Share this article on:

Anterosuperior Calcaneal Process Fracture or OS Calcaneus Secundarius?

Kürklü, Mustafa MD; Köse, Özkan MD; Yurttas, Yüksel MD; Oğuz, Erbil MD; Atesalp, Ali Sabri MD

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: June 2010 - Volume 89 - Issue 6 - p 522
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ae08da
Visual Vignette

From the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Etlik, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey.

All correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Mustafa Kürklü, MD, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Etlik, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Etlik, Ankara, Turkey.

A 36-yr-old woman was admitted to our emergency department after having sustained an inversion injury of her right ankle. On physical examination, there was diffuse swelling and ecchymosis on the dorsolateral aspect of her foot. The ankle joint movements were in normal range without laxity. The anteroposterior and lateral x-rays of the right foot were considered to be normal by the emergency physician. The patient was diagnosed with simple ankle sprain and was treated accordingly with classical RICE protocol and a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug. Four weeks after the initial trauma, the patient presented to our orthopedic outpatient clinic with persistent complaint of right foot pain on weight bearing. On physical examination, severe pain on the dorsal part of the calcaneocuboid joint was present. The initial anteroposterior and lateral x-rays were reevaluated, and a fracture was suspected at the anterior calcaneal process (Fig. 1A). Medial oblique foot x-ray revealed a bony fragment located between the anterosuperior calcaneal process and the cuboid (Fig. 1B). In the differential diagnosis, anterosuperior calcaneal process fracture and OS calcaneus secundarius were considered. Further computed tomography imaging delineated the anatomy of the fragment better, while the ovoid shape, well corticated margins, regular interface, and blunt edges of the fragment supported the diagnosis of OS calcaneus secundarius, wide proximal base and considerably large size favored the anterosuperior calcaneal process fracture. Magnetic resonance imaging was eventually performed and, with the presence of bone marrow edema adjacent to the fracture line, an anterosuperior calcaneal process fracture rather than an OS calcaneus secundarius was confirmed at diagnosis (Fig. 2). She was treated with a medial longitudinal arc support, and after 1 mo, she was free of pain during mobilization.





OS calcaneus secundarius and anterosuperior calcaneal process fractures are two similar clinical syndromes, both of which present with anterior ankle pain.1 The differentiation of these two entities may be quite challenging only with physical examination or classical x-rays.2 Herewith, we imply that the distinction may be possible when oblique x-rays or, even better, magnetic resonance imaging is performed.3 This is important because the treatment of each syndrome is different.

Back to Top | Article Outline


1. Mellado JM, Ramos A, Salvadó E, et al: Accessory ossicles and sesamoid bones of the ankle and foot: Imaging findings, clinical significance and differential diagnosis. Eur Radiol 2003;13(suppl 6):L164–L177
2. Trnka HJ, Zettl R, Ritschl P: Fracture of the anterior superior process of the calcaneus: An often misdiagnosed fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998;117:300–2
3. Robbins MI, Wilson MG, Sella EJ: MRI imaging of anterosuperior calcaneal process fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:475–9
© 2010 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.