Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

SPECIAL SECTION on COVID-19 and PM&R

Clinical Manifestation, Evaluation, and Rehabilitative Strategy of Dysphagia Associated With COVID-19

Aoyagi, Yoichiro MD, PhD; Inamoto, Yoko SLP, PhD; Shibata, Seiko MD, PhD; Kagaya, Hitoshi MD, DMSc; Otaka, Yohei MD, PhD; Saitoh, Eiichi MD, DMSc

Author Information
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: May 2021 - Volume 100 - Issue 5 - p 424-431
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001735
  • Open

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), referred to as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), outbreak has caused 90,891,380 confirmed cases and 1,944,750 deaths globally, with Japan having 292,212 confirmed cases and 4094 deaths as of January 12, 2021. Most infected individuals (81%) confer mild disease symptoms, characterized by fever, cough, and dyspnea as the most commonly reported symptoms.1 However, for a significant minority of patients, in particular, those older than 65 yrs, SARS-CoV-2 infection might display severe consequences, accounting for a relatively high proportion (20.3%) of patients in this age group requiring hospitalization and management in intensive care units.1 Reports of neurologic symptoms and stroke in individuals with COVID-19 raise concerns that the neurological system is impacted negatively by this virus.2–5 A dysphagia complication due to the cranial nerve involvement in COVID-19–infected patients has been reported recently.6 Disuse syndrome or sarcopenia due to prolonged bed rest7,8 or prolonged endotracheal intubation during intensive care of COVID-19 symptoms9–11 is thought to aggravate the swallowing function. Untreated dysphagia could enhance the risk of pulmonary complications, causing aspiration pneumonia, along with induction malnutrition, causing significant weight loss and dehydration, and contributing to the high mortality rate of the disease.

In conditions of dysphagia under COVID-19 pandemic, rehabilitation programs become critical challenges. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) and videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) are criterion standards of dysphagia evaluation, which are considered aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), defined as care practices that result in the generation of airborne particles like aerosols, and would, therefore, require wearing exceptionally high-grade personal protective equipment (PPE) by the medical staff. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic is far from being over, standard approaches to the clinical evaluation of dysphagia have to be modified as the situation demands. In addition, the current workflow of dysphagia rehabilitation needs to be modified accordingly. In this review, we first present possible causes and pathophysiology underlying dysphagia associated with COVID-19. Second, we offer some recommendations for dysphagia evaluation with modifications from conventional approaches to allow a safe and comprehensive assessment based on available evidence to date. Finally, we discuss possible strategies for managing dysphagia to ensure safe and efficient practice in the risks of SARS-CoV-2 exposure.

Clinical Manifestation Associated With Dysphagia

Although the primary manifestation is a respiratory symptom contributing to pulmonary diseases, like acute respiratory distress syndrome, COVID-19 influences other body systems. The clinical indications of dysphagia are challenged by swallowing and throat-clearing difficulties, coughing, regurgitation, heartburn sensations (reflux), and recurrent aspiration pneumonia, caused by the central nervous system aberrant-controlled neurological problems, triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Viral neuroinvasion could occur by several routes: transsynaptic transfer across infected neurons, entry via the olfactory nerve, infection of vascular endothelium, or leukocyte migration across the blood-brain barrier, evidenced by several investigations.3 A retrospective study by Mao et al.2 details the neurological signs and symptoms associated with COVID-19 infection in a hospitalized population. They reported that approximately one third of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 displayed neurological signs or symptoms, that taste and smell impairments as cranial nervous manifestations of COVID-19 were observed in 5.6% and 5.1% of hospitalized patients, respectively, and that the rate of skeletal muscle injury was 10.7%.2 Five cases of large-vessel stroke in patients SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported in New York City.12 In a further study from 2 New York City academic hospitals, approximately 1.6% of adults with COVID-19 who visited the emergency department or were hospitalized experienced ischemic stroke, a higher rate of stroke compared with a cohort of patients with influenza.13 According to clinical data sets collected from 125 patients from 3 major UK neuroscience bodies,14 77 (62%) presented with a cerebrovascular event, of whom 57 (74%) had ischemic stroke, 9 (12%) an intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1 (1%) central nervous system vasculitis. Thirty nine (31%) of 125 patients presented with altered mental status, comprising 9 (23%) patients with unspecified encephalopathy and 7 (18%) patients with encephalitis. Reportedly, nearly 35%–50% individuals develop dysphagia after their first acute ischemic stroke in the brain.15–18 Dysphagia after stroke affects many patients in the first few hours and days after onset, with associated increased morbidity and mortality due in part to aspiration, pneumonia, and malnutrition.

In a brain autopsy of 6 patients who died from COVID-19, localized perivascular and interstitial encephalitis with neuronal cell loss were noted. In addition, axon degeneration in the dorsal motor nuclei of the vagus nerve, trigeminal nerves, nucleus tractus solitarii, dorsal raphe nuclei, and fasciculus longitudinalis medialis were observed.19 A report from Northern Italy revealed that five patients developed Guillain-Barré syndrome after the onset of COVID-19.4 One of five patients developed dysphagia. Emerging data indicate that COVID-19 could trigger not only Guillain-Barré syndrome but other autoimmune neurological diseases including encephalomyelitis or myositis even without systemic symptoms.20 Evidence from an animal model of a neurogenic pathway for SARS-CoV-2 via olfactory, trigeminal nerves, and the brainstem nuclei led us to look for evidence of localized brainstem alterations.21

The act of swallowing is coordinated and executed by a complex neuronal network that incorporates cortical, subcortical, and brainstem structures, as well as a downstream peripheral nervous system including several cranial nerves and muscles (Fig. 1). Thus, different neurologic complications of COVID-19 might result in damage to central and peripheral parts of the swallowing neural circuits leading to dysphagia.

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1:
Swallowing neuronal network and COVID-19–associated complications that may lead to dysphagia. Swallowing is a dynamic process involving complex central neuronal networks throughout the cortex, subcortex, and brainstem. These central networks collaborate with the peripheral nervous system, including several cranial nerves that control sensorimotor swallowing function, to integrate muscle coordination. Cerebrovascular events, such as stroke, encephalomyelitis, encephalopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and myositis, may lead to dysphagia associated with COVID-19 as illustrated.

We reported previously the case of a patient who encountered oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia after COVID-19 infection, which was initiated by the development of taste and smell impairments, as cranial nervous manifestation.6 After treatment with a mechanical ventilator in an intensive care unit, he developed swallowing difficulty with persistent taste impairment, accompanied by high fever, general malaise, cough with expectoration, and aggravated dyspnea. The laboratory tests and chest x-ray showed re-elevated blood cell count and C-reactive protein level, as well as a further enhancement of the shadows in the field of the right lower lung (Fig. 2). In the process of recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection, superimposed aspiration pneumonia was diagnosed. The bilateral gag reflex was absent. The FEES, VFSS, and manometry revealed impaired pharyngolaryngeal sensation, silent aspiration, and mesopharyngeal contractile dysfunction, suggesting that glossopharyngeal and vagal neuropathy was the cause of the dysphagia. This case emphasizes the significance of overlooking the neurologic involvement, concurrent dysphagia, and subsequent aspiration pneumonia in SARS-CoV-2 infection and urges for awareness of this consideration. In contrast, Spannella et al.22 reported the case of a 95-yr-old patient who was initially diagnosed with common aspiration pneumonia; however, the condition was subsequently diagnosed as COVID-19 pneumonia during the initial spread of SARS-CoV-2.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2:
A, Chest x-ray of a patient recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection on a day before resuming oral intake. Multifocal patchy opacities are visible in both lungs. B, A chest x-ray was taken on day 3 after resuming oral intake. Note that new enhancement of the shadows in the right lower lung field is apparent in B, suggesting superimposed aspiration pneumonia under SARS-CoV-2 infection. In general, the right lower lung lobe is the most common site of infiltrate formation due to the larger caliber and the relatively more vertical orientation of the right mainstem bronchus.

Apart from neurologic complication, digestive symptoms are often recognized in patients with COVID-19. Of 204 patients COVID-19, 103 (51%) reported digestive symptoms, including appetite loss (81 [79%] cases), diarrhea (35 [34%] cases), and vomiting (4 [4%] cases) in Hubei province, China.23 Digestive symptoms became more identifiable as the severity of the disease increased. In a meta-analysis of 29 studies, including 6064 patients with COVID-19, gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 15%, with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and appetite loss being the three most common symptoms.24 Notably, the appetite loss leads to malnutrition and secondary sarcopenia that increases the risk of dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia. Difficulty in interpersonal rehabilitation therapy and nutritional intervention due to the infection control render patients with COVID-19 physical decline that provoking disuse muscle atrophy. Furthermore, prolonged mechanical ventilation is likely to exacerbate swallowing difficulty because of pharyngeal and laryngeal trauma, neuromuscular weakness, reduced sensorium, gastroesophageal reflux, and/or impaired synchronization of breathing and swallowing.9,10,25

Chaumont et al.26 reported four patients with encephalopathy and concurrent peripheral neuropathy with miscellaneous symptoms, including dysphagia, occurring after severe COVID-19. Neurological manifestations were detected after mechanical ventilation weaning and extubation. However, detailed findings or prognosis related to dysphagia was not described.

Transmission Route of COVID-19

SARS-CoV-2 transmission occurs via several modes, which include animal-to-human or person-to-person contact, droplet, airborne, blood-borne, contaminated object, and fecal-oral. The peak infectiousness at the time of symptom onset, or 1–2 days before symptoms begin,27 making it difficult to monitor early infection and prevent infecting others, leads to the formation of clusters, which is the aggregation of disease cases resulting from the concentration of infected individuals. Although in Japan, confirmed instances of COVID-19 have been relatively low compared with other countries, one of the largest clusters in which approximately 130 medical professionals and patients were confirmed occurred in a rehabilitation hospital in Japan.28

Because COVID-19 infects the upper aerodigestive tract with the highest viral loads occurring in the nasal cavities,29 droplets from coughing and sneezing are the source of infection. When susceptible individuals come into contact with the virus-containing body fluids (sputum, saliva, feces) from infected humans, SARS-CoV-2 could be transmitted through the oral cavity, nasal cavity, and other mucous membranes.

Because SARS-CoV-2 persists within the environment of infected individuals (e.g., household surfaces, door handles, mobile phones), when susceptible individuals come into contact with contaminated body fluid items, indirect transmission of SARS-CoV-2 could occur. Aerosols could be produced not only by coughing but also by normal breathing or talking as air passes over respiratory mucosa.30–33 Respiratory aerosols typically consist of droplet nuclei less than 5 μm in size. SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected in air samples in hospital rooms of patients with COVID-1934 could remain viable in aerosols for hours.35 Therefore, unless rooms are well ventilated, aerosolized droplets could become more concentrated in an environment over time, likely to infect any person who would have an encounter.

Personal Protective Equipment

The fundamental precautions for COVID-19 pandemic infection control include hand and respiratory hygiene, the use of appropriate PPE according to risk assessment,36 environmental cleanings, and safe waste management.37 In the course of COVID-19 pandemic, PPE worn by healthcare professionals is critical for reducing the infection transmission in healthcare settings, mainly when AGPs are being performed.38

The Canadian Society of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery made the guidance.39 Level 1 PPE includes a surgical mask, gown, gloves, and eye protection (face shield or goggles; Fig. 3A). Level 1 PPE should be used as a minimum for routine patient care and during non-AGPs in all patients. For asymptomatic and COVID-19–negative patients, the use of a gown is optional, especially when there is no risk of droplet or fluid spread. Level 2 PPE includes the use of N95 mask, eye protection preferably that seals to the face, gloves, and gown (Fig. 3B). Because of the possibility of false-negative testing in a population with a high prevalence of COVID-19, the recommendation is that level 2 PPE precautions should be followed for all AGPs in situations with a high or growing COVID-19 prevalence. Any patient who is symptomatic or COVID-19 positive scheduled for AGP should have the procedure performed in a negative pressure room while following standard operating procedures for their institution, and level 3 PPE is recommended, which consists of N95/FFP2 (or higher-level respirator), goggles, and the first layer of surgical gloves, followed by leg and foot covers, a long-sleeved, sterile water-impermeable gown, and sterile outer gloves (Fig. 3C).

FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3:
A, Minimum or standard PPE. B, Standard PPE with N95 mask and face shield. C, Full PPE.

The benefits of using surgical face masks are largely dependent on the parallel practice of handwashing.40 In recent reports, the surgical mask does not have sufficient filtering ability, but the mandated face covering in the community prevented airborne transmission from asymptomatic patients by blocking atomization and preventing contact infections via viral droplet release from infected person.41 The simultaneous implementation of face covering and social distancing was considered most optimal for minimizing transmission.

In an experiment using an aerosol generator and a breathing simulator, when a healthcare professional wore a face shield and was 46 cm far from the patient, the amount of aerosol inhaled immediately after the patient coughed was reduced by 96% with a reduction in mask surface pollution by 97%.42 However, if the particle size of the aerosol was small, the effect of face shield was reduced, and if the exposure time was long, the effect was reduced further because the aerosol had dispersed throughout the room. Therefore, face shield is useful for reducing infection risk when used in combination with a mask when dealing with patients in close proximity, as the combination of these two PPE yields additive protective effect.

Rehabilitation workers treat numerous patients at rehabilitation centers and bedsides. In the COVID-19 pandemic, it is indispensable to make efforts not to minimize the activity of patients and, by the same token, avoid the spread of the infection. The regional epidemic characteristics should also be considered when determining the level of PPE required, especially when a patient’s COVID-19 status is unknown, as, in several regions, the infections had occurred long before the symptoms began to show enabling clustering and escalation of the outbreak.

Dysphagia Evaluation

Evaluation should start early and with structured swallowing screening in patients at risk for dysphagia. Simple screening tests, including various water swallowing tests and the repetitive saliva swallowing test,43 and questionnaires, such as the Eating Assessment Tool 10, are used for standard screening.44 The repetitive saliva swallowing test assesses the patient’s ability to voluntarily swallow repeatedly after being asked to swallow saliva as many times as possible for 30 secs, while deglutition was counted through palpation of the larynx. The sensitivity and specificity for aspiration were 69%–98% and 66%–93%, respectively, when the cutoff point was set at 2.43,45 It is recommended that rapid screening with high accuracy be carried out by a trained nurse, a speech-language pathologist, an occupational therapist, or a physician.46 An assessment using postextubation dysphagia screening47 by a nurse in the intensive care unit is useful where speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, or physicians might not be available. In this COVID-19 era, postextubation dysphagia screening, a validated screening tool used after extubating, is recommended for utilization as a standard procedure, according to the local intensive care unit policy.

If the initial noninstrumental patient screening fails, instrumental evaluation is the next general step. The two main diagnostic tools for identifying aspiration are FEES, which provides direct visualization of the pharynx, and VFSS, which provides real-time visualization of the oral cavity, oropharynx, laryngopharynx, and esophagus viewed on a monitor in the radiology suite. It is noteworthy that FEES and VFSS, considered as AGPs, are not recommended to be used to perform nonemergent or nonurgent COVID-19–positive or suspected cases.9,48 Under an emergency condition, however, instrumental evaluation is unavoidable. Clinical assessment, including the full review of medical records and information from nurses and other staffs, plays a more prominent role; therefore, a thorough check on the patients’ status is made before recommendation for face-to-face evaluation.

In our hospital, we performed FEES in urgent patients who were not diagnosed with COVID-19 or who tested negative twice for COVID-19 but had tested positive previously by polymerase chain reaction during the first outbreak of COVID-19 infection (April and May 2020). During this time, the scheduled FEES cases decreased (Fig. 4), and noninstrumental evaluation cases increased. Although VFSS is considered a safer option than FEES,49 we also limited its usage for only urgent patients who were not diagnosed with COVID-19. Under this COVID-19 outbreak, it is recommended that the FEES procedure is executed with level 1 PPE for a non–COVID-19 patient and with higher PPE for a COVID-19–positive or suspected patient. In addition, FEES and VFSS could be used by shortening the examination to limit exposure to aerosolized viral particles.49

FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4:
Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing cases performed in the Department of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Hospital, from January through June 2018, 2019, and 2020. The gray bar charts represent the confirmed cases of COVID-19 per half month in Aichi prefecture, Japan, where the Fujita Health University Hospital is located. Aichi prefecture has a population of 7.6 million.

Ku et al.50 introduced the workflow for swallowing studies in head and neck patients with COVID-19. According to their workflow, VFSS and FEES were performed when high fever, travel, occupation, contact and clustering phenomenon history within the last 14 days, respiratory symptoms, and/or smell/taste disturbance were not confirmed. Nonetheless, if these symptoms were confirmed, patients were divided into two groups, urgent and nonurgent. For the urgent group, VFSS and/or FEES were performed regardless of polymerase chain reaction positive or negative, but a high level of PPE was required for the polymerase chain reaction positive case.

Recent articles introduced the practical system of evaluation and diagnosis of dysphagia by using telemedicine.49,51 In their algorithm, initial interview, screening, and clinical evaluation were performed via phone- or video-enabled encounter. If patients failed these evaluations, virtual evaluation, including mealtime observation, and trail of various consistencies were performed by speech-language pathologists, followed by the recommendation of appropriate diet and strategy. Meanwhile, the instrumental evaluation was performed only in those who were in need.49 Telephone or other remote contact was useful and preferred for the patients who did not need urgent intervention.9,50

Under the current condition, where theoretically, all patients are in the gray zone of COVID-19 positive/negative, it is recommended to balance the risk of aerosolization with the benefit acquired from instrumental evaluation to choose the optimal assessment method.

Rehabilitative Strategy for Dysphagia

Appropriate treatment plan established for dysphagia treatment, according to the abnormal findings from the evaluation, is essentially the same regardless of a patient being COVID-19 positive or negative. For the COVID-19–positive patient, however, conservative management, such as diet modification and utilization of swallow strategy, is more likely to be the first choice than using active exercise directly until the COVID-19 becomes negative.51

When performing the swallowing exercise, clinicians need to pay special attention to the risk of aerosol generation. The consensus of AGP for swallowing exercises has not yet been achieved, except the common recognition that cough is the generation of the source of aerosol and that procedures generating cough are AGPs.48 According to expert opinion,52 high risks of therapeutic interventions and procedures include tracheostomy care/assessment/management, laryngectomy care/assessment/management, tongue strength therapy using Iowa Oral Performance Instrument, high-resolution manometry, pharyngeal electrical stimulation, and expiratory muscle strength training. Low risk of therapeutic interventions and procedures include surface electromyography. Swallowing compensatory and exercise therapy are regarded as the moderate risk of nonprocedural encounters.52 Dysphagia societies, including the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association53 and the Japanese Society of Dysphagia Rehabilitation54 are calling medical staff attention to AGPs by classifying the risk of aerosol generation in dysphagia treatment.

Table 1 shows our university hospital’s general principles and classification of AGPs. Because of the current nonconsensus opinion regarding the risk of AGPs for each swallowing exercise, hospital-based decision and its flexible exercise provision, according to emerging evidence, are required at present.

TABLE 1 - General principles and classification of AGPs in speech-language pathology service
General principles
√ Wear a mask, gloves, gown, and face shield
√ Not to sit face to face, but to sit side-by-side or to sit perpendicular with a patient
√ Close contact is permitted only when necessary to observe oral mucosa, tongue, dentition, and palate.
√ Keep the treatment room well ventilated
√ Clean and disinfect the touched objects with alcohol (table, chair, doorknob, pencil, files, phones, keyboards, tablets, etc.) in each session
Risk for aerosol generating: low Risk for aerosol generating: high
Evaluation Questionnaire
Repetitive saliva swallowing test
Water swallowing test (for those who cough frequently)
Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing Videofluorographic swallowing study
Oral element-based exercise a Range-of-motion exercise of jaw, lip, cheek, and tongue Voice production exercise
Tongue resistance–strengthening exercise
- Tongue elevation exercise
- Isometric progressive resistance oropharyngeal therapy
- Tongue rotatory lateral exercise
Cheek puffing exercise
Chewing exercise using gum covered with gauze
Oral motor control exercise
Pharyngeal element-based exercise Tongue retraction exercise Cough exercise
Shaker exercise Strengthening vocal cord closure exercise
Head raising exercise Expiratory muscle strength training
Jaw opening exercise Blowing exercise
Tongue holding swallow
Behavior-based exercise b with facilitation techniques Thermal, tactile stimulation
K-point stimulation
Tube swallowing exercise (for those who cough)
Balloon dilation (for those who cough)
Behavior-based exercise with target-oriented methods Mendelsohn maneuver
Effortful swallow
Supraglottic swallow, super supraglottic swallow
Direct exercise (for those who cough frequently)
Others Stretching of head and neck
Oral care
Education Self-training
Instructing patients and patient’s family
aElement-based exercises target the neuromuscular control, which is a prerequisite of swallowing function.
bBehavior-based exercises promote therapeutic learning by integrating all the activity-dependent elements to the actual swallowing behavior.

Telerehabilitation of swallowing disorders has been used in the last few decades.55–57 This technology is being used for remote training in rehabilitation settings to rehabilitate patients with COVID-19 to reduce the risk of infection and prevent them from being isolated while minimizing the decline in functional status.58 Our university hospital has initiated a preliminary attempt at telerehabilitation to a provide dysphagia rehabilitation program consisting of range-of-motion and muscle-strengthening exercises that improve the ability to swallow (Fig. 5). The program achieved success without any mechanical trouble and with high participant satisfaction. Accordingly, this program is highly recommended as an alternative for dysphagia rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic, although the efficacy of dysphagia telerehabilitation requires further verification. Telerehabilitation systems may be available for online assessment of dysphagia.59 Clinicians have been appointed as delegates to take responsibility for meeting this challenge of COVID-19 by identifying new methods or technologies that would allow the swallowing evaluation and treatment remotely.

FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5:
Delivery of exercise program using telerehabilitation system. Left panel: A physical therapist provides exercise with instruction using the telerehabilitation system. The pulse rates and Spo 2, measured using a monitoring device, are displayed on the monitor in the therapist’s room. Right panel: Patients watch the screen of tablets computers and perform the exercise according to the instruction given by the physical therapist in the assigned rehabilitation room. The Spo 2 and pulse are monitored on display during the exercise.

REFERENCES

1. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, Cardona-Ospina JA, Gutierrez-Ocampo E, et al.: Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med Infect Dis 2020;34:101623
2. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, et al.: Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:683–90
3. Zubair AS, McAlpine LS, Gardin T, et al.: Neuropathogenesis and neurologic manifestations of the coronaviruses in the age of coronavirus disease 2019: a review. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1018–27
4. Toscano G, Palmerini F, Ravaglia S, et al.: Guillain-Barre syndrome associated with SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med 2020;382:2574–6
5. Li Z, Liu T, Yang N, et al.: Neurological manifestations of patients with COVID-19: potential routes of SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion from the periphery to the brain. Front Med 2020;14:533–41
6. Aoyagi Y, Ohashi M, Funahashi R, et al.: Oropharyngeal dysphagia and aspiration pneumonia following coronavirus disease 2019: a case report. Dysphagia 2020;35:545–8
7. Kunieda K, Fujishima I, Wakabayashi H, et al.: Relationship between tongue pressure and pharyngeal function assessed using high-resolution manometry in older dysphagia patients with sarcopenia: a pilot study. Dysphagia 2021;36:33–40
8. Ney DM, Weiss JM, Kind AJ, et al.: Senescent swallowing: impact, strategies, and interventions. Nutr Clin Pract 2009;24:395–413
9. Frajkova Z, Tedla M, Tedlova E, et al.: Postintubation dysphagia during COVID-19 outbreak-contemporary review. Dysphagia 2020;35:549–57
10. Schar MS, Omari TI, Fraser RJ, et al.: Disordered swallowing associated with prolonged oral endotracheal intubation in critical illness. Intensive Care Med 2020;46:140–2
11. Brodsky MB, Huang M, Shanholtz C, et al.: Recovery from dysphagia symptoms after oral endotracheal intubation in acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. A 5-year longitudinal study. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017;14:376–83
12. Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, et al.: Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of Covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med 2020;382:e60
13. Merkler AE, Parikh NS, Mir S, et al.: Risk of ischemic stroke in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vs patients with influenza. JAMA Neurol 2020;77:1366
14. Varatharaj A, Thomas N, Ellul MA, et al.: Neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of COVID-19 in 153 patients: a UK-wide surveillance study. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7:875–82
15. Daniels SK, Brailey K, Priestly DH, et al.: Aspiration in patients with acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:14–9
16. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D: Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke 1999;30:744–8
17. Smithard DG, O’Neill PA, Parks C, et al.: Complications and outcome after acute stroke. Does dysphagia matter?Stroke 1996;27:1200–4
18. Paciaroni M, Mazzotta G, Corea F, et al.: Dysphagia following stroke. Eur Neurol 2004;51:162–7
19. von Weyhern CH, Kaufmann I, Neff F, et al.: Early evidence of pronounced brain involvement in fatal COVID-19 outcomes. Lancet 2020;395:e109
20. Dalakas MC: Guillain-Barre syndrome: the first documented COVID-19-triggered autoimmune neurologic disease: more to come with myositis in the offing. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm 2020;7:e781
21. Roman GC, Spencer PS, Reis J, et al.: The neurology of COVID-19 revisited: a proposal from the Environmental Neurology Specialty Group of the World Federation of Neurology to implement international neurological registries. J Neurol Sci 2020;414:116884
22. Spannella F, Ristori L, Giulietti F, et al.: A 95-year-old patient with unexpected coronavirus disease 2019 masked by aspiration pneumonia: a case report. J Med Case Reports 2020;14:82
23. Pan L, Mu M, Yang P, et al.: Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients with digestive symptoms in Hubei, China: a descriptive, cross-sectional multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115:766–73
24. Mao R, Qiu Y, He JS, et al.: Manifestations and prognosis of gastrointestinal and liver involvement in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;5:667–78
25. Brodsky MB, Nollet JL, Spronk PE, et al.: Prevalence, pathophysiology, diagnostic modalities and treatment options for dysphagia in critically ill patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2020;99:1164–70
26. Chaumont H, San-Galli A, Martino F, et al.: Mixed central and peripheral nervous system disorders in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. J Neurol 2020;267:3121–7
27. He X, Lau EHY, Wu P, et al.: Temporal dynamics in viral shedding and transmissibility of COVID-19. Nat Med 2020;26:672–5
28. Yamamoto S: Coronavirus spreads through hospitals in Japan. NHK. Available at: https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/1055/. Published 2020. Accessed July 5, 2020
29. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, et al.: SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1177–9
30. Fairchild CI, Stampfer JF: Particle concentration in exhaled breath. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1987;48:948–9
31. Moriarty JA, Grotberg JB: Flow-induced instabilities of a mucus–serous bilayer. J Fluid Mech 1999;397:1–22
32. Papineni RS, Rosenthal FS: The size distribution of droplets in the exhaled breath of healthy human subjects. J Aerosol Med 1997;10:105–16
33. Morawska L, Milton DK: It is time to address airborne transmission of COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:2311–3
34. Santarpia JL, Rivera DN, Herrera V, et al.: Aerosol and surface transmission potential of SARS-CoV-2. medRxiv 2020
35. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, et al.: Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1564–7
36. World Health Organization: Rational use of personal protective equipment for coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and considerations during severe shortages Interim guidance 6 April 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/rational-use-of-personal-protective-equipment-for-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-and-considerations-during-severe-shortages. Published 2020. Accessed July 5, 2020
37. World Health Organization: Infection prevention and control during health carevwhen coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is suspectedvor confirmed Interim guidance, 29 June 2020. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-IPC-2020.4. Published 2020. Accessed 5 July, 2020
38. Liu M, Cheng SZ, Xu KW, et al.: Use of personal protective equipment against coronavirus disease 2019 by healthcare professionals in Wuhan, China: cross sectional study. BMJ 2020;369:m2195
39. CSO-HNS Executive Committee: Guidance for health care workers performing aerosol generating medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Available at: https://www.entcanada.org/wp-content/uploads/Protocol-for-COVID-and-AGMP-3-iw-mailer.pdf. Published 2020. Accessed June 29, 2020
40. Aiello AE, Perez V, Coulborn RM, et al.: Facemasks, hand hygiene, and influenza among young adults: a randomized intervention trial. PLoS One 2012;7:e29744
41. Zhang R, Li Y, Zhang AL, et al.: Identifying airborne transmission as the dominant route for the spread of COVID-19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020;117:14857–63
42. Lindsley WG, Noti JD, Blachere FM, et al.: Efficacy of face shields against cough aerosol droplets from a cough simulator. J Occup Environ Hyg 2014;11:509–18
43. Oguchi K, Saitoh E, Baba M, et al.: The repetitive saliva swallowing test (RSST) as a screening test of functional dysphagia (2) validity of RSST [In Japanese. Abstract in English]. Jpn J Rehabil Med 2000;37:383–8
44. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, et al.: Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:919–24
45. Persson E, Wardh I, Ostberg P: Repetitive saliva swallowing test: norms, clinical relevance and the impact of saliva secretion. Dysphagia 2019;34:271–8
46. Macht M, White SD, Moss M: Swallowing dysfunction after critical illness. Chest 2014;146:1681–9
47. Johnson KL, Speirs L, Mitchell A, et al.: Validation of a postextubation dysphagia screening tool for patients after prolonged endotracheal intubation. Am J Crit Care 2018;27:89–96
48. Bolton L, Mills C, Wallace S, et al.; Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists (RCSLT) COVID-19 Advisory Group: Aerosol generating procedures, dysphagia assessment and COVID-19: a rapid review. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2020;55:629–36
49. Soldatova L, Williams C, Postma GN, et al.: Virtual dysphagia evaluation: practical guidelines for dysphagia management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020;163:455–8
50. Ku PKM, Holsinger FC, Chan JYK, et al.: Management of dysphagia in the patient with head and neck cancer during COVID-19 pandemic: practical strategy. Head Neck 2020;42:1491–6
51. Fritz MA, Howell RJ, Brodsky MB, et al.: Moving forward with dysphagia care: implementing strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Dysphagia 2020. doi: 10.1007/s00455-020-10144-9
52. Zaga CJ, Pandian V, Brodsky MB, et al.: Speech-language pathology guidance for tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international multidisciplinary perspective. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2020;29:1320–34
53. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association: ASHA guidance to SLPs regarding aerosol generating procedures. Available at: https://www.asha.org/SLP/healthcare/ASHA-Guidance-to-SLPs-Regarding-Aerosol-Generating-Procedures/. Published 2020. Accessed July 25, 2020
54. Japanese Society of Dysphagia Rehabilitation: Reminder for COVID-19 (in Japanese). Available at: https://www.jsdr.or.jp/wp-content/uploads/file/news/news_20200420-2.pdf. Published 2020. Accessed June 28, 2020
55. Clawson B, Selden M, Lacks M, et al.: Complex pediatric feeding disorders: using teleconferencing technology to improve access to a treatment program. Pediatr Nurs 2008;34:213–6
56. Manor Y, Mootanah R, Freud D, et al.: Video-assisted swallowing therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2013;19:207–11
57. Wall LR, Ward EC, Cartmill B, et al.: Adherence to a prophylactic swallowing therapy program during (chemo) radiotherapy: impact of service-delivery model and patient factors. Dysphagia 2017;32:279–92
58. Mukaino M, Tatemoto T, Kumazawa N, et al.: Staying active in isolation: telerehabilitation for individuals with the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2020;99:478–9
59. Ward EC, Burns CL, Theodoros DG, et al.: Impact of dysphagia severity on clinical decision making via telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health 2014;20:296–303
Keywords:

Dysphagia; Intensive Care Unit; Personal Protective Equipment

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.