic volume could compress the posterior ciliary arteries or disturb autoregulation by causing vasoconstriction, thereby potentially contributing to ocular ischemia.121
Mechanical compression reduces the IOP by decreasing vitreous volume, increasing systemic absorption of orbital extracellular fluid, and increasing aqueous humor outflow.122 Ocular compression device use is cautioned in hypertensive eyes (baseline IOP >35 mm Hg) because induced pressures can exceed the central retinal artery perfusion pressure.123 Digital pressure also reduces IOP after peribulbar and sub-Tenon’s blocks, but similar caveats apply.
NONOPHTHALMIC SURGERY AND POSTOPERATIVE VISUAL LOSS
Postoperative visual loss (POVL) complicates 1/60,000–125,000 anesthetics.124 , 125 It is a rare but devastating occurrence for which the pathophysiology is not fully understood (Table 2). Different clinical entities have been implicated, including ischemic optic neuropathy (ION), retinal vascular occlusion, and cortical blindness.
ION refers to any damage to the optic nerve from ischemia and may be due to hypoperfusion or hypoxia.126 It is subdivided into anterior ION and posterior ION based on the segment of the optic nerve affected with the lamina cribrosa demarcating the junction between the 2.127 The latter is a sieve-like perforation in the posterior aspect of the sclera that allows passage of the retinal ganglion cell axons and central retinal vessels. It also preserves the pressure gradient between the intraocular and extraocular spaces. Anterior to the lamina cribrosa, the photoreceptors, retinal ganglion cells, and their axonal projections that form the optic nerve are supplied by the posterior ciliary arteries (via the choroidal circulation). These vessels are vulnerable to compression by increased IOP in a manner akin to that seen in acute-angle glaucoma.127 Posteriorly, the optic nerve is supplied by delicate pial vessels that are not directly affected by IOP but are vulnerable to compression in the setting of optic nerve edema.128 Swelling of the optic nerve head leads to mechanical compression of the optic nerve fibers against the lamina cribrosa. This is followed by impairment of axonal flow and of capillary perfusion, with a compartment syndrome potentially developing within the adventitial sheath enveloping the optic nerve and central retinal artery and vein.127
Anterior ION is associated with reduced ocular perfusion (especially in the cardiac surgery setting) from hypotension, cardiopulmonary bypass, anemia, or hyperviscosity during induced hypothermia.126
Posterior ION is most commonly described after prone spinal surgery or laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position, in which reduced venous drainage results in optic nerve edema.129 Increased optic nerve diameter is observed after 5 hours in the prone position130 and after just 30 minutes in steep Trendelenburg position during robotic laparoscopic surgery.131 In spinal surgery, positioning the head and orbit below the heart (eg, in a Wilson’s frame), prolonged surgery (>6.5 hours), excessive blood loss (>44.7% circulating blood volume), and overhydration with crystalloid are independent risk factors for POVL.132 Accordingly, the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss in spinal surgery recommends positioning the head at or above the level of the heart, continuous BP monitoring, blood loss replacement with colloids as well as crystalloids and periodical hemoglobin or hematocrit assessment. Staging of lengthy procedures should be considered in high-risk patients.132 The implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice may account, in part, for the significant reduction in reported perioperative ION after spinal fusion surgery from 1998 to 2012.133
During laparoscopic surgery, the venous congestion in the Trendelenburg position increases both CVP and IOP. The latter increases in a time-dependent manner: mean IOP doubling within 60 minutes, and in 25% of cases, tripling within 120 minutes. This IOP increase may be exacerbated by the pneumoperitoneum-induced increase in PaCO2.131 Blecha et al134 found an increase in IOP and optic nerve sheath diameter after 30 minutes in steep Trendelenburg position, rising from a mean baseline IOP of 19.9 to 30.7 mm Hg (P = .008). Patients <63 years of age are better able to tolerate changes in ocular dynamics. CVP was not measured in the study, but elevation of venous pressure is inevitable in this position. Taketani et al131 reported significant visual field defects in 28% of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy cases in the steep Trendelenburg position. Although these defects were transient, and all had recovered within 3 months, permanent visual loss has been reported.135 Leveling the patient at hourly intervals for 5–7 minutes significantly reduced the IOP throughout surgery, and at the end of the procedure, 75% of patients (as opposed to 11% in the control group) returned to baseline IOP.136 Again, venous pressures were not measured directly in the study.131 , 136
Retinal vascular occlusion (ie, central or branch retinal artery occlusion) may be unilateral or bilateral. It is most often associated with external compression of the eye due to poor intraoperative positioning, but can also be caused by increased IOP occluding the vasculature or a branch occlusion by embolus or vasospasm.135 Meticulous care during patient positioning and regular assessment of the eyes to ensure the patient has not inadvertently moved should prevent retinal vascular occlusion due to ocular compression.
Cortical blindness can result from occipital lobe infarction. Intraoperatively, this is typically due to profound hypotension resulting in ischemia in the watershed zones of the occipital cortex.129 However, it can also result from cerebral hemorrhage or from air or particulate embolism. Loss of vision may be temporary or permanent, with younger patients carrying a better visual prognosis.137
The ever-expanding complexity of ophthalmic surgery produces rapidly changing intraoperative ocular pressure dynamics even in short, seemingly straightforward procedures. These IOP changes directly affect retinal and optic disk perfusion, thereby influencing visual outcome (Table 3).
While the etiological mechanisms underlying poor visual outcome after surgery need further evaluation, those patients with preexisting retinal perfusion impairment are especially vulnerable. Even modest increases in IOP can have adverse effects, and mitigation of any such increases is possible by optimal perioperative management. The exact ischemic retinal threshold, in terms of both time and pressure, is, as yet, undetermined. POVL is a rare complication for which contributing factors are only partially understood. The rapid unpredictable pressure fluctuations in the eye and the lack of an accurate intraoperative IOP or retinal function monitor pose further challenges. Nonetheless, vigilance in controlling IOP and MOPP, thereby safeguarding OPP and optic nerve well-being, must be a central component of ophthalmic anesthesia management during and after surgery.
We would like to acknowledge Mark Cahill, Dara Kilmartin, and Max Treacy of the Ophthalmic Vitreoretinal Department of the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital for their expertise and assistance in the preparation of the manuscript. This article is dedicated to 2 great mentors and friends—Anthony Cunningham and Sorin Brull—for their help, friendship, and inspiration over many years.
Name: Dermot J. Kelly, MRCPI, FFARCSI, DABA.
Contribution: This author helped with the research, drafting, and referencing of the article.
Name: Sinéad M. Farrell, MRCPI, MCAI.
Contribution: This author helped with the research, drafting, and referencing of the article.
This manuscript was handled by: Richard C. Prielipp, MD.
2. Bansal AS, Hsu J, Garg SJ, et al. Optic neuropathy after vitrectomy for retinal detachment: clinical features and analysis of risk factors. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2364–2370.
3. Lee LA. Perioperative visual loss and anesthetic management. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013;26:375–381.
4. He Z, Nguyen CT, Armitage JA, Vingrys AJ, Bui BV. Blood pressure modifies retinal susceptibility to intraocular pressure elevation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e31104.
5. Findl O, Strenn K, Wolzt M, et al. Effects of changes in intraocular pressure on human ocular haemodynamics. Curr Eye Res. 1997;16:1024–1029.
6. Quigley HA, McKinnon SJ, Zack DJ, et al. Retrograde axonal transport of BDNF in retinal ganglion cells is blocked by acute IOP elevation in rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:3460–3466.
7. Demeler U. Surgical management of ocular hypotony. Eye (Lond). 1988;2 (Pt 1):77–79.
8. Ruiz RS, Salmonsen PC. Expulsive choroidal effusion. A complication of intraocular surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1976;94:69–70.
9. Moorhead LC, Gardner TW, Lambert HM, et al. Dynamic intraocular pressure measurements during vitrectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1514–1523.
10. Zhao Y, Li X, Tao A, Wang J, Lu F. Intraocular pressure and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:2927–2931.
11. Lee JW, Park H, Choi JH, et al. Short-term changes of intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:69.
12. David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, Dagan M, Yagev R, Yassur Y. Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:280–283.
13. Forrester JV, Dick AD, McMenamin PG, Roberts F. Biochemistry and cell biology. In: The Eye. 2008:3rd ed. Philadelphia, PASaunders Elsevier, 171–261.
14. Murphy DF. Anesthesia and intraocular pressure. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:520–530.
15. Heys JJ, Barocas VH. A boussinesq model of natural convection in the human eye and the formation of Krukenberg’s spindle. Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30:392–401.
16. Llobet A, Gasull X, Gual A. Understanding trabecular meshwork physiology: a key to the control of intraocular pressure? Physiology. 2003;18:205–209.
17. Friberg TR, Sanborn G, Weinreb RN. Intraocular and episcleral venous pressure increase during inverted posture. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;103:523–526.
18. Törnquist P, Alm A. Retinal and choroidal contribution to retinal metabolism in vivo. A study in pigs. Acta Physiol Scand. 1979;106:351–357.
19. Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:144–168.
20. Hayreh SS. Acute retinal arterial occlusive disorders. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011;30:359–394.
21. Robinson F, Riva CE, Grunwald JE, Petrig BL, Sinclair SH. Retinal blood flow autoregulation in response to an acute increase in blood pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:722–726.
22. Riva CE, Logean E, Falsini B. Visually evoked hemodynamical response and assessment of neurovascular coupling in the optic nerve and retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2005;24:183–215.
23. Alm A. The effect of sympathetic stimulation on blood flow through t,e uvea, retina and optic nerve in monkeys (Macacca irus). Exp Eye Res. 1977;25:19–24.
24. Boltz A, Schmidl D, Werkmeister RM, et al. Regulation of optic nerve head blood flow during combined changes in intraocular pressure and arterial blood pressure. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1850–1856.
25. Kiel JW. Choroidal myogenic autoregulation and intraocular pressure. Exp Eye Res. 1994;58:529–543.
26. Bishop PN. Structural macromolecules and supramolecular organisation of the vitreous gel. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000;19:323–344.
27. Ponsioen TL, Hooymans JM, Los LI. Remodelling of the human vitreous and vitreoretinal interface–a dynamic process. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:580–595.
28. Harju M, Kivelä T, Lindbohm N, Koivusalo R, Paloheimo M. Intravenous hypertonic saline to reduce intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:625–629.
29. Kiel JW. Granger DN, Granger JP. The ocular circulation. In: Colloquium Series on Integrated Systems Physiology: From Molecule to Function to Disease. 2011:3;San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences1–81.
30. Riva C, Alm A, Pournaras C. Levin LA, Nilsson SFE, VerHoeve J, Wu SM, Kaufman PL, Alm A. Ocular circulation. In: Adler’s Physiology of the Eye. 2011: 11th ed. Edinburgh, London, New York, Oxford, Philadelphia, St Louis, Sydney, Toronto: Saunders Elsevier243–332.
31. Kiel JW, van Heuven WA. Ocular perfusion pressure and choroidal blood flow in the rabbit. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:579–585.
32. Schmidl D, Boltz A, Kaya S, et al. Comparison of choroidal and optic nerve head blood flow regulation during changes in ocular perfusion pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:4337–4346.
33. Hayreh SS. Blood flow in the optic nerve head and factors that may influence it. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2001;20:595–624.
34. Newman EA. Functional hyperemia and mechanisms of neurovascular coupling in the retinal vasculature. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1685–1695.
35. Bill A, Sperber GO. Control of retinal and choroidal blood flow. Eye (Lond). 1990;4 (Pt 2):319–325.
36. Palkovits S, Lasta M, Told R, et al. Relation of retinal blood flow and retinal oxygen extraction during stimulation with diffuse luminance flicker. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18291.
37. Harris A, Ciulla TA, Chung HS, Martin B. Regulation of retinal and optic nerve blood flow. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1491–1495.
38. Pournaras CJ, Rungger-Brändle E, Riva CE, Hardarson SH, Stefansson E. Regulation of retinal blood flow in health and disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2008;27:284–330.
39. Cunningham AJ, Barry P. Intraocular pressure–physiology and implications for anaesthetic management. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986;33:195–208.
40. Nouvellon E, Cuvillon P, Ripart J. Regional anesthesia and eye surgery. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:1236–1242.
41. Sellés-Navarro I, Villegas-Pérez MP, Salvador-Silva M, Ruiz-Gómez JM, Vidal-Sanz M. Retinal ganglion cell death after different transient periods of pressure-induced ischemia and survival intervals. A quantitative in vivo study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2002–2014.
42. Uchida A, Shinoda K, Matsumoto CS, et al. Acute visual field defect following vitrectomy determined to originate from optic nerve by electrophysiological tests. Case Rep Ophthalmol. 2012;3:396–405.
43. Minami M, Oku H, Okuno T, Fukuhara M, Ikeda T. High infusion pressure in conjunction with vitreous surgery alters the morphology and function of the retina of rabbits. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:633–639.
44. Michelson G, Groh MJ, Langhans M. Perfusion of the juxtapapillary retina and optic nerve head in acute ocular hypertension. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996;5:315–321.
45. Taban M, Lewis H, Lee MS. Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy and ‘visual field defects’ following vitrectomy: could they be related? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007;245:600–605.
46. Hayreh SS. Ischemic optic neuropathies - where are we now? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251:1873–1884.
47. Millar-Craig MW, Bishop CN, Raftery EB. Circadian variation of blood-pressure. Lancet. 1978;1:795–797.
48. Hayreh SS, Jonas JB. Optic disk and retinal nerve fiber layer damage after transient central retinal artery occlusion: an experimental study in rhesus monkeys. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:786–795.
49. Rossi T, Querzoli G, Angelini G, Rossi A, Malvasi C, Iossa M, et al. Ocular perfusion pressure during pars plana vitrectomy: a pilot study: ocular perfusion pressure during pars plana vitrectomy. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2014;55:8497–8505.
50. Nguyen LT, Taravella MJ, Pelak VS. Determining whether delayed nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy associated with cataract extraction is a true entity. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32:2105–2109.
51. Lam BL, Jabaly-Habib H, Al-Sheikh N, et al. Risk of non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION) after cataract extraction in the fellow eye of patients with prior unilateral NAION. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007;91:585–587.
52. van Heuven WA, Kiel JW. ROP surgery and ocular circulation. Eye (Lond). 2008;22:1267–1272.
53. Jonas JB. Ophthalmodynamometric determination of the central retinal vessel collapse pressure correlated with systemic blood pressure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88:501–504.
54. Hayreh SS. Management of ischemic optic neuropathies. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2011;59:123–136.
55. Cheng MA, Todorov A, Tempelhoff R, McHugh T, Crowder CM, Lauryssen C. The effect of prone positioning on intraocular pressure in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:1351–1355.
56. Bui BV, Edmunds B, Cioffi GA, Fortune B. The gradient of retinal functional changes during acute intraocular pressure elevation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:202–213.
57. McLeod D. Ischemic penumbra in retina endures: vascular neuropathology is reconciled. Neural Regen Res. 2016;11:737–739.
59. Ophir A, Pikkel J, Groisman G. Spontaneous expulsive suprachoroidal hemorrhage. Cornea. 2001;20:893–896.
60. Macri FJ. Vascular pressure relationships and the intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 1961;65:571–574.
61. Pollack AL, McDonald HR, Ai E, et al. Massive suprachoroidal hemorrhage during pars plana vitrectomy associated with Valsalva maneuver. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;132:383–387.
62. Zare M, Javadi MA, Einollahi B, Baradaran-Rafii AR, Feizi S, Kiavash V. Risk factors for posterior capsule rupture and vitreous loss during phacoemulsification. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2009;4:208–212.
63. Mirakhur RK, Shepherd WF, Darrah WC. Propofol or thiopentone: effects on intraocular pressure associated with induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation (facilitated with suxamethonium). Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:431–436.
64. Famewo CE, Odugbesan CO, Osuntokun OO. Effect of etomidate on intra-ocular pressure. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1977;24:712–716.
65. Neel S, Deitch R Jr, Moorthy SS, Dierdorf S, Yee R. Changes in intraocular pressure during low dose intravenous sedation with propofol before cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79:1093–1097.
66. Drayna PC, Estrada C, Wang W, Saville BR, Arnold DH. Ketamine is not associated with elevation of intraocular pressure during procedural sedation. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30:1215–1218.
67. Mirakhur RK, Elliott P, Shepherd WF, McGalliard JN. Comparison of the effects of isoflurane and halothane on intraocular pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1990;34:282–285.
68. Park JT, Lim HK, Jang KY, Um DJ. The effects of desflurane and sevoflurane on the intraocular pressure associated with endotracheal intubation in pediatric ophthalmic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013;64:117–121.
69. Sator-Katzenschlager S, Deusch E, Dolezal S, et al. Sevoflurane and propofol decrease intraocular pressure equally during non-ophthalmic surgery and recovery. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:764–766.
70. Schäfer R, Klett J, Auffarth G, et al. Intraocular pressure more reduced during anesthesia with propofol than with sevoflurane: both combined with remifentanil. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002;46:703–706.
71. Goyagi T, Sato T, Horiguchi T, Nishikawa T. The effect of nitrous oxide on the intraocular pressure in patients undergoing abdominal surgery under sevoflurane and remifentanil anesthesia. Open J Anesthesiol. 2016;6:85.
72. Stinson TW 3rd, Donlon JV Jr. Interaction of intraocular air and sulfur hexafluoride with nitrous oxide: a computer simulation. Anesthesiology. 1982;56:385–388.
73. Shribman AJ, Smith G, Achola KJ. Cardiovascular and catecholamine responses to laryngoscopy with and without tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1987;59:295–299.
74. Sweeney J, Underhill S, Dowd T, Mostafa SM. Modification by fentanyl and alfentanil of the intraocular pressure response to suxamethonium and tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63:688–691.
75. Domi RQ. A comparison of the effects of sufentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure changes due to easy and difficult tracheal intubations. Saudi Med J. 2010;31:29–31.
76. Sator-Katzenschlager SM, Oehmke MJ, Deusch E, Dolezal S, Heinze G, Wedrich A. Effects of remifentanil and fentanyl on intraocular pressure during the maintenance and recovery of anaesthesia in patients undergoing non-ophthalmic surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:95–100.
77. Jaakola ML, Ali-Melkkilä T, Kanto J, Kallio A, Scheinin H, Scheinin M. Dexmedetomidine reduces intraocular pressure, intubation responses and anaesthetic requirements in patients undergoing ophthalmic surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68:570–575.
78. Kaya FN, Yavascaoglu B, Baykara M, Altun GT, Gülhan N, Ata F. Effect of oral gabapentin on the intraocular pressure and haemodynamic responses induced by tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52:1076–1080.
79. Carter K, Faberowski LK, Sherwood MB, Berman LS, McGorray S. A randomized trial of the effect of midazolam on intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:204–207.
80. Rahman I, Maino A, Devadason D, Leatherbarrow B. Open globe injuries: factors predictive of poor outcome. Eye (Lond). 2006;20:1336–1341.
81. Tranos P, Bhar G, Little B. Postoperative intraocular pressure spikes: the need to treat. Eye (Lond). 2004;18:673–679.
82. Madan R, Tamilselvan P, Sadhasivam S, Shende D, Gupta V, Kaul HL. Intra-ocular pressure and haemodynamic changes after tracheal intubation and extubation: a comparative study in glaucomatous and nonglaucomatous children. Anaesthesia. 2000;55:380–384.
83. Lamb K, James MF, Janicki PK. The laryngeal mask airway for intraocular surgery: effects on intraocular pressure and stress responses. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:143–147.
84. Bithal PK, Mohanty B, Reddy TS, Prabhaker H. Effect of repeat laryngoscopy on intraocular pressure. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21:496–497.
85. Haidry MA, Khan FA. Comparison of hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation with Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscopes. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:196–199.
86. Karaman T, Dogru S, Karaman S, et al. Intraocular pressure changes: the McGrath video laryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope; a randomized trial. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:358–364.
87. Ahmad N, Zahoor A, Riad W, Al Motowa S. Influence of GlideScope assisted endotracheal intubation on intraocular pressure in ophthalmic patients. Saudi J Anaesth. 2015;9:195–198.
88. Das B, Samal RK, Ghosh A, Kundu R. A randomised comparative study of the effect of Airtraq optical laryngoscope vs Macintosh laryngoscope on intraocular pressure in non-ophthalmic surgery. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66:19–23.
89. Watcha MF, White PF, Tychsen L, Stevens JL. Comparative effects of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube insertion on intraocular pressure in children. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:355–360.
90. Ghai B, Sharma A, Akhtar S. Comparative evaluation of intraocular pressure changes subsequent to insertion of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47:181–184.
91. Cook JH. The effect of suxamethonium on intraocular pressure. Anaesthesia. 1981;36:359–365.
92. Kelly RE, Dinner M, Turner LS, Haik B, Abramson DH, Daines P. Succinylcholine increases intraocular pressure in the human eye with the extraocular muscles detached. Anesthesiology. 1993;79:948–952.
93. Adams AK, Barnett KC. Anaesthesia and intraocular pressure. Anaesthesia. 1966;21:202–210.
94. Bowen DJ, McGrand JC, Palmer RJ. Intraocular pressures after suxamethonium and endotracheal intubation in patients pretreated with pancuronium. Br J Anaesth. 1976;48:1201–1205.
95. Chiu CL, Lang CC, Wong PK, Delilkan AE, Wang CY. The effect of mivacurium pretreatment on intra-ocular pressure changes induced by suxamethonium. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:501–505.
96. Vinik HR. Intraocular pressure changes during rapid sequence induction and intubation: a comparison of rocuronium, atracurium, and succinylcholine. J Clin Anesth. 1999;11:95–100.
97. Chiu CL, Jaais F, Wang CY. Effect of rocuronium compared with succinylcholine on intraocular pressure during rapid sequence induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82:757–760.
98. Fagan C, Frizelle HP, Laffey J, Hannon V, Carey M. The effects of intracuff lidocaine on endotracheal-tube-induced emergence phenomena after general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:201–205.
99. Kim ES, Bishop MJ. Cough during emergence from isoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:1170–1174.
100. Gild WM, Posner KL, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Eye injuries associated with anesthesia. A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 1992;76:204–208.
101. Aouad MT, Al-Alami AA, Nasr VG, Souki FG, Zbeidy RA, Siddik-Sayyid SM. The effect of low-dose remifentanil on responses to the endotracheal tube during emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2009;108:1157–1160.
102. Gonzalez RM, Bjerke RJ, Drobycki T, et al. Prevention of endotracheal tube-induced coughing during emergence from general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:792–795.
103. Sheta SA, Abdelhalim AA, Nada E. Evaluation of “no touch” extubation technique on airway-related complications during emergence from general anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2011;5:125–131.
104. Yagan O, Karakahya RH, Tas N, Canakci E, Hanci V, Yurtlu BS. Intraocular pressure changes associated with tracheal extubation: comparison of sugammadex with conventional reversal of neuromuscular blockade. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015;65:1219–1225.
105. Greenstein SH, Abramson DH, Pitts WR 3rd. Systemic atropine and glaucoma. Bull N Y Acad Med. 1984;60:961–968.
106. Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Posture, intraocular pressure and visual function. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:288–289.
107. Awad H, Santilli S, Ohr M, et al. The effects of steep Trendelenburg positioning on intraocular pressure during robotic radical prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:473–478.
108. Grosso A, Scozzari G, Bert F, Mabilia MA, Siliquini R, Morino M. Intraocular pressure variation during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: standard pneumoperitoneum leads to reversible elevation in intraocular pressure. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3370–3376.
109. Joo J, Koh H, Lee K, Lee J. Effects of systemic administration of dexmedetomidine on intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure during laparoscopic surgery in a Steep Trendelenburg Position: prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Korean Med Sci. 2016;31:989–996.
110. Buys YM, Alasbali T, Jin YP, et al. Effect of sleeping in a head-up position on intraocular pressure in patients with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1348–1351.
111. Coleman DJ, Trokel S. Direct-recorded intraocular pressure variations in a human subject. Arch Ophthalmol. 1969;82:637–640.
112. Miller D. Pressure of the lid on the eye. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967;78:328–330.
113. Kokkinis K, Manolopoulou P, Katsimpris J, Gartaganis S. Positive end-expiratory pressure does not increase intraocular pressure in patients with intracranial pathology. Crit. Care. 2001;5:1–2.
114. Sohn JT, Ahn HY, Bae JH, Lee HK, Lee SH, Chung YK. Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on intraocular pressure in the critically ill and mechanically ventilated patients. Korean J Crit Care Med. 1997;12:151–158.
115. Spapen HD, D’Haese J, Diltoer M, Huyghens LP. Bedside evaluation of intraocular pressure in critically ill patients, ventilated at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1993;44:39–43.
116. Amadasun FE, Isesele TO. Vitreous humour extrusion after suxamethonium induction of anaesthesia in a polytraumatized patient: a case report. Case Rep Med. 2010;2010:913763.
117. Garg P, Agarwal S, Choubey S, Waghray R. Effect of rocuronium and succinylcholine on intraocular pressure during rapid sequence induction and endotrachial intubation. Int J Ophthal Res. 2016;2:198–200.
118. Alwitry A, Koshy Z, Browning AC, Kiel W, Holden R. The effect of sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia on intraocular pressure. Eye (Lond). 2001;15:733–735.
119. Bowman R, Liu C, Sarkies N. Intraocular pressure changes after peribulbar injections with and without ocular compression. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:394–397.
120. Patton N, Malik TY, Aslam TM, Vallance JH. Effect of volume used in sub-Tenon’s anaesthesia on efficacy and intraocular pressure: a randomized clinical trial of 3 mL versus 5 mL. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;32:488–491.
121. Huber KK, Remky A. Effect of retrobulbar versus subconjunctival anaesthesia on retrobulbar haemodynamics. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89:719–723.
122. Robbins R, Blumenthal M, Galin MA. Reduction of vitreous weight by ocular massage. Am J Ophthalmol. 1970;69:603–607.
123. McDonnell PJ, Quigley HA, Maumenee AE, Stark WJ, Hutchins GM. The Honan intraocular pressure reducer. An experimental study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:422–425.
124. Warner ME, Warner MA, Garrity JA, MacKenzie RA, Warner DO. The frequency of perioperative vision loss. Anesth Analg. 2001;93:1417–1421.
125. Roth S, Thisted RA, Erickson JP, Black S, Schreider BD. Eye injuries after nonocular surgery. A study of 60,965 anesthetics from 1988 to 1992. Anesthesiology. 1996;85:1020–1027.
126. Kendrick H. Post-operative vision loss (POVL) following surgical procedures. J Anesth Clin Res. 2012;3:2.
127. Biousse V, Newman NJ. Ischemic optic neuropathies. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2428–2436.
128. Levin LA, Danesh-Meyer HV. Hypothesis: a venous etiology for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1582–1585.
129. Gilbert ME. Postoperative visual loss: a review of the current literature. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2008;32:194–199.
130. Grant GP, Szirth BC, Bennett HL, et al. Effects of prone and reverse trendelenburg positioning on ocular parameters. Anesthesiology. 2010;112:57–65.
131. Taketani Y, Mayama C, Suzuki N, et al. Transient but significant visual field defects after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in deep tRendelenburg position. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0123361.
132. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Practice advisory for perioperative visual loss associated with spine surgery: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Visual Loss. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:274–285.
133. Rubin DS, Parakati I, Lee LA, Moss HE, Joslin CE, Roth S. Perioperative visual loss in spine fusion surgery: ischemic optic neuropathy in the United States from 1998 to 2012 in the nationwide inpatient sample. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:457–464.
134. Blecha S, Harth M, Schlachetzki F, et al. Changes in intraocular pressure and optic nerve sheath diameter in patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in steep 45° Trendelenburg position. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:40.
135. Roth S. Perioperative visual loss: what do we know, what can we do? Br J Anaesth. 2009;103Suppl 1i31–i40.
136. Molloy B, Watson C. A comparative assessment of intraocular pressure in prolonged steep Trendelenburg position versus level supine position intervention. J Anesth Clin Res. 2012;1:9.
137. Bharati S, Sharma MK, Chattopadhay A, Das D. Transient cortical blindness following intracardiac repair of congenital heart disease in an 11-year-old boy. Ann Card Anaesth. 2017;20:256–258.