Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

Pulmonary Artery Catheters for Adult Patients in Intensive Care

Harvey, S; Young, D; Brampton, W; Cooper, A B; Doig, G; Sibbald, W; Rowan, K

doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246792.19389.cf
Cochrane Corner: Reprint
Back to Top | Article Outline

BACKGROUND:

Pulmonary artery catheterization was adopted about 30 yr ago and widely disseminated without rigorous evaluation as to whether it benefited critically ill patients. The technique is used to measure cardiac output and pressures in the pulmonary circulation to guide diagnosis and treatment. Clinicians believe these data can improve patients’ outcomes, even in the absence of consensus about the specific interpretation of the data.

Back to Top | Article Outline

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effect of pulmonary artery catheterization on mortality and cost of care in adult intensive care patients.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SEARCH STRATEGY:

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2006); MEDLINE (all records to April 2006); EMBASE (all records to April 2006); CINAHL (all records to April 2006); and reference lists of articles. We contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.

Back to Top | Article Outline

SELECTION CRITERIA:

We included all randomized controlled trials in adults, comparing management with and without a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC).

Back to Top | Article Outline

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:

We screened the titles and abstracts of the electronic search results and obtained the full text of studies of possible relevance for independent review. We determined the final results of the literature search by consensus among the authors. We did not contact study authors for additional information.

Back to Top | Article Outline

MAIN RESULTS:

We identified 12 studies. Mortality was reported as hospital, 28-day, 30-day, or intensive care unit. We considered studies of high-risk surgery patients (eight studies) and general intensive care patients (four studies) separately for the meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for the studies of general intensive care patients was 1.05 (95% confidence interval CI 0.87–1.26) and for the studies of high-risk surgery patients 0.99 (95% CI 0.73–1.24). Of the eight studies of high-risk surgery patients, five evaluated the effectiveness of preoperative optimization, but there was no difference in mortality when these studies were examined separately. Pulmonary artery catheterization did not affect intensive care unit (reported by 10 studies) or hospital (reported by nine studies) length of stay. Four studies, conducted in the United States, measured costs based on hospital charges billed to patients, which on average were higher in the PAC groups.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REVIEWERS’ CONCLUSIONS:

There have been two multicenter trials of the effectiveness of PACs for managing critically ill patients admitted to intensive care, although only one was adequately powered. Efficacy studies are needed to determine optimal management protocols and patient groups who could benefit from management with a PAC.

Back to Top | Article Outline

CITATION:

Harvey S, Young D, Brampton W, Cooper AB, Doig G, Sibbald W, Rowan K. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2006. Reproduced with permission.

© 2006 International Anesthesia Research Society