Univariate analysis indicated that there was no relationship between the diagnosis (P = 0.09) or severity of OSA, as measured by AHI or ASA grade and difficulty in laryngoscopy or difficult intubation (P = 0.82). There was no relationship between NC (per cm) and difficult intubation (odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.93-1.1) or BMI and difficult intubation (odds ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.92-1.06, P = 0.8). There was no relationship between number of intubation attempts and BMI (P = 0.8) or NC (P = 0.3). Mallampati Grade III or IV predicted difficult intubation (P = 0.02), as did male gender (P = 0.02). Finally, there was no relationship between CL grade and BMI (P = 0.88), AHI (P = 0.93), or OSA (P = 0.6). Increasing NC was associated with worse CL grade (P = 0.02), but not difficult intubation (P = 0.23).
Multivariate analysis confirmed the univariate findings and did not reveal any confounding between Mallampati and male gender.
This study refutes the widely held belief that the severity of OSA predicts difficult intubation.3 The study confirms previous reports that Mallampati Grade 3 or 4 predicts difficult intubation. In addition, men were more likely difficult to intubate, independent of BMI or the diagnosis of OSA. NC predicted difficulty in laryngoscopy, but not difficult intubation.
OSA occurs in up to 70% of MO patients undergoing bariatric surgery.11 OSA is associated with narrowing of the upper airway because of fat in the pharyngeal wall (at the level of the soft palate and submental area) and with loss of pharyngeal dilator activity during sleep.3 Not all patients who have OSA are obese, and not all morbidly obese patients have OSA. There is no direct relationship between OSA and BMI,12 although there is a known correlation with central obesity.
Currently, the ASA OSA severity scale defines no OSA as an AHI <5, mild OSA an AHI of 6-20, moderate OSA as an AHI of 21-40, and severe OSA as an AHI >40.13 The increasing severity presumes that this translates into increasing perioperative risk with regard to airway management, postoperative airway obstruction, hypoventilation, and apnea.14,15
Obese patients, and particularly those with OSA, are widely believed to be more difficult to intubate compared with the general population.16 However, there are few published data and much of the current focus on this issue relates to anecdotal information and sentinel events within individual institutions.17,18 A study of 764 consecutive patients without airway pathology undergoing general anesthesia failed to show a correlation between BMI and difficult laryngoscopy.18 Juvin et al.,2 using a previously published difficult intubation score,19 claimed a difficult intubation rate of 15.5% in patients with BMI >35 kg/m2 compared with 2.2% of controls (BMI <30), an absolute risk increase of 13.3%. However, the rate of difficult laryngoscopy was similar for both groups (10.4% vs 10.1%). No patients’ tracheas proved impossible to intubate.
Similar to our study, Brodsky et al.5 investigated difficult intubation in 100 patients with a BMI >40 kg/m2. There was one failed intubation and 12 problematic intubations. There was no association between difficult intubation and increased BMI.20 In the logistic regression analysis, only NC, male gender, and Mallampati score predicted difficult intubation.5
Gonzalez et al.21 compared intubation difficulty in 70 obese (mean BMI 44 ± 8) and 61 nonobese (mean BMI 24 ± 3) patients. They were placed in the “sniffing” position, with towels or pillows under their shoulders, and the head elevated and neck extended. The incidence of difficult intubation was 14.3% in obese patients versus 3% in nonobese patients (P = 0.03). There were no impossible intubations. Only 13% of the obese patients had a diagnosis of OSA, although it is unclear how this diagnosis was made and whether the true incidence was underreported.
There is good reason to suspect that the presence of OSA may increase the risk of difficult intubation. Obese patients who are difficult to intubate may have more paratracheal soft tissue.1 In a case-matched study of 15 patients who had proven difficult intubation, there was a significant relationship with AHI and OSA.7 Siyam and Benhamou8 performed a retrospective case-control analysis of difficult intubation in the setting of OSA and reported an incidence of difficult intubation of 21.9% in patients with OSA versus 2.6% in controls (P = 0.05). There was no relationship between the severity of AHI and difficulty of intubation. Kim and Lee6 undertook a retrospective case-matched study of 90 patients with OSA undergoing uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) surgery, versus 90 controls. The difficult intubation rate was 16.7% in the UPPP patients versus 3.3% (P = 0.003) in controls. An AHI >40 was associated with a significant increase in the risk of difficult intubation.
Why do the data in our study conflict with previous studies in patients with obesity and sleep apnea? Ours was a prospective study of patients undergoing bariatric surgery managed by a group of anesthesiologists using a standardized approach. All patients were placed in the “ramped” position for administration of oxygen and tracheal intubation. In this patient population, the ramped position significantly improves laryngoscopic view.22 We believe that this positioning, with the head, shoulders, and upper body elevated above the chest, is a key component in our relatively low rate of difficult intubation. One previous study that used the conventional “sniffing” position reported a 33% incidence of CL Grade 1 view.23 In this study, Grade 1 views were observed in 66% of the patients. Despite finding an absolute risk increase of 11.3% for difficult intubation, Gonzalez et al.21 reported a 66% incidence of Grade 1 view in their obese cohort. In normal weight patients, the “sniff” position is achieved by raising the occiput 7 cm, resulting in 35° of neck flexion on the chest and 85-90° of extension of the head at the atlanto-occipital joint.24 However, it is usually not possible to achieve this position in obese patients, because of fat deposition in the suboccipital and nuchal area. Repositioning such patients with a ramp, or equivalent, realigns the three axes and facilitates intubation.25
Mallampati score and male gender predicted difficulty with laryngoscopy and intubation; this is consistent with the previous work by Brodsky et al.5 and Voyagis et al.26 Increasing NC predicted difficulty with laryngoscopy, but not difficulty with intubation. Although there is a known association between NC and OSA, the presence of OSA and its severity did not predict difficult laryngoscopy or difficult intubation. This is a significant finding because the association between sleep apnea and difficult intubation is widely reported.6–8 Our data conflict with those published by Hiremath et al.,7 Siyam and Benhamou,8 and Kim and Lee6 The former study was a retrospective analysis of patients who had been proven difficult to intubate.7 Consequently, selection bias is likely, and the study included only 15 patients. The study by Siyam and Benhamou8 included only 36 patients with OSA, 92% of whom were men. The patients had an average BMI of 29.7 (±4.4); 57% of patients had a Mallampati score of 3 or 4. Although the majority of patients in our study were women, owing to the demographic of patients undergoing bariatric surgery, more men were included in our study than in that of Siyam and Benhamou. In our study, 22.5% of men had a Mallampati score of 3 or 4, mean BMI was 51.9, and the mean AHI was 46. Although male gender predicted difficult intubation, this was not related to a diagnosis of OSA. The study by Kim and Lee6 was a retrospective airway analysis of patients who were undergoing UPPP for OSA, and the average BMI of their OSA patients was 25.3 (±3.3) and for the control group it was 27.9 (±2.9). Consequently, their cohort who had a mean BMI of 49.44 (range, 36-77.5) is probably not comparable to ours. This suggests that patients with primary OSA may have a different risk profile for difficult intubation than those with OSA secondary to obesity.
Our study was not designed to address the incidence of an absolute inability to intubate because that would require an enormous number of patients. For example, el-Ghanzori et al.27 failed to reach significance in a study with more than 10,000 subjects. We chose the number of intubation attempts and CL grade as intermediate markers of difficulty of intubation and potentially impossible intubation. These intermediate markers are widely accepted in the anesthesiology community and have been used in previous studies.5,21 Our approach provides support for the use of IV induction and direct laryngoscopy with patients in the “ramped” position as an alternative to awake intubation and all of its discomforts and possible complications.
All of the patients enrolled in this study were intubated by anesthesiology residents, the majority of whom were in their first year of training. Each was supervised by an attending anesthesiologist who specialized in bariatric anesthesia. It is likely that the meticulous approach to airway assessment and positioning by the attending anesthesiologists impacted on the ability of the residents to secure the airway. However, it is not possible to quantify this effect.
Finally, what are the implications of this study for clinicians involved in airway management? Although the incidence of difficult airway was low in this study, and there were no failed intubations, the study was performed in laboratory-like conditions in the operating room. Many studies have demonstrated that MO patients may be difficult to intubate in conditions that are suboptimal and positioning is poor. This may occur, for example, in the emergency department or during cardiac arrests, when patients are frequently laid flat for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the pillow is removed. In addition to difficulty assessing the patient’s airway,28 time for preparation and positioning is often minimal.29 Hence, we strongly recommend placing such patients in the head-elevated ear to sternum (“ramped”) position for intubation.
In summary, this was a prospective observational study of difficulty of intubation in consecutive MO patients undergoing bariatric surgery who were positioned in the “ramped” position. There was no relationship between the presence and severity of OSA and difficult intubation. Only a Mallampati score of 3 or 4 or male gender predicted difficult intubation.
1. Ezri T, Gewurtz G, Sessler DI, Medalion B, Szmuk P, Hagberg C, Susmallian S. Prediction of difficult laryngoscopy in obese patients by ultrasound quantification of anterior neck soft tissue. Anaesthesia 2003;58:1111–4
2. Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, Desmonts JM. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg 2003;97:595–600
3. Hillman DR, Loadsman JA, Platt PR, Eastwood PR. Obstructive sleep apnoea and anaesthesia. Sleep Med Rev 2004;8:459–71
4. Ezri T, Medalion B, Weisenberg M, Szmuk P, Warters RD, Charuzi L. Increased body mass index per se is not a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:179–83
5. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:732–6
6. Kim JA, Lee JJ. Preoperative predictors of difficult intubation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Can J Anaesth 2006;53:393–7
7. Hiremath AS, Hillman DR, James AL, Noffsinger WJ, Platt PR, Singer SL. Relationship between difficult tracheal intubation and obstructive sleep apnoea. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:606–11
8. Siyam MA, Benhamou D. Difficult endotracheal intubation in patients with sleep apnea syndrome. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1098–102
9. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Saidman LJ, Levitan R. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery: proper positioning is important for laryngoscopy. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1841–2
10. Rich JM. Use of an elevation pillow to produce the head-elevated laryngoscopy position for airway management in morbidly obese and large-framed patients. Anesth Analg 2004;98:264–5
11. Frey WC, Pilcher J. Obstructive sleep-related breathing disorders in patients evaluated for bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2003;13:676–83
12. O’Keeffe T, Patterson EJ. Evidence supporting routine polysomnography before bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 2004;14:23–6
13. Gross JB, Bachenberg KL, Benumof JL, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Cote CJ, Nickinovich DG, Prachand V, Ward DS, Weaver EM, Ydens L, Yu S. Practice guidelines for the perioperative management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Management of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Anesthesiology 2006;104:1081–93
14. Kaw R, Michota F, Jaffer A, Ghamande S, Auckley D, Golish J. Unrecognized sleep apnea in the surgical patient: implications for the perioperative setting. Chest 2006;129:198–205
15. Nowbar S, Burkart KM, Gonzales R, Fedorowicz A, Gozansky WS, Gaudio JC, Taylor MR, Zwillich CW. Obesity-associated hypoventilation in hospitalized patients: prevalence, effects, and outcome. Am J Med 2004;116:1–7
16. Rose DK, Cohen MM. The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:372–83
17. Meoli AL, Rosen CL, Kristo D, Kohrman M, Gooneratne N, Aguillard RN, Fayle R, Troell R, Kramer R, Casey KR, Coleman J Jr. Upper airway management of the adult patient with obstructive sleep apnea in the perioperative period—avoiding complications. Sleep 2003;26:1060–5
18. Ezri T, Warters RD, Szmuk P, Saad-Eddin H, Geva D, Katz J, Hagberg C. The incidence of class “zero” airway and the impact of Mallampati score, age, sex, and body mass index on prediction of laryngoscopy grade. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1073–5
19. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, Clemessy JL, Fournier JL, Plaisance P, Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1290–7
20. Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 1988;61:211–6
21. Gonzalez H, Minville V, Delanoue K, Mazerolles M, Concina D, Fourcade O. The importance of increased neck circumference to intubation difficulties in obese patients. Anesth Analg 2008;106:1132–6
22. Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the “sniff” and “ramped” positions. Obes Surg 2004;14:1171–5
23. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Brimacombe L. The laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ as a temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:737–40
24. Benumof JL. Obstructive sleep apnea in the adult obese patient: implications for airway management. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2002;20:789–811
25. Greenland KB, Eley V, Edwards MJ, Allen P, Irwin MG. The origins of the sniffing position and the Three Axes Alignment Theory for direct laryngoscopy. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008;36(suppl 1):23–7
26. Voyagis GS, Kyriakis KP, Dimitriou V, Vrettou I. Value of oropharyngeal Mallampati classification in predicting difficult laryngoscopy among obese patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1998;15:330–4
27. el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg 1996;82:1197–204
28. Levitan RM, Everett WW, Ochroch EA. Limitations of difficult airway prediction in patients intubated in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2004;44:307–13
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
29. Levitan RM, Chudnofsky C, Sapre N. Emergency airway management in a morbidly obese, noncooperative, rapidly deteriorating patient. Am J Emerg Med 2006;24:894–6