Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

POST-OPERATIVE NARCOTIC REQUIREMENT FOLLOWING LUMBAR MICRODISCECTOMY IS RELATED TO PREOPERATIVE PAIN, NOT TO INTRA-OPERATIVE KETOROLAC OR BUPIVACAINE

Mack, P Fogarty MD; Abalos, A RN; Haas, D BS; Lavyne, M MD; Snow, R MD, PhD; Lien, CA MD

doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802001-00006
Abstracts of Posters Presented at the International Anesthesia Research Society; 72nd Clinical and Scientific Congress; Orlando, FL; March 7-11, 1998: Ambulatory Anesthesia
Free

Department of Anesthesiology (Mack, Abalos, Haas, Lien) and Division of Neurosurgery (Lavyne, Snow), Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY 10021.

Abstract S6

Introduction: Lumbar disc surgery is increasingly being performed on an outpatient basis, and poorly controlled post-operative pain is a reason for unplanned hospital admission. Various modalities to decrease post-operative narcotic requirements have been described, including epidural steroids, [1] epidural morphine [2] and oral non-steroidal agents [3].

Purpose: This randomized double-blind study compared the effect of preoperative pain and narcotic use, as well as intra-operative administration of intravenous ketorolac, intra-muscular injection of bupivacaine, or placebo on post-operative morphine (MSO (4)) requirements as measured by patient controlled analgesia in the first 24 hours after surgery.

Materials and Methods: After IRB approval and informed consent, 30 patients (ASA I-II) undergoing inpatient single-level lumbar microdiscectomy with a standardized general anesthetic were randomly assigned to receive either ketorolac (30 mg intravenously), bupivacaine 0.25% (15 cc injected into the paraspinous muscles via the surgical wound), or saline placebo, immediately prior to wound closure. Post-operatively all patients received demand-only intravenous MSO4 patient controlled analgesia (PCA), with a demand dose of 1.0 mg as frequently as every 6 minutes. MSO4 demand (mg requested) and usage (mg delivered) were compared between the three groups at 30 min, 1, 4, 8, 16, 20 and 24 hours post-operatively by one way ANOVA. Pre-operative narcotic use was noted. Pre- and post-operative pain was assessed using the scale standard for PCA in this institution (0 - 5 scale with 0 = no pain and 5 = most severe pain), and pre-operative pain was correlated to post-operative MSO4 use and demand by simple regression and Pearson correlation. Significance was assumed at P < 0.05.

Results: There were no group differences in age, sex, weight, disc level, pre-operative pain, nor were there differences postoperatively in time to voiding, ambulation or incidence of nausea and vomiting. With the greater access to post-operative narcotic provided by PCA, the total dose of MSO4 demanded in 24 hours in all groups (placebo=22.8 +/- 20.3 mg, bupivacaine=28.3 +/- 27.7 mg, and ketorolac=20.1 +/- 15.5 mg) was greater in this study than previously reported (12 +/- 1.9 mg); however, there was no relationship between group assignment and either post-operative use of or demand for MSO4 via PCA although sample size is small. There was, however, a significant correlation between pre-operative pain and post-operative narcotic demand (r=0.46, P < 0.01) and usage (r=0.37, P < 0.05). There was no correlation between pre-operative narcotic use and either pre-operative pain scores or post-operative MSO4 use or demand.

Conclusions: No difference in post-operative narcotic requirement was seen in patients undergoing single level lumbar microdiscectomy receiving either intravenous ketorolac or intramuscular bupivacaine as compared to placebo; however, a much larger study would be necessary to demonstrate a difference. Post-operative narcotic requirements are increased, however, in those patients who are in severe pain pre-operatively, regardless of pre-operative narcotic use. This suggests that those patients in severe pain pre-operatively are less likely to be successful outpatient surgical candidates.

The authors would like to thank Abbott, Inc. for the loan of two PCA pumps used in this study.

Back to Top | Article Outline

REFERENCES

1. J Neurosurg 77;90-95, 1992.
2. Neurosurgery 36:1135-1136, 1995.
3. Spine 19:526-530, 1994.
© 1998 International Anesthesia Research Society