Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Elevation of Postmortem Cerebrospinal Fluid Sodium and Chloride Levels Is a Potential Adjunct Test in the Diagnosis of Salt Water Drowning

Garland, Jack BMed*; McCarthy, Sinead MBChB; Hensby-Bennett, Sarah MBChB; Philcox, Winston BHSc§; O'Regan, Toni MBChB; Rousseau, Guillaume MD; Palmiere, Cristian MD; Elstub, Hannah FRCPA*; Cala, Allan FRCPA*; Clifton, Leah FRCPA*; Lam, Leo MBChB#; Barker, Claire MSc; Ondruschka, Benjamin MD**; Woydt, Lina MD**; Spark, Amy FRCPA; Kesha, Kilak MD; Morrow, Paul MD; Glenn, Charley MD; Stables, Simon FRCPA; Tse, Rexson FRCPA†§

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology: May 14, 2019 - Volume Publish Ahead of Print - Issue - p
doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000488
Original Article: PDF Only
Buy
SDC
PAP

Postmortem vitreous humor biochemistry is a useful test in the diagnosis of salt water drowning (SWD). A significant limitation of vitreous humor is the potential effect of prolonged immersion. A recent animal study and case report suggested that cerebrospinal fluid biochemistry may be an alternative to vitreous because it is more resistant to the effects of immersion, given its protected anatomical location. This study compared postmortem cerebrospinal fluid sodium and chloride (PMCSC) levels collected via ventricular aspiration (PMCSC_V) and via lumbar puncture (PMCSC_L) in 13 SWD and 31 nonimmersion deaths. It showed a significant elevation in PMCSC levels in SWD deaths for both PMCSC_V and PMCSC_L (P < 0.05). The areas under the curve on the receiver operating characteristic curves for PMCSC_V and PMCSC_L were 0.73 and 0.83, respectively. The optimal cutoff for PMCSC_V was 216 mmol/L (sensitivity, 0.60; specificity, 0.72; likelihood ratio, 1.80; positive predictive value, 0.45) and for PMCSC_L was 241 mmol/L (sensitivity, 0.78; specificity, 0.73; likelihood ratio, 2.89; positive predictive value, 0.46). This study supports PMCSC levels as another biochemical test that can potentially aid in the diagnosis of SWD, particularly in cases where vitreous humor samples are unavailable or uninterpretable.

From the *Forensic and Analytical Science Service, NSW Health Pathology, New South Wales, Australia;

Department of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland;

Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton;

§Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;

Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France;

CURML, University Center of Legal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland;

#Department of Biochemistry, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; and

**Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Manuscript received February 5, 2019; accepted March 17, 2019.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Rexson Tse, FRCPA, Department of Forensic Pathology, LabPLUS, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland 1148, New Zealand. E-mail: rexson.tse@gmail.com; rexsont@adhb.govt.nz.

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s Web site (www.amjforensicmedicine.com).

© 2019 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.