The Effect of Night Float Rotation on Resident Sleep, Activity, and Well-Being

Abstract

Background: 

Night float call systems are becoming increasingly common at training programs with the goal of reducing fatigue related to sleep deprivation and sleep disturbance. Previous studies have shown that trainees obtain less sleep during the night float rotation and have decreased sleep efficiency for several days after the rotation. The impact on physical and emotional well-being has not been documented.

Methods: 

Twenty-seven anesthesia residents were enrolled in a study using wearable sleep and activity trackers and National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (NIH PROMIS) surveys for sleep disturbance, fatigue, and positive affect to record data the week before (“baseline”), during (“night float”), and 1 week after (“recovery”) their night float rotation. Each subject’s data during the night float week and recovery week were compared to his or her own baseline week data using a paired, nonparametric analysis. The primary outcome variable was the change in average daily sleep hours during the night float week compared to the baseline week. Average daily rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, daily steps, and NIH PROMIS scores comparing night float and recovery weeks to baseline week were prespecified secondary outcomes. NIH PROMIS scores range from 0 to 100 with 50 as the national mean and more of the construct having a higher score.

Results: 

There was no difference in average daily sleep hours between the night float and the baseline weeks (6.7 [5.9–7.8] vs 6.7 [5.5–7.7] hours, median [interquartile range]; P = .20). Residents had less REM sleep during the night float compared to the baseline weeks (1.1 [0.7–1.5] vs 1.4 [1.1–1.9] hours, P = .002). NIH PROMIS fatigue scores were higher during the night float than the baseline week (58.8 [54.6–65.1] vs 48.6 [46.0–55.1], P = .0004) and did not return to baseline during the recovery week (51.0 [48.6–58.8], P = .029 compared to baseline). Sleep disturbance was not different among the weeks. Positive affect was reduced after night float compared to baseline (39.6 [35.0–43.5] vs 44.8 [40.1–49.6], P = .0009), but returned to baseline during the recovery week (43.6 [39.6–48.2], P = .38).

Conclusions: 

The residents slept the same number of total hours during their night float week but had less REM sleep, were more fatigued, and had less positive affect. All of these resolved to baseline except fatigue, that was still greater than the baseline week. This methodology appears to robustly capture psychophysiological data that might be useful for quality initiatives.