In the article “Differential Diagnosis of Renal Tumors with Papillary Architecture” in the March 2011 issue of Advances in Anatomic Pathology, on pages 127-128, Figure 6 was twice incorrectly cited as Figure 7 in text. On page 127, in paragraph 2, the sentence should have been listed as follows: “On account of their frequently dominant papillary architecture, these were often regarded as type-2 PRCC in the past (Fig. 6A).” On page 128, in paragraph 2, the sentence should have been listed as follows: “The most diagnostic and consistent feature of tumors is the presence of large nuclei with very prominent orangeophilic or eosinophilic nucleoli, surrounded by a clear halo, somewhat resembling cytomegalovirus inclusions (Fig. 6B).”
Tickoo SK, Reuter VE. Differential diagnosis of renal tumors with papillary architecture. Adv Anat Pathol.. 2011;18:120–132.