Secondary Logo

Institutional members access full text with Ovid®

Applied Force During Prone Restraint

Is Officer Weight a Factor?

Kroll, Mark W., PhD, FAIMBE*†; Brave, Michael A., MS, JD; Kleist, Scott R.§; Ritter, Mollie B., MS, PA; Ross, Darrell L., PhD; Karch, Steven B., MD

The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology: March 2019 - Volume 40 - Issue 1 - p 1–7
doi: 10.1097/PAF.0000000000000457
Original Articles
Buy

Introduction It has been suggested that law enforcement officer (LEO) weight on the backs of prone subjects may cause asphyxia.

Methods Law enforcement officers used their agency-trained “local” single- and double-knee techniques, the “Wisconsin” 3-Point Ground Stabilization, and the Human Factor Research Group Inc single-knee tactical handcuffing techniques, and the weight force was measured.

Results Forty-one LEOs (36 men, 5 women) participated, aged 38.4 ± 8.3 years, and weighing 96.2 ± 19.4 kg. The double-knee technique transmitted more weight than single knee (P < 0.0001). Wisconsin technique force was lower than other single-knee techniques (P < 0.0001). Double-knee weight was 23.3 kg plus 24% of LEO's body weight. Mean values for local and Human Factor Research Group Inc single-knee were 30.9 and 32.9 kg, respectively. The Wisconsin single knee weight force was given by 15.4 kg plus 9.5 kg for a male.

Conclusions A double-knee technique applies more weight force than single-knee techniques. The Wisconsin single-knee technique provides the least weight force of single-knee techniques. Law enforcement officer body weight is irrelevant to prone-force weight with single-knee techniques. With double-knee restraint, it has a modest influence. Our data do not support the hypothesis of restraint asphyxia.

From the *University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA;

LAAW International, LLC, Scottsdale, AZ;

§Police Department, Plymouth, MN; and

Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA.

Manuscript received October 15, 2018; accepted November 10, 2018.

M.B.R. is an independent consultant. S.B.K. is a consultant cardiac pathologist.

There was no funding for this study, and all time was donated. M.W.K., M.A.B., D.L.R., and S.B.K. have been expert witnesses in use-of-force litigation or coroner's inquests.

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Reprints: Mark W. Kroll, PhD, FAIMBE, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Box 23, Crystal Bay, MN 55323. E-mail: mark@kroll.name.

© 2019 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.