Secondary Logo

Share this article on:

The Changing Role of Non-Opioid Analgesic Techniques in the Management of Postoperative Pain

White, Paul F. PhD, MD, FANZCA

doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000177099.28914.A7
Review Articles: Review Article
Chinese Language Editions

Given the expanding role of ambulatory surgery and the need to facilitate an earlier hospital discharge, improving postoperative pain control has become an increasingly important issue for all anesthesiologists. As a result of the shift from inpatient to outpatient surgery, the use of IV patient-controlled analgesia and continuous epidural infusions has steadily declined. To manage the pain associated with increasingly complex surgical procedures on an ambulatory or short-stay basis, anesthesiologists and surgeons should prescribe multimodal analgesic regimens that use non-opioid analgesics (e.g., local anesthetics, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, acetaminophen, ketamine, α 2-agonists) to supplement opioid analgesics. The opioid-sparing effects of these compounds may lead to reduced nausea, vomiting, constipation, urinary retention, respiratory depression and sedation. Therefore, use of non-opioid analgesic techniques can lead to an improved quality of recovery for surgical patients.

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas

Supported in part by the Margaret Milam McDermott Distinguished Chair in Anesthesiology and the White Mountain Institute in Los Altos, California (Dr. White is the President). Financial support for preparing this manuscript was also provided by an unrestricted educational grant from Endo Pharmaceuticals, Chadds Ford, Pennsylvania.

Accepted for publication June 22, 2005.

Address correspondence to Paul F. White, PhD, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390–9068. Address electronic mail to paul.white@utsouthwestern.edu.

The current armamentarium of analgesic drugs and techniques for the management of postoperative pain continues to grow at a rapid rate. However, effective treatment of acute postsurgical pain still poses unique challenges for practitioners (1). An increasing number of complex operations are being performed on an outpatient basis for which the use of conventional opioid-based IV patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and central neuraxial (spinal and epidural) analgesia are not practical techniques for pain management. This expanding patient population requires a perioperative analgesic regimen that is highly effective, has minimal side effects, is intrinsically safe, and can be easily managed away from the hospital or surgical center (2).

Adequacy of postoperative pain control is one of the most important factors in determining when a patient can be safely discharged from a surgical facility and has a major influence on the patient’s ability to resume their normal activities of daily living (3). Perioperative analgesia has traditionally been provided by opioid analgesics. However, extensive use of opioids is associated with a variety of perioperative side effects, such as ventilatory depression, drowsiness and sedation, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), pruritus, urinary retention, ileus, and constipation, that can delay hospital discharge (4). Intraoperative use of large bolus doses or continuous infusions of potent opioid analgesics may actually increase postoperative pain as a result of their rapid elimination and/or the development of acute tolerance (5). In addition, it has been suggested by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations that excessive use of postoperative opioid analgesics leads to decreased patient satisfaction. Partial opioid agonists (e.g., tramadol) are also associated with increased side effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting, ileus) and patient dissatisfaction compared with both opioid (6) and non-opioid (7,8) analgesics.

Therefore, anesthesiologists and surgeons are increasingly turning to non-opioid analgesic techniques as adjuvants for managing pain during the perioperative period to minimize the adverse effects of analgesic medications. Multimodal or “balanced” analgesic techniques involving the use of smaller doses of opioids in combination with non-opioid analgesic drugs, such as local anesthetics, ketamine, acetaminophen and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), are becoming increasingly popular approaches to preventing pain after surgery (Table 1) (9–11). This review will discuss recent evidence supporting the use of non-opioid analgesic drugs and techniques during the perioperative period for facilitating the recovery process.

Table 1

Table 1

Back to Top | Article Outline

Local Anesthetic Techniques

The routine use of peripheral nerve blocks and wound infiltration with long-acting local anesthetics as an adjuvant to local, regional, and general anesthetic techniques can improve postoperative pain management after a wide variety of surgical procedures (Table 2) (4). When administered before surgery, these simple techniques can also decrease anesthetic and analgesic requirements during surgery, as well as reduce the need for opioid-containing analgesics postoperatively. More effective pain relief in the early postoperative period, as a result of the residual sensory block produced by local anesthetics, facilitates recovery by enabling earlier ambulation and discharge home (i.e., “fast-track” recovery) (12–14). In addition, use of local anesthetic-based techniques for preventing pain can decrease the incidence of PONV because of their opioid-sparing effects. However, these techniques are most effective for superficial procedures and the duration of analgesia lasts for only 6–8 h.

Table 2

Table 2

Blockade of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves significantly decreases opioid analgesic requirements in both children and adults undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy by providing 6–8 h of postoperative pain relief (15,16). Similarly, a subcutaneous ring block of the penis provides effective perioperative analgesia for circumcision (17). Local anesthetic infiltration of the mesosalpinx significantly decreases pain and cramping after laparoscopic tubal ligation (18). Simple instillation of local anesthetic after removal of the gallbladder also reduced right upper quadrant and shoulder pain (10,19). Pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery was decreased significantly by a suprascapular nerve block (20) and pain after knee surgery was minimized with a femoral nerve block (21). However, more complete perioperative analgesia for painful shoulder and knee procedures requires use of interscalene brachial plexus (22) and combined femoral, obturator, lateral femoral cutaneous, and sciatic nerve (23) blocks, respectively. Although additional preparation time may be required when major peripheral nerve blocks are performed before surgery, these techniques can offer significant advantages compared with general and spinal anesthesia with respect to pain control in the postoperative period (12,13,22,23).

It has been suggested that performing neural blockade with local anesthetics before surgical incision prevents the nociceptive input from altering excitability of the central nervous system by preemptively blocking the N-methyl-d-aspartate- (NMDA) induced “wind up” phenomena and subsequent release of inflammatory mediators (24). The concept of preemptive analgesia, or treating postoperative pain by preventing establishment of central sensitization, seems intuitively logical. However, the clinical relevance of preemptive analgesia has been questioned. Only a small number of well controlled clinical studies have demonstrated any benefit of preincisional versus postincisional analgesic administration (25,26). A quantitative systematic review by Møiniche et al. (27) stated that evidence is still lacking to support the claim that the timing of single-dose or continuous postoperative pain treatment is critically important in the management of postsurgical pain. These investigators concluded that there was no convincing evidence that preemptive treatment with centrally or peripherally administered local anesthetics, NSAIDs, opioid analgesics, or ketamine offers any advantage with respect to postoperative pain relief when compared with a similar analgesic regimen administered after the surgical incision (27). Nevertheless, preincisional local anesthetic administration offers an obvious advantage over infiltration at the end of surgery because it can provide supplemental intraoperative analgesia as well as effective analgesia in the early postoperative period after emergence from anesthesia.

Preincisional infiltration of the surgical wound site with local anesthetics, combined with general anesthesia, is clearly superior to general or spinal anesthesia alone in reducing postoperative pain (28,29). For example, preincisional infiltration of the tonsillar bed with bupivacaine decreased the intensity of both constant pain and pain on swallowing fluids for up to 5 days after tonsillectomy procedures (29). Paracervical block with 0.5% bupivacaine also reduced pain and the need for opioid analgesics after vaginal hysterectomy under general anesthesia (30). Preincisional ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block not only improves perioperative pain control for inguinal hernia repair but also reduces the need for oral opioid-containing analgesics in the postdischarge period (16). Although local infiltration can reduce incisional pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (31–34), some investigators have actually reported that infiltration of the trocar sites at the end of surgery provided better pain relief than when the local anesthetic was given before incision (32). The overall analgesic efficacy of trocar wound infiltration after laparoscopic surgery remains controversial (35).

Although preincisional infiltration of the operative site with local anesthetics remains popular for reducing the perioperative opioid analgesic requirement, other simpler local anesthetic delivery systems (e.g., topical applications) have been described (36–40). Topical analgesia with a lidocaine aerosol was effective in decreasing pain, as well as the opioid analgesic requirement, after inguinal herniorrhaphy in adults (36), and instillation of 0.25% bupivacaine before surgical closure compared favorably to an ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block in children undergoing hernia repair (37). Furthermore, the simple application of topical lidocaine jelly or ointment, as well as eutectic mixture of local anesthesia (EMLA) cream, have been shown to be as effective as peripheral nerve blocks or parenteral opioids in providing pain relief after outpatient circumcision (38–40). Use of a 5% lidocaine patch has also been reported to be effective in providing peripheral analgesia (41). However, further studies are needed to define the role (if any) of this analgesic device in the postoperative period.

Intracavitary instillation of local anesthetics is another simple, yet effective, technique for providing pain relief during the early postoperative period after laparoscopic and arthroscopic procedures. For example, when 80 mL of lidocaine 0.5% or bupivacaine 0.125% was administered intraperitoneally at the start of the laparoscopic procedure, postoperative scapular pain and the need for opioid analgesic during the first 48 h after surgery were significantly reduced (42). Compared with a control group receiving saline, use of intraperitoneal bupivacaine 0.5% (15–30 mL) also led to a larger percentage of patients going home on the day of surgery (79% versus 43%) (43). However, other studies involving intraperitoneal administration of local anesthetics during laparoscopy report inconsistent effects on postoperative pain and the need for opioid analgesics (44–54). Some investigators have suggested that the beneficial effects of intraperitoneal bupivacaine are transient and have little impact on patient recovery (49). Furthermore, when bupivacaine was injected at the preperitoneal fascial plane during extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair, it also failed to reduce postoperative pain (55). Subfacial infiltration with bupivacaine 0.5% at the trochar and incision sites reduced pain and the length of stay after laparoscopic nephrectomy procedures (56). Yndgaard et al. (57) demonstrated that subfascially administered lidocaine was significantly more effective than subcutaneous injection in reducing pain after inguinal herniotomy. It is obvious that the location, volume, and timing of the local anesthetic administration are key factors in determining efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation in preventing pain after both superficial and laparoscopic surgery (19,43,53).

Analogous to intraperitoneal administration, intrapleural instillation of local anesthetic solutions has been reported to improve pain control after laparoscopic surgery (58–66). Some investigators report that interpleural bupivacaine produced more effective analgesia than intraperitoneal bupivacaine (66) and compared favorably with epidural bupivacaine (58) after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Compared with standard opioid analgesics, intrapleural bupivacaine achieved better pain relief and greater improvement in postoperative pulmonary function (59,64). In contrast, Oxorn and Whatley (65) reported that postoperative pulmonary mechanics were worsened after intrapleural bupivacaine. Adverse effects on pulmonary function (resulting from muscle weakness) and the risk of systemic local anesthetic toxicity (resulting from rapid systemic absorption) are the major concerns with this technique (66,67). Although intercostal nerve blocks can also improve pain relief after cholecystectomy procedures, this does not necessarily lead to improved pulmonary function (68).

Local anesthetics are also commonly injected into joint spaces to provide analgesia during and after arthroscopic procedures (69,70). In a placebo-controlled study, intraarticular instillation of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine reduced opioid requirements and facilitated early mobilization and discharge after knee arthroscopy (70). In a follow-up study, a combination of intraarticular bupivacaine and systemic ketorolac (60 mg) further decreased pain in the early postoperative recovery period (71). In addition to the local anesthetics, a wide variety of other adjuvants (e.g., morphine, ketorolac, triamcinolone, and clonidine) have also been injected into the intraarticular space to decrease postarthroscopic pain (72–77). Small-dose intraarticular morphine, 0.5–1 mg, combined with bupivacaine, appears to provide the longest-lasting and most cost-effective analgesia after knee arthroscopy (76,77). Although administering intraarticular morphine before knee surgery was reported to provide a longer duration of analgesia and greater opioid-sparing effects than when it was given at the end of surgery (77), the clinical advantage of preemptive intraarticular local anesthetic administration remains controversial (27).

Although local anesthetic supplementation decreases the severity of incisional pain in the early postoperative period, many patients still experience significant pain when the local anesthetic effect wears off. Therefore, continuous (78,79) and/or intermittent perfusion (80,81) of the surgical wound (or peripheral nerve) with local anesthetic solutions has been reintroduced as a way of extending local anesthetic-induced incisional pain relief into the postoperative period. In a study by White et al. (82), infusion of 0.5% bupivacaine (4 mL/h) at the median sternotomy site reduced postoperative pain and opioid analgesic requirement after cardiac surgery. As a result of the opioid-sparing effect, these patients recovered bowel and bladder function more rapidly. Similarly, wound instillation with 0.2% ropivacaine (5 mL/h) improved pain control after spine fusion surgery (83). These continuous local anesthetic infusion techniques can be modified to allow for patient-controlled local anesthetic administration after surgery (84,85).

Investigators have failed to find consistent improvement in pain scores or opioid-sparing effects when the local anesthetic was infused at the incision site after abdominal surgery (57,86–88). Efficacy of local anesthetic infusion systems is enhanced when the catheter is placed at the subfacial level or near a peripheral nerve. For example, a continuous popliteal-sciatic nerve block provides improved postoperative analgesia, decreased opioid use, and enhanced patient satisfaction after painful foot and ankle surgery (89,90). Similarly, a continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block provides highly effective pain control after discharge in patients undergoing shoulder surgery (91). Although continuous local anesthetic infusions with concomitant PCA capability appears to be superior to a continuous infusion alone for prolonging nerve blocks (92,93), many patients elect not to use the PCA function on their electronic pumps (91).

When using a continuous local anesthetic infusion, analgesic efficacy is influenced by a wide variety of factors in addition to location of the catheter system, including the concentration and volume of the local anesthetic solution (82), as well as the accuracy and consistency of the pumps (94). The use of a disposable, nonelectronic infusion system may offer advantages over the electronic pump because its simplicity minimizes the need for troubleshooting (95). However, accuracy of the infusion rate of the nonelectronic pumps can change over time (94). Temperature changes also influence the infusion rate of elastomeric pumps, and battery life is a limiting factor for the electronic pumps (94). With these catheter delivery systems, the risk of infection appears to be small. However, bacterial colonization of the catheter is a common occurrence (96). Patient satisfaction and comfort when using these delivery systems outside the hospital is high, and more than 90% of the patients are comfortable removing the catheter at home (97). Finally, combining local anesthetic infusion techniques with other analgesic modalities as part of multimodal analgesic therapy further improves pain control throughout the perioperative period (98).

Peripheral nerve block techniques are simple, safe, and highly effective approaches to providing perioperative analgesia. Use of long-acting local anesthetics for neural blockade techniques involving the upper (e.g., interscalene brachial plexus block) and lower (e.g., femoral-sciatic nerve block) extremities can facilitate an earlier discharge after major shoulder and knee reconstructive procedures, respectively (99,100). Availability of long-acting local anesthetics that claim less toxicity and greater selectivity with respect to sensory and motor blockade (e.g., ropivacaine) may further enhance the benefits of local anesthetic supplementation after both major and minor surgery.

Although ropivacaine 0.2% provides better pain relief with less motor impairment than lidocaine 1% for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (101), its clinical advantages relative to equipotent concentrations of bupivacaine are less well established. Addition of adjuvants (e.g., epinephrine, clonidine) that can prolong postoperative analgesia and facilitate recovery when using central and peripheral nerve blocks may be of greater clinical importance (102,103). Interestingly, a more recent study (104) found that clonidine’s use as an adjunct to ropivacaine as part of a continuous perineural infusion technique failed to reduce postoperative pain and oral analgesic usage or improve the patient’s quality of sleep after upper extremity surgery when compared with the local anesthetic alone. Although pain control can be improved after orthopedic procedures by continuously infusing local anesthetic solutions (89,90,105–107), availability of longer-acting local anesthetic suspensions and “delayed release” formulations containing liposomes or polymer microspheres may minimize the need for continuous infusion catheter delivery systems in the future.

Back to Top | Article Outline

NSAIDs

Oral NSAIDs have long been used for treating nonsurgical pain syndromes because of their well known antiinflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic properties. When parenteral preparations of NSAIDs (e.g., ketorolac, ketoprofen, diclofenac) became available, these drugs were more widely used in the management of acute perioperative pain. NSAIDs block the synthesis of prostaglandins by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) types I and II, thereby reducing production of mediators of the acute inflammatory response. By decreasing the inflammatory response to surgical trauma, NSAIDs have been alleged to reduce peripheral nociception. Studies also suggest that the central response to painful stimuli is modulated by NSAID-induced inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis in the spinal cord (27).

Early reports suggested that parenteral NSAIDs possessed analgesic properties comparable to the traditional opioid analgesics (108–110) without opioid-related side effects (111,112). Compared with the partial opioid agonist tramadol, diclofenac produced better postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects after cardiac surgery (8). When administered as an adjuvant during outpatient anesthesia, ketorolac was associated with improved postoperative analgesia and patient comfort compared with fentanyl and the partial opioid agonist, dezocine (112,113). Other investigators reported that ketorolac provided postoperative pain relief similar to that of fentanyl but was associated with less nausea and somnolence, as well as an earlier return of bowel function (114). In most studies, use of ketorolac has been associated with a less frequent incidence of PONV than the opioid analgesics. As a result, patients tolerate oral fluids and are fit for discharge earlier than those receiving only opioid analgesics during the perioperative period. Of interest, ketorolac (30 mg q 6 h) was superior to a dilute local anesthetic infusion (bupivacaine 0.125%) in supplementing epidural PCA hydromorphone in patients undergoing thoracotomy procedures (115). Furthermore, it has been found that the injection of ketorolac (30 mg) at the incision site in combination with local anesthesia resulted in significantly less postoperative pain, a better quality of recovery, and earlier discharge compared with local anesthesia alone (116). In fact, there is evidence for both a peripheral and central analgesic action of NSAIDs (117). However, when ketorolac was substituted for or combined with fentanyl during minor gynecologic and laparoscopic procedures, the beneficial effects of the NSAID were reduced (118,119).

Using shock wave lithotripsy to evaluate the effect of NSAIDs on visceral pain, diclofenac produced only a marginal opioid-sparing effect (120). However, when diclofenac (1 mg/kg IV) was administered before arthroscopic surgery, it was associated with similar pain scores to fentanyl (1 μg/kg IV) (121). Preoperative diclofenac (50 mg) also decreased pain and the opioid analgesic requirements for 24 h after laparoscopic surgery (122). Similarly, preoperative administration of ketorolac to patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (119) decreased postoperative opioid requirements and improved some ventilatory variables during the early postoperative period. A perioperative ketorolac infusion (2 mg/h) also improved the quality of postoperative pain relief after abdominal surgery (123). Compared to tramadol (100 mg IV), ketorolac (30 mg IV) produced comparable analgesia with a 68% decreased incidence of PONV after maxillofacial surgery (124). Of interest, diclofenac (1 mg/kg) is alleged to be a more cost-effective alternative to ketorolac (0.5 mg/kg) (125,126).

When diclofenac was administered preoperatively to pediatric patients, the incidence of restlessness and the incidence of crying, as well as the postoperative opioid requirements, were less than in acetaminophen-treated patients (127). Similarly, oral ketorolac (1 mg/kg) was superior to small-dose acetaminophen (10 mg/kg) in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy procedures (128). In children undergoing inguinal hernia repair (129), ketorolac (1 mg/kg IV) compared favorably with caudal bupivacaine 0.2% with respect to pain control and postoperative side effects. In addition, ketorolac-treated children had an improved recovery profile, including less vomiting, shorter times to voiding and ambulation, and earlier discharge home. Intraoperative administration of ketorolac as an adjuvant to general anesthesia in pediatric patients provided postoperative analgesia comparable to morphine with less PONV (130). When ketorolac or morphine is administered for pain control in pediatric patients, ketorolac-induced analgesia developed more slowly but lasted longer (131).

Oral or rectal administration of NSAIDs is also effective and less costly in the prophylactic management of surgical pain (132). For example, when oral naproxen was administered before laparoscopic surgery, postoperative pain scores, opioid requirements, and time to discharge were significantly reduced (133). Furthermore, premedication with oral ibuprofen (800 mg) was associated with superior postoperative analgesia and less nausea compared with fentanyl (75 μg IV) after laparoscopic surgery (134). However, the more important role for oral NSAIDs may be in the postdischarge period. Ibuprofen liquogel (400 mg po) was significantly more effective than celecoxib (200 mg po) in treating pain after oral surgery (135). Ibuprofen (5 mg/kg po) compared favorably to rofecoxib (0.625 mg/kg po) for minimizing postoperative pain when used in combination with acetaminophen (20 mg/kg) before tonsillectomy procedures (136). When used as part of a multimodal analgesic technique consisting of alfentanil, lidocaine, and ketorolac (137), oral ibuprofen (800 mg q 8h) was equianalgesic to paracetamol 800 mg in combination with codeine 60 mg (q 8h) during the first 72 h after discharge, and resulted in better global patient satisfaction and less constipation than opioid-containing oral analgesics. Ibuprofen (400 or 600 mg po) appears to produce comparable analgesia to the combination of tramadol (75–112.5 mg) and acetaminophen (650 or 975 mg) for acute postoperative pain relief (138). To achieve the optimal benefit of using NSAIDs in the perioperative period, these compounds should be continued during the postdischarge period as part of a preventative pain management strategy (98).

Despite the obvious benefits of using NSAIDs in the perioperative period, controversy still exists regarding their use because of the potential for gastrointestinal mucosal damage and renal tubular and platelet dysfunction (139). Although some studies have found increased blood loss and risk of reoperation when ketorolac was administered to children undergoing tonsillectomy procedures (140,141), a recent systematic review of the literature suggested that the evidence supporting an increase of bleeding was equivocal at best (142).

Back to Top | Article Outline

COX-2 Inhibitors

In an effort to minimize the potential for operative site bleeding complications, as well as gastrointestinal damage, associated with the classic nonselective NSAIDs such as ketorolac and diclofenac, the more highly selective COX-2 inhibitors are increasingly being used as non-opioid adjuvants for minimizing pain during the perioperative period (Table 3) (143). Early clinical studies in surgical patients evaluated the use of celecoxib, rofecoxib, and valdecoxib as preventative analgesics when administered for oral premedication (144–148). Rofecoxib (50 mg po) produced more effective and sustained analgesia compared with celecoxib (200 mg po) after spinal surgery (144). Celecoxib (200 mg po) was equivalent to acetaminophen (2 g po) when administered before otolaryngologic operations (145). However, the analgesic efficacy of celecoxib is dose-related and 400 mg is the currently recommended dose for prevention of acute pain (146). Rofecoxib (50 mg po) produced significantly more effective analgesia than acetaminophen (2 g po) and the pain relief was more sustained in the postdischarge period (147). Premedication with rofecoxib also facilitated recovery by reducing postoperative pain and improving the quality of recovery from the patient’s perspective (148). It has also been suggested that the long-acting rofecoxib is more cost-effective than celecoxib in the perioperative period (149). In one study (143), a single preoperative dose of rofecoxib, 25–50 mg po, produced a 44%–59% reduction in the PCA morphine requirement after major abdominal surgery (150). However, clinical studies suggest a more sustained benefit can be achieved when the drug is administered both before and after surgery (148,151). The recent withdrawal of rofecoxib from the market by its manufacturer because of an increased risk of cardiovascular side effects after prolonged use (>16 mo) has led investigators to begin re-evaluating other COX-2 inhibitors in the perioperative period.

Table 3

Table 3

Valdecoxib has been introduced recently for the prevention of postoperative pain, with doses of 20–40 mg reducing the opioid requirement by 25%–50% after elective surgery (152,153). In patients undergoing oral surgery and bunionectomy, premedication with valdecoxib 40 mg appears to produce the optimal analgesic effect in the postoperative period (152). Valdecoxib is as rapidly acting and effective as oxycodone in combination with acetaminophen but has a longer duration of action and fewer side effects when used for the management of pain after oral surgery. Valdecoxib (40 mg po) was alleged to be even more effective than rofecoxib, 50 mg po, in treating pain after oral surgery (154).

A parenterally active COX-2 inhibitor, parecoxib (a prodrug which is rapidly converted to valdecoxib), has been investigated as an alternative to the parenteral NSAIDs (155–157). However, to achieve equi-analgesia with the IV prodrug, a larger dose may be required compared with the orally active drug valdecoxib. Parecoxib is similar pharmacokinetically to both celecoxib and valdecoxib. Preliminary studies suggested that parecoxib (40–80 mg IV), was as effective and longer-acting than ketorolac (30 mg IV) in reducing pain after oral (158) and laparotomy surgery (159). Both preoperative and postoperative administration of this COX-2 inhibitor resulted in significant opioid-sparing effects, reduced adverse effects, and improved quality of recovery and patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management (152,160). Unfortunately, one study in patients undergoing cardiac surgery suggested that perioperative use of parecoxib and valdecoxib as part of a 14-day analgesic treatment regimen increased adverse events, including sternal wound infections (161). Another recent study found that although parecoxib, 40 mg IV, was given at induction of anesthesia, it was less effective than ketorolac, 30 mg IV, after tonsillectomy procedures (141). A new more highly-selective COX-2 inhibitor, etoricoxib (120 mg po), provided rapid and long-lasting pain relief after dental surgery (162). A recent study also suggested that etoricoxib was associated with fewer side effects than a standard opioid-containing oral analgesic. Current evidence suggests that the newer COX-2 inhibitors appear to offer minimal advantages over the first-generation COX-2 inhibitors and the nonselective NSAIDs (163,164).

In addition to the growing controversy regarding the potential adverse cardiovascular risks of the COX-2 inhibitors, many orthopedic surgeons are also concerned about the negative influence of these compounds (as well as the traditional NSAIDs) on bone growth (165,166). As COX-2 activity appears to play an important role in bone healing (167–169), some orthopedic surgeons have recommended that these drugs be avoided in the early postoperative period (164,165). Because the effect on bone growth is dose-dependent and reversible (166), COX-2 inhibitors should only be used for 3–5 d in the early postoperative period. Although several review articles on the COX-2 inhibitors have recently been published (163,170–172), the question remains as to whether these compounds truly overcome the perceived limitations of the nonselective NSAIDs (173).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Acetaminophen (Paracetamol)

Of the non-opioid analgesics, acetaminophen (also known as paracetamol) is perhaps the safest and most cost-effective non-opioid analgesic when it is administered in analgesic dosages. Although both parenteral and rectal acetaminophen produce analgesic effects in the postoperative period, concurrent use with a NSAID is superior to acetaminophen alone (145,147). The addition of acetaminophen, 1 g every 4 h, to PCA morphine improved the quality of pain relief and patient satisfaction after major orthopedic procedures (174). Although Watcha et al. (128) reported minimal analgesic-sparing effects after a 10 mg/kg oral dose of acetaminophen, Rusy et al. (140) found that a larger dose (35 mg/kg pr) was as effective as ketorolac (1 mg/kg IV) in reducing pain after tonsillectomy procedures and was associated with less postoperative bleeding. Subsequently, Korpela et al. (175) demonstrated that the opioid-sparing effect of rectal acetaminophen was dose-related up to 60 mg/kg. The optimal dosing regimen for acetaminophen in children appears to consist of a preoperative initial dose of 30–40 mg/kg followed by a maintenance dose of 15–20 mg/kg every 6–8 h during the early postoperative period (176). In adults, acetaminophen 2 g orally was equivalent to celecoxib 200 mg but less effective than celecoxib 400 mg, rofecoxib 50 mg, or ketoprofen 150 mg in preventing pain after ambulatory surgery (145–147).

An IV formulation of a prodrug of acetaminophen, propacetamol, has been administered to adults as an alternative to ketorolac in the perioperative period (177,178). Propacetamol reduced PCA morphine consumption by 22%–46% in patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery (179,180). However, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, propacetamol (2 g IV every 6 h for 3 d) failed to enhance analgesia, decrease opioid usage, or reduce adverse side effects in the postoperative period (181). Propacetamol has become a popular adjuvant to opioid analgesics for postoperative pain control in Europe; however, this drug may soon be replaced when an investigational IV formulation of acetaminophen becomes available for clinical use (182). Rectal acetaminophen (1.3 g) has also been successfully used as an adjuvant to NSAIDs and local anesthetics as part of a multimodal fast-tracking surgery recovery protocol (183). Given the adverse effects associated with both NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in patients with preexisting cardiovascular disease, acetaminophen may assume a greater role in postoperative pain management in the future (184).

Back to Top | Article Outline

NMDA Antagonists

Ketamine is a unique IV anesthetic with analgesic-like properties that has been used for both induction and maintenance of anesthesia (185), as well as an analgesic adjuvant during local anesthesia (186,187). As a result of its well known side-effect profile (Table 4), ketamine fell into disfavor in the late 1980s. However, adjunctive use of small doses of ketamine (0.1–0.2 mg/kg IV) appear to be associated with a opioid-sparing effects and a less frequent incidence of adverse events and greater patient and physician acceptance (188). Several studies have described the use of small-dose ketamine in combination with local anesthetics and/or opioid analgesics (189–199). However, when ketamine (1 mg/mL) was combined with morphine (1 mg/mL) for PCA after major abdominal surgery, it did not significantly improve pain relief and was associated with increased side effects (e.g., vivid dreaming) compared with the opioid alone (191). One study (192) supports use of a PCA morphine-ketamine combination in a 1:1 ratio with a lockout interval of 8 min for pain control after major orthopedic procedures. Further studies are obviously needed to clarify ketamine’s role as a supplemental analgesic.

Table 4

Table 4

Administration of ketamine, 4–18 μg · kg−1 · min−1, in combination with propofol, 30–90 μg · kg−1 · min−1, obviated the respiratory depression produced by commonly used sedative-opioid combinations while producing positive mood effects after surgery, and it may even provide for an earlier recovery of cognitive function (186,187). In addition, a single bolus dose of ketamine, 0.1–0.15 mg/kg IV, during surgery has been reported to produce significant opioid-sparing effects after painful orthopedic and intraabdominal procedures without increasing the incidence of side effects (194–200). Ketamine (0.1 mg/kg IM) reduced swallowing-evoked pain after tonsillectomy procedures in children receiving a multimodal analgesic regimen (198). Small doses of epidural ketamine (20–30 mg) enhanced epidural morphine-induced analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery (199). Although it was alleged that ketamine possesses preemptive analgesic effects as a result of its ability to inhibit central NMDA receptors (200), well controlled clinical studies have failed to demonstrate significant preemptive analgesic effects (201,202). Interestingly, a modest dose of ketamine (250 μg/kg) after surgery was alleged to improve analgesia in the presence of opioid-resistant pain (203). Acute tolerance to opioid-induced analgesia leading to long-lasting hyperalgesia may be prevented by repeat doses of this NMDA antagonist (204).

Small-doses of the S(+) and R(-) isomers of ketamine have been administered both IV and epidurally in an effort to decrease injury-induced hyperalgesia. Although S(+) ketamine (0.5 mg/kg IV followed by 0.125–1 μg/kg/min) failed to improve pain control after arthroscopic knee surgery (205), epidural S(+) ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) enhanced ropivacaine-induced analgesia after total knee arthroplasty (206). Interestingly, transdermal nitroglycerin (5 mg) has been alleged to enhance the spinal analgesia produced by epidural S(+) ketamine (0.1–0.2 mg/kg) (207). Consistent with an early comparative clinical study involving the ketamine isomers (208). R(-) ketamine (1 mg/kg IV) produced only a short-lasting analgesic effect in the postoperative period (209).

Dextromethorphan, another NMDA receptor antagonist that inhibits wind-up and NMDA-mediated nociceptive responses in dorsal horn neurons, has been alleged to enhance opioid, local anesthetic and NSAID-induced analgesia. Premedication with dextromethorphan (150 mg po) reduced the PCA morphine requirement in the early postoperative period after abdominal hysterectomy procedures but failed to produce prolonged beneficial effects on wound hyperalgesia (210). In patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy or inguinal herniorrhaphy procedures, dextromethorphan (90 mg po) improved well-being and reduced analgesic consumption, pain intensity and sedation, as well as thermal-induced hyperalgesia (211). Preincisional administration of dextromethorphan, 40–120 mg IM, provided some evidence of preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and upper abdominal surgery (212,213). Perioperative dextromethorphan (40–90 mg IM) reduced the opioid requirement and/or improved pain control after modified radical mastectomy (214). Interestingly, in patients undergoing knee surgery, dextromethorphan (200 mg q 8 h) failed to significantly improve pain management (215). Compared with ibuprofen (400 mg po), dextromethorphan (120 mg po) was significantly less effective in providing postoperative analgesia and was associated with increased nausea in the preoperative period (216). In patients undergoing knee replacement surgery with epidural anesthesia, dextromethorphan (40 mg IM) also failed to produce any preemptive analgesic effect but did enhance pain control in the postoperative period (217).

Other NMDA antagonists are being actively investigated in the perioperative setting. Preoperative amantadine, 200 mg IV, failed to enhance postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy procedures (218). However, a more recent study reports that perioperative amantadine reduced PCA morphine requirement after radical prostatectomy surgery (219). Further clinical studies are clearly needed to better define the role of noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists in the perioperative setting.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Alpha-2 Adrenergic Agonists

The α2-adrenergic agonists, clonidine and dexmedetomidine, produce significant anesthetic and analgesic-sparing effects. Premedication with oral and transdermal clonidine decreased the PCA-morphine requirement 50% after radical prostatectomy surgery (220). Clonidine also improved and prolonged central neuraxis (221,222) and peripheral nerve blocks (223) when administered as part of multimodal analgesic regimens. For example, epidural infusion of clonidine in combination with ropivacaine improved analgesia after major abdominal surgery in children (224). Adding intrathecal clonidine (0.075 mg) to local anesthesia provided excellent analgesia for up to 8 h after urologic surgery (225). Although clonidine, 4 μg/kg IV over 20 min, failed to reduce PCA morphine requirement after lower abdominal surgery in adults, it did reduce pain, nausea, and vomiting while improving patient satisfaction with their pain relief (226). However, when used to treat postoperative pain, clonidine (0.3 mg IV) was apparently ineffective (227).

Dexmedetomidine is a pure α2-agonist that also reduces postoperative pain and opioid analgesic requirement (228). However, its use was associated with increased postoperative sedation and bradycardia. When used for premedication before IV regional anesthesia (229), dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg IV) reduced patient anxiety, sympathoadrenal responses, and intraoperative opioid analgesic requirement. Compared with propofol (75 μg · kg−1 · min−1), dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg followed by 0.4–0.7 μg · kg−1 · h−1) had a slower onset and offset of sedation but was associated with improved analgesia and reduced morphine use in the postoperative period (230). Administration of dexmedetomidine, 1 μg/kg followed by 0.4 μg · kg−1 · h−1, was also associated with a 66% reduction in PCA morphine use in the early postoperative period after major inpatient surgery (231).

Back to Top | Article Outline

Miscellaneous Non-Opioid Compounds

A diverse array of non-opioid pharmacologic compounds used during the perioperative period, such as adenosine (232,233), droperidol (234), magnesium (235), neostigmine (236), and gabapentin (237,238), have been alleged to possess analgesic-sparing properties. Although the analgesic-sparing effects of these compounds have not been extensively evaluated and their use for acute postoperative pain management is considered investigational, the preliminary findings are nonetheless intriguing. For example, use of an adenosine infusion as an alternative to an opioid analgesic (remifentanil) for controlling acute autonomic responses during lower abdominal surgery resulted in a significant reduction in both postoperative pain scores and the requirement for opioid analgesics (232).

Gabapentin (a structural analog of gamma-aminobutyric acid) is an anticonvulsant that has proven useful in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain and may also be a useful adjuvant in the management of acute postoperative pain (237–242). For example, premedication with gabapentin (1.2 g po) reduced postoperative analgesic requirement significantly without increasing side effects (237). When gabapentin (1.2 g) was continued for 10 d after breast surgery (238), it reduced the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and movement-related pain; however, the overall incidence of chronic pain was unaffected. Recent studies by Dierking et al. (239), Turan et al. (240), and Rorarius et al. (241) suggested that the improvement in postoperative pain control with gabapentin was not necessarily associated with a decrease in opioid-related side effects. Pregabalin, a related compound, has also been reported to possess analgesic potential comparable to that of ibuprofen in treating acute dental pain (242). This review article discussed the potential role of gabapentin and pregabalin in “protective premedication.”

Magnesium, a divalent cation, is also alleged to possess antinociceptive effects. For example, Kara et al. (235) reported that perioperative magnesium (30 mg/kg IV followed by an infusion of 0.5 g/h) yielded a significant reduction in the postoperative analgesic requirement after abdominal hysterectomy. A bolus dose of magnesium (50 mg/kg IV) at induction of anesthesia also led to improved pain control and better patient satisfaction with less opioid medication after major orthopedic surgery (243). However, magnesium 50 mg/kg IV failed to produce opioid-sparing effects after open cholecystectomy procedures (244). In addition, a non-opioid multimodal analgesic regimen that included magnesium produced comparable postoperative pain relief with fewer side effects than fentanyl in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery (245). However, other investigators have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of magnesium (30–50 mg/kg followed by 10–15 mg · kg−1 · h−1) with respect to reducing postoperative pain or the need for opioid analgesics (246). Of interest, intrathecal magnesium was reported to prolong fentanyl analgesia (247).

Neostigmine, a cholinesterase inhibitor, has been reported to possess analgesic properties when doses of 10–200 μg were administered in the subarachnoid or epidural spaces (236,248). Although peripherally administered neostigmine failed to produce postoperative analgesia, epidurally administered neostigmine (1 μg/kg) produced more than 5 h of pain relief after knee surgery (249). Neostigmine (10 μg/kg) also enhanced epidural local analgesia (250). Both epidural (60 μg) and spinal (1–5 μg) neostigmine enhanced morphine-induced neuraxial analgesia (251–254). In patients undergoing knee replacement surgery with intrathecal bupivacaine, adjunctive use of neostigmine (50 μg) was alleged to produce better postoperative analgesia than morphine (300 μg) (255). In addition, transdermal nitroglycerin enhanced spinal neostigmine-induced postoperative analgesia without increasing perioperative side effects (256). However, epidural neostigmine (75–300 μg) alone produced only modest analgesia after cesarean delivery (257). The primary adverse effects associated with neuraxial neostigmine appear to be mild sedation (257) and PONV (15%–30%) (237,253).

Cannabinoids have been reported to reduce hyperalgesia and drug-induced allodynia. However, clinical studies have failed to demonstrate any evidence of postoperative analgesia (258,259). A new antiinflammatory drug, inositol triphosphate, reduced postoperative pain and the need for opioid analgesics after cholecystectomy surgery (260). However, additional well controlled clinical trials are needed with all of these novel adjunctive drugs.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Nonpharmacologic Techniques

Nonpharmacologic “electroanalgesic” techniques such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and percutaneous neuromodulation therapy can also be useful adjuvants to pharmacologic compounds in the management of acute postoperative pain (261). Given the inherent side effects produced by both opioid and non-opioid analgesics (Table 4), it is possible that the use of nonpharmacologic approaches will assume a more prominent role in the future management of acute postoperative pain (262).

Clinical studies suggest that electroanalgesia can reduce opioid analgesic requirements up to 60% after surgery (263,264). In addition to reducing pain and the need for oral analgesics, Jensen et al. (265) reported a more rapid recovery of joint mobility after arthroscopic knee surgery. When used as an adjuvant to pharmacologic analgesia, TENS reduced the intensity of exercise-induced pain and facilitated ambulation after abdominal surgery (266). In reviewing the medical literature, Carroll et al. (267) found conflicting results regarding the effect of TENS on the requirement for opioid analgesic medication and the quality of postoperative pain relief. Studies suggest that the location, intensity, timing, and frequency of electrical stimulation are all important variables influencing the efficacy of electroanalgesics therapies (263,264,268). More recent studies have confirmed the importance of these variables in achieving improved pain relief with TENS therapy (269).

Of interest, simple (mechanical) intradermal needles placed in the paravertebral region before abdominal surgery reduced postoperative pain and the opioid analgesic requirement as well as PONV (270). However, a “minute sphere”-induced acupressure technique (in which 1-mm stainless steel spheres are applied at known analgesic acupoints) failed to relieve pain after major abdominal surgery (271). Other nonpharmacologic approaches that have been used as analgesic adjuvants in the perioperative period include cryoanalgesia (272), ultrasound (273), and laser stimulation (274), as well as hypnotherapy. However, well controlled clinical studies are needed to establish benefits of these nonpharmacologic modalities on postoperative pain and patient outcomes after surgery.

Back to Top | Article Outline

Summary

As more extensive and painful operations (e.g., laparoscopic cholecystectomy, adrenalectomy, and nephrectomy procedures, as well as prostatectomy, laminectomy, shoulder and knee reconstructions, hysterectomy) are performed on an outpatient or short-stay basis, the use of multimodal perioperative analgesic regimens involving non-opioid analgesic therapies will likely assume an increasingly important role in facilitating the recovery process and improving patient satisfaction (4). Pavlin et al. (275) confirmed the importance of postoperative pain on recovery after ambulatory surgery. Moderate-to-severe pain prolonged recovery room stay by 40–80 min. Use of local anesthetics and NSAIDs decreased pain scores and facilitated an earlier discharge home. Additional outcome studies are needed to validate the beneficial effect of these non-opioid therapeutic approaches with respect to important recovery variables (e.g., resumption of normal activities, dietary intake, bowel function, return to work). Although many factors other than pain per se must be controlled to minimize postoperative morbidity and facilitate the recovery process (1), pain remains a major concern of all patients undergoing elective surgical procedures (276).

Opioid analgesics continue to play an important role in the management of moderate-to-severe pain after surgical procedures. However, adjunctive use of non-opioid analgesics will likely assume a greater role as minimally invasive (“key hole”) surgery continues to expand (2,4). In addition to the local anesthetics, NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, acetaminophen, ketamine, dextromethorphan, α-2 agonists, gabapentin, magnesium, and neostigmine may all prove to be useful adjuncts in the management of postoperative pain in the future. Adjunctive use of droperidol (234) and glucocorticoid steroids (277,278) also appear to provide beneficial effects in the postoperative period. Use of analgesic drug combinations with differing mechanisms of action as part of a multimodal regimen will provide additive (or even synergistic) effects with respect to improving pain control, reducing the need for opioid analgesics, and facilitating the recovery process (279). Safer, simpler, and less costly analgesic drug delivery systems are needed to provide cost-effective pain relief in the postdischarge period as more major surgery is performed on an ambulatory (or short-stay) basis in the future. In introducing new therapeutic modalities for pain management, it is important to carefully consider the risk:benefit ratio (280).

In conclusion, the optimal non-opioid analgesic technique for postoperative pain management would not only reduce pain scores and enhance patient satisfaction but also facilitate earlier mobilization and rehabilitation by reducing pain-related complications after surgery. Recent evidence suggests that this goal can be best achieved by using a combination of preemptive techniques involving both central and peripheral-acting analgesic drugs and devices.

Back to Top | Article Outline

References

1. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet 2003;362:1921–8.
2. White PF. Ambulatory anesthesia advances into the new millennium. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1234–5.
3. Chung F, Ritchie E, Su J. Postoperative pain in ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;85:808–16.
4. White PF. The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;94:577–85.
5. Guignard B, Bossard AE, Coste C, et al. Acute opioid tolerance: intraoperative remifentanil increases postoperative pain and morphine requirement. Anesthesiology 2000;93:409–17.
6. Silvasti M, Svartling N, Pitkanen M, Rosenberg PH. Comparison of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with tramadol versus morphine after microvascular breast reconstruction. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2000;17:448–55.
7. Rawal N, Allvin R, Amilon A, et al. Postoperative analgesia at home after ambulatory hand surgery: a controlled comparison of tramadol, metamizol, and paracetamol. Anesth Analg 2001;92:347–51.
8. Immer FF, Immer-Bansi AS, Tachesel N, et al. Pain treatment with a COX-2 inhibitor after coronary artery bypass operation: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:490–5.
9. Eriksson H, Tenhunen A, Korttila K. Balanced analgesia improves recovery and outcome after outpatient tubal ligation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996;40:151–5.
10. Michaloliakou C, Chung F, Sharma S. Preoperative multimodal analgesia facilitates recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1996;82:44–51.
11. Pavlin DJ, Horvath KD, Pavlin EG, Sima K. Preincisional treatment to prevent pain after ambulatory hernia surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1627–32.
12. Vloka JD, Hadzic A, Mulcare R, et al. Femoral and genitofemoral nerve blocks versus spinal anesthesia for outpatients undergoing long saphenous vein stripping surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:749–52.
13. Song D, Greilich NB, White PF, et al. Recovery profiles and costs of anesthesia for outpatient unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg 2000;91:876–81.
14. Li S, Coloma M, White PF, et al. Comparison of the costs and recovery profiles of three anesthetic techniques for ambulatory anorectal surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:1225–30.
15. Harrison CA, Morris S, Harvey JS. Effect of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block and wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine on postoperative pain after hernia repair. Br J Anaesth 1994;72:691–3.
16. Ding Y, White PF. Post-herniorrhaphy pain in outpatients after pre-incision ilioinguinal-hypogastric nerve block during monitored anesthesia care. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:12–5.
17. Broadman LM, Hannallah RS, Belman AB, et al. Post-circumcision analgesia: a prospective evaluation of subcutaneous ring block of the penis. Anesthesiology 1987;67:399–402.
18. Baram D, Smith C, Stinson S. Intraoperative topical etidocaine for reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation. J Reprod Med 1990;35:407–10.
19. Gharaibeh KI, Al-Jaberi TM. Bupivacaine instillation into gallbladder bed after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: does it decrease shoulder pain? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2000;10:137–41.
20. Ritchie ED, Tong D, Chung F, et al. Suprascapular nerve block for postoperative pain relief in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a new modality? Anesth Analg 1997;84:1306–12.
21. Tierney E, Lewis G, Hurtig JB, Johnson D. Femoral nerve block with bupivacaine 0.25 per cent for postoperative analgesia after open knee surgery. Can J Anaesth 1987;34:455–8.
22. Brown AR, Weiss R, Greenberg C, et al. Interscalene block for shoulder arthroscopy: comparison with general anesthesia. Arthroscopy 1993;9:295–300.
23. Casati A, Cappelleri G, Fanelli G, et al. Regional anaesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy: a randomized clinical comparison of two different anaesthetic techniques. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:543–7.
24. Woolf CJ, Chong MS. Preemptive analgesia: treating postoperative pain by preventing the establishment of central sensitization. Anesth Analg 1993;77:362–79.
25. Ejlersen E, Andersen HB, Eliasen K, Mogensen T. A comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 1992;74:495–8.
26. Reuben SS, Bhopatkar S, Maciolek H, et al. The preemptive analgesic effect of rofecoxib after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;94:55–9.
27. Møiniche S, Kehlet H, Dahl JB. A qualitative and quantitative systematic review of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain relief: the role of timing of analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002;96:725–41.
28. Tverskoy M, Cozacov C, Ayache M, et al. Postoperative pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy with different types of anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1990;70:29–35.
29. Jebeles J, Reilly J, Gutierrez J, et al. The effect of preincisional infiltration of tonsils with bupivacaine on the pain following tonsillectomy under general anesthesia. Pain 1991;47:305–8.
30. O’Neal MG, Beste T, Shackelford DP. Utility of preemptive local analgesia in vaginal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:1539–41.
31. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Kristiansen VB, et al. Multi-regional local anesthetic infiltration during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients receiving prophylactic multimodal analgesia: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1017–24.
32. Sarac AM, Aktan AO, Baykan N, et al. The effect of timing of local anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:362–6.
33. Hasaniya NW, Zayed FF, Faiz H, Severino R. Preinsertion local anesthesia at the trocar site improves perioperative pain and decreases costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:962–4.
34. Fong SY, Pavy TJ, Yeo ST, et al. Assessment of wound infiltration with bupivacaine in women undergoing day-case gynecological laparoscopy. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:131–6.
35. Moiniche S, Jorgensen H, Wetterslev J, Dahl JB. Local anesthetic infiltration for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopy: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review of intraperitoneal, port-site infiltration and mesosalpinx block. Anesth Analg 2000;90:899–912.
36. Sinclair R, Cassuto J, Hogstrom S, et al. Topical anesthesia with lidocaine aerosol in the control of postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 1988;68:895–901.
37. Casey WF, Rice LJ, Hannallah RS, et al. A comparison between bupivacaine instillation versus ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve block for postoperative analgesia following inguinal herniorrhaphy in children. Anesthesiology 1990;72:637–9.
38. Tree-Trakarn T, Pirayavaraporn S. Postoperative pain relief for circumcision in children: comparison among morphine, nerve block, and topical analgesia. Anesthesiology 1985;62:519–22.
39. Tree-Trakarn T, Pirayavaraporn S, Lertakyamee J. Topical analgesia for relief of post-circumcision pain. Anesthesiology 1987;67:395–9.
40. Choi WY, Irwin MG, Hui TWC, et al. EMLA® cream versus dorsal penile nerve block for postcircumcision analgesia in children. Anesth Analg 2003;96:396–9.
41. Gammaitoni AR, Alvarez NA, Galer BS. Safety and tolerability of the lidocaine patch 5%, a targeted peripheral analgesic: a review of the literature. J Clin Pharmacol 2003;43:111–7.
42. Narchi P, Benhamou D, Fernandez H. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for shoulder pain after day-case laparoscopy. Lancet 1991;338:1569–70.
43. Paulson J, Mellinger J, Baguley W. The use of intraperitoneal bupivacaine to decrease the length of stay in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Am J Surg 2003;69:275–8.
44. Rademaker BM, Kalkman CJ, Odoom JA, et al. Intraperitoneal local anaesthetics after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: effects on postoperative pain, metabolic responses and lung function. Br J Anaesth 1994;72:263–6.
45. Joris J, Thiry E, Paris P, et al. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: characteristics and effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine. Anesth Analg 1995;81:379–84.
46. Scheinin B, Kellokumpu I, Lindgren I, et al. Effect of intraperitoneal bupivacaine on pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:195–8.
47. Raetzell M, Maier C, Schroder D, Wulf H. Intraperitoneal application of bupivacaine during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: risk or benefit? Anesth Analg 1995;81:967–72.
48. Pasqualucci A, de Angelis V, Contardo R, et al. Preemptive analgesia: intraperitoneal local anesthetic in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 1996;85:11–20.
49. Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS. A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs saline for the reduction of postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:44–8.
50. Mraovic B, Jurisic T, Kogler-Majeric V, Sustic A. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine for analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997;41:193–6.
51. Cunniffe MG, McAnena OJ, Dar JA, et al. A prospective randomized trial of intraoperative bupivacaine irrigation for management of shoulder-tip pain following laparoscopy. Am J Surg 1998;176:258–61.
52. Wallin G, Cassuto J, Hogstrom S, Hedner T. Influence of intraperitoneal anesthesia on pain and the sympathoadrenal response to abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988;32:553–8.
53. Zmora O, Stolik-Dollberg O, Bar-Zakai B, et al. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine does not attenuate pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2000;4:301–4.
54. Maestroni U, Sortini D, Devito C, et al. A new method of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2002;16:1336–40.
55. Saff GN, Marks RA, Kuroda M, et al. Analgesic effect of bupivacaine on extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Anesth Analg 1998;87:377–81.
56. Ashcraft EE, Baillie GM, Shafizadeh SF, et al. Further improvements in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: decreased pain and accelerated recovery. Clin Transplant 2001;15:59–61.
57. Yndgaard S, Holst P, Bjerre-Jepsen K, et al. Subcutaneously versus subfascially administered lidocaine in pain treatment after inguinal herniotomy. Anesth Analg 1994;79:324–7.
58. Scott NB, Mogensen T, Bigler D, Kehlet H. Comparison of the effects of continuous intrapleural vs epidural administration of 0.5% bupivacaine on pain, metabolic response and pulmonary function following cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989;33:535–9.
59. Schroeder D, Baker P. Interpleural catheter for analgesia after cholecystectomy: the surgical perspective. Aust N Z J Surg 1990;60:689–94.
60. Frank ED, McKay W, Rocco A, Gallo JP. Interpleural bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia following cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study. Reg Anesth 1990;15:26–30.
61. Stromskag KE, Minor BG, Lindeberg A. Comparison of 40 milliliters of 0.25% intrapleural bupivacaine with epinephrine with 20 milliliters of 0.5% intrapleural bupivacaine with epinephrine after cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1991;73:397–400.
62. Rademaker BM, Sih IL, Kalkman CJ, et al. Effects of interpleurally administered bupivacaine 0.5% on opioid analgesic requirements and endocrine response during and after cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991;35:108–12.
63. Laurito CE, Kirz LI, VadeBoncouere TR, et al. Continuous infusion of interpleural bupivacaine maintains effective analgesia after cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1991;72:516–21.
64. Frenette L, Boudreault D, Guay J. Interpleural analgesia improves pulmonary function after cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth 1991;38:71–4.
65. Oxorn DC, Whatley GS. Post-cholecystectomy pulmonary function following interpleural bupivacaine and intramuscular pethidine. Anaesth Intensive Care 1989;17:440–3.
66. Lee A, Boon D, Bagshaw P, Kempthorne P. A randomized double-blind study of interpleural analgesia after cholecystectomy. Anaesthesia 1990;45:1028–31.
67. Schulte-Steinberg H, Weninger E, Jokisch D, et al. Intraperitoneal versus interpleural morphine or bupivacaine for pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 1995;82:634–40.
68. Ross WB, Tweedie JH, Leong YP, et al. Intercostal blockade and pulmonary function after cholecystectomy. Surgery 1989;105:166–9.
69. Dahl MR, Dasta JF, Zuelzer W, McSweeney TD. Lidocaine local anesthesia for arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1990;71:670–4.
70. Smith I, Van Hemelrijck J, White PF, Shively R. Effects of local anesthesia on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1991;73:536–9.
71. Smith I, Shively RA, White PF. Effects of ketorolac and bupivacaine on recovery after outpatient arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 1992;75:208–12.
72. Stein C, Comisel K, Haimerl E, et al. Analgesic effect of intraarticular morphine after arthroscopic knee surgery. N Engl J Med 1991;325:1123–6.
73. Reuben S, Connelly NR. Postoperative analgesia for outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery with intraarticular bupivacaine and ketorolac. Anesth Analg 1995;80:1154–7.
74. Wang JJ, Ho ST, Lee SC, et al. Intraarticular triamcinolone acetonide for pain control after arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 1998;87:1113–6.
75. Joshi W, Reuben SS, Kilaru PR, et al. Postoperative analgesia for outpatient arthroscopic knee surgery with intraarticular clonidine and/or morphine. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1102–6.
76. Khoury GF, Chen ACN, Garland DE, Stein C. Intraarticular morphine, bupivacaine, and morphine/bupivacaine for pain control after knee videoarthroscopy. Anesthesiology 1992;77:263–6.
77. Reuben SS, Sklar J, El-Mansouri M. The preemptive analgesic effect of intraarticular bupivacaine and morphine after ambulatory arthroscopic knee surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:923–6.
78. Thomas DFM, Lambert WG, Williams KL. The direct perfusion of surgical wounds with local anaesthetic solution: an approach to postoperative pain? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1983;65:226–9.
79. Gibbs P, Purushotam A, Auld C, Cuschieri RJ. Continuous wound perfusion with bupivacaine for postoperative wound pain. Br J Surg 1988;75:923–4.
80. Levack ID, Holmes JD, Robertson GS. Abdominal wound perfusion for the relief of postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 1986;58:615–9.
81. Gupta A, Thorn SE, Axelsson K, et al. Postoperative pain relief using intermittent injections of 0.5% ropivacaine through a catheter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 2002;95:450–6.
82. White PF, Rawal S, Latham P, et al. Use of a continuous local anesthetic infusion for pain management after median sternotomy. Anesthesiology 2003;99:918–23.
83. Bianconi M, Ferraro L, Ricci R, et al. The pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ropivacaine continuous wound instillation after spine fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:166–72.
84. Rawal N, Axelsson K, Hylander J, et al. Postoperative patient-controlled local anesthetic administration at home. Anesth Analg 1998;86:86–9.
85. Rawal N, Allvin R, Axelsson K, et al. Patient-controlled regional analgesia (PCRA) at home: controlled comparison between bupivacaine and ropivacaine brachial plexus analgesia. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1290–6.
86. Fredman B, Shapiro A, Zohar E, et al. The analgesic efficacy of patient-controlled ropivacaine instillation after Cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1436–40.
87. Fredman B, Zohar E, Tarabykin A, et al. Bupivacaine wound instillation via an electronic patient-controlled analgesia device and a double-catheter system does not decrease postoperative pain or opioid requirements after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:189–93.
88. Cameron AEP, Cross FW. Pain and morbility after inguinal herniorrhaphy: ineffectiveness of subcutaneous bupivacaine. Br J Surg 1985;72:68–9.
89. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wang RD, Enneking FK. Continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2002;97:959–65.
90. White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, et al. Use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block for the management of pain after major podiatric surgery: does it improve quality of recovery? Anesth Analg 2003;97:1303–9.
91. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Continuous infraclavicular brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1297–304.
92. Singelyn FJ, Seguy S, Gouverneur JM. Interscalene brachial plexus analgesia after open shoulder surgery: continuous versus patient-controlled infusion. Anesth Analg 1999;89:1216–20.
93. Singelyn FJ, Vanderelst PE, Gouverneus JM. Extended femoral nerve sheath block after total hip arthroplasty: continuous versus patient-controlled techniques. Anesth Analg 2001;92:455–9.
94. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Portable infusion pumps used for continuous regional analgesia: delivery rate accuracy and consistency. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:424–32.
95. Capdevila X, Macaire P, Aknin P, et al. Patient-controlled perineural analgesia after ambulatory orthopedic surgery: a comparison of electronic versus elastomeric pumps. Anesth Analg 2003;96:414–7.
96. Cuvillon P, Ripart J, Lalourcey L, et al. The continuous femoral nerve block catheter for postoperative analgesia: bacterial colonization, infectious rate and adverse effects. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1045–9.
97. Ilfeld BM, Esener DE, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Ambulatory perineural infusion: the patient’s perspective. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003;28:418–23.
98. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of “multimodal” or “balanced analgesia” in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg 1993;77:1048–56.
99. Klein SM, Greengrass RA, Steele SM, et al. A comparison of 0.5% bupivacaine, 0.5% ropivacaine, and 0.75% ropivacaine for interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1998;87:1316–9.
100. Mulroy MF, Larkin KL, Batra MS, et al. Femoral nerve block with 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia following outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:24–9.
101. Casati A, Vinciguerra F, Scarioni M, et al. Lidocaine versus ropivacaine for continuous interscalene brachial plexus block after open shoulder surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:355–60.
102. Casati A, Magistris L, Fanelli G, et al. Small-dose clonidine prolongs postoperative analgesia after sciatic-femoral nerve block with 0.75% ropivacaine for foot surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:388–92.
103. Niemi G, Breivik H. Epinephrine markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a small-dose infusion of ropivacaine, fentanyl, and epinephrine after major thoracic or abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blinded crossover study with and without epinephrine. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1598–605.
104. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Continuous infraclavicular perineural infusion with clonidine and ropivacaine compared with ropivacaine alone: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled study. Anesth Analg 2003;97:706–12.
105. Klein SM, Greengrass RA, Grant SA, et al. Ambulatory surgery for multi-ligament knee reconstruction with continuous dual catheter peripheral nerve blockade. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:375–8.
106. Klein SM, Grant SA, Greengrass RA, et al. Interscalene brachial plexus block with a continuous catheter system and a disposable infusion pump. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1473–8.
107. Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Wright TW, et al. Continuous interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative pain control at home: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1089–95.
108. Yee JP, Koshiver JE, Allbon C, Brown CR. Comparison of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine and morphine sulphate for analgesia of pain after major surgery. Pharmacotherapy 1986;6:253–61.
109. O’Hara DA, Fragen RJ, Kinzer M, Pemberton D. Ketorolac tromethamine as compared with morphine sulfate for the treatment of postoperative pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987;41:556–61.
110. Powell H, Smallman JMB, Morgan M. Comparison of intramuscular ketorolac and morphine in pain control after laparotomy. Anaesthesia 1990;45:538–42.
111. Murray AW, Brockway MS, Kenny GNC. Comparison of the cardiorespiratory effects of ketorolac and alfentanil during propofol anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1989;63:601–3.
112. Ding Y, White PF. Comparative effects of ketorolac, dezocine and fentanyl as adjuvants during outpatient anesthesia. Anesth Analg 1992;75:566–71.
113. Ramirez-Ruiz M, Smith I, White PF. Use of analgesics during propofol sedation: a comparison of ketorolac, dezocine, and fentanyl. J Clin Anesth 1995;7:481–5.
114. Wong HY, Carpenter RL, Kopacz DJ, et al. A randomized double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine for postoperative analgesia in ambulatory surgery patients. Anesthesiology 1993;78:6–14.
115. Singh H, Bossard RF, White PF, Yeatts RW. Effects of ketorolac versus bupivacaine coadministration during patient-controlled hydromorphone epidural analgesia after thoracotomy procedures. Anesth Analg 1997;84:564–9.
116. Coloma M, White PF, Huber PJ, et al. The effect of ketorolac on recovery after anorectal surgery: IV versus local administration. Anesth Analg 2000;90:1107–10.
117. Romsing J, Moiniche S, Ostergaard D, Dahl JB. Local infiltration with NSAIDs for postoperative analgesia: evidence for a peripheral analgesic action. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:672–83.
118. Ding Y, Fredman B, White PF. Use of ketorolac and fentanyl during outpatient gynecological surgery. Anesth Analg 1993;77:205–10.
119. Liu J, Ding Y, White PF, et al. Effects of ketorolac on postoperative analgesia and ventilatory function after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993;76:1061–6.
120. Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Aronheim M. The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL). J Clin Anesth 1993;5:141–4.
121. McLoughlin C, McKinney MS, Fee JPH, Boules Z. Diclofenac for day-care arthroscopy surgery: comparison with standard opioid therapy. Br J Anaesth 1990;65:620–3.
122. Gillberg LE, Harsten AS, Stahl LB. Preoperative diclofenac sodium reduces post-laparoscopy pain. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:406–8.
123. Varrassi G, Panella L, Piroli A, et al. The effects of perioperative ketorolac infusion on postoperative pain and endocrine-metabolic response. Anesth Analg 1994;78:514–9.
124. Zackova M, Taddei S, Calo P, et al. Ketorolac vs tramadol in the treatment of postoperative pain during maxillofacial surgery. Minerva Anesthesiol 2001;67:641–6.
125. Wilson YG, Rhodes M, Ahmed R, et al. Intramuscular diclofenac sodium postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized, controlled trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:340–4.
126. Fredman B, Olsfanger D, Jedeikin R. A comparative study of ketorolac and diclofenac on post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995;12:501–4.
127. Baer GA, Rorarius MGF, Kolehmainen S, Seliu S. The effect of paracetamol or diclofenac administered before operation on postoperative pain and behavior after adenoidectomy in small children. Anaesthesia 1992;47:1078–80.
128. Watcha MF, Ramirez-Ruiz M, White PF, et al. Perioperative effects of oral ketorolac and acetaminophen in children undergoing bilateral myringotomy. Can J Anaesth 1992;39:649–54.
129. Splinter WM, Reid CW, Roberts DJ, Bass J. Reducing pain after inguinal hernia repair in children: caudal anesthesia versus ketorolac tromethamine. Anesthesiology 1997;87:542–6.
130. Watcha MF, Jones MB, Lagueruela RG, et al. Comparison of ketorolac and morphine as adjuvants during pediatric surgery. Anesthesiology 1992;76:368–72.
131. Maunuksela EL, Kokki H, Bullingham RES. Comparison of IV ketorolac with morphine for postoperative pain in children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1992;52:436–43.
132. Forse A, El-Beheiry H, Butler PO, Pace RF. Indomethacin and ketorolac given preoperatively are equally effective in reducing early postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Surg 1996;39:26–30.
133. Comfort VK, Code WE, Rooney ME, Yip RW. Naproxen premedication reduces postoperative tubal ligation pain. Can J Anaesth 1992;4:349–52.
134. Rosenblum M, Weller RS, Conard PL, et al. Ibuprofen provides longer lasting analgesia than fentanyl after laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 1991;73:255–9.
135. Doyle G, Jayawardena S, Ashraf E, Cooper SA. Efficacy and tolerability of nonprescription ibuprofen versus celecoxib for dental pain. J Clin Pharmacol 2002;42:912–9.
136. Pickering AE, Bridge HS, Nolan J, Stoddart PA. Double-blind, placebo-controlled analgesic study of ibuprofen or rofecoxib in combination with paracetamol for tonsillectomy in children. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:72–7.
137. Raeder JC, Steine S, Vatsgar TT. Oral ibuprofen versus paracetamol plus codeine for analgesia after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1470–2.
138. Edwards JE, McQuay HJ, Moore RA. Combination analgesic efficacy: Individual patient data meta-analysis of single-dose oral tramadol plus acetaminophen in acute postoperative pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;23:121–30.
139. Souter A, Fredman B, White PF. Controversies in the perioperative use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Anesth Analg 1994;79:1178–90.
140. Rusy LM, Houck CS, Sullivan LJ, et al. A double-blind evaluation of ketorolac tromethamine versus acetaminophen in pediatric tonsillectomy: analgesia and bleeding. Anesth Analg 1995;80:226–9.
141. Gunter JB, Varughese AM, Harrington JF, et al. Recovery and complications after tonsillectomy in children: a comparison of ketorolac and morphine. Anesth Analg 1995;81:1136–41.
142. Moiniche S, Romsing J, Dahl JB, Tramer MR. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of operative bleeding after tonsillectomy: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg 2003;96:68–77.
143. FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs, selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. N Engl J Med 2001;345:433–42.
144. Reuben SS, Connelly NR. Postoperative analgesic effects of celecoxib or rofecoxib after spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 2000;91:1221–5.
145. Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF, et al. The efficacy of premedication with celecoxib and acetaminophen in preventing pain after otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1188–93.
146. Recart A, Issioui T, White PF, et al. The efficacy of celecoxib premedication on postoperative pain and recovery times after ambulatory surgery: a dose-ranging study. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1631–5.
147. Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF, et al. Cost-efficacy of rofecoxib versus acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:931–7.
148. Ma H, Tang J, White PF, et al. Perioperative rofecoxib improves early recovery after outpatient herniorrhaphy. Anesth Analg 2004;98:970–5.
149. Watcha MF, Issioui T, Klein KW, White PF. Costs and effectiveness of rofecoxib, celecoxib and acetaminophen for preventing pain after ambulatory otolaryngologic surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;96:987–94.
150. Sinatra RS, Shen QJ, Halaszynski T, et al. Preoperative rofecoxib oral suspension as an analgesic adjunct after lower abdominal surgery: the effects on effort-dependent pain and pulmonary function. Anesth Analg 2004;98:135–40.
151. Buvanendran A, Kroin JS, Tuman KJ, et al. Effects of perioperative administration of a selective cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitor on pain management and recovery of function after knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003;290:2411–8.
152. Desjardins PJ, Shu VS, Recker DP, et al. A single preoperative oral dose of valdecoxib, a new cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitor, relieves post-oral surgery or bunionectomy pain. Anesthesiology 2002;97:565–73.
153. Joshi GP, Viscusi ER, Gan TJ, et al. Effective treatment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain with intravenous followed by oral COX-2 specific inhibitor. Anesth Analg 2004;98:336–42.
154. Fricke J, Varkalis J, Zwillich S, et al. Valdecoxib is more efficacious than rofecoxib in relieving pain associated with oral surgery. Am J Ther 2002;9:89–97.
155. Desjardins PJ, Grossman EH, Kuss ME, et al. The injectable cyclooxygenase-2-specific inhibitor parecoxib sodium has analgesic efficacy when administered preoperatively. Anesth Analg 2001;93:721–7.
156. Tang J, Li S, White PF, et al. Effect of parecoxib, a novel intravenous cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, on the postoperative opioid requirement and quality of pain control. Anesthesiology 2002;96:1305–9.
157. Ng A, Smith G, Davidson AC. Analgesic effects of parecoxib following total abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:746–9.
158. Mehlisch DR, Desjardins PJ, Daniels S, Hubbard RC. Single doses of parecoxib sodium intravenously are as effective as ketorolac in reducing pain after oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:1030–7.
159. Barton SF, Langeland FF, Snabes MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery. Anesthesiology 2002;97:306–14.
160. Malan TP Jr., Marsh G, Hakki SI, et al. Parecoxib sodium, a parenteral cyclooxygenase 2 selective inhibitor, improves morphine analgesia and is opioid-sparing following total hip arthroplasty. Anesthesiology 2003;98:950–6.
161. Ott E, Nussmeier NA, Duke PC, et al. Efficacy and safety of cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors parecoxib and valdecoxib in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1481–92.
162. Malmstrom K, Kotey P, Coughlin H, Desjardins PJ. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the analgesic effect of etoricoxib to placebo, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen with codeine using the dental impaction pain model. Clin J Pain 2004;20:147–55.
163. Romsing J, Moiniche S. A systematic review of COX-2 inhibitors compared with traditional NSAIDs, or different COX-2 inhibitors for postoperative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:525–46.
164. Stichtenoth DO, Frolich JC. The second generation of COX-2 inhibitors: what advantages do the newest offer? Drugs 2003;63:33–45.
165. Glassman SD, Rose S, Matthew BE, et al. The effect of postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug administration on spinal fusion. Spine 1998;23:834–8.
166. Einhorn TA. COX-2: Where are we in 2003? The role of cyclooxygenase-2 in bone repair. Arthritis Res Ther 2003;5:5–7.
167. Seidenberg AB, An YH. Is there an inhibitory effect of COX-2 inhibitors on bone healing? Pharm Res 2004;50:151–6.
168. Simon AM, Manigrasso MB, O’Connor JP. Cyclo-oxygenase 2 function is essential for bone fracture healing. J Bone Miner Res 2002;17:963–76.
169. Harder AT, An YH. The mechanisms of the inhibitory effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs on bone healing: a concise review. J Clin Pharm 2004;43:807–15.
170. Gajraj NM. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors. Anesth Analg 2003;96:1720–38.
171. Gilron I, Milne B, Hong M. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in postoperative pain management. Anesthesiology 2003;99:1198–208.
172. Cicconetti A, Bartoli A, Ripari F, Ripari A. COX-2 selective inhibitors: a literature review of analgesic efficacy and safety in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:139–46.
173. Hyllested M, Jones S, Pedersen JL, Kehlet H. Comparative effect of paracetamol, NSAIDs or their combination in postoperative pain management: a qualitative review. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:199–214.
174. Schug SA, Sidebotham DA, McGuinnety M, et al. Acetaminophen as an adjunct to morphine by patient-controlled analgesia in the management of acute postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 1998;87:368–72.
175. Korpela R, Korvenoja P, Meretoja OA. Morphine-sparing effect of acetaminophen in pediatric day-case surgery. Anesthesiology 1999;91:442–7.
176. Birmingham PK, Tobin MJ, Fisher DM, et al. Initial and subsequent dosing of rectal acetaminophen in children: a 24-hour pharmacokinetic study of new dose recommendations. Anesthesiology 2001;94:385–9.
177. Varrassi G, Marinangeli F, Agro F, et al. A double-blinded evaluation of propacetamol versus ketorolac in combination with patient-controlled analgesia morphine: analgesic efficacy and tolerability after gynecologic surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;88:611–16.
178. Zhou TJ, Tang J, White PF. Propacetamol versus ketorolac for treatment of acute postoperative pain after total hip or knee replacement. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1569–75.
179. Delbos A, Boccard E. The morphine-sparing effect of propacetamol in orthopedic postoperative pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995;10:279–86.
180. Hernandez-Palazon J, Tortosa JA, Martinez-Lage JF, Perez-Flores D. Intravenous administration of propacetamol reduces morphine consumption alter spinal fusion surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1473–6.
181. Lahtinen P, Kokki H, Hendolin H, et al. Propacetamol as adjunctive treatment for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;95:813–9.
182. Moller PL, Juhl GI, Payen-Champenois C, et al. Ready-to-use IV paracetamol: comparable analgesic efficacy, but better local safety than its prodrug, propacetamol for postoperative pain after third molar surgery. Anesth Analg 2005;101:90–6.
183. Coloma M, Chiu JW, White PF, Armbruster SC. The use of esmolol as an alternative to remifentanil during desflurane anesthesia for fast-track outpatient gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:352–7.
184. Hillis WS. Areas of emerging interest in analgesia: cardiovascular complications. Am J Ther 2002;9:259–69.
185. White PF, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Ketamine: its pharmacology and therapeutic uses. Anesthesiology 1982;56:119–36.
186. Badrinath S, Avramov MN, Shadrick M, et al. The use of ketamine-propofol combination during monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg 2000;90:858–62.
187. Mortero RF, Clark LD, Tolan MM, et al. The effects of small-dose ketamine on propofol sedation: respiration, postoperative mood, perception, cognition, and pain. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1465–9.
188. Kohrs R, Durieux ME. Ketamine: teaching an old drug new tricks. Anesth Analg 1998;87:1186–93.
189. Blakeley KR, Klein KW, White PF, et al. A total IV anesthetic technique for outpatient facial laser resurfacing. Anesth Analg 1998;87:827–9.
190. Guillou N, Tanguy M, Seguin P, et al. The effects of small-dose ketamine on morphine consumption in surgical intensive care unit patients after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:843–7.
191. Reeves M, Lindholm DE, Myles PS, et al. Adding ketamine to morphine for patient-controlled analgesia after major abdominal surgery: a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2001;93:116–20.
192. Sveticic G, Gentilini A, Eichenberger U, et al. Combinations of morphine with ketamine for patient-controlled analgesia: a new optimization method. Anesthesiology 2003;98:1195–205.
193. Suzuki M, Tsueda K, Lansing PS, et al. Small-dose ketamine enhances morphine-induced analgesia after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 1999;89:98–103.
194. Menigaux C, Fletcher D, Dupont X, et al. The benefits of intraoperative small-dose ketamine on postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament repair. Anesth Analg 2000;90:129–35.
195. Menigaux C, Guignard B, Fletcher D, et al. Intraoperative small-dose ketamine enhances analgesia after outpatient knee arthroscopy. Anesth Analg 2001;93:606–12.
196. Guignard B, Coste C, Costes H, et al. Supplementing desflurane-remifentanil anesthesia with small-dose ketamine reduces perioperative opioid analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 2002;95:103–8.
197. Guillou N, Tanguy M, Seguin P, et al. The effects of small-dose ketamine on morphine consumption in surgical intensive care unit patients after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:843–7.
198. Elhakim M, Khalafallah Z, El-Fattah HA, et al. Ketamine reduces swallowing-evoked pain after paediatric tonsillectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:604–9.
199. Taura P, Fuster J, Blasi A, et al. Postoperative pain relief after hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients: the efficacy of a single small dose of ketamine plus morphine epidurally. Anesth Analg 2003;96:475–80.
200. Fu ES, Miguel R, Scharf JE. Preemptive ketamine decreases postoperative narcotic requirements in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg 1997;84:1086–90.
201. Adam F, Libier M, Oszustowicz T, et al. Preoperative small-dose ketamine has no preemptive analgesic effect in patients undergoing total mastectomy. Anesth Analg 1999;89:444–7.
202. Dahl V, Ernoe PE, Steen T, et al. Does ketamine have preemptive effects in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy procedures? Anesth Analg 2000;90:1419–22.
203. Weinbroum AA. A single small dose of postoperative ketamine provides rapid and sustained improvement in morphine analgesia in the presence of morphine-resistant pain. Anesth Analg 2003;96:789–95.
204. Laulin JP, Maurette P, Corcuff JB, et al. The role of ketamine in preventing fentanyl-induced hyperalgesia and subsequent acute morphine tolerance. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1263–9.
205. Jaksch W, Lang S, Reichhalter R, et al. Perioperative small-dose S(+)-ketamine has no incremental beneficial effects on postoperative pain when standard-practice opioid infusions are used. Anesth Analg 2002;94:981–6.
206. Himmelseher S, Ziegler-Pithamitsis D, Argiriadou H, et al. Small-dose S(+)-ketamine reduces postoperative pain when applied with ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1290–5.
207. Lauretti GR, Oliveira AP, Rodrigues AM, Paccola CA. The effect of transdermal nitroglycerin on spinal S(+)-ketamine antinociception following orthopedic surgery. J Clin Anesth 2001;13:576–81.
208. White PF, Ham J, Way WL, Trevor AJ. Pharmacology of ketamine isomers in surgical patients. Anesthesiology 1980;52:231–9.
209. Mathisen LC, Aasbo V, Raeder J. Lack of preemptive analgesic effect of (R)-ketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43:220–4.
210. Ilkjaer S, Bach LF, Nielsen PA, et al. Effect of preoperative oral dextromethorphan on immediate and late postoperative pain and hyperalgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy. Pain 2000;86:19–24.
211. Weinbroum AA, Gorodezky A, Niv D, et al. Dextromethorphan attenuation of postoperative pain and primary and secondary thermal hyperalgesia. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:167–74.
212. Wu CT, Yu JC, Yeh CC, et al. Preincisional dextromethorphan treatment decreases postoperative pain and opioid requirement after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1999;88:1331–4.
213. Helmy SA, Bali A. The effect of the preemptive use of the NMDA receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesth Analg 2001;92:739–44.
214. Wu CT, Yu JC, Yeh CC, et al. Postoperative intramuscular dextromethorphan injection provides pain relief and decreases opioid requirement after modified radical mastectomy. Int J Surg Invest 2000;2:145–9.
215. Wadhwa A, Clarke D, Goodchild CS, Young D. Large-dose oral dextromethorphan as an adjunct to patient-controlled analgesia with morphine after knee surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:448–54.
216. Ilkjaer S, Nielsen PA, Bach LF, et al. The effect of dextromethorphan, alone or in combination with ibuprofen, on postoperative pain after minor gynaecological surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:873–7.
217. Yeh CC, Hot ST, Kong SS, et al. Absence of preemptive analgesic effect of dextromethorphan in total knee replacement under epidural anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin 2000;38:187–93.
218. Gottschalk A, Schroeder F, Ufer M, et al. Amantadine, a N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, does not enhance postoperative analgesia in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Anesth Analg 2001;93:192–6.
219. Snijdelaar DG, Koren G, Katz J. Effects of perioperative oral amantadine on postoperative pain and morphine consumption in patients after radical prostatectomy. Anesthesiology 2004;100:134–41.
220. Segal IS, Jarvis DJ, Duncan SR, et al. Clinical efficacy of oral-transdermal clonidine combinations during the perioperative period. Anesthesiology 1991;74:220–5.
221. Singh H, Liu J, Gaines GY, White PF. Effect of oral clonidine and intrathecal fentanyl on tetracaine spinal block. Anesth Analg 1994;79:1113–6.
222. Milligan KR, Convery PN, Weir P, et al. The efficacy and safety of epidural infusions of levobupivacaine with and without clonidine for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Anesth Analg 2000;91:393–7.
223. Singelyn FJ, Gouverneur JM, Robert A. A minimum dose of clonidine added to mepivacaine prolongs the duration of anesthesia and analgesia after axillary brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg 1996;83:1046–50.
224. Klamt JG, Garcia LV, Stocche RM, Meinberg AC. Epidural infusion of clonidine or clonidine plus ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in children undergoing major abdominal surgery. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:510–14.
225. Santiveri X, Arxer A, Plaja I, et al. Anaesthetic and postoperative analgesic effects of spinal clonidine as an additive to prilocaine in the transurethral resection of urinary bladder tumours. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:589–93.
226. Jeffs SA, Hall JE, Morris S. Comparison of morphine alone with morphine plus clonidine for postoperative patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth 2002;89:424–7.
227. Striebel WH, Koenigs DI, Kramer JA. Intravenous clonidine fails to reduce postoperative meperidine requirements. J Clin Anesth 1993;5:221–5.
228. Aho MS, Erkola OA, Scheinin H, et al. Effect of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine on pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation. Anesth Analg 1991;73:112–8.
229. Jaakola ML. Dexmedetomidine premedication before intravenous regional anesthesia in minor outpatient hand surgery. J Clin Anesth 1994;6:204–11.
230. Arain SR, Ebert TJ. The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation. Anesth Analg 2002;95:461–6.
231. Arain SR, Ruehlow RM, Uhrich TD, Ebert TJ. The efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery. Anesth Analg 2004;98:153–8.
232. Zárate E, Sá Rêgo MM, White PF, et al. Comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions as adjuvants to desflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1999;90:956–63.
233. Fukunaga AF, Alexander GE, Stark CW. Characterization of the analgesic actions of adenosine: comparison of adenosine and remifentanil infusions in patients undergoing major surgical procedures. Pain 2003;101:129–38.
234. Yamamoto S, Yamaguchi H, Sakaguchi M, et al. Preoperative droperidol improved postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing rotator-cuff repair during general anesthesia using intravenous morphine. J Clin Anesth 2003;15:525–9.
235. Kara H, Sahin N, Ulusan V, Aydogdu T. Magnesium infusion reduces perioperative pain. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2002;19:52–6.
236. Lauretti GR, de Olivera R, Reis MP, et al. Study of three different doses of epidural neostigmine co-administered with lidocaine for postoperative analgesia. Anesthesiology 1999;90:1534–6.
237. Dirks J, Fredensborg BB, Christensen D, et al. A randomized study of the effects of single-dose gabapentin versus placebo on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after mastectomy. Anesthesiology 2002;97:560–4.
238. Fassoulaki A, Patris K, Sarantopoulos C, Hogan Q. The analgesic effect of gabapentin and mexiletine after breast surgery for cancer. Anesth Analg 2002;95:985–91.
239. Dierking G, Duedahl TH, Rasmussen ML, et al. Effects of gabapentin on postoperative morphine consumption and pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:322–6.
240. Turan A, Karamanlioglu B, Memis D, et al. Analgesic effects of gabapentin after spinal surgery. Anesthesiology 2004;100:935–8.
241. Rorarius MG, Mennander S, Suominen P, et al. Gabapentin for the prevention of postoperative pain after vaginal hysterectomy. Pain 2004;110:175–81.
242. Dahl JB, Mathiesen O, Moiniche S. “Protective premedication”: an option with gabapentin and related drugs? A review of gabapentin and pregabalin in the treatment of post-operative pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:1130–6.
243. Levaux C, Bonhomme V, Dewandre PY, et al. Effect of intra-operative magnesium sulphate on pain relief and patient comfort after major lumbar orthopaedic surgery. Anaesthesia 2003;58:131–5.
244. Bhatia A, Kashyap L, Pawar DK, Trikha A. Effect of intraoperative magnesium infusion on perioperative analgesia in open cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 2004;16:262–5.
245. Feld JM, Laurito CE, Beckerman M, et al. Non-opioid analgesia improves pain relief and decreases sedation after gastric bypass surgery. Can J Anaesth 2003;50:336–41.
246. Ko S-H, Lim H-R, Kim D-C, et al. Magnesium sulfate does not reduce postoperative analgesic requirements. Anesthesiology 2001;95:640–6.
247. Buvanendran A, McCarthy RJ, Kroin JS, et al. Intrathecal magnesium prolongs fentanyl analgesia: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2002;95:661–6.
248. Tan P-H, Kuo J-H, Liu K, et al. Efficacy of intrathecal neostigmine for the relief of postinguinal herniorrhaphy pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:1056–60.
249. Lauretti GR, de Loivera R, Perez MV, Paccola CA. Postoperative analgesia by intraarticular and epidural neostigmine following knee surgery. J Clin Anesth 2000;12:444–8.
250. Nakayama M, Ichinose H, Nakabayashi K, et al. Analgesic effect of epidural neostigmine after abdominal hysterectomy. J Clin Anesth 2001;13:86–9.
251. Turan A, Memis D, Basaran UN, et al. Caudal ropivacaine and neostigmine in pediatric surgery. Anesthesiology 2003;98:719–22.
252. Abdulatif M, El-Sanabary M. Caudal neostigmine, bupivacaine, and their combination for postoperative pain management after hypospadias surgery in children. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1215–8.
253. Almeida RA, Lauretti GR, Mattos AL. Antinociceptive effect of low-dose intrathecal neostigmine combined with intrathecal morphine following gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 2003;98:495–8.
254. Omais M, Lauretti GR, Paccola CA. Epidural morphine and neostigmine for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic surgery. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1698–701.
255. Tan PH, Chia YY, Lo Y, et al. Intrathecal bupivacaine with morphine or neostigmine for postoperative analgesia alter total knee replacement surgery. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:551–6.
256. Lauretti GR, Oliveira AP, Juliano MC, et al. Transdermal nitroglycerine enhances spinal neostigmine postoperative analgesia following gynecological surgery. Anesthesiology 2000;93:943–6.
257. Kaya FN, Sahin S, Owen MD, Eisenach JC. Epidural neostigmine produces analgesia but also sedation in women after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 2004;100:381–5.
258. Campbell FA, Tramer MR, Carroll D, et al. Are cannabinoids an effective and safe treatment option in the management of pain? A qualitative systematic review. BJM 2001;323:13–6.
259. Buggy DJ, Toogood L, Maric S, et al. Lack of analgesic efficacy of oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in postoperative pain. Pain 2003;106:169–72.
260. Tarnow P, Cassuto J, Jonsson A, et al. Postoperative analgesia by D-myo-inositol-1,2,6-trisphosphate in patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1998;86:107–10.
261. White PF, Li S, Chiu JW. Electroanalgesia: its role in acute and chronic pain management. Anesth Analg 2001;92:505–13.
262. White PF. Electroanalgesia: Does it have a place in the routine management of acute and chronic pain? Anesth Analg 2004;98:1197–8.
263. Wang B, Tang J, White PF, Naruse R, et al. Effect of the intensity of transcutaneous acupoint electrical stimulation on the postoperative analgesic requirement. Anesth Analg 1997;85:406–13.
264. Hamza MA, White PF, Ahmed HE, Ghoname EA. Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the postoperative opioid analgesic requirement and recovery profile. Anesthesiology 1999;91:1232–8.
265. Jensen JE, Conn RR, Hazelrigg G, Hewett JE. The use of transcutaneous neural stimulation and isokinetic testing in arthroscopic knee surgery. Am J Sports Med 1985;13:27–33.
266. Rakel B, Frantz R. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative pain with movement. J Pain 2003;4:455–64.
267. Carroll D, Tramer M, McQuay H, et al. Randomization is important in studies with pain outcomes: systematic review of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in acute postoperative pain. Br J Anaesth 1996;77:798–803.
268. Chen L, Tang J, White PF, et al. The effect of the location of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on postoperative opioid analgesic requirement: acupoint versus non-acupoint stimulation. Anesth Analg 1998;87:1129–34.
269. Lin JG, Lo MW, Wen YR, et al. The effect of high and low frequency electroacupuncture in pain after lower abdominal surgery. Pain 2002;99:509–14.
270. Kotani N, Hashimoto H, Sato Y, et al. Preoperative intradermal acupuncture reduces postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting, analgesic requirement, and sympathoadrenal responses. Anesthesiology 2001;95:359–56.
271. Sakurai M, Suleman MI, Morioka N, et al. Minute sphere acupressure does not reduce postoperative pain with morphine consumption. Anesth Analg 2003;96:493–7.
272. Tovar EA, Roethe RA, Weissig MD, et al. One-day admission for lung lobectomy: an incidental result of a clinical pathway. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:803–6.
273. Hashish I, Hai HK, Harvey W, et al. Reduction of postoperative pain and swelling by ultrasound treatment: a placebo effect. Pain 1988;33:303–11.
274. Gam AN, Thorsen H, Lonnberg F. The effect of low-level laser therapy on musculoskeletal pain: a meta-analysis. Pain 1993;52:63–6.
275. Pavlin DJ, Chen C, Penaloza DA, et al. Pain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:1627–32.
276. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg 1999;89:652–8.
277. Coloma M, Duffy LL, White PF, et al. Dexamethasone facilitates discharge after outpatient anorectal surgery. Anesth Analg 2001;92:85–8.
278. Aasboe V, Raeder JC, Groegaard B. Betamethasone reduces postoperative pain and nausea after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 1998;87:319–23.
279. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW. Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 2002;183:630–41.
280. White PF. Changing role of COX-2 inhibitors in the perioperative period: is parecoxib really the answer? Anesth Analg 2005;100:1306–8.
© 2005 International Anesthesia Research Society