Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

Original Articles

A Detailed Clinicopathologic Study of ALK-translocated Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

Chou, Angela FRCPA*†‡; Fraser, Sheila FRCS§; Toon, Christopher W. FRCPA*∥; Clarkson, Adele BSc; Sioson, Loretta BSc; Farzin, Mahtab MBBS; Cussigh, Carmen*; Aniss, Ahmad PhD§#; O’Neill, Christine PhD, FRACS§; Watson, Nicole*; Clifton-Bligh, Roderick J. PhD, FRACP#**; Learoyd, Diana L. PhD, FRACP#**; Robinson, Bruce G. MD, FRACP#**; Selinger, Christina I. PhD††; Delbridge, Leigh W. MD, FRACS§; Sidhu, Stanley B. PhD, FRACS§; O’Toole, Sandra A. PhD, FRCPA‡††‡‡; Sywak, Mark MMed Sci, FRACS§; Gill, Anthony J. MD, FRCPA*¶‡‡§§

Author Information
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology: May 2015 - Volume 39 - Issue 5 - p 652-659
doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000368
  • Open

Abstract

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) is the most common endocrine cancer, accounting for 70% to 80% of all new thyroid malignancies.1 Although PTC typically has an excellent prognosis after surgery with or without adjuvant radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, some subtypes such as the tall cell, columnar cell, or diffuse sclerosing variants may be more aggressive.2–5 Further, PTC can also undergo dedifferentiation into the aggressive poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (also known as “insular carcinoma”) or the extremely aggressive anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, which is almost universally fatal.3,6,7

Well-characterized and generally mutually exclusive pathogenic driver mutations, including mutations in BRAF, RAS, EIF1AX, PPM1D, and CHEK2, and translocations involving RET, BRAF, PPARγ, NTRK1, NTRK3, THADA, and FGFR2, have been reported in the great majority of PTCs.8–16 Recent studies have demonstrated that some PTCs carry an oncogenic fusion gene caused by translocation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene with various partners including EML4, STRN, TFG, and GTF2IRD1.12–16ALK translocations appear to be mutually exclusive with all other driver mutations and translocations12–16 and to date have only been identified in PTCs and poorly differentiated and anaplastic carcinomas (presumably arising from dedifferentiation of PTC) but not follicular carcinomas or medullary carcinomas.12 For example, Kelly et al12 reported pathogenic ALK translocations in 4 of 256 (1.6%) PTCs, 3 of 35 (4%) poorly differentiated carcinomas, and 1 of 24 (4%) of anaplastic carcinomas but in none of 36 follicular or 22 medullary carcinomas and suggested that ALK translocations may be more common in aggressive subtypes of PTC.

Crizotinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor rationally designed to target ALK, has proven clinically effective in the treatment of lung adenocarcinomas harboring ALK translocations (summarized in Febbo et al17). In animal models and in vitro studies,12 as well as in a single-case report in humans,18 crizotinib has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in thyroid carcinomas harboring ALK translocations. Therefore, the identification and targeting of ALK translocations in thyroid carcinoma, so called “drug repurposing,” represents a rational therapeutic approach particularly if ALK translocations are overrepresented in clinically aggressive thyroid carcinomas.

For these reasons there is a need to better define the true incidence and clinicopathologic features of ALK-translocated thyroid carcinomas and to devise an optimal screening strategy to identify this rare molecular event in a common tumor. We therefore sought to develop and implement a screening strategy for ALK translocations in thyroid carcinoma on the basis of immunohistochemistry (IHC) with follow-up fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies only in IHC-positive cases (a model that we and many others use in routine clinical practice in lung cancer19). We then used this approach to determine the true incidence and clinicopathologic significance of ALK translocations in both unselected PTCs and carcinomas with aggressive behavior including the diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC, PTCs with distant metastases, poorly differentiated (insular) carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We first sought to validate IHC as a screening tool for ALK translocation in both usual PTCs and aggressive thyroid carcinomas. We developed a test cohort comprising tumors from 259 patients. This cohort was enriched for cases with aggressive clinical or pathologic features so that it contained 164 consecutive and truly unselected PTCs (some of which may have been aggressive) and an additional group of 95 aggressive PTCs consisting of another 20 diffuse sclerosing variant PTCs, another 27 PTCs with distant metastases, 28 poorly differentiated (insular) carcinomas, and 20 anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. All cases underwent central pathologic review by an experienced endocrine pathologist (A.J.G.) to confirm the diagnosis. Poorly differentiated (insular) carcinoma was defined by strict application of the Turin criteria,7 whereas all other tumors including the diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma were defined according to the WHO 2004 classification.3 Six of 28 (21.4%) poorly differentiated (insular) carcinomas and 5 of 20 anaplastic carcinomas (25%) arose in close association with a component of papillary carcinoma in keeping with the origin from dedifferentiation of a lower-grade tumor. In all cases of poorly differentiated and anaplastic (insular) carcinomas, the PTC component when present was minor (<10% of the volume of the tumor).

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed to include two 1 mm cores of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue from all patients in this cohort. In patients with multiple tumors, the largest tumor was selected. In cases with poor or anaplastic differentiation arising in association with papillary carcinoma, the high-grade (poorly differentiated or anaplastic) components were cored. IHC was performed on TMA sections using the same methods we use to screen lung carcinomas for ALK translocation.19 Briefly, we used a mouse monoclonal antibody to ALK at high concentration (dilution 1:10, clone 5A4; Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, UK). All slides were processed with an automated staining system, the Leica Bond III autostainer (Leica Biosystems) used according to the manufacturer’s protocol and with the manufacturer’s retrieval solutions. Heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed for 30 minutes in the manufacturer’s alkaline retrieval solution ER2 (VBS part no: AR9640). Staining for ALK was interpreted as positive if there was genuine cytoplasmic staining irrespective of whether the staining was patchy or diffuse. All slides were scored by a single pathologist (A.J.G.) who was blinded to all other data (including the results of FISH studies).

All 259 tumors from this cohort also underwent FISH studies. FISH was performed on TMAs using the Vysis LSI ALK Dual-Color Break-Apart Rearrangement Probe (Abbott Molecular). This probe set includes 2 DNA probes, 1 labeled with Spectrum Orange (which is telomeric to the breakpoint of the ALK gene at 2p23) and 1 with Spectrum Green (which is centromeric to the breakpoint on the ALK gene). Therefore, this probe should identify the presence of any ALK rearrangement at the common breakpoint but not the accompanying fusion partner.19 The FISH studies were interpreted according to the established protocols as applied in lung carcinoma and in parallel with hematoxylin and eosin–stained sections to confirm that only neoplastic cells were assessed. Briefly, FISH signals from 50 malignant cells were assessed, and a case was scored as positive when >15% of the tumor nuclei showed ≥2 signal diameters between the red and green signal (red 3′, green 5′) or if there was an isolated red signal. FISH testing was performed and interpreted by a surgical pathologist with extensive clinical experience in FISH interpretation using this probe (A.C.) who was blinded to all other data (including the results of IHC on the same cohort).

If either IHC or FISH studies could not be interpreted in TMA sections due to insufficient material or ambiguous signals, then the studies were repeated on whole sections. All cases that were positive by IHC or FISH on TMA sections also underwent repeat testing with both IHC and FISH on whole sections.

Cases that were confirmed to be rearranged by FISH studies using the break-apart probe, then underwent second FISH studies on whole sections using the Zytolight SPEC ALK/EML4 TriCheck Probe (ZytoVision, Germany). In addition to the telomeric Spectrum Orange and centromeric Spectrum Green probes, which identify the break-apart in ALK at 2p23, this kit also includes a blue fluorochrome, which hybridizes with the EML4 gene as well as the surrounding region of 2p21. Therefore, in addition to confirming the presence of a translocation involving ALK by the separation of orange and green signals, the presence of an additional “split” blue signal colocalizing with the other signals is presumptive evidence that the translocation partner for ALK is EML4, whereas the absence of an additional blue signal indicates an ALK rearrangement without rearrangement of EML4 and suggests an alternate translocation partner. The TriCheck FISH studies were performed and interpreted using the manufacturer’s guidelines by both a scientist (C.S.) and a pathologist (S.O.T.) with extensive clinical experience in FISH interpretation using this probe. At the time of interpretation of the TriCheck probe FISH these observers were not blinded to the IHC and break-apart FISH results.

After screening IHC was demonstrated to be highly sensitive for the presence of ALK gene rearrangements, an additional cohort of 334 unselected patients with PTC were identified from the clinical database of the University of Sydney Endocrine Surgery unit. Again the cases were reviewed by an experienced endocrine pathologist (A.J.G.) to confirm the diagnosis and classify according to WHO criteria,3 and TMAs were constructed containing duplicate 1 mm cores. These cases underwent IHC for ALK and, if positive, then underwent repeat IHC and FISH studies on whole sections with both the Abbot break-apart and Zytolight TriCheck probes.

BRAFV600E mutation–specific IHC was performed with clone VE1 (Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA) on all cases in TMA format (and repeated on whole sections in ALK translocation–positive cases) using previously described methods, which we have specifically demonstrated to be highly sensitive and specific for the presence of BRAFV600E in our hands.10 Again BRAFV600E IHC was interpreted by a single pathologist (A.J.G.) who was blinded to all other clinical and pathologic information (including ALK status) at the time of scoring the TMA. BRAFV600E IHC was repeated on whole sections on all ALK IHC-positive and FISH-positive cases.

ALK translocation status was correlated with thyroid cancer survival data collected prospectively within a comprehensive thyroid cancer database previously described.10,20,21 The rate of thyroid cancer structural recurrence was analyzed on the basis of ALK-rearranged status. Univariate analysis was performed using the Fisher exact test for discrete variables and the Student t test for continuous variables. Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using the Log-rank test. The α for significance was set at <0.05.

RESULTS

From the initial cohort of 259 patients who underwent both FISH and IHC, IHC was positive in 8 (3.2%) cases (Figs. 1, 2). FISH studies using the break-apart probe confirmed the presence of ALK gene rearrangements in 6 of these cases (Fig. 3). All 251 cases that were negative for ALK by IHC were confirmed to lack ALK rearrangements by FISH studies using the break-apart probe indicating a sensitivity of IHC of 100% in this cohort.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
A, ALK-translocated PTC with a follicular and solid architecture. Although this tumor was considered insufficiently infiltrative to be classified as diffuse sclerosing variant, numerous psammoma bodies are noted in the thyroid away from the main tumor mass, indicating a tendency to lymphovascular invasion. B, ALK IHC on a diffuse sclerosing variant PTC arising in the setting of Hashimoto thyroiditis. ALK highlights small groups of malignant cells (arrows) in lymphatics or the interstitium associated with psammoma bodies. C, ALK-translocated PTC with a follicular and solid architecture. D, ALK shows strong diffuse cytoplasmic staining in all neoplastic cells. Although there is some nonspecific staining of colloid, non-neoplastic cells are negative (A and C, hematoxylin and eosin; B and D, ALK IHC).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2:
A, Unencapsulated follicular variant papillary carcinoma was one of the more common patterns demonstrated by ALK-translocated PTC. B, Follicular and solid architectures appeared to be overrepresented in ALK-translocated PTC. C, In some areas this ALK-translocated carcinoma demonstrated a solid and almost morula architecture reminiscent of a solid cell rest. D, Serial sections of this area demonstrates diffuse strong positive staining for ALK (A–C, hematoxylin and eosin; D, ALK IHC).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3:
FISH studies from ALK-translocated cases. A, Using the break-apart probe ALK-rearranged PTC with >15% of tumor nuclei showing splitting of the orange (3′) and green (5′) signals. B, Using the Tricheck probe, the splitting of orange and green signals is still evident; however, an extra “split” blue signal is now present and colocalizes with the split orange and green signals, suggesting that the translocation partner is EML4.

Three of the 6 translocation-positive cases from the group were from the cohort of unselected papillary carcinomas (incidence 1.8%), which incidentally included 3 cases of diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary carcinoma, which were all FISH and IHC negative. The remaining 3 cases that were FISH positive were from the additional group of 20 diffuse sclerosing variant papillary carcinomas. Therefore, the incidence of ALK translocations among all diffuse sclerosing variant PTCs encountered in our institution was 3 of 23 (13%). No IHC-positive or FISH-positive cases were identified in the additional group of 27 PTCs with distant metastases, 28 poorly differentiated (insular) carcinomas, or 20 anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.

Having demonstrated that IHC was highly sensitive albeit not fully specific for ALK translocations, we then performed screening IHC on an additional group of 334 unselected patients with PTC with follow-up FISH studies only in IHC-positive cases. In this second unselected group, 13 cases were positive by IHC, of which 8 were confirmed rearranged by FISH studies (61.5% of IHC-positive cases, 2.4% of this cohort). When the 2 unselected cohorts of patients with PTC were combined, we identified an ALK gene rearrangement in a total of 11 of 498 (2.2%) of all unselected patients with PTC.

Additional FISH testing using the Zytolight SPEC ALK/EML4 TriCheck Probe was performed on whole-tissue sections of all tumors that were positive for translocation using the break-apart probe. This confirmed the presence of an ALK rearrangement in all 14 cases. In 8 cases (57%), the blue fluorochrome demonstrated an additional signal, which colocalized with the split orange and green signals indicating rearrangement of EML4 (Fig. 3). In the other 6 ALK-rearranged cases, there were split orange and green signals with only 2 blue signals, suggesting that the translocation partner was a gene other than EML4.

We noted that in all translocated cases ALK IHC was diffusely positive in all or almost all neoplastic cells (including being present in both primary and metastatic disease) and that FISH studies demonstrated the presence of the translocation in all areas of the tumors that were screened (including areas with weak or patchy IHC staining), indicating that ALK gene rearrangements are an early clonal event. All ALK-translocated patients demonstrated negative IHC staining for BRAFV600E with mutation-specific IHC, suggesting that ALK gene rearrangements and BRAFV600E mutation were mutually exclusive.

The morphology of all 14 ALK-translocated cases was specifically reviewed in search of any phenotype-genotype correlations (Figs. 1, 2). In addition to 3 cases of diffuse sclerosing variant PTC, there were 6 unencapsulated follicular variant PTCs, many of which demonstrated areas with a prominent solid architecture, sometimes with relatively subtle nuclear atypia despite an obviously infiltrative growth pattern. There were 2 cases that demonstrated a mixed follicular and papillary architecture but were follicular predominant, again with small areas of solid growth and an obviously infiltrative growth pattern. There was 1 tall cell variant PTC, 1 Hurthle cell variant PTC (again with some solid areas), and 1 Warthin tumor–like variant. Of note, in 5 of 14 cases (36%) the non-neoplastic thyroid demonstrated typical histologic features of Hashimoto thyroiditis.

We then studied the clinical significance of ALK gene rearrangements by comparing translocation status with all available clinical and pathologic data in the cohort of 498 unselected patients with PTC (11 of whom harbored translocations) (summarized in Table 1). Briefly, ALK-rearranged PTCs presented at a significantly younger age than nonrearranged cases (mean 38 vs. 48 y, P=0.0289), and there was a statistically significant association with female sex (P=0.0425). In fact, all 14 patients with ALK translocations were female. The mean follow-up for translocated cases was 67.3 versus 56.5 months (P=0.5854), and at last follow-up all 11 translocated patients were disease free and had undetectable thyroglobulin levels, whereas in nontranslocated cases there were 50 structural recurrences (P=0.3080), 9 distant metastases (P=0.813), and 105 patients with elevated serum thyroglobulin at last follow-up (P=0.0810). There were no significant differences between ALK-rearranged and other PTCs with respect to tumor size, stage, number of lymph nodes resected, number of lymph nodes involved, lymphovascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, multifocality, number of doses of RAI received or cumulative dose of RAI received.

TABLE 1
TABLE 1:
Clinical and Pathologic Features of ALK-rearranged Versus Non–ALK-rearranged PTC in Unselected Patients

DISCUSSION

PTC is inherently an indolent malignancy with a 10-year survival of >93%.1,2,3,22,23 However, recurrence and metastases still occur in 10% to 15% of patients, two thirds of whom will eventually develop RAI refractory disease.23–26 Therefore, there is still a need to develop new treatments for patients with resistant disease. ALK gene rearrangements have been reported to show all the characteristics of driver mutations12,16 and to be mutually exclusive with all other driver mutations in PTC,12,13,14,15,16 and therefore represent an attractive potential therapeutic target. However, before this targeted therapy can be investigated in an appropriate clinical trial, there remains the very real difficulty of how to identify these rare gene rearrangements in a common malignancy in a cost-effective and practical manner.

Although there is widespread acceptance that FISH studies are the gold standard for identifying ALK translocations in lung cancer,17,27 these studies are expensive and, because of the subtlety of intrachromosomal inversion events, potentially difficult to interpret in the routine clinical setting.19 Therefore, one increasingly widespread approach in lung cancer is to perform screening IHC with next-generation highly sensitive ALK antibodies (eg, clones 5A4 or D5F3) and then perform confirmatory FISH studies only in IHC-positive cases.19,28–31 This approach has been endorsed by professional bodies provided IHC has been validated in the local setting32 and has the significant advantage of low cost and rapid turnaround time.19

In this study, we confirm that the approach of performing screening IHC followed by FISH studies only in IHC-positive cases is valid in PTC and aggressive tumors presumably arising from PTC (anaplastic and poorly differentiated “insular” carcinoma). In fact, from the initial cohort that underwent FISH and IHC, all 251 cases that were IHC negative lacked ALK rearrangements on FISH studies, whereas 6 of the 8 IHC-positive cases were confirmed to be translocated by FISH. We caution that if major management decisions may potentially be made on the basis of IHC findings, there is a need to validate this approach with the specific antibodies and conditions present in individual laboratories. However, as we used the same protocols for this study that we have validated and now routinely use in lung cancer,19 it is likely that if an individual laboratory has validated an IHC-based screening strategy followed up by FISH studies in lung cancer then the same protocol is likely to be valid in thyroid carcinoma.

Using this algorithm we demonstrate that at least 11 of 498 (2.2%) unselected PTCs harbor gene rearrangements involving ALK. Because initial screening IHC was performed only on TMA sections, it is possible that cases with subclonal ALK gene rearrangements would not be identified by our approach; however, given that ALK gene rearrangements were early clonal events and present in all neoplastic cells, we think this would be a rare phenomenon if it occurs at all. Our incidence of ALK rearrangements is similar but slightly greater than that reported by Kelly et al,12 who found ALK gene rearrangements in 4 of 256 (1.6%) of all PTCs, McFadden et al,13 who found rearrangements in 2 of 126 (1.6%) follicular variant PTCs, and the Cancer Genome Atlas study, which found rearrangements in 4 of 484 PTCs (0.8%).16

Before this study, the rearrangement partners for ALK have been reported in 28 patients.12–16,18,33 In 15 cases (54%) the translocation partner has been EML4, in 11 cases STRN, and in 1 case each TFG and GTF2IRD1. In addition to the usual break-apart probe, in this study we also performed FISH with the Zytolight SPEC ALK/EML4 TriCheck Probe, which includes a blue fluorochrome that hybridizes with a 1.8 Mbp region of chromosome 2p21 including the entire EML4 gene as well as the surrounding region from D2S1481 to D2S1494E. In 8 cases (57%) this blue fluorochrome produced a split signal, which colocalized with split orange and green signals, suggesting the presence of an ALK-EML4 inversion. In the other 6 translocated cases, there were split orange and green signals with 2 intact blue signals, suggesting the presence of ALK rearrangement without involvement of EML4. We caution that this aspect of the tricheck probe has not been validated by an independent method, and it is possible that other translocation partners may be involved; however, our findings are strong presumptive evidence that the translocation partner for ALK was EML4 in 57% of cases and another gene(s) in 43% of cases.

This is the first study to systematically investigate the clinicopathologic features of ALK-rearranged PTC. It is noteworthy that all 14 ALK-rearranged PTCs in our study occurred in females individual (P=0.0425) and that ALK-rearranged PTCs presented in patients 10 years younger than those with other tumors—another finding that reached statistical significance (P=0.0289). It has previously been suggested that ALK rearrangements are more common in aggressive disease.12 However, this is not supported by our data. We found no ALK rearrangements in 36 PTCs with distant metastases (9 from the unselected cohort and 27 additional cases screened), 28 poorly differentiated (insular) carcinomas, and 20 anaplastic thyroid carcinomas. Further, none of 11 ALK-rearranged PTCs from the unselected cohort recurred (either structurally or with elevated serum thyroglobulin), and there were no significant differences between ALK-rearranged and other PTCs with respect to tumor size, stage, number of lymph nodes resected, number of lymph nodes involved, lymphovascular invasion, extrathyroidal extension, and multifocality. Further, given that there was no difference in the number or cumulative doses of RAI received, it is unlikely that ALK-rearranged PTC is more likely to be RAI resistant.

When we specifically reviewed the histology of ALK-rearranged PTCs in search of genotype-phenotype correlations, we did note that 6 cases were unencapsulated follicular variant PTCs, commonly with areas of solid growth (Figs. 1, 2), and 2 cases included areas with a follicular architecture but demonstrated papillary areas. Our findings suggest that an infiltrative follicular architecture, perhaps with areas of solid growth, may be overrepresented in ALK-translocated PTCs. However, other morphologies including 1 tall cell variant, 1 Hurthle cell variant, and 1 Warthin tumor–like variant were noted, and this morphology is unlikely to be specific enough to help identify these cases without IHC or FISH studies.

It is interesting that ALK gene rearrangement was identified in 3 of 23 (13%) diffuse sclerosing variants of papillary carcinoma—a subtype of PTC that is itself more common in young female individuals (the same demographic as ALK-translocated PTC) and has been reported to have a 25% incidence of lung metastasis.3 The diffuse sclerosing variant of PTC has been reported to have a very low rate of BRAFV600E mutation,34 and indeed in our cohort, 5 of 23 (22%) harbored this mutation versus 62.4% from our unselected cohort. Although the number of cases is small and our results should be interpreted with caution, given that BRAFV600E mutation and ALK rearrangement are mutually exclusive, ALK rearrangement may be a relatively frequent driver mutation in diffuse sclerosing variant PTCs. Our finding that 5 of 15 (36%) of PTCs with ALK rearrangement were associated with histologic evidence of Hashimoto thyroiditis is interesting given that Hashimoto thyroiditis has previously been associated with another translocation (RET-PTC).35 However, this potential link requires further investigation before any conclusions can be made.

In conclusion, 2.2% of PTCs harbor translocation of the ALK gene, and these cases can be effectively identified using screening IHC followed by FISH. ALK gene rearrangement occurs more commonly in female individuals and at a younger age and is mutually exclusive with BRAFV600E. ALK gene rearrangement may occur more commonly in diffuse sclerosing variant PTC but does not appear to predict more aggressive behavior.

REFERENCES

1. Davies L, Welch G. Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973-2002. JAMA. 2006;295:2164–2167.
2. Gonzalez-Gonzalez R, Bologna-Molina R, Carreon-Burciaga RG, et al.. Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Values of Its Different Variants: Review of the Literature. ISRN Oncology 2011;2011:915925.doi:10.5402/2011/915925.
3. DeLellis RA, Lloyd RV, Heitz PU, et al.. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Endocrine Organs. 2004.Lyon, France:IARC Press;51–80.
4. Hay ID, Thompson GB, Grant CS, et al.. Papillary thyroid carcinoma managed at the Mayo Clinic during six decades (1940-1999): temporal trends in initial therapy and long-term outcome in 2444 consecutively treated patients. World J Surg. 2002;26:879–885.
5. Nixon I, Ganly I, Patel SG, et al.. Changing trends in well differentiated thyroid carcinoma over eight decades. Int J Surg. 2012;10:618–623.
6. Xing M. Molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:184–199.
7. Volante M, Collini P, Nikiforov YE, et al.. Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma: the Turin proposal for the use of uniform diagnostic criteria and an algorithmic diagnostic approach. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31:1256–1264.
8. Gandhi M, Evdokimova V, Nikiforov YE. Mechanisms of chromosomal rearrangements in solid tumors: the model of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;321:36–43.
9. Greco A, Miranda C, Pierotti MA. Rearrangements of NTRK1 gene in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010;321:44–49.
10. Bullock M, O’Neill C, Chou A, et al.. Utilization of a MAB for BRAFv600e detection in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2012;19:779–784.
11. Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN. Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011;7:569–580.
12. Kelly LM, Barila G, Liu P, et al.. Identification of the transforming STRN-ALK fusion as a potential therapeutic target in the aggressive forms of thyroid cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4233–4238.
13. Mcfadden DG, Dias-Santagata D, Sado PM, et al.. Identification of oncogenic mutations and gene fusions in the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E2457–2462.
14. Pe´rot G, Soubeyran I, Ribeiro A, et al.. Identification of a recurrent STRN/ALK fusion in thyroid carcinomas. PLoS One. 2014;9:e87170.
15. Demeure MJ, Aziz M, Rosenberg R, et al.. Whole-genome sequencing of an aggressive BRAF wild-type papillary thyroid cancer identified EML4–ALK translocation as a therapeutic target. World J Surg. 2014;38:1296–1305.
16. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cell. 2014;159:676–690.
17. Febbo PG, Ladanyi M, Aldape KD, et al.. NCCN Task Force report: Evaluating the clinical utility of tumor markers in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2011;9suppl 5S1–32.
18. Godbert Y, Henriques de Figueiredo B, Bonichon F, et al.. Remarkable response to crizotinib in 71-year old woman with ALk-rearranged anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014[Epub ahead of print].
19. Houang M, Toon CW, Clarkson A, et al.. Reflex ALK immunohistochemistry is feasible and highly specific for ALK gene rearrangements in lung cancer. Pathology. 2014;46:383–388.
20. O’Neill CJ, Bullock M, Chou A, et al.. BRAF(v600e) mutation is associated with an increased risk of nodal recurrence requiring reoperative surgery in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Surgery. 2010;148:1139–1145.
21. Kruijff S, Aniss AM, Chen P, et al.. Decreasing the dose of radioiodine for remnant ablation does not increase structural recurrence rates in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery. 2013;154:1337–1344.
22. Schlumberger M, Sherman S. Approach to the patient with advanced differentiated thyroid cancer. Eur J Endocrinol. 2012;166:5–11.
23. Sherman SI. Thyroid carcinoma. Lancet. 2003;361:501–511.
24. Baudin E, Schlumberger M. New therapeutic approaches for metastatic thyroid carcinoma. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:148–156.
25. Durante C, Haddy N, Baudin E, et al.. Long term outcome of 444 patients with distant metastases from papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma: benefits and limits of radioiodine therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;91:2892–2899.
26. Schlumberger MJ. Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:297–306.
27. Kwak EL, Bang YJ, Camidge DR, et al.. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition in non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1693–1703.
28. Conklin CM, Craddock KJ, Have C, et al.. Immunohistochemistry is a reliable screening tool for identification of ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung carcinoma and is antibody dependent. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:45–51.
29. Selinger CI, Rogers TM, Russell PA, et al.. Testing for ALK rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter comparison of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:1545–1553.
30. McLeer-Florin A, Moro-Sibilot D, Melis A, et al.. Dual IHC and FISH testing for ALK gene rearrangement in lung adenocarcinomas in a routine practice: a French study. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:348–354.
31. Yi ES, Boland JM, Maleszewski JJ, et al.. Correlation of IHC and FISH for ALK gene rearrangement in non-small cell lung carcinoma: IHC score algorithm for FISH. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:459–465.
32. Leighl NB, Rekhtman N, Biermann WA, et al.. Molecular testing for selection of patients with lung cancer for epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the College of American Pathologists/International Society of for the Study of Lung Cancer/Association of Molecular Pathologists Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3673–3679.
33. Hamatani K, Mukai M, Takahashi K, et al.. Rearranged anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene in adult-onset papillary thyroid cancer amongst atomic bomb survivors. Thyroid. 2012;22:1153–1159.
34. Sheu S-Y, Schwertheim S, Worm K, et al.. Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: lack of BRAF mutation but occurrence of RET/PTC rearrangements. Mod Pathol. 2007;20:779–787.
35. Jankovic B I, Le KT, Hershman JM. Clinical review: Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and papillary thyroid carcinoma: is there a correlation? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:474–482.
Keywords:

thyroid cancer; papillary thyroid carcinoma; ALK; EML4-ALK

Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.