Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Influence of Remifentanil on the Control Performance of the Bispectral Index Controlled Bayesian-Based Closed-Loop System for Propofol Administration

Neckebroek, Martine, MD*; Boldingh, Jan-Willem H. L., MD; De Smet, Tom, PhD; Struys, Michel M. R. F., MD, PhD, FRCA†,§

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004208
Technology, Computing and Simulation: PDF Only
Buy
PAP

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the clinical performance of a model-based, patient-individualized closed-loop (CL) control system for propofol administration using the bispectral index (BIS) as a controlled variable during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil and studied the influence of the targeted effect-site concentration of remifentanil (CeREMI) on its clinical performance.

METHODS: In 163 patients, propofol was administered using a CL system (BIS target [BISTARGET] between 40 and 50). Initial CeREMI targets between 2 and 7.5 ng/mL were selected as deemed clinically required. Performance parameters during induction were the time required to initially cross the target BIS, the time required to reach the maximal drug effect after induction (TPEAK, BIS) and the corresponding BIS at this moment, and the time required to regain the target BIS at the end of induction. Performance during maintenance was defined as the percentage of case time with target BIS ± 10 from target and the amount of performance error (PE) between the observed and target BIS values and its derived median PE (MDPE) as a measure of control bias, median absolute PE (MDAPE) as a measure of control inaccuracy, divergence as a measure of the time-related trend of the measured BIS values relative to the target BIS values, and wobble as a measure of intrasubject variability in prediction error. The secondary end point was the hemodynamic stability of the patient during CL control.

RESULTS: The applied CL system induced and maintained anesthesia within clinically accepted ranges. The percentage of case time [mean (standard deviation [SD]) across all study participants] with BIS ± 10 from the target was 82% (14%). The mean (SD) population MDPE and MDAPE were −6.6% (5.5%) and 11.2% (5.5%), respectively. A negative divergence [−0.001 (0.004)] and acceptable wobble [9.7% (4.0%)] were found. The correlation between the system PE and CeREMI was low and only influenced by a CeREMI <2.8 ng/mL. Hemodynamic stability stayed within the clinically acceptable range.

CONCLUSIONS: The applied CL system for propofol administration has an acceptable performance in the CeREMI range of 2.8–7.5 ng/mL during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. There was no evidence of a strong association between CeREM and the CL performance. This study also shows that when the CeREMI is <2.8 ng/mL, it might be more challenging to prevent arousal during propofol anesthesia.

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium

Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

Demed Medical, Temse, Belgium

§Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

Accepted for publication March 28, 2019.

Funding: Departmental and/or institutional.

Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.

Clinical trial number: NCT00764855.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Address correspondence to Michel M. R. F. Struys, MD, PhD, FRCA, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands. Address e-mail to m.m.r.f.struys@umcg.nl.

© 2019 International Anesthesia Research Society
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website