Personalized Research on Diet in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Series of N-of-1 Diet Trials : Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo

ARTICLE: INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

Personalized Research on Diet in Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: A Series of N-of-1 Diet Trials

Kaplan, Heather C. MD, MSCE1,2,3,*; Opipari-Arrigan, Lisa PhD2,3,4,*; Yang, Jiabei MS5; Schmid, Christopher H. PhD5; Schuler, Christine L. MD MPH3,6; Saeed, Shehzad A. MD7; Braly, Kimberly L. RDN8; Chang, Fandi BA, BS5; Murphy, Lauren BA2; Dodds, Cassandra M. MA2; Nuding, Mason BS9; Liu, Hao BS10; Pilley, Sheri BA11,12; Stone, Julie11,13; Woodward, Gisele MSW11,14; Yokois, Nancy MD15; Goyal, Alka MD16,17; Lee, Dale MD, MSCE8; Yeh, Ann Ming MD17; Lee, Peter MD18; Gold, Benjamin D. MD14; Molle-Rios, Zarela MD19; Zwiener, R. Jeff MD20; Ali, Sabina MD21; Chavannes, Mallory MD, MHSc22,23; Linville, Tiffany MD24; Patel, Ashish MD25,26; Ayers, Travis MD27; Bassett, Mikelle MD28; Boyle, Brendan MD29; Palomo, Pablo MD30; Verstraete, Sofia MD, MAS31; Dorsey, Jill MD, MS32; Kaplan, Jess L. MD33; Steiner, Steven J. MD34; Nguyen, Kaylie MS, PNP35; Burgis, Jennifer MD31; Suskind, David L. MD8;  for the ImproveCareNow Pediatric IBD Learning Health System

Author Information
The American Journal of Gastroenterology 117(6):p 902-917, June 2022. | DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001800

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: 

Evidence about specific carbohydrate diet (SCD) for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is limited. We conducted 54 single-subject, double-crossover N-of-1 trials comparing SCD with a modified SCD (MSCD) and comparing each with the participant's baseline, usual diet (UD).

METHODS: 

Across 19 sites, we recruited patients aged 7–18 years with IBD and active inflammation. Following a 2-week baseline (UD), patients were randomized to 1 of 2 sequences of 4 alternating 8-week SCD and MSCD periods. Outcomes included fecal calprotectin and patient-reported symptoms. We report posterior probabilities from Bayesian models comparing diets.

RESULTS: 

Twenty-one (39%) participants completed the trial, 9 (17%) completed a single crossover, and 24 (44%) withdrew. Withdrawal or early completion occurred commonly (lack of response [n = 11], adverse events [n = 11], and not desiring to continue [n = 6]). SCD and MSCD performed similarly for most individuals. On average, there was <1% probability of a clinically meaningful difference in IBD symptoms between SCD and MSCD. The average treatment difference was −0.3 (95% credible interval −1.2, 0.75). There was no significant difference in the ratio of fecal calprotectin geometric means comparing SCD and MSCD (0.77, 95% credible interval 0.51, 1.10). Some individuals had improvement in symptoms and fecal calprotectin compared with their UD, whereas others did not.

DISCUSSION: 

SCD and MSCD did not consistently improve symptoms or inflammation, although some individuals may have benefited. However, there are inherent difficulties in examining dietary changes that complicate study design and ultimately conclusions regarding effectiveness.

© 2022 by The American College of Gastroenterology

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid