Digital Health Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review : Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG

Secondary Logo

Journal Logo


Digital Health Technologies for Remote Monitoring and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Nguyen, Nghia H. MD, MAS1,*; Martinez, Ivonne MD2,*; Atreja, Ashish MD, MPH2,3; Sitapati, Amy M. MD4,5,6; Sandborn, William J. MD1; Ohno-Machado, Lucila MD, PhD4; Singh, Siddharth MD, MS1,4

Author Information
The American Journal of Gastroenterology 117(1):p 78-97, January 2022. | DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001545
  • Buy
  • SDC
  • Infographic



Digital health technologies may be useful tools in the management of chronic diseases. We performed a systematic review of digital health interventions in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and evaluated its impact on (i) disease activity monitoring, (ii) treatment adherence, (iii) quality of life (QoL) measures, and/or (iv) health care utilization.


Through a systematic review of multiple databases through August 31, 2020, we identified randomized controlled trials in patients with IBD comparing digital health technologies vs standard of care (SoC) for clinical management and monitoring and reporting impact on IBD disease activity, treatment adherence, QoL, and/or health care utilization or cost-effectiveness. We performed critical qualitative synthesis of the evidence supporting digital health interventions in patients with IBD and rated certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.


Overall, we included 14 randomized controlled trials (median, 98 patients; range 34—909 patients; follow-up <12 months) that compared web-based interventions, mobile applications, and different telemedicine platforms with SoC (clinic-based encounters). Although overall disease activity and risk of relapse were comparable between digital health technologies and SoC (very low certainty of evidence), digital health interventions were associated with lower rate of health care utilization and health care costs (low certainty of evidence). Digital health interventions did not significantly improve patients' QoL and treatment adherence compared with SoC (very low certainty of evidence). Trials may have intrinsic selection bias due to nature of digital interventions.


Digital health technologies may be effective in decreasing health care utilization and costs, though may not offer advantage in reducing risk of relapse, QoL, and improving treatment adherence in patients with IBD. These techniques may offer value-based care for population health management.


© 2021 by The American College of Gastroenterology

Full Text Access for Subscribers:

You can read the full text of this article if you:

Access through Ovid