Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Share this article on:

Low Cardiac Output Syndrome After Adult Cardiac Surgery: Predictive Value of Peak Systolic Global Longitudinal Strain

Amabili, Philippe MD*; Benbouchta, Sabeha MD*; Roediger, Laurence MD, PhD*; Senard, Marc MD, PhD*; Hubert, Marie Bernard MD, PhD*; Donneau, Anne-Françoise MSci, PhD; Brichant, Jean-François MD, PhD*; Hans, Gregory A. MD, PhD*

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002605
Research Report: PDF Only

BACKGROUND: Peak systolic global longitudinal strain (GLS) is increasingly used to quantify left ventricular systolic function. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether GLS obtained during intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram, performed before cardiopulmonary bypass, improves the prediction of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) after adult cardiac surgery.

METHODS: GLS from 275 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery was calculated retrospectively using two-dimensional– speckle tracking echocardiography (aCMQ module from Qlab software version 10.5, Philips Medical, Brussels, Belgium). LCOS was defined as the need for inotropic or mechanical circulatory support for >24 hours postoperatively. Patient and procedure characteristics associated with LCOS at the univariable level (P ≤ .05) were entered into a forward stepwise logistic regression to create a first predictive model. A second model was created by adding GLS. The 2 models were compared using the likelihood-ratio test, the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the integrated discrimination index. The optimal cutoff value of GLS associated with LCOS was determined by maximizing the Youden index of the ROC curve. Secondary outcomes included time until complete weaning from inotropes, discharge from the intensive care unit and from the hospital, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS: GLS was significantly associated with LCOS (P < .001) at the univariable level. Predictors of LCOS retained in the first model were cardiopulmonary bypass duration, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, mitral valve surgery, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV. Adding the GLS value improved the prediction of LCOS (P = .02). However, the area under the ROC curve did not differ between the 2 models (0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.99 vs 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79–0.90; P = .15). The integrated discrimination index associated with addition of GLS was 0.02 (P = .046), meaning that the difference in predicted risk between patients with and without LCOS increased by 2% after adding GLS. A GLS cutoff value of −17% (95% CI, −18.8% to −15.3%) was found to best identify LCOS. After adjusting for covariates included in model 1, a lower GLS value was significantly associated with a lower cumulative probability of weaning from inotropes postoperatively (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82–0.97; P = .01). No association was found between GLS and other secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS: GLS is an independent predictor of LCOS after on-pump cardiac surgery. Its incremental value over other established risk factors for postoperative LCOS is, however, limited.

From the *Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU of Liege, Liege, Belgium; and Department of Public Health, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Accepted for publication September 25, 2017.

Funding: Departmental

Conflicts of Interest: See Disclosures at the end of the article.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (

Presented at the annual meeting of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology, April 19–21, 2017, Berlin. NCT02771080.

Reprints will not be available from the authors.

Address correspondence to Gregory A. Hans, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, CHU de Liege, Domaine Universitaire du Sart Tilman, Ave de l’hôpital Bat, B35, 4000 Liege, Belgium. Address e-mail to

© 2018 International Anesthesia Research Society
You currently do not have access to this article

To access this article:

Note: If your society membership provides full-access, you may need to login on your society website