Journal Logo

Letters to the Editor

Lymph Node Metastasis With Both Components of Combined Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma/Merkel Cell (Neuroendocrine) Carcinoma

Navarrete, Jorge MD*; Gugelmeier, Natalia MD*; Mazzei, María Eugenia MD*; González, Sergio MD; Barcia, Juan J. MD; Magliano, Julio MD*

Author Information
The American Journal of Dermatopathology: August 2018 - Volume 40 - Issue 8 - p 626-628
doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000927
  • Free

To the Editor:

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an infrequent primary neuroendocrine cutaneous tumor with aggressive behavior. The risk of MCC is increased 66–182-fold in organ transplant recipients and tends to appear at a younger age.1 MCC can be found in combination with other tumor types, mainly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC),2–8 and in single reports with basal cell carcinoma (BCC),9 glandular epithelial carcinomas and of sarcomatous differentiation.3,10 A biphenotypic metastasis of SSC/MCC suggests that this combination in primary tumors is higher than chance. Our work provides new evidence that supports the hypothesis that combined tumors constitute a genetically and immunohistochemically different type of tumor from MCC.4 To our knowledge, this is the first report of lymph node metastasis with both components of combined cutaneous SCC/MCC.

CASE REPORT

A 49-year-old male patient presented to our dermatology service with a history of 2 renal transplants for Alport disease in hemodialysis for the past 7 years. He was under treatment with everolimus, mofetil mycophenolate, and prednisone. He had had several surgical procedures for multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers since 2010.

On admission we observed an exophytic lesion on the lateral-external surface of his right forearm, 3 cm in diameter, round, exudative, with superficial erosion and a fibrino-hematic crust indurated on palpation (Fig. 1). The surrounding skin showed significant sun damage. Fitzpatrick phototype II. No adenopathies were palpable at the time. This asymptomatic lesion had appeared 6 months before consultation, with a progressive growth.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.:
Exophytic lesion on the right forearm, 3 cm in diameter, round, exudative, with a superficial erosion, and a fibrino-hematic crust.

Considering the history of renal transplant and pharmacological immunosuppression, clinical diagnosis of SCC was made confirmed with an incisional punch biopsy (Fig. 2). Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) was indicated, however, on debulking, SCC was seen as well as small monomorphic cells with vesicular nuclei (Fig. 3A). A SCC combined with MCC was suspected and confirmed with immunohistochemistry that showed positive reaction for CK20 (Fig. 3B), chromogranin, and synaptophysin in the MCC portion, as well as for CK5/6 and p63 in the SCC component.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.:
Hematoxylin and eosin stain of incisional punch biopsy (original magnification ×4). Well differentiated SCC.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.:
A, Hematoxylin and eosin stain of MMS debulking (original magnification ×10); well-differentiated SCC intermingled with small monomorphic basophilic cells consistent with MCC. B, Immunohistochemistry of MMS debulking (original magnification ×10); positive reaction for CK20.

A month after surgery, the patient developed an ipsilateral axillary adenopathy, which showed metastatic MCC with focal squamous differentiation (nonkeratinizing SCC) (Fig. 4A). Immunohistochemistry was positive for CK5/6 (Fig. 4B), and p63 in the squamous component, and positive for CK20 (Fig. 4C), synaptophysin and chromogranin in the MCC portion.

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.:
A, Hematoxylin and eosin stain of lymph node (original magnification ×20); metastatic MCC with nonkeratinizing SCC. Immunohistochemistry of metastatic tumor in lymph node (original magnification ×20, in similar tissue site); positive reaction for (B) CK5/6 in SCC portion and (C) CK20 in MCC portion.

Radiotherapy of the primary tumor zone and axillary zone was indicated. On follow-up, he presented bicytopenia, and bone marrow biopsy showed presence of nonhematologic cells. The patient died because of progression of his malignancy.

DISCUSSION

Classically, combined SCC/MCC has been considered as a variant of MCC. It is yet to be determined whether these 2 components derive from the same precursor cell. Combined SCC/MCC tumors are increasingly thought to represent a genetically and immunohistochemically distinct disease process from MCC.5 Although 66%–88% of the MCC are positive for Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) (with immunohistochemistry or polymerase chain reaction analysis), it is consistently negative in combined SCC/MCC.5,8,11

In our patient, without the clinically evident adenopathy on first examination, the doubt that remains is whether metastasis happened before or after MMS.

As we were able to see in our case, a common punch biopsy may only show the more superficial SCC component of a combined tumor, without evidence of MCC that is usually located deeper in dermis. This could mean a delay in diagnosis and adequate treatment. Clinically, these combined tumors are difficult to suspect; however, on dermoscopic examination, a higher frequency of polymorphous vessels and milky-red areas/globules have been described in tumors that clinically appear to be SCC or basal cell carcinoma.5 In these cases a deeper biopsy is recommended.

REFERENCES

1. Koljonen V, Sahi H, Böhling T, et al. Post-transplant Merkel cell carcinoma. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016;96:442–447.
2. McGowan MA, Helm MF, Tarbox MB. Squamous cell carcinoma in situ overlying Merkel cell carcinoma. J Cutan Med Surg. 2016;20:563–566.
3. Narisawa Y, Koba S, Inoue T, et al. Histogenesis of pure and combined Merkel cell carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study of 14 cases. J Dermatol. 2015;42:445.
4. Pulitzer MP, Brannon AR, Berger MF, et al. Cutaneous squamous and neuroendocrine carcinoma: genetically and immunohistochemically different from Merkel cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2015;28:1023–1032.
5. Suárez AL, Louis P, Kitts J, et al. Clinical and dermoscopic features of combined cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)/neuroendocrine [Merkel cell] carcinoma (MCC). J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:968–975.
6. Kaibuchi-Noda K, Yokota K, Matsumoto T, et al. Detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma before occurrence of Merkel cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65:152–154.
7. Sirikanjanapong S, Melamed J, Patel RR. Intraepidermal, and dermal Merkel cell carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma in situ: a case report with review of literature. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37:881–885.
8. Mitteldorf C, Mertz KD, Fernández-Figueras MT, et al. Detection of Merkel cell polyomavirus and human papillomaviruses in Merkel cell carcinoma combined with squamous cell carcinoma in immunocompetent European patients. Am J Dermatopathol. 2012;34:506–510.
9. Iwasaki T, Kodama H, Matsushita M, et al. Merkel cell polyomavirus infection in both components of a combined Merkel cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma with ductal differentiation; each component had a similar but different novel Merkel cell polyomavirus large T antigen truncating mutation. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:442–447.
10. Koba S, Misago N, Nagase K, et al. Triphasic differentiations of Merkel cell carcinoma in primary and metastatic lesions. J Cutan Pathol. 2014;41:469–474.
11. Iwasaki T, Matsushita M, Kuwamoto S, et al. Usefulness of significant morphologic characteristics in distinguishing between Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive and Merkel cell polyomavirus-negative Merkel cell carcinomas. Hum Pathol. 2013;44:1912–1917.
Copyright © 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.